Healthcare worker´s use, opinion and knowledge of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes, Thales Lima
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pinheiro, Andrey Felipe de Carvalho, Silva, Cláudia Gregorini, Mocelin, Paula Carolina, Zanin, Giovane Douglas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20016
Resumo: The prevention and control of occupational infections require a broad approach with well-defined policies based on the characteristics of health institutions. In healthcare workers, occupational risk may be related to the handling of materials, chemical products, or equipment, which can be the cause of work accidents. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is one of the main safety measures to be adopted by professionals to ensure their protection. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between health workers and PPE and to assess the number of leaves of absence due to upper airway infection diagnosis and awareness of the risks they are exposed to at work. The vast majority of professionals reported using masks (55, 93.2%), closed shoes (50, 84.7%), and long-sleeved coat (44, 74.6%). However, there was less adherence to the use of procedure gloves (36, 61%), cap or hood (32, 54.2%), and eyewear (19, 32.2%). Although about one third of the workers reported using eyewear, almost half (47.5%) believe that this equipment should be mandatory during the workday. 93.2% of the interviewees mentioned using PPE because they are aware of the risks they are exposed to at work. Regarding the inferential analyses, there was no statistically relevant association between days away from work due to upper airway infections among health professionals participating in the study with age (p>0.05), gender (p>0.05), education (p>0.05), type of job (p>0.05), function (p>0.05) and UBS (p>0.05). Thus, it can be concluded that it is of great importance to increase the safety of health workers through training to demonstrate to professionals the importance of using PPE and the correct way to use this equipment.
id UNIFEI_5ef692a4906ae5e0d6927a5e13af2301
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20016
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Healthcare worker´s use, opinion and knowledge of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross-sectional studyUso, opinión y conocimientos de los profesionales de salud sobre los Equipos de Protección Individual (EPI) durante la pandemia de Sars-CoV-2: un estudio transversalUtilização, opinião e conhecimento dos profissionais de saúde sobre Equipamentos de Proteção Individual (EPIs) durante a pandemia de Sars-CoV-2: um estudo transversalEquipamento de Proteção IndividualProfissionais da SaúdeCOVID-19.Equipo de protección personalProfesionales de la saludCOVID-19.Personal Protective EquipmentHealth ProfessionalsCOVID-19.The prevention and control of occupational infections require a broad approach with well-defined policies based on the characteristics of health institutions. In healthcare workers, occupational risk may be related to the handling of materials, chemical products, or equipment, which can be the cause of work accidents. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is one of the main safety measures to be adopted by professionals to ensure their protection. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between health workers and PPE and to assess the number of leaves of absence due to upper airway infection diagnosis and awareness of the risks they are exposed to at work. The vast majority of professionals reported using masks (55, 93.2%), closed shoes (50, 84.7%), and long-sleeved coat (44, 74.6%). However, there was less adherence to the use of procedure gloves (36, 61%), cap or hood (32, 54.2%), and eyewear (19, 32.2%). Although about one third of the workers reported using eyewear, almost half (47.5%) believe that this equipment should be mandatory during the workday. 93.2% of the interviewees mentioned using PPE because they are aware of the risks they are exposed to at work. Regarding the inferential analyses, there was no statistically relevant association between days away from work due to upper airway infections among health professionals participating in the study with age (p>0.05), gender (p>0.05), education (p>0.05), type of job (p>0.05), function (p>0.05) and UBS (p>0.05). Thus, it can be concluded that it is of great importance to increase the safety of health workers through training to demonstrate to professionals the importance of using PPE and the correct way to use this equipment.La prevención y el control de las infecciones profesionales requieren un enfoque amplio con políticas bien definidas basadas en las características de las instituciones de salud. En el personal sanitario, el riesgo laboral puede estar relacionado con la manipulación de materiales, productos químicos o equipos, que pueden ser la causa de accidentes laborales. Los equipos de protección individual (EPI) son una de las principales medidas de seguridad que deben adoptar los profesionales para garantizar su protección. Así pues, este estudio busca evaluar la relación entre los trabajadores sanitarios y los EPI y evaluar el número de días de ausencia del trabajo debido al diagnóstico de infección del tracto respiratorio superior y conciencia de los riesgos que están expuestos en el trabajo. La mayoría de los profesionales informaron el uso de mascarilla (55, 93,2%), zapatos cerrados (50, 84,7%) y bata de manga larga (44, 74,6%). Sin embargo, hubo una menor adherencia al uso de guantes de procedimiento (36, 61%), gorro o capucha (32, 54,2%) y anteojos de protección (19, 32,2%). Aunque cerca de un tercio de los trabajadores declararon utilizar anteojos de protección, casi la mitad (47,5%) cree que este equipo debería ser obligatorio durante la jornada laboral. 93,2% de los entrevistados afirma utilizar los EPI porque son conscientes de los riesgos a los que se exponen en el trabajo. En cuanto a los análisis inferenciales, no hubo asociación estadísticamente relevante entre las ausencias debidas a infecciones de las vías respiratorias superiores entre los profesionales de la salud que participaron en el estudio con el grupo de edad (p>0,05), el género (p>0,05), la educación (p>0,05), el tipo de trabajo (p>0,05), la función (p>0,05) y el UBS de trabajo (p>0,05). Por lo tanto, se puede concluir que es de gran importancia para aumentar la seguridad de los trabajadores de la salud capacitaciones para demostrar a los profesionales la importancia de usar el EPI y la forma correcta de utilizar este equipo.A prevenção e o controle das infecções ocupacionais requerem uma abordagem ampla com políticas bem-definidas e fundamentadas nas características das instituições de saúde. Nos trabalhadores da área de saúde, o risco ocupacional pode estar relacionado ao manuseio de materiais, produtos químicos ou equipamentos, que podem ser os causadores de acidentes de trabalho. O Equipamento de Proteção Individual (EPI) é uma das principais medidas de segurança a serem adotadas pelo profissional para garantir sua proteção. Dessa forma, o presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a relação do trabalhador de saúde com os EPIs e avaliar a quantidade de afastamentos por diagnóstico de infecção de vias aéreas superiores e consciência dos riscos que está exposto no trabalho. A maioria dos profissionais relatou uso de máscara (55, 93,2%), calçado fechado (50, 84,7%) e jaleco com manga longa (44, 74,6%). Contudo, houve menor adesão a utilização de luvas de procedimento (36, 61%), toca ou capuz (32, 54,2%) e óculos de proteção (19, 32,2%). Embora cerca de um terço dos trabalhadores referirem utilizar óculos de proteção, quase a metade (47,5%) acredita que este equipamento deveria obrigatoriamente ser utilizado durante a jornada de trabalho. 93,2% dos entrevistados relataram utilizar EPIs por ter consciência dos riscos em que está exposto no trabalho. Com relação as análises inferenciais, não houve associação estatisticamente relevante entre afastamentos por infecções de vias aéreas superiores entre profissionais de saúde participantes do estudo com faixa etária (p>0,05), sexo (p>0,05), escolaridade (p>0,05), tipo de emprego (p>0,05), função (p>0,05) e UBS de atuação (p>0,05). Dessa forma, pode-se concluir que é de grande importância para o aumento da segurança dos trabalhadores da saúde treinamentos para demonstrar aos profissionais a importância da utilização de EPIs e o modo correto de utilização destes equipamentos.Research, Society and Development2021-09-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2001610.33448/rsd-v10i12.20016Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e26101220016Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e26101220016Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e261012200162525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20016/17925Copyright (c) 2021 Thales Lima Lopes; Andrey Felipe de Carvalho Pinheiro; Cláudia Gregorini Silva; Paula Carolina Mocelin; Giovane Douglas Zaninhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes, Thales Lima Pinheiro, Andrey Felipe de Carvalho Silva, Cláudia Gregorini Mocelin, Paula Carolina Zanin, Giovane Douglas 2021-11-14T20:26:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20016Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:46.700503Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Healthcare worker´s use, opinion and knowledge of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
Uso, opinión y conocimientos de los profesionales de salud sobre los Equipos de Protección Individual (EPI) durante la pandemia de Sars-CoV-2: un estudio transversal
Utilização, opinião e conhecimento dos profissionais de saúde sobre Equipamentos de Proteção Individual (EPIs) durante a pandemia de Sars-CoV-2: um estudo transversal
title Healthcare worker´s use, opinion and knowledge of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
spellingShingle Healthcare worker´s use, opinion and knowledge of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
Lopes, Thales Lima
Equipamento de Proteção Individual
Profissionais da Saúde
COVID-19.
Equipo de protección personal
Profesionales de la salud
COVID-19.
Personal Protective Equipment
Health Professionals
COVID-19.
title_short Healthcare worker´s use, opinion and knowledge of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
title_full Healthcare worker´s use, opinion and knowledge of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Healthcare worker´s use, opinion and knowledge of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare worker´s use, opinion and knowledge of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
title_sort Healthcare worker´s use, opinion and knowledge of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
author Lopes, Thales Lima
author_facet Lopes, Thales Lima
Pinheiro, Andrey Felipe de Carvalho
Silva, Cláudia Gregorini
Mocelin, Paula Carolina
Zanin, Giovane Douglas
author_role author
author2 Pinheiro, Andrey Felipe de Carvalho
Silva, Cláudia Gregorini
Mocelin, Paula Carolina
Zanin, Giovane Douglas
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes, Thales Lima
Pinheiro, Andrey Felipe de Carvalho
Silva, Cláudia Gregorini
Mocelin, Paula Carolina
Zanin, Giovane Douglas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Equipamento de Proteção Individual
Profissionais da Saúde
COVID-19.
Equipo de protección personal
Profesionales de la salud
COVID-19.
Personal Protective Equipment
Health Professionals
COVID-19.
topic Equipamento de Proteção Individual
Profissionais da Saúde
COVID-19.
Equipo de protección personal
Profesionales de la salud
COVID-19.
Personal Protective Equipment
Health Professionals
COVID-19.
description The prevention and control of occupational infections require a broad approach with well-defined policies based on the characteristics of health institutions. In healthcare workers, occupational risk may be related to the handling of materials, chemical products, or equipment, which can be the cause of work accidents. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is one of the main safety measures to be adopted by professionals to ensure their protection. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between health workers and PPE and to assess the number of leaves of absence due to upper airway infection diagnosis and awareness of the risks they are exposed to at work. The vast majority of professionals reported using masks (55, 93.2%), closed shoes (50, 84.7%), and long-sleeved coat (44, 74.6%). However, there was less adherence to the use of procedure gloves (36, 61%), cap or hood (32, 54.2%), and eyewear (19, 32.2%). Although about one third of the workers reported using eyewear, almost half (47.5%) believe that this equipment should be mandatory during the workday. 93.2% of the interviewees mentioned using PPE because they are aware of the risks they are exposed to at work. Regarding the inferential analyses, there was no statistically relevant association between days away from work due to upper airway infections among health professionals participating in the study with age (p>0.05), gender (p>0.05), education (p>0.05), type of job (p>0.05), function (p>0.05) and UBS (p>0.05). Thus, it can be concluded that it is of great importance to increase the safety of health workers through training to demonstrate to professionals the importance of using PPE and the correct way to use this equipment.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20016
10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20016
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20016
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20016/17925
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e26101220016
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e26101220016
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e26101220016
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052689008295936