Chlorhexidine added to different adhesive systems - Assessment of antibacterial activity and bond strength
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
| Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25785 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to assess the effects of adding chlorhexidine (CHX) to different adhesive systems on antibacterial activity and bond strength after 24 hours and 30 days under in vitro conditions. A total of 210 bovine incisor crowns and divided into three groups, based on the adhesive system: Single Bond Plus (SB), Clearfil SE Bond (CL), and AdheSE Primer and Bond (AD). All groups were subdivided by CHX concentration (n=7): no CHX, CHX applied before the adhesive (CPA), and the adhesive incorporated with 0.5% CHX, 1.0% CHX, and 2.0% CHX. The micro shear test was conducted on one-half of the specimens after 24 hours, and on the other half after 30 days. Antibacterial activity was evaluated using the agar diffusion test with Streptococcus mutans. The bond strength variable was assessed using the factorial analysis of variance for repeated measurements, whereas the variable of the bacterial halo size was subjected to the Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test. The significance level was 5% for both tests. The qualitative variable of fracture pattern was assessed by descriptive statistical analysis. Thus, CHX concentration of 2% (10.80 ±2.83) and CPA (9.95 ±1.47) (p >0.05) helped to increase the bond strength values for most adhesive systems, whereas CL had the highest bond strength values. The CL adhesive system also presented the best results in the antibacterial test with S.mutans. |
| id |
UNIFEI_5fda4dc01bdf4bb289bd5d99ec609b51 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25785 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
| network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Chlorhexidine added to different adhesive systems - Assessment of antibacterial activity and bond strengthAdición de clorhexidina a diferentes sistemas adhesivos - Evaluación de la actividad antibacteriana y fuerza de unionAdição de clorexidina a diferentes sistemas adesivos - Avaliação da atividade antibacteriana e resistência de uniãoClorexidinaAdesivos dentináriosAgente antibacteriano.ChlorhexidineDentin-bonding agentsAnti-bacterial agents.ClorhexidinaRecubrimientos dentinariosAntibacterianos.This study aimed to assess the effects of adding chlorhexidine (CHX) to different adhesive systems on antibacterial activity and bond strength after 24 hours and 30 days under in vitro conditions. A total of 210 bovine incisor crowns and divided into three groups, based on the adhesive system: Single Bond Plus (SB), Clearfil SE Bond (CL), and AdheSE Primer and Bond (AD). All groups were subdivided by CHX concentration (n=7): no CHX, CHX applied before the adhesive (CPA), and the adhesive incorporated with 0.5% CHX, 1.0% CHX, and 2.0% CHX. The micro shear test was conducted on one-half of the specimens after 24 hours, and on the other half after 30 days. Antibacterial activity was evaluated using the agar diffusion test with Streptococcus mutans. The bond strength variable was assessed using the factorial analysis of variance for repeated measurements, whereas the variable of the bacterial halo size was subjected to the Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test. The significance level was 5% for both tests. The qualitative variable of fracture pattern was assessed by descriptive statistical analysis. Thus, CHX concentration of 2% (10.80 ±2.83) and CPA (9.95 ±1.47) (p >0.05) helped to increase the bond strength values for most adhesive systems, whereas CL had the highest bond strength values. The CL adhesive system also presented the best results in the antibacterial test with S.mutans.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar los efectos de la adición de clorhexidina (CHX) a diferentes sistemas adhesivos sobre la actividad antibacteriana y la fuerza de unión después de 24 horas y después de 30 días en condiciones in vitro. Seleccionamos 210 coronas de incisivos bovinos y las dividimos en tres grupos, según el sistema adhesivo: Single Bond Plus (SB), Clearfil SE Bond (CL) y AdheSE Primer and Bond (AD). Todos los grupos se subdividieron por concentración de CHX (n=7): sin CHX, CHX aplicado antes del adhesivo (CPA) y el adhesivo incorporado con 0,5% de CHX, 1,0% de CHX y 2,0% de CHX. La prueba de corte transversal se realizó en la mitad de las muestras después de 24 horas y en la otra mitad después de 30 días. La actividad antibacteriana se evaluó mediante la prueba de difusión en agar con Streptococcus mutans. El análisis de la fuerza de unión se realizó mediante análisis factorial de varianza para medidas repetidas y el crecimiento del halo bacteriano mediante la prueba no paramétrica de Kruskal-Wallis. El nivel de significancia fue del 5% para ambas pruebas. La variable cualitativa del patrón de fractura se evaluó mediante análisis estadístico descriptivo. Por lo tanto, una concentración de CHX de 2% (10.80 ± 2.83) y CPA (9.95 ± 1.47) (p> 0.05) ayudaron a aumentar los valores de fuerza de unión para la mayoría de los sistemas adhesivos, donde CL mostró los valores de fuerza de unión más altos. El sistema adhesivo CL también mostró los mejores resultados en la prueba antibacteriana con S. mutans.Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar os efeitos da adição de clorexidina (CHX) a diferentes sistemas adesivos sobre a atividade antibacteriana e a resistência de união após 24 horas e após 30 dias em condições in vitro. Foram selecionadas 210 coroas de incisivos bovinos e divididas em três grupos, com base no sistema adesivo: Single Bond Plus (SB), Clearfil SE Bond (CL) e AdheSE Primer and Bond (AD). Todos os grupos foram subdivididos pela concentração de CHX (n=7): sem CHX, CHX aplicado antes do adesivo (CPA) e o adesivo incorporado com 0,5% de CHX, 1,0% de CHX e 2,0% de CHX. O teste de microcisalhamento foi realizado em metade das amostras após 24 horas e na outra metade após 30 dias. A atividade antibacteriana foi avaliada pelo teste de difusão em ágar com Streptococcus mutans. A análise da resistência de união foi feita pela análise fatorial de variância para medidas repetidas e o crescimento do halo bacteriano pelo teste não paramétrico de Kruskal-Wallis. O nível de significância foi de 5% para ambos os testes. A variável qualitativa do padrão de fratura foi avaliada por meio de análise estatística descritiva. Assim, a concentração de CHX de 2% (10,80 ± 2,83) e de CPA (9,95 ± 1,47) (p> 0,05) ajudaram a aumentar os valores de resistência de união para a maioria dos sistemas adesivos, onde o CL apresentou os maiores valores de resistência de união. O sistema adesivo CL também apresentou os melhores resultados no teste antibacteriano com S.mutans.Research, Society and Development2022-02-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2578510.33448/rsd-v11i3.25785Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 3; e19011325785Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 3; e19011325785Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 3; e190113257852525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25785/23147Copyright (c) 2022 Bruna Caroline de Oliveira Lima; Thayna Carolina Zeni; Marcio José Mendonça; João Vitor Oribka Roque; Julio Katuhide Ueda; Rafael Andrade Menolli; Veridiana Camilottihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Lima, Bruna Caroline de OliveiraZeni, Thayna Carolina Mendonça, Marcio José Roque, João Vitor OribkaUeda, Julio Katuhide Menolli, Rafael AndradeCamilotti, Veridiana2022-03-09T13:44:38Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25785Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:59.207947Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Chlorhexidine added to different adhesive systems - Assessment of antibacterial activity and bond strength Adición de clorhexidina a diferentes sistemas adhesivos - Evaluación de la actividad antibacteriana y fuerza de union Adição de clorexidina a diferentes sistemas adesivos - Avaliação da atividade antibacteriana e resistência de união |
| title |
Chlorhexidine added to different adhesive systems - Assessment of antibacterial activity and bond strength |
| spellingShingle |
Chlorhexidine added to different adhesive systems - Assessment of antibacterial activity and bond strength Lima, Bruna Caroline de Oliveira Clorexidina Adesivos dentinários Agente antibacteriano. Chlorhexidine Dentin-bonding agents Anti-bacterial agents. Clorhexidina Recubrimientos dentinarios Antibacterianos. |
| title_short |
Chlorhexidine added to different adhesive systems - Assessment of antibacterial activity and bond strength |
| title_full |
Chlorhexidine added to different adhesive systems - Assessment of antibacterial activity and bond strength |
| title_fullStr |
Chlorhexidine added to different adhesive systems - Assessment of antibacterial activity and bond strength |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Chlorhexidine added to different adhesive systems - Assessment of antibacterial activity and bond strength |
| title_sort |
Chlorhexidine added to different adhesive systems - Assessment of antibacterial activity and bond strength |
| author |
Lima, Bruna Caroline de Oliveira |
| author_facet |
Lima, Bruna Caroline de Oliveira Zeni, Thayna Carolina Mendonça, Marcio José Roque, João Vitor Oribka Ueda, Julio Katuhide Menolli, Rafael Andrade Camilotti, Veridiana |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Zeni, Thayna Carolina Mendonça, Marcio José Roque, João Vitor Oribka Ueda, Julio Katuhide Menolli, Rafael Andrade Camilotti, Veridiana |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Bruna Caroline de Oliveira Zeni, Thayna Carolina Mendonça, Marcio José Roque, João Vitor Oribka Ueda, Julio Katuhide Menolli, Rafael Andrade Camilotti, Veridiana |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Clorexidina Adesivos dentinários Agente antibacteriano. Chlorhexidine Dentin-bonding agents Anti-bacterial agents. Clorhexidina Recubrimientos dentinarios Antibacterianos. |
| topic |
Clorexidina Adesivos dentinários Agente antibacteriano. Chlorhexidine Dentin-bonding agents Anti-bacterial agents. Clorhexidina Recubrimientos dentinarios Antibacterianos. |
| description |
This study aimed to assess the effects of adding chlorhexidine (CHX) to different adhesive systems on antibacterial activity and bond strength after 24 hours and 30 days under in vitro conditions. A total of 210 bovine incisor crowns and divided into three groups, based on the adhesive system: Single Bond Plus (SB), Clearfil SE Bond (CL), and AdheSE Primer and Bond (AD). All groups were subdivided by CHX concentration (n=7): no CHX, CHX applied before the adhesive (CPA), and the adhesive incorporated with 0.5% CHX, 1.0% CHX, and 2.0% CHX. The micro shear test was conducted on one-half of the specimens after 24 hours, and on the other half after 30 days. Antibacterial activity was evaluated using the agar diffusion test with Streptococcus mutans. The bond strength variable was assessed using the factorial analysis of variance for repeated measurements, whereas the variable of the bacterial halo size was subjected to the Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test. The significance level was 5% for both tests. The qualitative variable of fracture pattern was assessed by descriptive statistical analysis. Thus, CHX concentration of 2% (10.80 ±2.83) and CPA (9.95 ±1.47) (p >0.05) helped to increase the bond strength values for most adhesive systems, whereas CL had the highest bond strength values. The CL adhesive system also presented the best results in the antibacterial test with S.mutans. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-18 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25785 10.33448/rsd-v11i3.25785 |
| url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25785 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i3.25785 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25785/23147 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 3; e19011325785 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 3; e19011325785 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 3; e19011325785 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
| instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
| institution |
UNIFEI |
| reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
| collection |
Research, Society and Development |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
| _version_ |
1797052703303532544 |