Biocompatibility assessment of bioceramic repair cements: An in vivo study in wistar rats

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Valentim, Diego
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Bueno, Carlos Roberto Emerenciano, Marques, Vanessa Abreu Sanches, Benetti, Francine, Vasques, Ana Maria Veiga, Cury, Marina Tolomei Sandoval, Silva, Ana Claudia Rodrigues da, Jacinto, Rogério Castilho, Sivieri-Araujo, Gustavo, Cintra, Luciano Tavares Angelo, Dezan-Junior, Eloi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14422
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of Biodentine® bioceramic repair cement when compared to White Angelus MTA® and calcium hydroxide. Twenty-four Wistar rats were used (n = 6 animals / group), divided into four experimental periods of 7, 15, 30 and 60 days. The animals received subcutaneous implants of polyethylene tubes containing the 3 test materials and an empty tube used as control. After experimental periods, animals were euthanized and the tubes were removed along with the adjacent surrounding tissue and histologically processed to assess biocompatibility. Inflammatory infiltrate and fibrous capsule thickness were analyzed by HE staining through inflammation scores. Data was submitted to Kruskal Wallis and Dunn’s test (p <0.05). After 15 days, Biodentine® induced less inflammatory response than control group and Ca (OH)2 (p <0.05). In calcium hydroxide group there was a decrease in the inflammatory infiltrate, as well as a decrease in the fibrous capsule, from day 15 to 60. The White Angelus MTA® showed thin fibrous capsule and low inflammatory intensity in all periods. At the endo of experiment, all materials showed mild inflammation and thin fibrous capsule. It is concluded that Biodentine® demonstrated tissue biocompatibility as it induced low inflammation, which reduced over time, comparable White Angelus MTA® and calcium hydroxide.
id UNIFEI_6f132fcab214bae0180c957b6a89f7cf
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14422
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Biocompatibility assessment of bioceramic repair cements: An in vivo study in wistar ratsEvaluación de la biocompatibilidad de los cementos reparadores biocerámicos: Un estudio in vivo en ratas wistarAvaliação da biocompatibilidade de cimentos reparadores biocerâmicos: Estudo in vivo em ratos wistarPulpotomiaInflamaçãoTeste de materiaisEndodontia.PulpotomíaInflamaciónEnsayo de materialesEndodoncia.PulpotomyInflammationMaterials testingEndodontics.The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of Biodentine® bioceramic repair cement when compared to White Angelus MTA® and calcium hydroxide. Twenty-four Wistar rats were used (n = 6 animals / group), divided into four experimental periods of 7, 15, 30 and 60 days. The animals received subcutaneous implants of polyethylene tubes containing the 3 test materials and an empty tube used as control. After experimental periods, animals were euthanized and the tubes were removed along with the adjacent surrounding tissue and histologically processed to assess biocompatibility. Inflammatory infiltrate and fibrous capsule thickness were analyzed by HE staining through inflammation scores. Data was submitted to Kruskal Wallis and Dunn’s test (p <0.05). After 15 days, Biodentine® induced less inflammatory response than control group and Ca (OH)2 (p <0.05). In calcium hydroxide group there was a decrease in the inflammatory infiltrate, as well as a decrease in the fibrous capsule, from day 15 to 60. The White Angelus MTA® showed thin fibrous capsule and low inflammatory intensity in all periods. At the endo of experiment, all materials showed mild inflammation and thin fibrous capsule. It is concluded that Biodentine® demonstrated tissue biocompatibility as it induced low inflammation, which reduced over time, comparable White Angelus MTA® and calcium hydroxide.El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la biocompatibilidad del cemento biocerámico reparador Biodentine® en comparación con MTA Branco Angelus® e hidróxido de calcio. Para ello se utilizaron veinticuatro ratas Wistar (n = 6 animales / grupo), divididas en cuatro tiempos experimentales de 7, 15, 30 y 60 días. Los animales recibieron implantes subcutáneos de tubos de polietileno que contenían los 3 materiales y un tubo vacío utilizado como control. Después de los períodos experimentales, los animales fueron sacrificados y los tubos, junto con el tejido circundante, se retiraron y se procesaron histológicamente para evaluar la biocompatibilidad. El infiltrado inflamatorio y el espesor de la cápsula fibrosa se analizaron mediante tinción con HE a través de puntuaciones de inflamación. Los datos se sometieron a la prueba de Kruskal Wallis y Dunn (p <0,05). Biodentine® a los 15 días generó menos respuesta inflamatoria que el control y Ca(OH)2 (p <0.05). A partir de los días 15, 30 y 60 hubo una disminución del infiltrado inflamatorio, así como una disminución de la cápsula fibrosa, en el grupo de hidróxido de calcio. El White Angelus® MTA mostró cápsula fibrosa fina y baja intensidad inflamatoria en todos los períodos. Después de los períodos experimentales, todos los materiales mostraron una leve inflamación y una fina cápsula fibrosa. Se concluye que Biodentine® demostró biocompatibilidad tisular porque indujo una baja inflamación, que se redujo con el tiempo, comparable a MTA Angelus Branco® e hidróxido de calcio.O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a biocompatibilidade do cimento biocerâmico reparador Biodentine® quando comparado ao MTA Branco Angelus® e hidróxido de cálcio. Para isso foram utilizados vinte e quatro ratos Wistar (n=6 animais/grupo), divididos em quatro tempos experimentais de 7, 15, 30 e 60 dias. Os animais receberam implantes subcutâneos de tubos de polietileno contendo os 3 materiais e um tubo vazio utilizado como controle. Após os períodos experimentais os animais foram eutanasiados e os tubos, juntamente com o tecido circundante, foram removidos e processados histologicamente para avalição da biocompatibilidade. Infiltrado inflamatório e espessura de cápsula fibrosa foram analisados por coloração de HE através de escores de inflamação. Os dados foram submetidos ao teste de Kruskal Wallis e Dunn (p<0,05). O Biodentine® aos 15 dias gerou menor resposta inflamatória que o controle e o Ca(OH)2 (p<0,05). No grupo hidróxido de cálcio, apartir dos 15 dias em diante houve diminuição do infiltrado inflamatório, assim como diminuição da cápsula fibrosa. O MTA Branco Angelus® mostrou capsula fibrosa fina e baixa intensidade inflamatório em todos os períodos. Após os períodos experimentais, todos materiais apresentaram inflamação leve e capsula fibrosa fina. Conclui-se que o Biodentine® demonstrou biocompatibilidade tecidual pois induziu baixa inflamação, que reduziu ao longo do tempo, comparável ao MTA Angelus Branco® e hidróxido de cálcio.Research, Society and Development2021-06-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1442210.33448/rsd-v10i7.14422Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e1610714422Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e1610714422Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e16107144222525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14422/14793Copyright (c) 2021 Diego Valentim; Carlos Roberto Emerenciano Bueno; Vanessa Abreu Sanches Marques; Francine Benetti; Ana Maria Veiga Vasques; Marina Tolomei Sandoval Cury; Ana Claudia Rodrigues da Silva; Rogério Castilho Jacinto; Gustavo Sivieri-Araujo; Luciano Tavares Angelo Cintra; Eloi Dezan-Juniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessValentim, Diego Bueno, Carlos Roberto Emerenciano Marques, Vanessa Abreu Sanches Benetti, FrancineVasques, Ana Maria VeigaCury, Marina Tolomei Sandoval Silva, Ana Claudia Rodrigues daJacinto, Rogério CastilhoSivieri-Araujo, Gustavo Cintra, Luciano Tavares AngeloDezan-Junior, Eloi2021-07-18T21:07:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14422Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:33.582224Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biocompatibility assessment of bioceramic repair cements: An in vivo study in wistar rats
Evaluación de la biocompatibilidad de los cementos reparadores biocerámicos: Un estudio in vivo en ratas wistar
Avaliação da biocompatibilidade de cimentos reparadores biocerâmicos: Estudo in vivo em ratos wistar
title Biocompatibility assessment of bioceramic repair cements: An in vivo study in wistar rats
spellingShingle Biocompatibility assessment of bioceramic repair cements: An in vivo study in wistar rats
Valentim, Diego
Pulpotomia
Inflamação
Teste de materiais
Endodontia.
Pulpotomía
Inflamación
Ensayo de materiales
Endodoncia.
Pulpotomy
Inflammation
Materials testing
Endodontics.
title_short Biocompatibility assessment of bioceramic repair cements: An in vivo study in wistar rats
title_full Biocompatibility assessment of bioceramic repair cements: An in vivo study in wistar rats
title_fullStr Biocompatibility assessment of bioceramic repair cements: An in vivo study in wistar rats
title_full_unstemmed Biocompatibility assessment of bioceramic repair cements: An in vivo study in wistar rats
title_sort Biocompatibility assessment of bioceramic repair cements: An in vivo study in wistar rats
author Valentim, Diego
author_facet Valentim, Diego
Bueno, Carlos Roberto Emerenciano
Marques, Vanessa Abreu Sanches
Benetti, Francine
Vasques, Ana Maria Veiga
Cury, Marina Tolomei Sandoval
Silva, Ana Claudia Rodrigues da
Jacinto, Rogério Castilho
Sivieri-Araujo, Gustavo
Cintra, Luciano Tavares Angelo
Dezan-Junior, Eloi
author_role author
author2 Bueno, Carlos Roberto Emerenciano
Marques, Vanessa Abreu Sanches
Benetti, Francine
Vasques, Ana Maria Veiga
Cury, Marina Tolomei Sandoval
Silva, Ana Claudia Rodrigues da
Jacinto, Rogério Castilho
Sivieri-Araujo, Gustavo
Cintra, Luciano Tavares Angelo
Dezan-Junior, Eloi
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Valentim, Diego
Bueno, Carlos Roberto Emerenciano
Marques, Vanessa Abreu Sanches
Benetti, Francine
Vasques, Ana Maria Veiga
Cury, Marina Tolomei Sandoval
Silva, Ana Claudia Rodrigues da
Jacinto, Rogério Castilho
Sivieri-Araujo, Gustavo
Cintra, Luciano Tavares Angelo
Dezan-Junior, Eloi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pulpotomia
Inflamação
Teste de materiais
Endodontia.
Pulpotomía
Inflamación
Ensayo de materiales
Endodoncia.
Pulpotomy
Inflammation
Materials testing
Endodontics.
topic Pulpotomia
Inflamação
Teste de materiais
Endodontia.
Pulpotomía
Inflamación
Ensayo de materiales
Endodoncia.
Pulpotomy
Inflammation
Materials testing
Endodontics.
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of Biodentine® bioceramic repair cement when compared to White Angelus MTA® and calcium hydroxide. Twenty-four Wistar rats were used (n = 6 animals / group), divided into four experimental periods of 7, 15, 30 and 60 days. The animals received subcutaneous implants of polyethylene tubes containing the 3 test materials and an empty tube used as control. After experimental periods, animals were euthanized and the tubes were removed along with the adjacent surrounding tissue and histologically processed to assess biocompatibility. Inflammatory infiltrate and fibrous capsule thickness were analyzed by HE staining through inflammation scores. Data was submitted to Kruskal Wallis and Dunn’s test (p <0.05). After 15 days, Biodentine® induced less inflammatory response than control group and Ca (OH)2 (p <0.05). In calcium hydroxide group there was a decrease in the inflammatory infiltrate, as well as a decrease in the fibrous capsule, from day 15 to 60. The White Angelus MTA® showed thin fibrous capsule and low inflammatory intensity in all periods. At the endo of experiment, all materials showed mild inflammation and thin fibrous capsule. It is concluded that Biodentine® demonstrated tissue biocompatibility as it induced low inflammation, which reduced over time, comparable White Angelus MTA® and calcium hydroxide.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14422
10.33448/rsd-v10i7.14422
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14422
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i7.14422
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14422/14793
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e1610714422
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e1610714422
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e1610714422
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052674881880064