Technical evaluation of structural concrete made with coarse aggregate from construction and demolition waste
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30582 |
Resumo: | Civil construction sector is one of the largest producers of solid waste in the world and it is responsible to a enormous quantity of non-renewable natural resource consumption. An option to reduce the use of these resources is waste recycling as concrete aggregates. This article aims to present a study of Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) use as recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) in structural concrete, focusing on the mix design effectiveness analysis of the concrete with RCA. The methodology consisted of establishing a reference mix design, then three concrete types were defined with total replacement of natural coarse aggregate by RCA. The amount of water and sand were constant and the percentage of cement varied in the proportions of 0%, 10% and 20%. Results of the Slump Test showed that the use of superplasticizer leads to an increase of the workability of mix design containing RCA. Regarding compressive strength at 28 days, only the concrete with 20% of cement addition showed strength value near to the reference. The other concretes presented strength with low values when compared to the reference, being the biggest reduction equal to 21.60% (mix design with 0% of cement). The three studied concretes can be classified as structural, since the lowest obtained strength was equal to 25.34 MPa. The concrete with addition of 20% of cement presented strength properties similar to the reference concrete. |
id |
UNIFEI_7054a7f7c1145779f7a9acc0fbc2129e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30582 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Technical evaluation of structural concrete made with coarse aggregate from construction and demolition wasteEvaluación técnica de hormigón estructural elaborado con árido grueso procedente de residuos de construcción y demoliciónAvaliação técnica de concreto estrutural fabricado com agregado graúdo de resíduos de construção e demoliçãoResiduos de Construcción y DemoliciónÁridos reciclados para hormigónHormigón con árido reciclado.Construction and Demolition WasteRecycled Aggregates for ConcreteRecycled aggregate concrete.Resíduos de construção e demoliçãoAgregados reciclados para concretoConcreto com agregado reciclado.Civil construction sector is one of the largest producers of solid waste in the world and it is responsible to a enormous quantity of non-renewable natural resource consumption. An option to reduce the use of these resources is waste recycling as concrete aggregates. This article aims to present a study of Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) use as recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) in structural concrete, focusing on the mix design effectiveness analysis of the concrete with RCA. The methodology consisted of establishing a reference mix design, then three concrete types were defined with total replacement of natural coarse aggregate by RCA. The amount of water and sand were constant and the percentage of cement varied in the proportions of 0%, 10% and 20%. Results of the Slump Test showed that the use of superplasticizer leads to an increase of the workability of mix design containing RCA. Regarding compressive strength at 28 days, only the concrete with 20% of cement addition showed strength value near to the reference. The other concretes presented strength with low values when compared to the reference, being the biggest reduction equal to 21.60% (mix design with 0% of cement). The three studied concretes can be classified as structural, since the lowest obtained strength was equal to 25.34 MPa. The concrete with addition of 20% of cement presented strength properties similar to the reference concrete.El sector de la construcción civil es uno de los mayores productores de residuos sólidos del mundo y es responsable por una gran cantidad de consumo de recursos naturales no renovables. Una opción para reducir el uso de estos recursos es el reciclaje de residuos como áridos de hormigón. Este artículo tiene como objetivo presentar un estudio del uso de Residuos de Construcción y Demolición (RCD) como agregado grueso reciclado (RCA) en concreto estructural, enfocándose en el análisis de la efectividad del diseño de trazas del concreto con RCA. La metodología consistió en establecer una traza de referencia. Luego, se definieron tres tipos de trazas con reemplazo total de agregado grueso natural por agregado grueso reciclado. La cantidad de agua y arena fue constante y el porcentaje de cemento varió en las proporciones de 0%, 10% y 20%. Los resultados del Slump Test mostraron que el uso de un aditivo superplastificante conduce a un aumento de la trabajabilidad de las trazas que contienen RCA. En cuanto a la resistencia a la compresión a los 28 días, solo la traza con 20% de adición de cemento mostró valor de resistencia cercano a la traza de referencia. Las demás trazas presentaron resistencia con valores bajos en comparación con la referencia, siendo la gran reducción igual al 21,60% (traza con 0% de cemento). Las tres trazas estudiadas pueden clasificarse como hormigón estructural, ya que la menor resistencia obtenida fue igual a 25,34 MPa. La traza con adición del 20% de cemento presentó propiedades de resistencia similares a la traza de hormigón convencional.O setor da construção civil é considerado um dos maiores geradores de resíduos sólidos do mundo, sendo responsável pelo consumo de grande parte dos recursos naturais não renováveis. Uma opção para reduzir o uso desses recursos é reutilizar os resíduos como agregados no concreto. Diante disso, o presente trabalho visa estudar a incorporação de Resíduos da Construção e Demolição (RCD) como agregado graúdo reciclado (AGR) no concreto estrutural, tendo-se como foco a análise da eficácia mecânica no redimensionamento do traço de concreto com AGR. A metodologia consistiu em estabelecer um traço referência e a partir dele definiu-se três tipos de traços com substituição de 100% do agregado graúdo natural pelo reciclado. Para os traços com AGR a quantidade de água e areia se manteveram constantes e a porcentagem de cimento, em relação ao traço referência, foi variada nas proporções de 0%,10% e 20%. Os resultados do Slump Test mostraram que a utilização de aditivo superplastificante provoca aumento do abatimento nas misturas contendo AGR. Em relação à resistência à compressão aos 28 dias, somente o traço com 20% de adição de cimento apresentou resistência próxima à referência. Os demais traços tiveram quedas de resistência quando comparados com o concreto referência, sendo a maior delas de 21,60% no traço sem adição de cimento. Conclui-se que todos os concretos fabricados podem ser classificados como estruturais, uma vez que a menor resistência foi cerca de 25 MPa e que o traço com 20% de adição de cimento alcançou propriedades resistentes semelhantes ao traço convencional.Research, Society and Development2022-06-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3058210.33448/rsd-v11i8.30582Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 8; e45011830582Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 8; e45011830582Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 8; e450118305822525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30582/26690Copyright (c) 2022 Poliana de Souza Maia; Ladir Antônio da Silva Júnior; Pedro Valle Salles; Malheny Vitoria Silva Carvalhohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaia, Poliana de SouzaSilva Júnior, Ladir Antônio daSalles, Pedro ValleCarvalho, Malheny Vitoria Silva2022-07-01T13:34:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30582Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:47:17.229826Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Technical evaluation of structural concrete made with coarse aggregate from construction and demolition waste Evaluación técnica de hormigón estructural elaborado con árido grueso procedente de residuos de construcción y demolición Avaliação técnica de concreto estrutural fabricado com agregado graúdo de resíduos de construção e demolição |
title |
Technical evaluation of structural concrete made with coarse aggregate from construction and demolition waste |
spellingShingle |
Technical evaluation of structural concrete made with coarse aggregate from construction and demolition waste Maia, Poliana de Souza Residuos de Construcción y Demolición Áridos reciclados para hormigón Hormigón con árido reciclado. Construction and Demolition Waste Recycled Aggregates for Concrete Recycled aggregate concrete. Resíduos de construção e demolição Agregados reciclados para concreto Concreto com agregado reciclado. |
title_short |
Technical evaluation of structural concrete made with coarse aggregate from construction and demolition waste |
title_full |
Technical evaluation of structural concrete made with coarse aggregate from construction and demolition waste |
title_fullStr |
Technical evaluation of structural concrete made with coarse aggregate from construction and demolition waste |
title_full_unstemmed |
Technical evaluation of structural concrete made with coarse aggregate from construction and demolition waste |
title_sort |
Technical evaluation of structural concrete made with coarse aggregate from construction and demolition waste |
author |
Maia, Poliana de Souza |
author_facet |
Maia, Poliana de Souza Silva Júnior, Ladir Antônio da Salles, Pedro Valle Carvalho, Malheny Vitoria Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva Júnior, Ladir Antônio da Salles, Pedro Valle Carvalho, Malheny Vitoria Silva |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maia, Poliana de Souza Silva Júnior, Ladir Antônio da Salles, Pedro Valle Carvalho, Malheny Vitoria Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Residuos de Construcción y Demolición Áridos reciclados para hormigón Hormigón con árido reciclado. Construction and Demolition Waste Recycled Aggregates for Concrete Recycled aggregate concrete. Resíduos de construção e demolição Agregados reciclados para concreto Concreto com agregado reciclado. |
topic |
Residuos de Construcción y Demolición Áridos reciclados para hormigón Hormigón con árido reciclado. Construction and Demolition Waste Recycled Aggregates for Concrete Recycled aggregate concrete. Resíduos de construção e demolição Agregados reciclados para concreto Concreto com agregado reciclado. |
description |
Civil construction sector is one of the largest producers of solid waste in the world and it is responsible to a enormous quantity of non-renewable natural resource consumption. An option to reduce the use of these resources is waste recycling as concrete aggregates. This article aims to present a study of Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) use as recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) in structural concrete, focusing on the mix design effectiveness analysis of the concrete with RCA. The methodology consisted of establishing a reference mix design, then three concrete types were defined with total replacement of natural coarse aggregate by RCA. The amount of water and sand were constant and the percentage of cement varied in the proportions of 0%, 10% and 20%. Results of the Slump Test showed that the use of superplasticizer leads to an increase of the workability of mix design containing RCA. Regarding compressive strength at 28 days, only the concrete with 20% of cement addition showed strength value near to the reference. The other concretes presented strength with low values when compared to the reference, being the biggest reduction equal to 21.60% (mix design with 0% of cement). The three studied concretes can be classified as structural, since the lowest obtained strength was equal to 25.34 MPa. The concrete with addition of 20% of cement presented strength properties similar to the reference concrete. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30582 10.33448/rsd-v11i8.30582 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30582 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i8.30582 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30582/26690 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 8; e45011830582 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 8; e45011830582 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 8; e45011830582 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052795685175296 |