Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Different Restorative Materials - An In Vitro Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maeda, Walber
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Nascimento, Wayne Martins, Coelho, Marcelo Santos, Campos , Danilo de Luca, Drumond , João Paulo, Soares, Adriana de Jesus, Frozoni, Marcos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16150
Resumo: Aim: In this study was evaluated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with      different restorative materials. Methods: Sixty maxillary premolars were submitted to the same mesio-occlusal-distal cavity preparation, endodontic treatment and divided into 5 groups (n = 10): Coltosol Group – GCO restored with calcium silicate material; Glass Ionomer Cement Group – GGIC, restored with Maxxion R; Modified Glass Ionomer Cement – GMGIC, restored with Gold Label 2; Composite Group - GC, restored with Z100, and the positive control group (GP) - left unrestored. One group remained intact (n=10) serving as negative control (GN). Samples were subjected to fracture resistance testing by the universal testing machine until fracture occurred and was registered in newtons (N). Fracture pattern was assessed and described as favorable or unfavorable. The results were statistically analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey test with significant statistical difference at P < 0.05.  Results: Higher fracture resistance results were found for GC (1,128.35 ± 249.17), GMGIC (1,250.77 ± 173.29), and GN (1,277.22 ± 433.44) (P < .05). More favorable fractures were observed in the GCO (6), GC (7), and GN (7) (P < .05). Conclusion: Teeth restored with composite and modified GIC presented the same resistance as intact teeth. Teeth restored with Coltosol and GGIC presented similar resistance to unrestored teeth.
id UNIFEI_71c6b4dacd3c068807e4bbf8a60bbb5c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16150
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Different Restorative Materials - An In Vitro StudyEvaluación de la resistencia a la fractura de premolares maxilares tratados endodónticamente restaurados con diferentes materiales de restauración: Un estudio in vitroAvaliação da resistência à fratura de pré-molares superiores tratados endodonticamente e restaurados com diferentes materiais restauradores – Estudo In vitroOdontología Restauradora AvanzadaComposicionAdhesión dentalPreparación de la cavidad dentalRestauración dentalRestauración temporalFallo de restauración dental.Odontologia Restauradora AvançadaCompósitosColagem DentáriaPreparação da Cavidade DentáriaRestauração DentáriaRestauração temporáriaFalha de restauração dentária.Advanced restorative dentistryCompositesDental bondingDental cavity preparationDental restorationTemporary restorationDental restoration failure.Aim: In this study was evaluated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with      different restorative materials. Methods: Sixty maxillary premolars were submitted to the same mesio-occlusal-distal cavity preparation, endodontic treatment and divided into 5 groups (n = 10): Coltosol Group – GCO restored with calcium silicate material; Glass Ionomer Cement Group – GGIC, restored with Maxxion R; Modified Glass Ionomer Cement – GMGIC, restored with Gold Label 2; Composite Group - GC, restored with Z100, and the positive control group (GP) - left unrestored. One group remained intact (n=10) serving as negative control (GN). Samples were subjected to fracture resistance testing by the universal testing machine until fracture occurred and was registered in newtons (N). Fracture pattern was assessed and described as favorable or unfavorable. The results were statistically analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey test with significant statistical difference at P < 0.05.  Results: Higher fracture resistance results were found for GC (1,128.35 ± 249.17), GMGIC (1,250.77 ± 173.29), and GN (1,277.22 ± 433.44) (P < .05). More favorable fractures were observed in the GCO (6), GC (7), and GN (7) (P < .05). Conclusion: Teeth restored with composite and modified GIC presented the same resistance as intact teeth. Teeth restored with Coltosol and GGIC presented similar resistance to unrestored teeth.Objetivo: En este estudio se evaluó la resistencia a la fractura de premolares maxilares tratados endodónticamente restaurados con diferentes materiales restauradores. Métodos: Sesenta premolares maxilares fueron sometidos a la misma preparación de cavidad mesio-oclusal-distal, tratamiento endodóntico y divididos en 5 grupos (n = 10): Grupo Coltosol - GCO restaurado con material de silicato de calcio; Grupo de cemento de ionómero de vidrio - GCIV, restaurado con Maxxion R; Cemento de ionómero de vidrio modificado - GCIM, restaurado con Gold Label 2; Grupo compuesto - GC, restaurado con Z100, y el grupo de control positivo (GP) - dejado sin restaurar. Un grupo permaneció intacto (n = 10) sirviendo como control negativo (GN). Las muestras se sometieron a pruebas de resistencia a la fractura mediante la máquina de prueba universal hasta que se produjo la fractura y se registró en newtons (N). El patrón de fractura se evaluó y describió como favorable o desfavorable. Los resultados se analizaron estadísticamente mediante un análisis de varianza de 1 vía y la prueba de Tukey post hoc con una diferencia estadística significativa a P <0,05. Resultados: Se encontraron mayores resultados de resistencia a la fractura para GC (1.128,35 ± 249,17), GCIM (1.250,77 ± 173,29) y GN (1.277,22 ± 433,44) (p <0,05). Se observaron fracturas más favorables en el GCO (6), GC (7) y GN (7) (p <0,05). Conclusión: Los dientes restaurados con composite y CIV modificado presentaron la misma resistencia que los dientes intactos. Los dientes restaurados con Coltosol y GIC presentaron una resistencia similar a los dientes no restaurados.Objetivo: Neste estudo foi avaliada a resistência à fratura de pré-molares superiores tratados endodonticamente, e restaurados com diferentes materiais restauradores. Métodos: Sessenta pré-molares superiores foram submetidos ao mesmo preparo cavitário mésio-ocluso-distal, tratamento endodôntico e divididos em 5 grupos (n = 10): Grupo Coltosol - GCO restaurado com material de silicato de cálcio; Grupo de Cimento de Ionômero de Vidro - GCIV, restaurado com Maxxion R; Cimento de Ionômero de Vidro Modificado - GCIM, restaurado com Gold Label 2; Grupo resina composta - GC, restaurado com Z100, e o grupo de controle positivo (GP) - não restaurado. Um grupo permaneceu intacto (n = 10) servindo como controle negativo (GN). As amostras foram submetidas a teste de resistência à fratura pela máquina de teste universal até que a fratura ocorresse e fosse registrada em newtons (N). O padrão de fratura foi avaliado e descrito como favorável ou desfavorável. Os resultados foram analisados estatisticamente através da análise de variância unilateral e pelo teste post hoc de Tukey com diferença estatística significativa para P <0,05. Resultados: Resultados mais altos de resistência à fratura foram encontrados para GC (1.128,35 ± 249,17), GCIM (1.250,77 ± 173,29) e GN (1.277,22 ± 433,44) (P <0,05). Fraturas mais favoráveis foram observadas no GCO (6), GC (7) e GN (7) (P <0,05). Conclusão: Os dentes restaurados com resina e GCIM modificado apresentaram a mesma resistência dos dentes íntegros. Os dentes restaurados com Coltosol e CIV apresentam resistência semelhante aos dentes não restaurados.Research, Society and Development2021-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1615010.33448/rsd-v10i7.16150Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e5110716150Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e5110716150Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e51107161502525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16150/14526Copyright (c) 2021 Walber Maeda; Wayne Martins Nascimento; Marcelo Santos Coelho; Danilo de Luca Campos ; João Paulo Drumond ; Adriana de Jesus Soares; Marcos Frozonihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaeda, WalberNascimento, Wayne Martins Coelho, Marcelo Santos Campos , Danilo de Luca Drumond , João Paulo Soares, Adriana de Jesus Frozoni, Marcos 2021-07-18T21:07:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16150Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:36:47.089965Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Different Restorative Materials - An In Vitro Study
Evaluación de la resistencia a la fractura de premolares maxilares tratados endodónticamente restaurados con diferentes materiales de restauración: Un estudio in vitro
Avaliação da resistência à fratura de pré-molares superiores tratados endodonticamente e restaurados com diferentes materiais restauradores – Estudo In vitro
title Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Different Restorative Materials - An In Vitro Study
spellingShingle Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Different Restorative Materials - An In Vitro Study
Maeda, Walber
Odontología Restauradora Avanzada
Composicion
Adhesión dental
Preparación de la cavidad dental
Restauración dental
Restauración temporal
Fallo de restauración dental.
Odontologia Restauradora Avançada
Compósitos
Colagem Dentária
Preparação da Cavidade Dentária
Restauração Dentária
Restauração temporária
Falha de restauração dentária.
Advanced restorative dentistry
Composites
Dental bonding
Dental cavity preparation
Dental restoration
Temporary restoration
Dental restoration failure.
title_short Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Different Restorative Materials - An In Vitro Study
title_full Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Different Restorative Materials - An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Different Restorative Materials - An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Different Restorative Materials - An In Vitro Study
title_sort Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Different Restorative Materials - An In Vitro Study
author Maeda, Walber
author_facet Maeda, Walber
Nascimento, Wayne Martins
Coelho, Marcelo Santos
Campos , Danilo de Luca
Drumond , João Paulo
Soares, Adriana de Jesus
Frozoni, Marcos
author_role author
author2 Nascimento, Wayne Martins
Coelho, Marcelo Santos
Campos , Danilo de Luca
Drumond , João Paulo
Soares, Adriana de Jesus
Frozoni, Marcos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maeda, Walber
Nascimento, Wayne Martins
Coelho, Marcelo Santos
Campos , Danilo de Luca
Drumond , João Paulo
Soares, Adriana de Jesus
Frozoni, Marcos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Odontología Restauradora Avanzada
Composicion
Adhesión dental
Preparación de la cavidad dental
Restauración dental
Restauración temporal
Fallo de restauración dental.
Odontologia Restauradora Avançada
Compósitos
Colagem Dentária
Preparação da Cavidade Dentária
Restauração Dentária
Restauração temporária
Falha de restauração dentária.
Advanced restorative dentistry
Composites
Dental bonding
Dental cavity preparation
Dental restoration
Temporary restoration
Dental restoration failure.
topic Odontología Restauradora Avanzada
Composicion
Adhesión dental
Preparación de la cavidad dental
Restauración dental
Restauración temporal
Fallo de restauración dental.
Odontologia Restauradora Avançada
Compósitos
Colagem Dentária
Preparação da Cavidade Dentária
Restauração Dentária
Restauração temporária
Falha de restauração dentária.
Advanced restorative dentistry
Composites
Dental bonding
Dental cavity preparation
Dental restoration
Temporary restoration
Dental restoration failure.
description Aim: In this study was evaluated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with      different restorative materials. Methods: Sixty maxillary premolars were submitted to the same mesio-occlusal-distal cavity preparation, endodontic treatment and divided into 5 groups (n = 10): Coltosol Group – GCO restored with calcium silicate material; Glass Ionomer Cement Group – GGIC, restored with Maxxion R; Modified Glass Ionomer Cement – GMGIC, restored with Gold Label 2; Composite Group - GC, restored with Z100, and the positive control group (GP) - left unrestored. One group remained intact (n=10) serving as negative control (GN). Samples were subjected to fracture resistance testing by the universal testing machine until fracture occurred and was registered in newtons (N). Fracture pattern was assessed and described as favorable or unfavorable. The results were statistically analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey test with significant statistical difference at P < 0.05.  Results: Higher fracture resistance results were found for GC (1,128.35 ± 249.17), GMGIC (1,250.77 ± 173.29), and GN (1,277.22 ± 433.44) (P < .05). More favorable fractures were observed in the GCO (6), GC (7), and GN (7) (P < .05). Conclusion: Teeth restored with composite and modified GIC presented the same resistance as intact teeth. Teeth restored with Coltosol and GGIC presented similar resistance to unrestored teeth.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16150
10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16150
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16150
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16150
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16150/14526
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e5110716150
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e5110716150
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e5110716150
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052679101349888

Registros relacionados