Floristic survey in the Caatinga: comparison between a preserved area and a degraded area in the Sertão Pernambucano

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vital, Maria Janaina Lira
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Alves, Gilian Clebson Pereira, Silva, Arlene Alves da, Oliveira, Maria do Socorro Germano de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20153
Resumo: The objective of this work was to collect and identify native species of the florist composition in two different areas in the city of Salgueiro-PE. The collection was carried out in the municipality of Formiga, in an area of ​​preserved native forest and in the Uri site, where the degraded area was seen. In all areas, 2 rectangular transects (10x30m) were demarcated and distributed around each area, each transect was composed of three quadrangular plots (10x20m) separated by an interval of 10m. 102 species were collected in the degraded area and distributed in botanical families. In the preserved area, 375 individuals belonging to different families and species were found, having a greater number of species, that is, greater biodiversity and a rich variety of trees and shrubs in relation to the degraded area. The Shannon-Weaver (H') value found in the degraded area (A) 1.75 and in the preserved area (B) 2.51, indicating that area B is more diverse and that A. What about Simpson's dominance index (C) the observed value was 0.90 in area (A) and 0.76 in area (B). The observed values ​​of evenness were 0.90 for the preserved area and 0.84 for the degraded area, that is, the low value reflects that there is less uniformity regarding the plant distribution in the degraded area. According to the diversity indices, we can see that the degraded area loses its diversity in species, that is, it loses its richness that can influence the characteristics of the soil, fauna and biotic and abiotic interactions.
id UNIFEI_7b22d3720ad3dc2e689c7fd6379cc7b1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20153
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Floristic survey in the Caatinga: comparison between a preserved area and a degraded area in the Sertão PernambucanoEncuesta florística en la Caatinga: comparación entre un área preservada y un área degradada en el Sertão PernambucanoLevantamento florístico na Caatinga: comparação entre uma área preservada e uma área degradada no Sertão Pernambucano CaatingaSpeciesIndexesPreservation.CaatingaEspeciesÍndicesPreservación.CaatingaEspéciesÍndicesPreservação. The objective of this work was to collect and identify native species of the florist composition in two different areas in the city of Salgueiro-PE. The collection was carried out in the municipality of Formiga, in an area of ​​preserved native forest and in the Uri site, where the degraded area was seen. In all areas, 2 rectangular transects (10x30m) were demarcated and distributed around each area, each transect was composed of three quadrangular plots (10x20m) separated by an interval of 10m. 102 species were collected in the degraded area and distributed in botanical families. In the preserved area, 375 individuals belonging to different families and species were found, having a greater number of species, that is, greater biodiversity and a rich variety of trees and shrubs in relation to the degraded area. The Shannon-Weaver (H') value found in the degraded area (A) 1.75 and in the preserved area (B) 2.51, indicating that area B is more diverse and that A. What about Simpson's dominance index (C) the observed value was 0.90 in area (A) and 0.76 in area (B). The observed values ​​of evenness were 0.90 for the preserved area and 0.84 for the degraded area, that is, the low value reflects that there is less uniformity regarding the plant distribution in the degraded area. According to the diversity indices, we can see that the degraded area loses its diversity in species, that is, it loses its richness that can influence the characteristics of the soil, fauna and biotic and abiotic interactions.El objetivo de este trabajo fue recolectar e identificar especies nativas de la composición floristería en dos áreas diferenciadas de la ciudad de Salgueiro-PE. La recolección se realizó en el municipio de Formiga, en un área de bosque nativo preservado y en el sitio de Uri, donde se observó el área degradada. En todas las áreas se demarcaron 2 transectos rectangulares (10x30m) y se distribuyeron alrededor de cada área, cada transecto estuvo compuesto por tres parcelas cuadrangulares (10x20m) separadas por un intervalo de 10m. Se recolectaron 102 especies en el área degradada y se distribuyeron en familias botánicas. En el área preservada se encontraron 375 individuos pertenecientes a diferentes familias y especies, teniendo un mayor número de especies, es decir, mayor biodiversidad y una rica variedad de árboles y arbustos en relación al área degradada. El valor de Shannon-Weaver (H ') encontrado en el área degradada (A) 1.75 y en el área preservada (B) 2.51, indica que el área B es más diversa y que A. ¿Qué pasa con el índice de dominancia de Simpson (C) el valor observado? fue 0,90 en el área (A) y 0,76 en el área (B). Los valores de uniformidad observados fueron 0.90 para el área preservada y 0.84 para el área degradada, es decir, el valor bajo refleja que hay menos uniformidad en la distribución de plantas en el área degradada. De acuerdo con los índices de diversidad, podemos ver que el área degradada pierde su diversidad en especies, es decir, pierde su riqueza que puede influir en las características del suelo, la fauna y las interacciones bióticas y abióticas.O objetivo desse trabalho foi coletar e identificar espécies nativas da composição florista em duas áreas diferentes na cidade de Salgueiro-PE. A coleta foi realizada no município Formiga, em uma área de mata nativa preservada e no sítio Uri, onde foi visto a área degradada. Em todas as áreas foram demarcados 2 transectos retangulares (10x30m) distribuídos no entorno de cada área, cada transecto era composto por três parcelas quadrangulares (10x20m) separadas por um intervalo de 10m. Foram coletadas 102 espécies na área degradada e distribuídas em famílias botânicas. Na área preservada foram encontrados 375 indivíduos pertencentes a famílias e espécies diferentes, possuindo um número maior de espécies, ou seja, uma maior biodiversidade e uma rica variedade arbóreo-arbustiva em relação a área degradada. O valor encontrado de Shannon-Weaver (H’) na área degradada (A) 1, 75 e na área preservada (B) 2,51, indicando que área B é mais diversa e que A. E quanto ao índice de dominância de Simpson (C) o valor observado foi de 0,90 na área (A) e 0,76 na área (B). Os valores observados de equabilidade foi de foi de 0,90 para a área preservada e 0,84 para a área degradada, ou seja, o baixo valor reflete que há uma menor uniformidade referente à distribuição vegetal na área degradada. De cordo com os índices de diversidade podemos perceber que a área degradada perde sua diversidade em espécies, ou seja, perde sua riqueza que pode influenciar nas características do solo, da fauna e nas interações bióticas e abióticas.Research, Society and Development2021-09-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2015310.33448/rsd-v10i12.20153Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e76101220153Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e76101220153Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e761012201532525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20153/17987Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Janaina Lira Vital; Gilian Clebson Pereira Alves; Arlene Alves da Silva; Maria do Socorro Germano de Oliveirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVital, Maria Janaina LiraAlves, Gilian Clebson Pereira Silva, Arlene Alves daOliveira, Maria do Socorro Germano de 2021-11-14T20:26:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20153Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:53.084101Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Floristic survey in the Caatinga: comparison between a preserved area and a degraded area in the Sertão Pernambucano
Encuesta florística en la Caatinga: comparación entre un área preservada y un área degradada en el Sertão Pernambucano
Levantamento florístico na Caatinga: comparação entre uma área preservada e uma área degradada no Sertão Pernambucano
title Floristic survey in the Caatinga: comparison between a preserved area and a degraded area in the Sertão Pernambucano
spellingShingle Floristic survey in the Caatinga: comparison between a preserved area and a degraded area in the Sertão Pernambucano
Vital, Maria Janaina Lira
Caatinga
Species
Indexes
Preservation.
Caatinga
Especies
Índices
Preservación.
Caatinga
Espécies
Índices
Preservação.
title_short Floristic survey in the Caatinga: comparison between a preserved area and a degraded area in the Sertão Pernambucano
title_full Floristic survey in the Caatinga: comparison between a preserved area and a degraded area in the Sertão Pernambucano
title_fullStr Floristic survey in the Caatinga: comparison between a preserved area and a degraded area in the Sertão Pernambucano
title_full_unstemmed Floristic survey in the Caatinga: comparison between a preserved area and a degraded area in the Sertão Pernambucano
title_sort Floristic survey in the Caatinga: comparison between a preserved area and a degraded area in the Sertão Pernambucano
author Vital, Maria Janaina Lira
author_facet Vital, Maria Janaina Lira
Alves, Gilian Clebson Pereira
Silva, Arlene Alves da
Oliveira, Maria do Socorro Germano de
author_role author
author2 Alves, Gilian Clebson Pereira
Silva, Arlene Alves da
Oliveira, Maria do Socorro Germano de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vital, Maria Janaina Lira
Alves, Gilian Clebson Pereira
Silva, Arlene Alves da
Oliveira, Maria do Socorro Germano de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Caatinga
Species
Indexes
Preservation.
Caatinga
Especies
Índices
Preservación.
Caatinga
Espécies
Índices
Preservação.
topic Caatinga
Species
Indexes
Preservation.
Caatinga
Especies
Índices
Preservación.
Caatinga
Espécies
Índices
Preservação.
description The objective of this work was to collect and identify native species of the florist composition in two different areas in the city of Salgueiro-PE. The collection was carried out in the municipality of Formiga, in an area of ​​preserved native forest and in the Uri site, where the degraded area was seen. In all areas, 2 rectangular transects (10x30m) were demarcated and distributed around each area, each transect was composed of three quadrangular plots (10x20m) separated by an interval of 10m. 102 species were collected in the degraded area and distributed in botanical families. In the preserved area, 375 individuals belonging to different families and species were found, having a greater number of species, that is, greater biodiversity and a rich variety of trees and shrubs in relation to the degraded area. The Shannon-Weaver (H') value found in the degraded area (A) 1.75 and in the preserved area (B) 2.51, indicating that area B is more diverse and that A. What about Simpson's dominance index (C) the observed value was 0.90 in area (A) and 0.76 in area (B). The observed values ​​of evenness were 0.90 for the preserved area and 0.84 for the degraded area, that is, the low value reflects that there is less uniformity regarding the plant distribution in the degraded area. According to the diversity indices, we can see that the degraded area loses its diversity in species, that is, it loses its richness that can influence the characteristics of the soil, fauna and biotic and abiotic interactions.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20153
10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20153
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20153
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20153
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20153/17987
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e76101220153
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e76101220153
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e76101220153
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052689179213824