Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10557 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Classically, thyroid nodules are initially evaluated by ultrasonography in Mode B. Despite being sensitive for the diagnosis of NT, it does not take into account the stiffness of the nodule, an important characteristic that is related to its malignancy. In this sense, elastography has been used as an instrument to assist in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. With this in mind, the aim of the present study is to qualitatively assess the performance of manual pressure elastography in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign thyroid nodules in adults. Method: This is a prospective, observational study, which included patients who had thyroid nodules and required fine needle aspiration (FNAB). The elastography was obtained in real time from the US in Mode B. The percentage of the nodule's rigid area was calculated using the ImageJ software. Results: The study included 41 patients, 87.8% female. Age ranged from 18 to 75 years, with an average of 46.4 years (SD: 13.57). Most of the nodules were classified as TI-RADS 3, 53.7%. As for the Bethesda classification, 82.9% of the sample was classified as Bethesda 2 (benign nodule). The percentage of rigid area (% AR) ranged from 3% to 73%, with an average of 28.73% (SD: 18.15). Highly suspicious nodules from the TI-RADS classification had a higher AR% (51.6%). Regarding cytological analysis, nodules characterized as benign had an average AR% of 24.23% (SD: 13.66), while malignant ones of 55% (SD: 19.94), a difference of 30.77% , which proved to be statistically significant (p <0.001). Conclusion: The quantitative evaluation of Strain-type elastography based on the% AR evaluation proved to be useful to discriminate between benign and malignant nodules and is presented as a tool that can complement the assessment of thyroid nodules. |
id |
UNIFEI_7bd27d41c7474c50bb70919b8246af9d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10557 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspectiveEvaluación cuantitativa de la elastografía por ultrasonido de deformación de los nódulos tiroideos: una nueva perspectiva de clasificaciónAvaliação quantitativa da elastografia do tipo strain por ultrassom de nódulos de tireoides: uma nova perspectiva de classificaçãoElastographyThyroid nodulesUltrasound of thyroid.ElastografíaNódulos tiroideosEcografía de tiroides.ElastografiaNódulos de tireoideUltrassonografia de tireoide.Introduction: Classically, thyroid nodules are initially evaluated by ultrasonography in Mode B. Despite being sensitive for the diagnosis of NT, it does not take into account the stiffness of the nodule, an important characteristic that is related to its malignancy. In this sense, elastography has been used as an instrument to assist in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. With this in mind, the aim of the present study is to qualitatively assess the performance of manual pressure elastography in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign thyroid nodules in adults. Method: This is a prospective, observational study, which included patients who had thyroid nodules and required fine needle aspiration (FNAB). The elastography was obtained in real time from the US in Mode B. The percentage of the nodule's rigid area was calculated using the ImageJ software. Results: The study included 41 patients, 87.8% female. Age ranged from 18 to 75 years, with an average of 46.4 years (SD: 13.57). Most of the nodules were classified as TI-RADS 3, 53.7%. As for the Bethesda classification, 82.9% of the sample was classified as Bethesda 2 (benign nodule). The percentage of rigid area (% AR) ranged from 3% to 73%, with an average of 28.73% (SD: 18.15). Highly suspicious nodules from the TI-RADS classification had a higher AR% (51.6%). Regarding cytological analysis, nodules characterized as benign had an average AR% of 24.23% (SD: 13.66), while malignant ones of 55% (SD: 19.94), a difference of 30.77% , which proved to be statistically significant (p <0.001). Conclusion: The quantitative evaluation of Strain-type elastography based on the% AR evaluation proved to be useful to discriminate between benign and malignant nodules and is presented as a tool that can complement the assessment of thyroid nodules.Introducción: Clásicamente, los nódulos tiroideos se evalúan inicialmente mediante ecografía en Modo B. A pesar de ser sensible para el diagnóstico de NT, no tiene en cuenta la rigidez del nódulo, característica importante que se relaciona con su malignidad. En este sentido, la elastografía se ha utilizado como instrumento para ayudar en el diagnóstico de nódulos tiroideos. Teniendo esto en cuenta, el objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar cualitativamente la realización de la elastografía de presión manual en el diagnóstico diferencial de nódulos tiroideos malignos y benignos en adultos. Método: Se trata de un estudio prospectivo, observacional, que incluyó a pacientes que presentaban nódulos tiroideos y requerían aspiración con aguja fina (PAAF). La elastografía se obtuvo en tiempo real desde EE. UU. En Modo B. El porcentaje del área rígida del nódulo se calculó utilizando el software ImageJ. Resultados: El estudio incluyó a 41 pacientes, 87,8% mujeres. La edad osciló entre 18 y 75 años, con una media de 46,4 años (DE: 13,57). La mayoría de los nódulos se clasificaron como TI-RADS 3, 53,7%. En cuanto a la clasificación de Bethesda, el 82,9% de la muestra se clasificó como Bethesda 2 (nódulo benigno). El porcentaje de área rígida (% AR) osciló entre el 3% y el 73%, con un promedio de 28,73% (DE: 18,15). Los nódulos altamente sospechosos de la clasificación TI-RADS tuvieron un AR% más alto (51,6%). En cuanto al análisis citológico, los nódulos caracterizados como benignos tuvieron un AR% promedio de 24,23% (DE: 13,66), mientras que los malignos del 55% (DE: 19,94), una diferencia de 30,77%, que resultó ser estadísticamente significativa (p <0,001). Conclusión: La evaluación cuantitativa de la elastografía tipo Strain basada en la evaluación del% AR demostró ser útil para discriminar entre nódulos benignos y malignos y se presenta como una herramienta que puede complementar la evaluación de nódulos tiroideos.Introdução: Classicamente os nódulos de tireoide são avaliados inicialmente pela ultrassonografia no Modo B. Apesar de ser sensível para o diagnóstico dos NT, ela não leva em consideração a rigidez do nódulo, uma importante característica que possui relação com a malignidade deste. Nesse sentido, têm se empregado a elastografia como instrumento para auxiliar o diagnóstico de nódulos de tireoide. Tendo isso em vista, o objetivo do presente estudo é avaliar o desempenho da elastografia por pressão manual de forma qualitativa no diagnóstico diferencial de nódulos tireoidianos malignos e benignos em adultos. Método: Trata-se de um estudo prospectivo, observacional, que incluiu pacientes que apresentavam nódulos de tireoide e necessitassem de punção aspirativa por agulha fina (PAAF). A elastografia foi obtida em tempo real junto ao US no Modo B. Foi realizado o cálculo da percentual de área rígida do nódulo com auxílio do software ImageJ. Resultados: O estudo incluiu 41 pacientes, 87,8% do sexo feminino. A idade variou entre 18 a 75 anos, com média de 46,4 anos (DP: 13,57). A maior parte dos nódulos foram classificados como TI-RADS 3, 53,7%. Quanto a classificação de Bethesda, 82,9% da amostra foi classificado como Bethesda 2 (nódulo benigno). O percentual de área rígida (%AR) variou de 3% a 73%, com média de 28,73% (DP: 18,15). Nódulos altamente suspeitos da classificação TI-RADS tiveram maior %AR (51,6%). Em relação a análise citológica, os nódulos caracterizados como benignos tiveram média do %AR de 24,23% (DP: 13,66), enquanto os malignos de 55% (DP: 19,94), uma diferença de 30,77%, que se mostrou estatisticamente significativa (p < 0,001). Conclusão: A avaliação quantitativa da elastografia do tipo Strain a partir da avaliação do %AR se mostrou útil para discriminar nódulos benignos e malignos e se apresenta como uma ferramenta que pode complementar a avaliação de nódulos de tireoide.Research, Society and Development2020-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1055710.33448/rsd-v9i12.10557Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e2491210557Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e2491210557Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e24912105572525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10557/9616Copyright (c) 2020 Antônio José de Macedo Bernardes; Ivan Luiz Pedroso Pires; Matheus Rodrigues de Souza; Fabiana Alvarez Domiciliano; Priscila Pereira Fáverohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBernardes, Antônio José de Macedo Pires, Ivan Luiz Pedroso Souza, Matheus Rodrigues de Domiciliano, Fabiana Alvarez Fávero, Priscila Pereira 2020-12-30T23:32:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10557Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:32:36.290460Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective Evaluación cuantitativa de la elastografía por ultrasonido de deformación de los nódulos tiroideos: una nueva perspectiva de clasificación Avaliação quantitativa da elastografia do tipo strain por ultrassom de nódulos de tireoides: uma nova perspectiva de classificação |
title |
Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective |
spellingShingle |
Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective Bernardes, Antônio José de Macedo Elastography Thyroid nodules Ultrasound of thyroid. Elastografía Nódulos tiroideos Ecografía de tiroides. Elastografia Nódulos de tireoide Ultrassonografia de tireoide. |
title_short |
Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective |
title_full |
Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective |
title_fullStr |
Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective |
title_sort |
Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective |
author |
Bernardes, Antônio José de Macedo |
author_facet |
Bernardes, Antônio José de Macedo Pires, Ivan Luiz Pedroso Souza, Matheus Rodrigues de Domiciliano, Fabiana Alvarez Fávero, Priscila Pereira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pires, Ivan Luiz Pedroso Souza, Matheus Rodrigues de Domiciliano, Fabiana Alvarez Fávero, Priscila Pereira |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bernardes, Antônio José de Macedo Pires, Ivan Luiz Pedroso Souza, Matheus Rodrigues de Domiciliano, Fabiana Alvarez Fávero, Priscila Pereira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Elastography Thyroid nodules Ultrasound of thyroid. Elastografía Nódulos tiroideos Ecografía de tiroides. Elastografia Nódulos de tireoide Ultrassonografia de tireoide. |
topic |
Elastography Thyroid nodules Ultrasound of thyroid. Elastografía Nódulos tiroideos Ecografía de tiroides. Elastografia Nódulos de tireoide Ultrassonografia de tireoide. |
description |
Introduction: Classically, thyroid nodules are initially evaluated by ultrasonography in Mode B. Despite being sensitive for the diagnosis of NT, it does not take into account the stiffness of the nodule, an important characteristic that is related to its malignancy. In this sense, elastography has been used as an instrument to assist in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. With this in mind, the aim of the present study is to qualitatively assess the performance of manual pressure elastography in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign thyroid nodules in adults. Method: This is a prospective, observational study, which included patients who had thyroid nodules and required fine needle aspiration (FNAB). The elastography was obtained in real time from the US in Mode B. The percentage of the nodule's rigid area was calculated using the ImageJ software. Results: The study included 41 patients, 87.8% female. Age ranged from 18 to 75 years, with an average of 46.4 years (SD: 13.57). Most of the nodules were classified as TI-RADS 3, 53.7%. As for the Bethesda classification, 82.9% of the sample was classified as Bethesda 2 (benign nodule). The percentage of rigid area (% AR) ranged from 3% to 73%, with an average of 28.73% (SD: 18.15). Highly suspicious nodules from the TI-RADS classification had a higher AR% (51.6%). Regarding cytological analysis, nodules characterized as benign had an average AR% of 24.23% (SD: 13.66), while malignant ones of 55% (SD: 19.94), a difference of 30.77% , which proved to be statistically significant (p <0.001). Conclusion: The quantitative evaluation of Strain-type elastography based on the% AR evaluation proved to be useful to discriminate between benign and malignant nodules and is presented as a tool that can complement the assessment of thyroid nodules. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10557 10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10557 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10557 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10557 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10557/9616 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e2491210557 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e2491210557 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e2491210557 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052665197232128 |