Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animals
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
DOI: | 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7014 |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7014 |
Resumo: | Objective: this study aimed to verify the importance of fungal culture in the conclusive diagnosis of dermatophytosis in dogs and cats, given the variability of dermatological signs and their infectious and contagious nature, which can affect humans. Method: retrospective documentary analysis was carried out at the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Jataí, between 2018 and 2019, of the cases in which dermatozoonosis was listed among the clinical suspicions. Fungal culture was carried out in laminoculture with TMD, by means of deposition in the culture medium of scales and broken hair from various suspect sites. After incubation at room temperature, an inspection was carried out to detect the color change from medium to red and colonies growth, followed by morphological identification of macroconids to determine the species. Results: among the 193 dogs treated at the dermatology service, 60 (31.1%) had dermatological signs that justified the inclusion of dermatophytosis among the differential diagnoses. In 43 cats, in 17 (39.5%), dermatophytosis was identified among the possible suspicions. However, after fungal culture, dermatophytosis was confirmed only in 5.7% (11/193) of the total cases treated. In dogs it represented 2.6% and in cats 14% of diagnosed skin diseases. Conclusion: dermatophytosis is often included in the differential diagnosis of skin diseases that develop with alopecic, scaly and crusted lesions. Fungal culture is a fundamental tool for confirming infection and implementing assertive therapeutic measures. M. canis is the most frequent dermatophyte in dogs and cats, which reinforces the need for an accurate diagnosis, due to its zoonotic character. |
id |
UNIFEI_7c59542d407d0d445d691c95240f8b74 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7014 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
spelling |
Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animalsImportancia del cultivo fúngico en el diagnóstico de dermatofitosis en animales de compañíaImportância da cultura fúngica no diagnóstico da dermatofitose em animais de companhiaDermatozoonosisDermatofitosEnfermedad fúngica.DermatozoonosisDermatophytesFungal disease.DermatozoonoseDermatófitosDoença fúngica.Objective: this study aimed to verify the importance of fungal culture in the conclusive diagnosis of dermatophytosis in dogs and cats, given the variability of dermatological signs and their infectious and contagious nature, which can affect humans. Method: retrospective documentary analysis was carried out at the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Jataí, between 2018 and 2019, of the cases in which dermatozoonosis was listed among the clinical suspicions. Fungal culture was carried out in laminoculture with TMD, by means of deposition in the culture medium of scales and broken hair from various suspect sites. After incubation at room temperature, an inspection was carried out to detect the color change from medium to red and colonies growth, followed by morphological identification of macroconids to determine the species. Results: among the 193 dogs treated at the dermatology service, 60 (31.1%) had dermatological signs that justified the inclusion of dermatophytosis among the differential diagnoses. In 43 cats, in 17 (39.5%), dermatophytosis was identified among the possible suspicions. However, after fungal culture, dermatophytosis was confirmed only in 5.7% (11/193) of the total cases treated. In dogs it represented 2.6% and in cats 14% of diagnosed skin diseases. Conclusion: dermatophytosis is often included in the differential diagnosis of skin diseases that develop with alopecic, scaly and crusted lesions. Fungal culture is a fundamental tool for confirming infection and implementing assertive therapeutic measures. M. canis is the most frequent dermatophyte in dogs and cats, which reinforces the need for an accurate diagnosis, due to its zoonotic character.Objetivo: este estudio tuvo como objetivo verificar la importancia del cultivo de hongos en el diagnóstico concluyente de dermatofitosis en perros y gatos, dada la variabilidad de los signos dermatológicos y su naturaleza infecciosa y contagiosa, que puede afectar a los humanos. Método: Se realizó un análisis documental retrospectivo en el Hospital Veterinario de la Universidad Federal de Jataí, entre 2018 y 2019, de casos en los que la dermatozoonosis figuraba entre las sospechas clínicas. El cultivo de hongos se realizó en laminocultivo con TMD, mediante el depósito en el medio de cultivo de escamas y cabello roto de varios sitios sospechosos. Después de la incubación a temperatura ambiente, se realizó una inspección para detectar el cambio de color de medio a rojo y el crecimiento de colonias, seguido de la identificación morfológica de macroconidos para determinar la especie. Resultados: entre los 193 perros tratados en el servicio de dermatología, 60 (31,1%) tenían signos dermatológicos que justificaban la inclusión de dermatofitosis entre los diagnósticos diferenciales. En 43 gatos, en 17 (39.5%), se identificó dermatofitosis entre las posibles sospechas. Sin embargo, después del cultivo fúngico, la dermatofitosis se confirmó solo en el 5,7% (11/193) del total de casos tratados. En perros representó 2.6% y en gatos 14% de las enfermedades cutáneas diagnosticadas. Conclusión: la dermatofitosis a menudo se incluye en el diagnóstico diferencial de enfermedades de la piel que se desarrollan con lesiones alopécicas, escamosas y con costras. El cultivo de hongos es una herramienta fundamental para confirmar la infección e implementar medidas terapéuticas asertivas. M. canis es el dermatofito más frecuente en perros y gatos, lo que refuerza la necesidad de un diagnóstico preciso, debido a su carácter zoonótico.Objetivo: este estudo teve como objetivo verificar a importância da cultura fúngica no diagnóstico conclusivo da dermatofitose em cães e gatos, dada a variabilidade dos sinais dermatológicos e sua natureza infectocontagiosa, que pode acometer seres humanos. Método: realizou-se análise documental retrospectiva, no Hospital Veterinário da Universidade Federal de Jataí, entre 2018 e 2019, dos casos nos quais a dermatozoonose foi listada entre as suspeitas clínicas. Procedeu-se cultura fúngica em laminocultivo com DTM, por meio da deposição em meio de cultura de escamas e pelos quebrados de vários locais suspeitos. Após incubação em temperatura ambiente realizou-se inspeção para detecção da mudança de cor do meio para vermelho e crescimento de colônias, seguido de identificação morfológica de macroconídeos para determinação da espécie. Resultados: dentre os 193 cães atendidos no serviço de dermatologia, 60 (31,1%) tiveram sinais dermatológicos que justificaram a inclusão da dermatofitose entre os diagnósticos diferenciais. Nos 43 felinos, em 17 (39,5%), a dermatofitose foi apontada entre as possíveis suspeitas. Contudo, após cultura fúngica a dermatofitose foi confirmada apenas em 5,7% (11/193) do total de casos atendidos. Em cães representou 2,6% e em gatos 14% das dermatopatias diagnosticadas. Conclusão: a dermatofitose é frequentemente inserida no diagnóstico diferencial de dermatopatias que cursam com lesões alopécicas, descamativas e crostosas. A cultura fúngica é ferramenta fundamental para confirmação da infecção e implementação de medidas terapêuticas assertivas. O M. canis é o dermatófito mais frequente em cães e gatos, o que reforça a necessidade de diagnóstico preciso, em virtude de seu caráter zoonótico.Research, Society and Development2020-08-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/701410.33448/rsd-v9i9.7014Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e312997014Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e312997014Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e3129970142525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7014/6466Copyright (c) 2020 Alana Flávia Romani, Rhuan Paulo de Castro Rodrigues, Andréia Vitor Couto do Amaral, Dirceu Guilherme de Souza Ramos, Raphaella Barbosa Meirelles-Bartoli, Priscila Gomes de Oliveira, Carolina Alvarenga Cruzhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRomani, Alana FláviaRodrigues, Rhuan Paulo de CastroAmaral, Andréia Vitor Couto doRamos, Dirceu Guilherme de SouzaOliveira, Priscila Gomes deMeirelles-Bartoli, Raphaella BarbosaCruz, Carolina Alvarenga2020-09-18T01:42:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7014Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:29:53.906164Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animals Importancia del cultivo fúngico en el diagnóstico de dermatofitosis en animales de compañía Importância da cultura fúngica no diagnóstico da dermatofitose em animais de companhia |
title |
Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animals |
spellingShingle |
Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animals Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animals Romani, Alana Flávia Dermatozoonosis Dermatofitos Enfermedad fúngica. Dermatozoonosis Dermatophytes Fungal disease. Dermatozoonose Dermatófitos Doença fúngica. Romani, Alana Flávia Dermatozoonosis Dermatofitos Enfermedad fúngica. Dermatozoonosis Dermatophytes Fungal disease. Dermatozoonose Dermatófitos Doença fúngica. |
title_short |
Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animals |
title_full |
Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animals |
title_fullStr |
Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animals Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animals Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animals |
title_sort |
Importance of fungal culture in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis in companion animals |
author |
Romani, Alana Flávia |
author_facet |
Romani, Alana Flávia Romani, Alana Flávia Rodrigues, Rhuan Paulo de Castro Amaral, Andréia Vitor Couto do Ramos, Dirceu Guilherme de Souza Oliveira, Priscila Gomes de Meirelles-Bartoli, Raphaella Barbosa Cruz, Carolina Alvarenga Rodrigues, Rhuan Paulo de Castro Amaral, Andréia Vitor Couto do Ramos, Dirceu Guilherme de Souza Oliveira, Priscila Gomes de Meirelles-Bartoli, Raphaella Barbosa Cruz, Carolina Alvarenga |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues, Rhuan Paulo de Castro Amaral, Andréia Vitor Couto do Ramos, Dirceu Guilherme de Souza Oliveira, Priscila Gomes de Meirelles-Bartoli, Raphaella Barbosa Cruz, Carolina Alvarenga |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Romani, Alana Flávia Rodrigues, Rhuan Paulo de Castro Amaral, Andréia Vitor Couto do Ramos, Dirceu Guilherme de Souza Oliveira, Priscila Gomes de Meirelles-Bartoli, Raphaella Barbosa Cruz, Carolina Alvarenga |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dermatozoonosis Dermatofitos Enfermedad fúngica. Dermatozoonosis Dermatophytes Fungal disease. Dermatozoonose Dermatófitos Doença fúngica. |
topic |
Dermatozoonosis Dermatofitos Enfermedad fúngica. Dermatozoonosis Dermatophytes Fungal disease. Dermatozoonose Dermatófitos Doença fúngica. |
description |
Objective: this study aimed to verify the importance of fungal culture in the conclusive diagnosis of dermatophytosis in dogs and cats, given the variability of dermatological signs and their infectious and contagious nature, which can affect humans. Method: retrospective documentary analysis was carried out at the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Jataí, between 2018 and 2019, of the cases in which dermatozoonosis was listed among the clinical suspicions. Fungal culture was carried out in laminoculture with TMD, by means of deposition in the culture medium of scales and broken hair from various suspect sites. After incubation at room temperature, an inspection was carried out to detect the color change from medium to red and colonies growth, followed by morphological identification of macroconids to determine the species. Results: among the 193 dogs treated at the dermatology service, 60 (31.1%) had dermatological signs that justified the inclusion of dermatophytosis among the differential diagnoses. In 43 cats, in 17 (39.5%), dermatophytosis was identified among the possible suspicions. However, after fungal culture, dermatophytosis was confirmed only in 5.7% (11/193) of the total cases treated. In dogs it represented 2.6% and in cats 14% of diagnosed skin diseases. Conclusion: dermatophytosis is often included in the differential diagnosis of skin diseases that develop with alopecic, scaly and crusted lesions. Fungal culture is a fundamental tool for confirming infection and implementing assertive therapeutic measures. M. canis is the most frequent dermatophyte in dogs and cats, which reinforces the need for an accurate diagnosis, due to its zoonotic character. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7014 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7014 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7014 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7014/6466 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e312997014 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e312997014 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e312997014 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822178535076265984 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7014 |