Ageism and COVID-19: an integrative review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Manso, Maria Elisa Gonzalez
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Kim, Beatriz Myung Jin, Silva, William de Figueiredo, Baticini, Bruna
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19233
Resumo: This research brings an integrative review on the theme “Ageism during the COVID-19 pandemic”, seeking to answer the question whether there was an outbreak of ageism during the pandemic or simply the visibility of stereotypes already presents in society. The review followed the steps provided by the PRISMA protocol - Key Items for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyzes having selected 34 articles from August to October 2020 and from April to June 2021. The resurgence of stereotypes already presents against the age group composed of elderly people is observed, which was treated homogeneously. Portrayed as a burden to society, the elderly was widely associated with decline, uselessness, and dependence mainly by governments, health professionals, the media, and social networks. Such attitudes reinforced intergenerational conflicts, prejudice, and discrimination. However, manifestations of empathy also emerged in contrast to those positions. It is noteworthy that, in a world where social vulnerabilities, access to care and the social determination of falling ill have become especially visible by the pandemic, it is important to firmly confront ageism in all its forms, offering hope for groups in social disadvantage. Finally, we highlight the little interest that the topic aroused in the national academic literature, being much more widely analyzed, and discussed outside Brazil, as observed in this review.
id UNIFEI_7c69cef41e796bc7abfafb5196a2a24c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19233
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Ageism and COVID-19: an integrative reviewEdadismo y COVID-19: revisión integradoraAgeísmo e COVID-19: revisão integrativaEdadismoPersonaCOVID-19COVID-19.AgeismElderlyCOVID-19.COVID-19AgeismoIdosoCOVID-19.COVID-19This research brings an integrative review on the theme “Ageism during the COVID-19 pandemic”, seeking to answer the question whether there was an outbreak of ageism during the pandemic or simply the visibility of stereotypes already presents in society. The review followed the steps provided by the PRISMA protocol - Key Items for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyzes having selected 34 articles from August to October 2020 and from April to June 2021. The resurgence of stereotypes already presents against the age group composed of elderly people is observed, which was treated homogeneously. Portrayed as a burden to society, the elderly was widely associated with decline, uselessness, and dependence mainly by governments, health professionals, the media, and social networks. Such attitudes reinforced intergenerational conflicts, prejudice, and discrimination. However, manifestations of empathy also emerged in contrast to those positions. It is noteworthy that, in a world where social vulnerabilities, access to care and the social determination of falling ill have become especially visible by the pandemic, it is important to firmly confront ageism in all its forms, offering hope for groups in social disadvantage. Finally, we highlight the little interest that the topic aroused in the national academic literature, being much more widely analyzed, and discussed outside Brazil, as observed in this review.Esta investigación trae una revisión integradora sobre el tema "edadismo durante la pandemia COVID-19", buscando responder a la pregunta de si hubo un brote de discriminación por edad durante la pandemia o solo se hicieron visibles los estereotipos ya presentes en la sociedad. La revisión siguió los pasos dispuestos en el protocolo PRISMA - Elementos Clave para Informar Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis y se seleccionaron 34 artículos entre los meses de agosto a octubre de 2020 y abril a junio de 2021. Se observa un recrudecimiento de estereotipos ya presentes contra el grupo de edad compuesto por personas mayores, lo cual fue tratado de manera homogénea. Las personas mayores fueron retratadas como una carga para la sociedad y ampliamente asociadas, principalmente por gobiernos, profesionales de la salud, medios de comunicación y redes sociales, con el declive, la inutilidad y la dependencia, actitudes que reforzaron los enfrentamientos intergeneracionales, los prejuicios y la discriminación. Sin embargo, también surgieron manifestaciones de empatía, en contraste con estas posiciones. Es de destacar que, en un mundo donde las vulnerabilidades sociales, el acceso a la atención y la determinación social de enfermarse se han vuelto especialmente visibles por la pandemia, es importante enfrentar con firmeza el edadismo en todas sus formas, ofreciendo esperanza a los grupos en desventaja social. Finalmente, destacamos el escaso interés que despertó el tema en la literatura académica nacional, siendo mucho más analizado y discutido fuera de Brasil, como se observa en esta revisión.Esta pesquisa traz revisão integrativa sobre o tema “Ageísmo durante a pandemia de COVID-19”, buscando responder à questão se existiu eclosão do ageísmo durante a pandemia ou apenas se tornaram visíveis estereótipos já presentes na sociedade. A revisão seguiu os passos dispostos no protocolo PRISMA- Principais Itens para Relatar Revisões Sistemáticas e Meta-análises, tendo selecionado 34 artigos entre os meses de agosto a outubro de 2020 e abril a junho de 2021. Nota-se recrudescimento de estereótipos já presentes contra o grupo etário composto por pessoas idosas, o qual foi tratado de forma homogênea. As pessoas idosas foram retratadas como um fardo para a sociedade e amplamente associadas, principalmente por governos, profissionais de saúde, mídias e redes sociais ao declínio, inutilidade e dependência, atitudes estas que reforçaram embates intergeracionais, preconceitos e discriminação. Entretanto, manifestações de empatia também surgiram, em contraposição a estas posições. Destaca-se que, em um mundo onde as vulnerabilidades sociais, o acesso aos cuidados e a determinação social do adoecer se tornaram especialmente visíveis pela pandemia, é importante enfrentar firmemente o ageísmo em todas as suas formas, oferecendo esperança para com os grupos em desvantagem social. Destaca-se, por último, o pouco interesse que o tema despertou para a literatura acadêmica nacional, sendo muito mais amplamente analisado e discutido fora do Brasil, como o observado nesta revisão.Research, Society and Development2021-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1923310.33448/rsd-v10i11.19233Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 11; e274101119233Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 11; e274101119233Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 11; e2741011192332525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19233/17519Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Elisa Gonzalez Manso; Beatriz Myung Jin Kim; William de Figueiredo Silva; Bruna Baticinihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessManso, Maria Elisa Gonzalez Kim, Beatriz Myung Jin Silva, William de FigueiredoBaticini, Bruna2021-10-23T19:01:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19233Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:10.572510Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ageism and COVID-19: an integrative review
Edadismo y COVID-19: revisión integradora
Ageísmo e COVID-19: revisão integrativa
title Ageism and COVID-19: an integrative review
spellingShingle Ageism and COVID-19: an integrative review
Manso, Maria Elisa Gonzalez
Edadismo
Persona
COVID-19
COVID-19.
Ageism
Elderly
COVID-19.
COVID-19
Ageismo
Idoso
COVID-19.
COVID-19
title_short Ageism and COVID-19: an integrative review
title_full Ageism and COVID-19: an integrative review
title_fullStr Ageism and COVID-19: an integrative review
title_full_unstemmed Ageism and COVID-19: an integrative review
title_sort Ageism and COVID-19: an integrative review
author Manso, Maria Elisa Gonzalez
author_facet Manso, Maria Elisa Gonzalez
Kim, Beatriz Myung Jin
Silva, William de Figueiredo
Baticini, Bruna
author_role author
author2 Kim, Beatriz Myung Jin
Silva, William de Figueiredo
Baticini, Bruna
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Manso, Maria Elisa Gonzalez
Kim, Beatriz Myung Jin
Silva, William de Figueiredo
Baticini, Bruna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Edadismo
Persona
COVID-19
COVID-19.
Ageism
Elderly
COVID-19.
COVID-19
Ageismo
Idoso
COVID-19.
COVID-19
topic Edadismo
Persona
COVID-19
COVID-19.
Ageism
Elderly
COVID-19.
COVID-19
Ageismo
Idoso
COVID-19.
COVID-19
description This research brings an integrative review on the theme “Ageism during the COVID-19 pandemic”, seeking to answer the question whether there was an outbreak of ageism during the pandemic or simply the visibility of stereotypes already presents in society. The review followed the steps provided by the PRISMA protocol - Key Items for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyzes having selected 34 articles from August to October 2020 and from April to June 2021. The resurgence of stereotypes already presents against the age group composed of elderly people is observed, which was treated homogeneously. Portrayed as a burden to society, the elderly was widely associated with decline, uselessness, and dependence mainly by governments, health professionals, the media, and social networks. Such attitudes reinforced intergenerational conflicts, prejudice, and discrimination. However, manifestations of empathy also emerged in contrast to those positions. It is noteworthy that, in a world where social vulnerabilities, access to care and the social determination of falling ill have become especially visible by the pandemic, it is important to firmly confront ageism in all its forms, offering hope for groups in social disadvantage. Finally, we highlight the little interest that the topic aroused in the national academic literature, being much more widely analyzed, and discussed outside Brazil, as observed in this review.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19233
10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19233
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19233
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19233
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19233/17519
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 11; e274101119233
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 11; e274101119233
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 11; e274101119233
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052754288443392