Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Laís Samara Juliano de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lima, Nathália Larissa Bezerra, Souza , Jéssica Caroline Carvalho, Rêgo, Dayane Bezerra, Menezes, Desirée de Paula Barroso, Peixoto, Raniel Fernandes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14614
Resumo: Objective: To compare the satisfaction and quality of life of complete denture elderly users and non-users, (but who need denture). Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of 62 elderly, 31 users (G1) and 31 non-users (G2) of complete denture (CD). For all participants, satisfaction (Gurgel et al., 2015) and quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous - OHIP-Edent) questionnaires were applied. Data were analyzed by descriptive analysis, followed by statistical tests to evaluate differences in satisfaction and quality of life before CD users and non-users. Results: The comparative analysis of the socio-demographic aspects between G1 and G2 showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The majority were female (n=51; 82.3%), married (n=20; 32.3%), retired (n=45; 72.6%), income up to one salary (n=44; 71.0%) and incomplete elementary school (n=35; 56.5%). Satisfaction was significantly higher in CD users in all parameters evaluated (p<0.05). Among the indicators of quality of life, only physical pain (p=0.123) and psychological limitation (p=0.087) showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05).  Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, rehabilitation with CD promoted a positive impact on the life of the elderly, guaranteeing greater satisfaction and better quality of life. In addition, the VAS and adjective scales presented substantial agreement.
id UNIFEI_7ccf3103211e56cc4b6db4eb2d23563b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14614
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete denturesSatisfacción y calidad de vida de los usuarios ancianos institucionalizados y no usuarios de prótesis totalSatisfação e qualidade de vida de idosos institucionalizados usuários e não usuários de prótese totalComplete denturePatient satisfactionQuality of life.Prótesis totalSatisfacción del pacienteCalidad de vida.Prótese totalSatisfação do pacienteQualidade de vida.Objective: To compare the satisfaction and quality of life of complete denture elderly users and non-users, (but who need denture). Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of 62 elderly, 31 users (G1) and 31 non-users (G2) of complete denture (CD). For all participants, satisfaction (Gurgel et al., 2015) and quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous - OHIP-Edent) questionnaires were applied. Data were analyzed by descriptive analysis, followed by statistical tests to evaluate differences in satisfaction and quality of life before CD users and non-users. Results: The comparative analysis of the socio-demographic aspects between G1 and G2 showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The majority were female (n=51; 82.3%), married (n=20; 32.3%), retired (n=45; 72.6%), income up to one salary (n=44; 71.0%) and incomplete elementary school (n=35; 56.5%). Satisfaction was significantly higher in CD users in all parameters evaluated (p<0.05). Among the indicators of quality of life, only physical pain (p=0.123) and psychological limitation (p=0.087) showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05).  Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, rehabilitation with CD promoted a positive impact on the life of the elderly, guaranteeing greater satisfaction and better quality of life. In addition, the VAS and adjective scales presented substantial agreement.Objetivo: Comparar la satisfacción y la calidad de vida de los usuarios de edad avanzada y los no usuarios de prótesis completas (pero que requieren prótesis). Métodos: se trata de un estudio transversal. La muestra estuvo formada por 62 ancianos, 31 usuarios (G1) y 31 no usuarios (G2) de prótesis total (TP). Para todos los participantes, se aplicaron cuestionarios de satisfacción (Gurgel et al., 2015) y calidad de vida (Perfil de Impacto en la Salud Oral para desdentados - OHIP-Edent). Los datos se analizaron mediante análisis descriptivo, seguido de pruebas estadísticas para evaluar las diferencias en satisfacción y calidad de vida entre usuarios y no usuarios de TP. Resultados: El análisis comparativo de los aspectos sociodemográficos entre G1 y G2 no mostró diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p> 0.05). La mayoría eran mujeres (n = 51; 82,3%), casadas (n = 20; 32,3%), jubiladas (n = 45; 72,6%), con ingresos de hasta 1 salario (n = 44; 71,0%) y educación primaria incompleta (n = 35; 56,5%). La satisfacción fue significativamente mayor entre los usuarios de TP en todos los parámetros evaluados (p <0,05). Entre los indicadores de calidad de vida, solo el dolor físico (p = 0,123) y la limitación psicológica (p = 0,087) no mostraron diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p> 0,05). Conclusión: Dentro de las limitaciones de este estudio, la rehabilitación con TP promovió un impacto positivo en la vida de las personas mayores, al asegurar una mayor satisfacción y una mejor calidad de vida. Además, la EVA y las escalas de adjetivos mostraron un acuerdo sustancial.Objetivo: Comparar a satisfação e a qualidade de vida de idosos usuários e não usuários de prótese total (mas que necessitam de prótese). Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo transversal. A amostra foi constituída por 62 idosos, sendo 31 usuários (G1) e 31 não usuários (G2) de prótese total (PT). Para todos os participantes, questionários de satisfação (Gurgel et al., 2015) e qualidade de vida (Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous – OHIP-Edent) foram aplicados. Os dados foram analisados por meio de análise descritiva, seguido por testes estatísticos para avaliar diferenças na satisfação e qualidade de vida entre usuários e não usuários de PT. Resultados: A análise comparativa dos aspectos sóciodemográficos entre G1 e G2 mostrou nenhuma diferença estatisticamente significante (p>0,05). A maioria foi do gênero feminino (n=51; 82,3%), casado (n=20; 32,3%), aposentado (n=45; 72,6%), renda de até 1 salário (n=44; 71,0%) e ensino fundamental incompleto (n=35; 56,5%). A satisfação foi significativamente maior nos usuários de PT em todos os parâmetros avaliados (p<0,05). Dentre os indicadores de qualidade de vida, somente dor física (p=0,123) e limitação psicológica (p=0,087) não mostraram diferença estatisticamente significante (p>0,05). Conclusão: Dentro das limitações deste estudo, a reabilitação com PT promoveu um impacto positivo na vida dos idosos, ao garantir uma maior satisfação e melhor qualidade de vida. Adicionalmente, as escalas EVA e adjetiva apresentaram uma concordância substancial.Research, Society and Development2021-04-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1461410.33448/rsd-v10i4.14614Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e56010414614Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e56010414614Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e560104146142525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14614/13009Copyright (c) 2021 Laís Samara Juliano de Carvalho; Nathália Larissa Bezerra Lima; Jéssica Caroline Carvalho Souza ; Dayane Bezerra Rêgo; Desirée de Paula Barroso Menezes; Raniel Fernandes Peixotohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Laís Samara Juliano de Lima, Nathália Larissa Bezerra Souza , Jéssica Caroline Carvalho Rêgo, Dayane BezerraMenezes, Desirée de Paula Barroso Peixoto, Raniel Fernandes 2021-04-25T11:21:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14614Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:41.438875Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures
Satisfacción y calidad de vida de los usuarios ancianos institucionalizados y no usuarios de prótesis total
Satisfação e qualidade de vida de idosos institucionalizados usuários e não usuários de prótese total
title Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures
spellingShingle Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures
Carvalho, Laís Samara Juliano de
Complete denture
Patient satisfaction
Quality of life.
Prótesis total
Satisfacción del paciente
Calidad de vida.
Prótese total
Satisfação do paciente
Qualidade de vida.
title_short Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures
title_full Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures
title_fullStr Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures
title_full_unstemmed Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures
title_sort Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures
author Carvalho, Laís Samara Juliano de
author_facet Carvalho, Laís Samara Juliano de
Lima, Nathália Larissa Bezerra
Souza , Jéssica Caroline Carvalho
Rêgo, Dayane Bezerra
Menezes, Desirée de Paula Barroso
Peixoto, Raniel Fernandes
author_role author
author2 Lima, Nathália Larissa Bezerra
Souza , Jéssica Caroline Carvalho
Rêgo, Dayane Bezerra
Menezes, Desirée de Paula Barroso
Peixoto, Raniel Fernandes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Laís Samara Juliano de
Lima, Nathália Larissa Bezerra
Souza , Jéssica Caroline Carvalho
Rêgo, Dayane Bezerra
Menezes, Desirée de Paula Barroso
Peixoto, Raniel Fernandes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Complete denture
Patient satisfaction
Quality of life.
Prótesis total
Satisfacción del paciente
Calidad de vida.
Prótese total
Satisfação do paciente
Qualidade de vida.
topic Complete denture
Patient satisfaction
Quality of life.
Prótesis total
Satisfacción del paciente
Calidad de vida.
Prótese total
Satisfação do paciente
Qualidade de vida.
description Objective: To compare the satisfaction and quality of life of complete denture elderly users and non-users, (but who need denture). Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of 62 elderly, 31 users (G1) and 31 non-users (G2) of complete denture (CD). For all participants, satisfaction (Gurgel et al., 2015) and quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous - OHIP-Edent) questionnaires were applied. Data were analyzed by descriptive analysis, followed by statistical tests to evaluate differences in satisfaction and quality of life before CD users and non-users. Results: The comparative analysis of the socio-demographic aspects between G1 and G2 showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The majority were female (n=51; 82.3%), married (n=20; 32.3%), retired (n=45; 72.6%), income up to one salary (n=44; 71.0%) and incomplete elementary school (n=35; 56.5%). Satisfaction was significantly higher in CD users in all parameters evaluated (p<0.05). Among the indicators of quality of life, only physical pain (p=0.123) and psychological limitation (p=0.087) showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05).  Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, rehabilitation with CD promoted a positive impact on the life of the elderly, guaranteeing greater satisfaction and better quality of life. In addition, the VAS and adjective scales presented substantial agreement.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14614
10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14614
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14614
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14614
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14614/13009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e56010414614
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e56010414614
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e56010414614
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052748504498176