Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14614 |
Resumo: | Objective: To compare the satisfaction and quality of life of complete denture elderly users and non-users, (but who need denture). Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of 62 elderly, 31 users (G1) and 31 non-users (G2) of complete denture (CD). For all participants, satisfaction (Gurgel et al., 2015) and quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous - OHIP-Edent) questionnaires were applied. Data were analyzed by descriptive analysis, followed by statistical tests to evaluate differences in satisfaction and quality of life before CD users and non-users. Results: The comparative analysis of the socio-demographic aspects between G1 and G2 showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The majority were female (n=51; 82.3%), married (n=20; 32.3%), retired (n=45; 72.6%), income up to one salary (n=44; 71.0%) and incomplete elementary school (n=35; 56.5%). Satisfaction was significantly higher in CD users in all parameters evaluated (p<0.05). Among the indicators of quality of life, only physical pain (p=0.123) and psychological limitation (p=0.087) showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, rehabilitation with CD promoted a positive impact on the life of the elderly, guaranteeing greater satisfaction and better quality of life. In addition, the VAS and adjective scales presented substantial agreement. |
id |
UNIFEI_7ccf3103211e56cc4b6db4eb2d23563b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14614 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete denturesSatisfacción y calidad de vida de los usuarios ancianos institucionalizados y no usuarios de prótesis totalSatisfação e qualidade de vida de idosos institucionalizados usuários e não usuários de prótese totalComplete denturePatient satisfactionQuality of life.Prótesis totalSatisfacción del pacienteCalidad de vida.Prótese totalSatisfação do pacienteQualidade de vida.Objective: To compare the satisfaction and quality of life of complete denture elderly users and non-users, (but who need denture). Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of 62 elderly, 31 users (G1) and 31 non-users (G2) of complete denture (CD). For all participants, satisfaction (Gurgel et al., 2015) and quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous - OHIP-Edent) questionnaires were applied. Data were analyzed by descriptive analysis, followed by statistical tests to evaluate differences in satisfaction and quality of life before CD users and non-users. Results: The comparative analysis of the socio-demographic aspects between G1 and G2 showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The majority were female (n=51; 82.3%), married (n=20; 32.3%), retired (n=45; 72.6%), income up to one salary (n=44; 71.0%) and incomplete elementary school (n=35; 56.5%). Satisfaction was significantly higher in CD users in all parameters evaluated (p<0.05). Among the indicators of quality of life, only physical pain (p=0.123) and psychological limitation (p=0.087) showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, rehabilitation with CD promoted a positive impact on the life of the elderly, guaranteeing greater satisfaction and better quality of life. In addition, the VAS and adjective scales presented substantial agreement.Objetivo: Comparar la satisfacción y la calidad de vida de los usuarios de edad avanzada y los no usuarios de prótesis completas (pero que requieren prótesis). Métodos: se trata de un estudio transversal. La muestra estuvo formada por 62 ancianos, 31 usuarios (G1) y 31 no usuarios (G2) de prótesis total (TP). Para todos los participantes, se aplicaron cuestionarios de satisfacción (Gurgel et al., 2015) y calidad de vida (Perfil de Impacto en la Salud Oral para desdentados - OHIP-Edent). Los datos se analizaron mediante análisis descriptivo, seguido de pruebas estadísticas para evaluar las diferencias en satisfacción y calidad de vida entre usuarios y no usuarios de TP. Resultados: El análisis comparativo de los aspectos sociodemográficos entre G1 y G2 no mostró diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p> 0.05). La mayoría eran mujeres (n = 51; 82,3%), casadas (n = 20; 32,3%), jubiladas (n = 45; 72,6%), con ingresos de hasta 1 salario (n = 44; 71,0%) y educación primaria incompleta (n = 35; 56,5%). La satisfacción fue significativamente mayor entre los usuarios de TP en todos los parámetros evaluados (p <0,05). Entre los indicadores de calidad de vida, solo el dolor físico (p = 0,123) y la limitación psicológica (p = 0,087) no mostraron diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p> 0,05). Conclusión: Dentro de las limitaciones de este estudio, la rehabilitación con TP promovió un impacto positivo en la vida de las personas mayores, al asegurar una mayor satisfacción y una mejor calidad de vida. Además, la EVA y las escalas de adjetivos mostraron un acuerdo sustancial.Objetivo: Comparar a satisfação e a qualidade de vida de idosos usuários e não usuários de prótese total (mas que necessitam de prótese). Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo transversal. A amostra foi constituída por 62 idosos, sendo 31 usuários (G1) e 31 não usuários (G2) de prótese total (PT). Para todos os participantes, questionários de satisfação (Gurgel et al., 2015) e qualidade de vida (Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous – OHIP-Edent) foram aplicados. Os dados foram analisados por meio de análise descritiva, seguido por testes estatísticos para avaliar diferenças na satisfação e qualidade de vida entre usuários e não usuários de PT. Resultados: A análise comparativa dos aspectos sóciodemográficos entre G1 e G2 mostrou nenhuma diferença estatisticamente significante (p>0,05). A maioria foi do gênero feminino (n=51; 82,3%), casado (n=20; 32,3%), aposentado (n=45; 72,6%), renda de até 1 salário (n=44; 71,0%) e ensino fundamental incompleto (n=35; 56,5%). A satisfação foi significativamente maior nos usuários de PT em todos os parâmetros avaliados (p<0,05). Dentre os indicadores de qualidade de vida, somente dor física (p=0,123) e limitação psicológica (p=0,087) não mostraram diferença estatisticamente significante (p>0,05). Conclusão: Dentro das limitações deste estudo, a reabilitação com PT promoveu um impacto positivo na vida dos idosos, ao garantir uma maior satisfação e melhor qualidade de vida. Adicionalmente, as escalas EVA e adjetiva apresentaram uma concordância substancial.Research, Society and Development2021-04-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1461410.33448/rsd-v10i4.14614Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e56010414614Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e56010414614Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e560104146142525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14614/13009Copyright (c) 2021 Laís Samara Juliano de Carvalho; Nathália Larissa Bezerra Lima; Jéssica Caroline Carvalho Souza ; Dayane Bezerra Rêgo; Desirée de Paula Barroso Menezes; Raniel Fernandes Peixotohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Laís Samara Juliano de Lima, Nathália Larissa Bezerra Souza , Jéssica Caroline Carvalho Rêgo, Dayane BezerraMenezes, Desirée de Paula Barroso Peixoto, Raniel Fernandes 2021-04-25T11:21:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14614Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:41.438875Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures Satisfacción y calidad de vida de los usuarios ancianos institucionalizados y no usuarios de prótesis total Satisfação e qualidade de vida de idosos institucionalizados usuários e não usuários de prótese total |
title |
Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures |
spellingShingle |
Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures Carvalho, Laís Samara Juliano de Complete denture Patient satisfaction Quality of life. Prótesis total Satisfacción del paciente Calidad de vida. Prótese total Satisfação do paciente Qualidade de vida. |
title_short |
Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures |
title_full |
Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures |
title_fullStr |
Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures |
title_sort |
Satisfaction and quality of life of institutionalized elderly users and non-users of complete dentures |
author |
Carvalho, Laís Samara Juliano de |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Laís Samara Juliano de Lima, Nathália Larissa Bezerra Souza , Jéssica Caroline Carvalho Rêgo, Dayane Bezerra Menezes, Desirée de Paula Barroso Peixoto, Raniel Fernandes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lima, Nathália Larissa Bezerra Souza , Jéssica Caroline Carvalho Rêgo, Dayane Bezerra Menezes, Desirée de Paula Barroso Peixoto, Raniel Fernandes |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Laís Samara Juliano de Lima, Nathália Larissa Bezerra Souza , Jéssica Caroline Carvalho Rêgo, Dayane Bezerra Menezes, Desirée de Paula Barroso Peixoto, Raniel Fernandes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Complete denture Patient satisfaction Quality of life. Prótesis total Satisfacción del paciente Calidad de vida. Prótese total Satisfação do paciente Qualidade de vida. |
topic |
Complete denture Patient satisfaction Quality of life. Prótesis total Satisfacción del paciente Calidad de vida. Prótese total Satisfação do paciente Qualidade de vida. |
description |
Objective: To compare the satisfaction and quality of life of complete denture elderly users and non-users, (but who need denture). Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of 62 elderly, 31 users (G1) and 31 non-users (G2) of complete denture (CD). For all participants, satisfaction (Gurgel et al., 2015) and quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous - OHIP-Edent) questionnaires were applied. Data were analyzed by descriptive analysis, followed by statistical tests to evaluate differences in satisfaction and quality of life before CD users and non-users. Results: The comparative analysis of the socio-demographic aspects between G1 and G2 showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The majority were female (n=51; 82.3%), married (n=20; 32.3%), retired (n=45; 72.6%), income up to one salary (n=44; 71.0%) and incomplete elementary school (n=35; 56.5%). Satisfaction was significantly higher in CD users in all parameters evaluated (p<0.05). Among the indicators of quality of life, only physical pain (p=0.123) and psychological limitation (p=0.087) showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, rehabilitation with CD promoted a positive impact on the life of the elderly, guaranteeing greater satisfaction and better quality of life. In addition, the VAS and adjective scales presented substantial agreement. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14614 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14614 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14614 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14614 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14614/13009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e56010414614 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e56010414614 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e56010414614 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052748504498176 |