The application of good Faith principle of precontract in common law and civil law contry
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23621 |
Resumo: | In Indonesia, development of application of good faith principle in legal agreement focuses on the application of Civil Code (KUHPerdata) where scope is still placed on the implementation of agreement. It is as if Civil Code has not recognized the existence of good faith principle at pre-contract stage. In comparison, according to modern agreement theory that parties who suffer losses in pre-agreement/contract stage or at negotiation stage, their rights also deserve to be protected. Thus, pre-agreement/contract promises will have legal implications for those who violate them. This will be seen in countries that have common law and civil law systems. An important issue in this case relates to the principle of good faith at the pre-contract stage which creates a gap with the provisions in the legislation. To analyze these problems, legal research was conducted with the black-letter law paradigm. Technique of collecting legal materials in this research used library research. Legal materials are analyzed deductively and utilize the method of interpretation (hermeneutics). Results showed that the application of the principle of good faith at the pre-contract stage in Common Law and Civil Law countries had differences. In the Civil Law system, good faith is highly emphasized in the stage of contractual negotiation. Whereas in the Common Law system, it prioritizes efforts to restore rights of aggrieved party in pre-contract stage. Parties who do not have good faith at the pre-contract stage have legal consequences for cancellation of the agreement. |
id |
UNIFEI_84a08b21f65c3ba6507b2e972377598f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23621 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The application of good Faith principle of precontract in common law and civil law contryLa aplicación del principio de buena fe del precontrato en el país de derecho consuetudinario y civil A aplicação do princípio de boa fé do pré-contrato no país de direito consuetudinário e civilPrincípio da boa féDireito comum e direito civilPré-contrato.Principio de buena feDerecho consuetudinario y derecho civilPrecontrato. Good Faith PrincipleCommon Law and Civil LawPrecontract.In Indonesia, development of application of good faith principle in legal agreement focuses on the application of Civil Code (KUHPerdata) where scope is still placed on the implementation of agreement. It is as if Civil Code has not recognized the existence of good faith principle at pre-contract stage. In comparison, according to modern agreement theory that parties who suffer losses in pre-agreement/contract stage or at negotiation stage, their rights also deserve to be protected. Thus, pre-agreement/contract promises will have legal implications for those who violate them. This will be seen in countries that have common law and civil law systems. An important issue in this case relates to the principle of good faith at the pre-contract stage which creates a gap with the provisions in the legislation. To analyze these problems, legal research was conducted with the black-letter law paradigm. Technique of collecting legal materials in this research used library research. Legal materials are analyzed deductively and utilize the method of interpretation (hermeneutics). Results showed that the application of the principle of good faith at the pre-contract stage in Common Law and Civil Law countries had differences. In the Civil Law system, good faith is highly emphasized in the stage of contractual negotiation. Whereas in the Common Law system, it prioritizes efforts to restore rights of aggrieved party in pre-contract stage. Parties who do not have good faith at the pre-contract stage have legal consequences for cancellation of the agreement.En Indonesia, el desarrollo de la aplicación del principio de buena fe en los acuerdos legales se centra en la aplicación del Código Civil (KUHPerdata), donde todavía se da alcance a la implementación del acuerdo. Es como si el Código Civil no hubiera reconocido la existencia del principio de buena fe en la etapa previa al contrato. En comparación, de acuerdo con la teoría moderna del acuerdo de que las partes que sufren pérdidas en la etapa de preacuerdo / contrato o en la etapa de negociación, sus derechos también merecen ser protegidos. Por lo tanto, las promesas previas al acuerdo / contrato tendrán implicaciones legales para quienes las violen. Esto se verá en países que tienen sistemas de derecho consuetudinario y de derecho civil. Una cuestión importante en este caso se relaciona con el principio de buena fe en la etapa previa al contrato, que crea una brecha con las disposiciones de la legislación. Para analizar estos problemas, se llevó a cabo una investigación jurídica con el paradigma de la ley de letra negra. La técnica de recopilación de materiales legales en esta investigación utilizó la investigación bibliotecaria. Los materiales legales se analizan deductivamente y utilizan el método de interpretación (hermenéutica). Los resultados mostraron que la aplicación del principio de buena fe en la etapa previa al contrato en los países de derecho consuetudinario y de derecho civil presentaba diferencias. En el sistema de Derecho Civil, la buena fe se enfatiza mucho en la etapa de negociación contractual. Mientras que en el sistema de Common Law, prioriza los esfuerzos para restaurar los derechos de la parte agraviada en la etapa precontractual. Las partes que no tengan buena fe en la etapa previa al contrato tienen consecuencias legales por la cancelación del acuerdo. Na Indonésia, o desenvolvimento da aplicação do princípio da boa fé em acordos legais se concentra na aplicação do Código Civil (KUHPerdata), onde o escopo ainda é colocado na implementação do acordo. É como se o Código Civil não tivesse reconhecido a existência do princípio da boa fé na fase pré-contratual. Em comparação, de acordo com a moderna teoria do acordo de que as partes que sofrem perdas na fase de pré-acordo / contrato ou na fase de negociação, seus direitos também merecem ser protegidos. Assim, as promessas de pré-acordo / contrato terão implicações legais para aqueles que as violarem. Isso será visto em países que possuem sistemas de common law e civil law. Uma questão importante neste caso diz respeito ao princípio da boa fé na fase de pré-contrato, que cria uma lacuna com as disposições da legislação. Para analisar esses problemas, uma pesquisa jurídica foi conduzida com o paradigma da letra preta. A técnica de coleta de materiais jurídicos nesta pesquisa utilizou a pesquisa em biblioteca. Os materiais jurídicos são analisados dedutivamente e utilizam o método de interpretação (hermenêutica). Os resultados mostraram que a aplicação do princípio da boa fé na fase pré-contratual em países de Common Law e Civil Law apresentou diferenças. No sistema Civil Law, a boa fé é altamente enfatizada na fase de negociação contratual. Já no sistema de direito consuetudinário, ele prioriza os esforços para restaurar os direitos da parte prejudicada na fase de pré-contrato. As partes que não tiverem boa fé na fase de pré-contrato têm consequências jurídicas para o cancelamento do acordo.Research, Society and Development2021-12-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2362110.33448/rsd-v10i16.23621Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 16; e139101623621Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 16; e139101623621Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 16; e1391016236212525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23621/20660Copyright (c) 2021 Rizky Febri Dewanti; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Yudho Taruno Muryantohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDewanti, Rizky Febri Pujiyono, PujiyonoMuryanto, Yudho Taruno 2021-12-20T11:03:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23621Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:42:25.487931Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The application of good Faith principle of precontract in common law and civil law contry La aplicación del principio de buena fe del precontrato en el país de derecho consuetudinario y civil A aplicação do princípio de boa fé do pré-contrato no país de direito consuetudinário e civil |
title |
The application of good Faith principle of precontract in common law and civil law contry |
spellingShingle |
The application of good Faith principle of precontract in common law and civil law contry Dewanti, Rizky Febri Princípio da boa fé Direito comum e direito civil Pré-contrato. Principio de buena fe Derecho consuetudinario y derecho civil Precontrato. Good Faith Principle Common Law and Civil Law Precontract. |
title_short |
The application of good Faith principle of precontract in common law and civil law contry |
title_full |
The application of good Faith principle of precontract in common law and civil law contry |
title_fullStr |
The application of good Faith principle of precontract in common law and civil law contry |
title_full_unstemmed |
The application of good Faith principle of precontract in common law and civil law contry |
title_sort |
The application of good Faith principle of precontract in common law and civil law contry |
author |
Dewanti, Rizky Febri |
author_facet |
Dewanti, Rizky Febri Pujiyono, Pujiyono Muryanto, Yudho Taruno |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pujiyono, Pujiyono Muryanto, Yudho Taruno |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dewanti, Rizky Febri Pujiyono, Pujiyono Muryanto, Yudho Taruno |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Princípio da boa fé Direito comum e direito civil Pré-contrato. Principio de buena fe Derecho consuetudinario y derecho civil Precontrato. Good Faith Principle Common Law and Civil Law Precontract. |
topic |
Princípio da boa fé Direito comum e direito civil Pré-contrato. Principio de buena fe Derecho consuetudinario y derecho civil Precontrato. Good Faith Principle Common Law and Civil Law Precontract. |
description |
In Indonesia, development of application of good faith principle in legal agreement focuses on the application of Civil Code (KUHPerdata) where scope is still placed on the implementation of agreement. It is as if Civil Code has not recognized the existence of good faith principle at pre-contract stage. In comparison, according to modern agreement theory that parties who suffer losses in pre-agreement/contract stage or at negotiation stage, their rights also deserve to be protected. Thus, pre-agreement/contract promises will have legal implications for those who violate them. This will be seen in countries that have common law and civil law systems. An important issue in this case relates to the principle of good faith at the pre-contract stage which creates a gap with the provisions in the legislation. To analyze these problems, legal research was conducted with the black-letter law paradigm. Technique of collecting legal materials in this research used library research. Legal materials are analyzed deductively and utilize the method of interpretation (hermeneutics). Results showed that the application of the principle of good faith at the pre-contract stage in Common Law and Civil Law countries had differences. In the Civil Law system, good faith is highly emphasized in the stage of contractual negotiation. Whereas in the Common Law system, it prioritizes efforts to restore rights of aggrieved party in pre-contract stage. Parties who do not have good faith at the pre-contract stage have legal consequences for cancellation of the agreement. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23621 10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23621 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23621 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23621 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23621/20660 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Rizky Febri Dewanti; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Yudho Taruno Muryanto https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Rizky Febri Dewanti; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Yudho Taruno Muryanto https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 16; e139101623621 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 16; e139101623621 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 16; e139101623621 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052759516643328 |