The use of integrative and complementary practices in leprosy-related pain is influenced by sociodemographic, clinical and care factors: A case-control study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Amanda Francielle
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Santana, Josimari Melo de, Reis, Francisco Prado, Silva, José Rodrigo Santos, Santos, Alexrangel Henrique Cruz, Siqueira, Thayane Santos, Celestino, Ariel Oliveira, Souza, Mariana Rosário de, Feitosa, Vera Lúcia Corrêa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17306
Resumo: Purpose: Study in order to evaluate the use of complementary and integrative practices for leprosy-related pain. Cross-sectional, descriptive and quantitative research carried out at the University Hospital and Medical Specialties Center of Sergipe between February and June 2019. Methods: 170 people with leprosy pain contributed socio-demographic data, resources used for pain relief and factors that hinder adherence to practices. For pain assessment, the Verbal Pain Scales, Descriptor Scales and the tester Douler Neuropathic 4 were used. Results: Neuropathic pain was present in 119 individuals (70.0%) and the pain was assessed as severe in 85 (50.0%). Half of them (86; 50.6%) reported using pain relief: restricted diet (50, 29.4%), exercise (32, 18.8%), massage (31, 18.2%), among others. The factors that most influenced adherence to practices: lack of information (65, 38.2%), economic reasons (36, 21.2%), subjective characteristics (34, 20.0%). Women (45, 60.0%, p = 0.0427), patients with the borderline clinical form of the patient (23, 74.2%, p = 0.0014), reporting a burning sensation on the skin (70, 55, 5%, p = 0.0437), and those monitored by a physiotherapist (11, 84.6%, p = 0.0178) showed greater adherence to the practices. Conclusion: It is concluded that several complementary and integrative practices are being used for pain relief, but sociodemographic, clinical and care factors can influence adherence to these interventions.
id UNIFEI_8ab231b814232c429a11d64bb40131e0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17306
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling The use of integrative and complementary practices in leprosy-related pain is influenced by sociodemographic, clinical and care factors: A case-control studyEl uso de prácticas integradoras y complementarias en el dolor relacionado con la lepra está influenciado por factores sociodemográficos, clínicos y asistenciales: Un estudio de casos y controlesO uso de práticas integrativas e complementares na dor relacionada à hanseníase é influenciado por fatores sociodemográficos, clínicos e assistenciais: Um estudo caso-controleHanseníaseDorTerapias complementares.LepraDolorTerapias complementarias.LeprosyPainComplementary therapies.Purpose: Study in order to evaluate the use of complementary and integrative practices for leprosy-related pain. Cross-sectional, descriptive and quantitative research carried out at the University Hospital and Medical Specialties Center of Sergipe between February and June 2019. Methods: 170 people with leprosy pain contributed socio-demographic data, resources used for pain relief and factors that hinder adherence to practices. For pain assessment, the Verbal Pain Scales, Descriptor Scales and the tester Douler Neuropathic 4 were used. Results: Neuropathic pain was present in 119 individuals (70.0%) and the pain was assessed as severe in 85 (50.0%). Half of them (86; 50.6%) reported using pain relief: restricted diet (50, 29.4%), exercise (32, 18.8%), massage (31, 18.2%), among others. The factors that most influenced adherence to practices: lack of information (65, 38.2%), economic reasons (36, 21.2%), subjective characteristics (34, 20.0%). Women (45, 60.0%, p = 0.0427), patients with the borderline clinical form of the patient (23, 74.2%, p = 0.0014), reporting a burning sensation on the skin (70, 55, 5%, p = 0.0437), and those monitored by a physiotherapist (11, 84.6%, p = 0.0178) showed greater adherence to the practices. Conclusion: It is concluded that several complementary and integrative practices are being used for pain relief, but sociodemographic, clinical and care factors can influence adherence to these interventions.Objetivo: Estudiar para evaluar el uso de prácticas complementarias e integradoras para el dolor relacionado con la lepra. Investigación transversal, descriptiva y cuantitativa realizada en el Hospital Universitario y Centro de Especialidades Médicas de Sergipe entre febrero y junio de 2019. Métodos: 170 personas con dolor por lepra aportaron datos sociodemográficos, recursos utilizados para el alivio del dolor y factores que dificultan la adherencia a las prácticas. Para la evaluación del dolor se utilizaron las Escalas Verbal de Dolor, las Escalas Descriptor y el probador Douler Neuropathic 4. Resultados: El dolor neuropático estuvo presente en 119 individuos (70,0%) y el dolor se calificó como severo en 85 (50,0%). La mitad de ellos (86; 50,6%) refirió utilizar analgésicos: dieta restringida (50, 29,4%), ejercicio (32, 18,8%), masajes (31, 18,2%), entre otros. Los factores que más influyeron en la adherencia a las prácticas: falta de información (65, 38,2%), razones económicas (36, 21,2%), características subjetivas (34, 20,0%). Mujeres (45, 60.0%, p = 0.0427), pacientes con la forma clínica límite del paciente (23, 74.2%, p = 0.0014), reportando una sensación de ardor en la piel (70, 55, 5%, p = 0.0437), y los monitorizados por fisioterapeuta (11, 84,6%, p = 0,0178) mostraron mayor adherencia a las prácticas. Conclusión: Se concluye que se están utilizando diversas prácticas complementarias e integradoras para el alivio del dolor, pero factores sociodemográficos, clínicos y asistenciales pueden influir en la adherencia de estas intervenciones.Objetivo: Estudo com intuito de avaliar o uso de práticas complementares e integrativas para a dor relacionada à hanseníase. Investigação transversal, descritiva e quantitativa realizada no Hospital Universitário e Centro de Especialidades Médicas de Sergipe entre fevereiro e junho de 2019. Método: 170 pessoas com dor hansênica contribuíram com dados sociodemográficos, recursos utilizados para o alívio da dor e fatores que dificultam a adesão às práticas. Para a avaliação da dor, foram utilizadas as Escalas Verbal de Dor, Descriptor Scales e o tester Douler Neuropathic 4.  Resultados: Dor neuropática esteve presente em 119 indivíduos (70,0%) e a dor foi avaliada como intensa em 85 (50,0%). Metade deles (86; 50,6%) informou usar para alívio da dor: dieta restrita (50, 29,4%), exercícios (32, 18,8%), massagens (31, 18,2%), entre outras. Os fatores que mais influenciaram na adesão às práticas: falta de informação (65, 38,2%), motivos econômicos (36, 21,2%), características subjetivas (34, 20,0%). Mulheres (45, 60,0%, p = 0,0427), pacientes com a forma clínica limítrofe do paciente (23, 74,2%, p = 0,0014), relatando sensação de queimação na pele (70, 55,5%, p = 0,0437), e os acompanhados por fisioterapeuta (11, 84,6%, p = 0,0178) apresentaram maior adesão às práticas. Conclusão: Conclui-se que diversas práticas complementares e integrativas estão sendo utilizadas para o alívio da dor, mas fatores sociodemográficos, clínicos e assistenciais podem influenciar na adesão dessas intervenções.Research, Society and Development2021-07-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1730610.33448/rsd-v10i8.17306Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e24210817306Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e24210817306Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e242108173062525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17306/15426Copyright (c) 2021 Amanda Francielle Santos; Josimari Melo de Santana; Francisco Prado Reis; José Rodrigo Santos Silva; Alexrangel Henrique Cruz Santos; Thayane Santos Siqueira; Ariel Oliveira Celestino; Mariana Rosário de Souza; Vera Lúcia Corrêa Feitosahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Amanda Francielle Santana, Josimari Melo de Reis, Francisco Prado Silva, José Rodrigo Santos Santos, Alexrangel Henrique Cruz Siqueira, Thayane Santos Celestino, Ariel Oliveira Souza, Mariana Rosário de Feitosa, Vera Lúcia Corrêa 2021-08-21T18:46:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17306Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:37:40.602135Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The use of integrative and complementary practices in leprosy-related pain is influenced by sociodemographic, clinical and care factors: A case-control study
El uso de prácticas integradoras y complementarias en el dolor relacionado con la lepra está influenciado por factores sociodemográficos, clínicos y asistenciales: Un estudio de casos y controles
O uso de práticas integrativas e complementares na dor relacionada à hanseníase é influenciado por fatores sociodemográficos, clínicos e assistenciais: Um estudo caso-controle
title The use of integrative and complementary practices in leprosy-related pain is influenced by sociodemographic, clinical and care factors: A case-control study
spellingShingle The use of integrative and complementary practices in leprosy-related pain is influenced by sociodemographic, clinical and care factors: A case-control study
Santos, Amanda Francielle
Hanseníase
Dor
Terapias complementares.
Lepra
Dolor
Terapias complementarias.
Leprosy
Pain
Complementary therapies.
title_short The use of integrative and complementary practices in leprosy-related pain is influenced by sociodemographic, clinical and care factors: A case-control study
title_full The use of integrative and complementary practices in leprosy-related pain is influenced by sociodemographic, clinical and care factors: A case-control study
title_fullStr The use of integrative and complementary practices in leprosy-related pain is influenced by sociodemographic, clinical and care factors: A case-control study
title_full_unstemmed The use of integrative and complementary practices in leprosy-related pain is influenced by sociodemographic, clinical and care factors: A case-control study
title_sort The use of integrative and complementary practices in leprosy-related pain is influenced by sociodemographic, clinical and care factors: A case-control study
author Santos, Amanda Francielle
author_facet Santos, Amanda Francielle
Santana, Josimari Melo de
Reis, Francisco Prado
Silva, José Rodrigo Santos
Santos, Alexrangel Henrique Cruz
Siqueira, Thayane Santos
Celestino, Ariel Oliveira
Souza, Mariana Rosário de
Feitosa, Vera Lúcia Corrêa
author_role author
author2 Santana, Josimari Melo de
Reis, Francisco Prado
Silva, José Rodrigo Santos
Santos, Alexrangel Henrique Cruz
Siqueira, Thayane Santos
Celestino, Ariel Oliveira
Souza, Mariana Rosário de
Feitosa, Vera Lúcia Corrêa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Amanda Francielle
Santana, Josimari Melo de
Reis, Francisco Prado
Silva, José Rodrigo Santos
Santos, Alexrangel Henrique Cruz
Siqueira, Thayane Santos
Celestino, Ariel Oliveira
Souza, Mariana Rosário de
Feitosa, Vera Lúcia Corrêa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hanseníase
Dor
Terapias complementares.
Lepra
Dolor
Terapias complementarias.
Leprosy
Pain
Complementary therapies.
topic Hanseníase
Dor
Terapias complementares.
Lepra
Dolor
Terapias complementarias.
Leprosy
Pain
Complementary therapies.
description Purpose: Study in order to evaluate the use of complementary and integrative practices for leprosy-related pain. Cross-sectional, descriptive and quantitative research carried out at the University Hospital and Medical Specialties Center of Sergipe between February and June 2019. Methods: 170 people with leprosy pain contributed socio-demographic data, resources used for pain relief and factors that hinder adherence to practices. For pain assessment, the Verbal Pain Scales, Descriptor Scales and the tester Douler Neuropathic 4 were used. Results: Neuropathic pain was present in 119 individuals (70.0%) and the pain was assessed as severe in 85 (50.0%). Half of them (86; 50.6%) reported using pain relief: restricted diet (50, 29.4%), exercise (32, 18.8%), massage (31, 18.2%), among others. The factors that most influenced adherence to practices: lack of information (65, 38.2%), economic reasons (36, 21.2%), subjective characteristics (34, 20.0%). Women (45, 60.0%, p = 0.0427), patients with the borderline clinical form of the patient (23, 74.2%, p = 0.0014), reporting a burning sensation on the skin (70, 55, 5%, p = 0.0437), and those monitored by a physiotherapist (11, 84.6%, p = 0.0178) showed greater adherence to the practices. Conclusion: It is concluded that several complementary and integrative practices are being used for pain relief, but sociodemographic, clinical and care factors can influence adherence to these interventions.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17306
10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17306
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17306
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17306
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17306/15426
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e24210817306
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e24210817306
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e24210817306
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052786924322816