Effectiveness and safety of resistance training after breast cancer surgery: an overview of systematic reviews
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27018 |
Resumo: | Objective: To analyze systematic reviews that evaluated the efficacy and safety of resistance training in women after breast cancer surgery. Methodology: A bibliographic search was performed in Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, PEDro, and Cochrane Library databases, using the RAYYAN (Intelligent Systematic Review) program. The methodological quality and risk of bias in the systematic reviews found were evaluated using the AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools. Results: None of the reviews showed an increase in lymphedema volume or an increased risk of developing it with the practice of resistance exercises after breast cancer treatment. Five systematic reviews were found, achieving critically low global confidence. In ROBIS, three reviews were rated as high risk of bias and two as low. Conclusion: Patients with or at risk of developing lymphedema can safely perform resistance exercises and may present benefits in quality of life and muscle strength, without adverse effects of their practice. |
id |
UNIFEI_8fa1a637b47f0ae66a6a6f168feea93c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27018 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effectiveness and safety of resistance training after breast cancer surgery: an overview of systematic reviewsEfectividad y seguridad del entrenamiento de resistencia después de la cirugía de cáncer de mama: una descripción general de las revisiones sistemáticasEficácia e segurança do treinamento resistido após cirurgia de câncer de mama: uma revisão de revisões sistemáticasCâncer de mamaLinfedemaTreinamento de forçaOncologia cirúrgicaRevisão sistemáticaPanorama de ensaios clínicos.Neoplasias de la MamaEntrenamiento de FuerzaRevisión SistemáticaLinfedemaOncología quirúrgicaMetaanálisis como asunto.LymphedemaResistance trainingSurgical oncologySystematic ReviewBreast neoplasmsOverview clinical trial.Objective: To analyze systematic reviews that evaluated the efficacy and safety of resistance training in women after breast cancer surgery. Methodology: A bibliographic search was performed in Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, PEDro, and Cochrane Library databases, using the RAYYAN (Intelligent Systematic Review) program. The methodological quality and risk of bias in the systematic reviews found were evaluated using the AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools. Results: None of the reviews showed an increase in lymphedema volume or an increased risk of developing it with the practice of resistance exercises after breast cancer treatment. Five systematic reviews were found, achieving critically low global confidence. In ROBIS, three reviews were rated as high risk of bias and two as low. Conclusion: Patients with or at risk of developing lymphedema can safely perform resistance exercises and may present benefits in quality of life and muscle strength, without adverse effects of their practice.Objetivo: Analizar las revisiones sistemáticas que evaluaron la eficacia y seguridad del entrenamiento de fuerza en mujeres después de la cirugía del cáncer de mama. Metodología: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en las bases de datos Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, PEDro y Cochrane Library, utilizando el programa RAYYAN (Intelligent Systematic Review). La calidad metodológica y el riesgo de sesgo de las revisiones sistemáticas encontradas se evaluaron mediante las herramientas AMSTAR 2 y ROBIS. Resultados: Ninguna de las revisiones mostró un aumento del volumen del linfedema o un mayor riesgo de desarrollarlo con la práctica de ejercicios de resistencia después del tratamiento del cáncer de mama. Se encontraron cinco revisiones sistemáticas, logrando una confianza global críticamente baja. En ROBIS, tres revisiones se calificaron como de alto riesgo de sesgo y dos como de bajo riesgo. Conclusión: Los pacientes con o en riesgo de desarrollar linfedema pueden realizar ejercicios de fuerza con seguridad y pueden presentar beneficios en la calidad de vida y fuerza muscular, sin efectos adversos de su práctica.Objetivo: Analisar revisões sistemáticas que avaliaram a eficácia e segurança do treinamento resistido em mulheres após cirurgia de câncer de mama. Metodologia: A pesquisa bibliográfica foi realizada nas bases de dados Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, PEDro e Cochrane Library, utilizando o programa RAYYAN (Intelligent Systematic Review). A qualidade metodológica e o risco de viés nas revisões sistemáticas encontradas foram avaliados por meio das ferramentas AMSTAR 2 e ROBIS. Resultados: Nenhuma das revisões mostrou aumento do volume do linfedema ou aumento do risco de desenvolvê-lo com a prática de exercícios resistidos após o tratamento do câncer de mama. Cinco revisões sistemáticas foram encontradas, alcançando confiança global criticamente baixa. No ROBIS, três revisões foram classificadas como alto risco de viés e duas como baixo. Conclusão: Pacientes com ou em risco de desenvolver linfedema podem realizar exercícios resistidos com segurança e podem apresentar benefícios na qualidade de vida e força muscular, sem efeitos adversos de sua prática.Research, Society and Development2022-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2701810.33448/rsd-v11i4.27018Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e5711427018Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e5711427018Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e57114270182525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27018/23668Copyright (c) 2022 Célia Katiuscia Duarte Dantas; Helen Kerlen Bastos Fuzari; Diego Dantas; Caroline Wanderley Souto Ferreirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDantas, Célia Katiuscia Duarte Fuzari, Helen Kerlen Bastos Dantas, DiegoFerreira, Caroline Wanderley Souto 2022-03-27T17:17:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27018Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:44:53.049649Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effectiveness and safety of resistance training after breast cancer surgery: an overview of systematic reviews Efectividad y seguridad del entrenamiento de resistencia después de la cirugía de cáncer de mama: una descripción general de las revisiones sistemáticas Eficácia e segurança do treinamento resistido após cirurgia de câncer de mama: uma revisão de revisões sistemáticas |
title |
Effectiveness and safety of resistance training after breast cancer surgery: an overview of systematic reviews |
spellingShingle |
Effectiveness and safety of resistance training after breast cancer surgery: an overview of systematic reviews Dantas, Célia Katiuscia Duarte Câncer de mama Linfedema Treinamento de força Oncologia cirúrgica Revisão sistemática Panorama de ensaios clínicos. Neoplasias de la Mama Entrenamiento de Fuerza Revisión Sistemática Linfedema Oncología quirúrgica Metaanálisis como asunto. Lymphedema Resistance training Surgical oncology Systematic Review Breast neoplasms Overview clinical trial. |
title_short |
Effectiveness and safety of resistance training after breast cancer surgery: an overview of systematic reviews |
title_full |
Effectiveness and safety of resistance training after breast cancer surgery: an overview of systematic reviews |
title_fullStr |
Effectiveness and safety of resistance training after breast cancer surgery: an overview of systematic reviews |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effectiveness and safety of resistance training after breast cancer surgery: an overview of systematic reviews |
title_sort |
Effectiveness and safety of resistance training after breast cancer surgery: an overview of systematic reviews |
author |
Dantas, Célia Katiuscia Duarte |
author_facet |
Dantas, Célia Katiuscia Duarte Fuzari, Helen Kerlen Bastos Dantas, Diego Ferreira, Caroline Wanderley Souto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fuzari, Helen Kerlen Bastos Dantas, Diego Ferreira, Caroline Wanderley Souto |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dantas, Célia Katiuscia Duarte Fuzari, Helen Kerlen Bastos Dantas, Diego Ferreira, Caroline Wanderley Souto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Câncer de mama Linfedema Treinamento de força Oncologia cirúrgica Revisão sistemática Panorama de ensaios clínicos. Neoplasias de la Mama Entrenamiento de Fuerza Revisión Sistemática Linfedema Oncología quirúrgica Metaanálisis como asunto. Lymphedema Resistance training Surgical oncology Systematic Review Breast neoplasms Overview clinical trial. |
topic |
Câncer de mama Linfedema Treinamento de força Oncologia cirúrgica Revisão sistemática Panorama de ensaios clínicos. Neoplasias de la Mama Entrenamiento de Fuerza Revisión Sistemática Linfedema Oncología quirúrgica Metaanálisis como asunto. Lymphedema Resistance training Surgical oncology Systematic Review Breast neoplasms Overview clinical trial. |
description |
Objective: To analyze systematic reviews that evaluated the efficacy and safety of resistance training in women after breast cancer surgery. Methodology: A bibliographic search was performed in Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, PEDro, and Cochrane Library databases, using the RAYYAN (Intelligent Systematic Review) program. The methodological quality and risk of bias in the systematic reviews found were evaluated using the AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools. Results: None of the reviews showed an increase in lymphedema volume or an increased risk of developing it with the practice of resistance exercises after breast cancer treatment. Five systematic reviews were found, achieving critically low global confidence. In ROBIS, three reviews were rated as high risk of bias and two as low. Conclusion: Patients with or at risk of developing lymphedema can safely perform resistance exercises and may present benefits in quality of life and muscle strength, without adverse effects of their practice. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27018 10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27018 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27018 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27018 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27018/23668 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e5711427018 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e5711427018 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e5711427018 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052793391939584 |