Analysis of evapotranspiration estimation by different models for Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fança, Manoel Vieira de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Medeiros, Raimundo Mainar de, Holanda, Romildo Morant de, Saboya, Luciano Marcelo Fallé, Rolim Neto, Fernando Cartaxo, Araújo, Wagner Rodolfo de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21505
Resumo: It is of fundamental importance to make the population aware of the use of water resources, increasingly exposing society that they depend on a period of regeneration and that irresponsible use causes water shortages. The objective is to evaluate and compare the performance of empirical methods for estimating evapotranspiration by the methods of Hargreaves, Hargreaves-Samani, Camargo and Thorntwaite with the standard method of Penman-Monteih, suggested by FAO-56, for Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe. The rainfall data were from the period 1963-2020 and the thermal data were estimated by the software estima - T. The climatological data were estimated by the simplified interpolation method. With the results, it became clear that land use changes, such as agriculture, grazing and reforestation, cause changes in the water dynamics of a watershed. The Penman - Monteith method indicated by the FAO for the determination of ETp, present values ​​different from the real water conditions, at least in the studied area, overestimating the monthly ETp in all studied land uses. This behavior may be linked to solar radiation and temperature, which are the determining factors for the estimation of evapotranspiration by the Penman-Monteith method.
id UNIFEI_91bd69ee8b93341592d05a185f2509bc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21505
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of evapotranspiration estimation by different models for Amparo de São Francisco – SergipeAnálisis de estimación de evapotranspiración por diferentes modelos para Amparo de São Francisco – SergipeAnálise da estimativa da evapotranspiração por diferentes modelos para Amparo de São Francisco – SergipeClimatological data; Different ETo methods; irrigation management.Climatological dataDifferent ETo methodsIrrigation management.Dados climatológicos; Diferentes métodos ETo; Manejo de irrigação.Dados climatológicosDiferentes métodos EToManejo de irrigação.Datos climatológicosdatos climatológicos; Diferentes métodos ETo; manejo de riego.Diferentes métodos EToManejo de riego.It is of fundamental importance to make the population aware of the use of water resources, increasingly exposing society that they depend on a period of regeneration and that irresponsible use causes water shortages. The objective is to evaluate and compare the performance of empirical methods for estimating evapotranspiration by the methods of Hargreaves, Hargreaves-Samani, Camargo and Thorntwaite with the standard method of Penman-Monteih, suggested by FAO-56, for Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe. The rainfall data were from the period 1963-2020 and the thermal data were estimated by the software estima - T. The climatological data were estimated by the simplified interpolation method. With the results, it became clear that land use changes, such as agriculture, grazing and reforestation, cause changes in the water dynamics of a watershed. The Penman - Monteith method indicated by the FAO for the determination of ETp, present values ​​different from the real water conditions, at least in the studied area, overestimating the monthly ETp in all studied land uses. This behavior may be linked to solar radiation and temperature, which are the determining factors for the estimation of evapotranspiration by the Penman-Monteith method.Es de fundamental importancia concienciar a la población sobre el uso de los recursos hídricos, exponiendo cada vez más a la sociedad que dependen de un período de regeneración y que el uso irresponsable provoca escasez de agua. El objetivo es evaluar y comparar el desempeño de métodos empíricos para estimar la evapotranspiración por los métodos de Hargreaves, Hargreaves-Samani, Camargo y Thorntwaite con el método estándar de Penman-Monteih, sugerido por FAO-56, para Amparo de São Francisco - Sergipe. . Los datos de precipitación fueron del período 1963-2020 y los datos térmicos fueron estimados por el software estima - T. Los datos climatológicos fueron estimados por el método de interpolación simplificado. Con los resultados, quedó claro que los cambios en el uso de la tierra, como la agricultura, el pastoreo y la reforestación, provocan cambios en la dinámica del agua de una cuenca. El método Penman-Monteith indicado por la FAO para la determinación de ETp, presenta valores diferentes a las condiciones reales del agua, al menos en el área estudiada, sobrestimando la ETp mensual en todos los usos de suelo estudiados. Este comportamiento puede estar relacionado con la radiación solar y la temperatura, que son los factores determinantes para la estimación de la evapotranspiración por el método Penman-Monteith.É de fundamental importância conscientizar a população sobre o uso dos recursos hídricos, expondo cada vez mais a sociedade que os mesmos dependem de um período de regeneração e que o uso irresponsável vem a provocar escassez d’água. Tem-se como objetivo avaliar e comparar o desempenho de métodos empíricos de estimativa da evapotranspiração pelos métodos de Hargreaves, Hargreaves-Samani, Camargo e Thorntwaite com o método padrão de Penman-Monteih, sugerido pela FAO-56, para Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe. Os dados pluviais foram do período 1963-2020 e os dados térmicos foram estimados pelo software estima – T. Os dados climatológicos foram estimados pelo método da interpolação simplificada. Com os resultados, ficou claro que as mudanças de uso da terra, tais como agricultura, pastagem e reflorestamento causam alterações na dinâmica da água de uma bacia hidrográfica. O método de Penman-Monteith apontado pela FAO para a determinação da ETp, apresentam valores diferentes das reais condições hídricas, pelo menos na área estudada, superestimando a ETp mensal em todos os usos da terra estudados. Este comportamento pode estar atrelado a radiação solar e a temperatura que são os fatores determinantes para a estimativa da evapotranspiração pelo método de Penman-Monteith.Research, Society and Development2021-10-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2150510.33448/rsd-v10i13.21505Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e514101321505Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e514101321505Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e5141013215052525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21505/19167Copyright (c) 2021 Manoel Vieira de Fança; Raimundo Mainar de Medeiros; Romildo Morant de Holanda; Luciano Marcelo Fallé Saboya; Fernando Cartaxo Rolim Neto; Wagner Rodolfo de Araújohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFança, Manoel Vieira de Medeiros, Raimundo Mainar de Holanda, Romildo Morant deSaboya, Luciano Marcelo Fallé Rolim Neto, Fernando Cartaxo Araújo, Wagner Rodolfo de 2021-11-21T18:26:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21505Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:40:54.248660Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of evapotranspiration estimation by different models for Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe
Análisis de estimación de evapotranspiración por diferentes modelos para Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe
Análise da estimativa da evapotranspiração por diferentes modelos para Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe
title Analysis of evapotranspiration estimation by different models for Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe
spellingShingle Analysis of evapotranspiration estimation by different models for Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe
Fança, Manoel Vieira de
Climatological data; Different ETo methods; irrigation management.
Climatological data
Different ETo methods
Irrigation management.
Dados climatológicos; Diferentes métodos ETo; Manejo de irrigação.
Dados climatológicos
Diferentes métodos ETo
Manejo de irrigação.
Datos climatológicos
datos climatológicos; Diferentes métodos ETo; manejo de riego.
Diferentes métodos ETo
Manejo de riego.
title_short Analysis of evapotranspiration estimation by different models for Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe
title_full Analysis of evapotranspiration estimation by different models for Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe
title_fullStr Analysis of evapotranspiration estimation by different models for Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of evapotranspiration estimation by different models for Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe
title_sort Analysis of evapotranspiration estimation by different models for Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe
author Fança, Manoel Vieira de
author_facet Fança, Manoel Vieira de
Medeiros, Raimundo Mainar de
Holanda, Romildo Morant de
Saboya, Luciano Marcelo Fallé
Rolim Neto, Fernando Cartaxo
Araújo, Wagner Rodolfo de
author_role author
author2 Medeiros, Raimundo Mainar de
Holanda, Romildo Morant de
Saboya, Luciano Marcelo Fallé
Rolim Neto, Fernando Cartaxo
Araújo, Wagner Rodolfo de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fança, Manoel Vieira de
Medeiros, Raimundo Mainar de
Holanda, Romildo Morant de
Saboya, Luciano Marcelo Fallé
Rolim Neto, Fernando Cartaxo
Araújo, Wagner Rodolfo de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Climatological data; Different ETo methods; irrigation management.
Climatological data
Different ETo methods
Irrigation management.
Dados climatológicos; Diferentes métodos ETo; Manejo de irrigação.
Dados climatológicos
Diferentes métodos ETo
Manejo de irrigação.
Datos climatológicos
datos climatológicos; Diferentes métodos ETo; manejo de riego.
Diferentes métodos ETo
Manejo de riego.
topic Climatological data; Different ETo methods; irrigation management.
Climatological data
Different ETo methods
Irrigation management.
Dados climatológicos; Diferentes métodos ETo; Manejo de irrigação.
Dados climatológicos
Diferentes métodos ETo
Manejo de irrigação.
Datos climatológicos
datos climatológicos; Diferentes métodos ETo; manejo de riego.
Diferentes métodos ETo
Manejo de riego.
description It is of fundamental importance to make the population aware of the use of water resources, increasingly exposing society that they depend on a period of regeneration and that irresponsible use causes water shortages. The objective is to evaluate and compare the performance of empirical methods for estimating evapotranspiration by the methods of Hargreaves, Hargreaves-Samani, Camargo and Thorntwaite with the standard method of Penman-Monteih, suggested by FAO-56, for Amparo de São Francisco – Sergipe. The rainfall data were from the period 1963-2020 and the thermal data were estimated by the software estima - T. The climatological data were estimated by the simplified interpolation method. With the results, it became clear that land use changes, such as agriculture, grazing and reforestation, cause changes in the water dynamics of a watershed. The Penman - Monteith method indicated by the FAO for the determination of ETp, present values ​​different from the real water conditions, at least in the studied area, overestimating the monthly ETp in all studied land uses. This behavior may be linked to solar radiation and temperature, which are the determining factors for the estimation of evapotranspiration by the Penman-Monteith method.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21505
10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21505
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21505
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21505
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21505/19167
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e514101321505
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e514101321505
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e514101321505
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052757277933568