Weed competition in pasture of the Panicum maximum BRS Tamani

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Gustavo Silva de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pereira, Leandro Spíndola, Sousa, Gustavo Dorneles de, Silva, Jeovane Nascimento, Costa, Estevam Matheus, Jakelaitis, Adriano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14388
Resumo: For the adoption of weed management strategies, it is essential to know the periods of interference between the weed community and the culture of economic interest. This research aimed to evaluate the effects of weed competition on the implantation of Panicum maximum BRS Tamani pasture and on its regrowth after cutting. Two trials were conducted in randomized blocks, with four replications. In the first trial, the forage was kept in contact with the weeds for periods of 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 and 63 days after the emergence (DAE) of the pasture, and in the second trial, the forage was kept without the weeds living together for the same periods until the forage cut, at 63 DAE. The plots were kept free of weeds by manual weeding, according to treatment. Weed competition was established soon after the forage emergence and reduced the forage yield. The critical period for preventing weed interference in P. maximum BRS Tamani pasture was between 1 (one) and extended up to 42 DAE. Weed interference decreased the production of forage, as well as the percentage of vegetation cover, canopy height and forage tillering.
id UNIFEI_9729a64507463937bed2fc5c74e84417
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14388
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Weed competition in pasture of the Panicum maximum BRS TamaniCompetencia de malezas en pastos de Panicum maximum BRS TamaniMatocompetição em pastagem de Panicum maximum BRS TamaniWeed communityPeriods of interferenceForage yield.Comunidad de malezasPeriodos de interferênciaRendimiento de forrajes.Comunidade infestantePeríodos de interferênciaRendimento de forragem.For the adoption of weed management strategies, it is essential to know the periods of interference between the weed community and the culture of economic interest. This research aimed to evaluate the effects of weed competition on the implantation of Panicum maximum BRS Tamani pasture and on its regrowth after cutting. Two trials were conducted in randomized blocks, with four replications. In the first trial, the forage was kept in contact with the weeds for periods of 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 and 63 days after the emergence (DAE) of the pasture, and in the second trial, the forage was kept without the weeds living together for the same periods until the forage cut, at 63 DAE. The plots were kept free of weeds by manual weeding, according to treatment. Weed competition was established soon after the forage emergence and reduced the forage yield. The critical period for preventing weed interference in P. maximum BRS Tamani pasture was between 1 (one) and extended up to 42 DAE. Weed interference decreased the production of forage, as well as the percentage of vegetation cover, canopy height and forage tillering.Para la adopción de estrategias de manejo de malezas, es fundamental conocer los períodos de interferencia entre la comunidad de malezas y la cultura de interés económico. Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo evaluar los efectos de la competencia de malezas en la implantación de la pastura Panicum maximum BRS Tamani y en su rebrote después del corte. Se realizaron dos ensayos en bloques aleatorios, con cuatro repeticiones. En el primer ensayo, el forraje se mantuvo en convivencia con las malezas por períodos de 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 y 63 días después de la emergencia (DLE) de la pastura. En el segundo ensayo, el forraje se mantuvo sin las malezas conviviendo durante los mismos períodos hasta el corte del forraje, a los 63 DLE. Las parcelas se mantuvieron libres de malezas mediante deshierbe manual, según tratamiento. La competencia de malezas se estableció poco después de la aparición del forraje y la reducción del rendimiento del forraje. El período crítico para la prevención de la interferencia de malezas en el pasto de P. maximum BRS Tamani fue entre 1 (uno) y se extendió hasta 42 DAE. La interferencia de malezas disminuyó la producción de forraje, así como el porcentaje de cobertura vegetal, la altura del dosel y el arado del forraje.Para a adoção de estratégias de manejo de plantas daninhas torna-se imprescindível o conhecimento dos períodos de interferência entre a comunidade infestante e a cultura de interesse econômico. Nesta pesquisa objetivou-se avaliar os efeitos da matocompetição na implantação da pastagem de Panicum maximum BRS Tamani e na rebrotação desta após o corte. Dois ensaios foram conduzidos em blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições. No primeiro ensaio, a forrageira foi mantida em convivência com as plantas daninhas pelos períodos de 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 e 63 dias após a emergência (DAE) da pastagem, e no segundo ensaio, a forrageira foi mantida sem a convivência das plantas daninhas pelos mesmos períodos até o corte da forrageira, aos 63 DAE. As parcelas foram mantidas livres da convivência de plantas daninhas por capinas manuais, conforme tratamento. A matocompetição se estabeleceu logo após a emergência da forrageira e reduziu o rendimento de forragem. O período crítico de prevenção da interferência de plantas daninhas na pastagem de P. maximum BRS Tamani situou-se entre 1(um) e se estendeu até aos 42 DAE. A interferência de plantas daninhas diminuiu a produção da forragem, bem como a porcentagem de cobertura vegetal, altura do dossel e perfilhamento da forrageira.Research, Society and Development2021-04-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1438810.33448/rsd-v10i4.14388Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e42010414388Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e42010414388Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e420104143882525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14388/12842Copyright (c) 2021 Gustavo Silva de Oliveira; Leandro Spíndola Pereira; Gustavo Dorneles de Sousa; Jeovane Nascimento Silva; Estevam Matheus Costa; Adriano Jakelaitishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Gustavo Silva de Pereira, Leandro Spíndola Sousa, Gustavo Dorneles de Silva, Jeovane Nascimento Costa, Estevam Matheus Jakelaitis, Adriano2021-04-25T11:21:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14388Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:32.145650Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Weed competition in pasture of the Panicum maximum BRS Tamani
Competencia de malezas en pastos de Panicum maximum BRS Tamani
Matocompetição em pastagem de Panicum maximum BRS Tamani
title Weed competition in pasture of the Panicum maximum BRS Tamani
spellingShingle Weed competition in pasture of the Panicum maximum BRS Tamani
Oliveira, Gustavo Silva de
Weed community
Periods of interference
Forage yield.
Comunidad de malezas
Periodos de interferência
Rendimiento de forrajes.
Comunidade infestante
Períodos de interferência
Rendimento de forragem.
title_short Weed competition in pasture of the Panicum maximum BRS Tamani
title_full Weed competition in pasture of the Panicum maximum BRS Tamani
title_fullStr Weed competition in pasture of the Panicum maximum BRS Tamani
title_full_unstemmed Weed competition in pasture of the Panicum maximum BRS Tamani
title_sort Weed competition in pasture of the Panicum maximum BRS Tamani
author Oliveira, Gustavo Silva de
author_facet Oliveira, Gustavo Silva de
Pereira, Leandro Spíndola
Sousa, Gustavo Dorneles de
Silva, Jeovane Nascimento
Costa, Estevam Matheus
Jakelaitis, Adriano
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Leandro Spíndola
Sousa, Gustavo Dorneles de
Silva, Jeovane Nascimento
Costa, Estevam Matheus
Jakelaitis, Adriano
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Gustavo Silva de
Pereira, Leandro Spíndola
Sousa, Gustavo Dorneles de
Silva, Jeovane Nascimento
Costa, Estevam Matheus
Jakelaitis, Adriano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Weed community
Periods of interference
Forage yield.
Comunidad de malezas
Periodos de interferência
Rendimiento de forrajes.
Comunidade infestante
Períodos de interferência
Rendimento de forragem.
topic Weed community
Periods of interference
Forage yield.
Comunidad de malezas
Periodos de interferência
Rendimiento de forrajes.
Comunidade infestante
Períodos de interferência
Rendimento de forragem.
description For the adoption of weed management strategies, it is essential to know the periods of interference between the weed community and the culture of economic interest. This research aimed to evaluate the effects of weed competition on the implantation of Panicum maximum BRS Tamani pasture and on its regrowth after cutting. Two trials were conducted in randomized blocks, with four replications. In the first trial, the forage was kept in contact with the weeds for periods of 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 and 63 days after the emergence (DAE) of the pasture, and in the second trial, the forage was kept without the weeds living together for the same periods until the forage cut, at 63 DAE. The plots were kept free of weeds by manual weeding, according to treatment. Weed competition was established soon after the forage emergence and reduced the forage yield. The critical period for preventing weed interference in P. maximum BRS Tamani pasture was between 1 (one) and extended up to 42 DAE. Weed interference decreased the production of forage, as well as the percentage of vegetation cover, canopy height and forage tillering.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14388
10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14388
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14388
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14388
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14388/12842
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e42010414388
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e42010414388
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e42010414388
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052832938983424