Ultrasound as a method for evaluation of body composition: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Novais, Rommel Larcher Rachid
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Silveira, André Luís de Oliveira, Diniz, Ieda Aparecida, Almeida, Nivea Aparecida de, Café, Ana Carolina Corrêa, Borges Neto, Juscelino de Souza, Campos, Cezenário Gonçalves, Romano, Márcia Christina Caetano, Lamounier, Joel Alves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26221
Resumo: Objective: To evaluate the clinical applicability, examination techniques and compare the US with other body composition methods, to elucidate its potentials and limitations. Methods: Studies were selected in which echography was used in parallel with computed tomography, magnetic resonance, DEXA, bioimpedance, or anthropometry and that included young adults in their sample. The search for articles was performed in Pubmed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, and BVS databases. Results: 2120 articles were found in the databases and after the evaluation steps, 30 articles were part of the review. In general, the US showed a good correlation with other body composition methods. In muscle assessment, the quantitative assessment with the measurement of muscle thickness or area showed better results. The authors obtained a strong correlation with MRI using measurements of 9 muscle groups (r=0.96 and r=0.91) for men and women, respectively. Qualitative assessment, due to muscle echogenicity, had weaker correlations. A sample studying the reliability and validity of US against MRI reports moderate reliability, with an interclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.42 to 0.44. Assessing subcutaneous adipose tissue, the studies also showed good results, even measuring adipose tissue in only two body regions, the results were consistent with DEXA (r=0.947) for men and (r=0.909) for women. Conclusion: ultrasound is a useful method for estimating adipose tissue and muscle tissue, showing a good correlation with the most widely used methods of body composition.
id UNIFEI_9bb3cd1c386ce77ecef6c152c4215918
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26221
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Ultrasound as a method for evaluation of body composition: a systematic review Ultrasonido como método de evaluación de la composición corporal: una revisión sistemáticaUltrassonografia como método para avaliação da composição corporal: uma revisão sistemática Composición CorporalUltrasonografíaAbsorciometría de FotónImagen por Resonancia MagnéticaTomografía.Composição CorporalUltrassonografiaFotodensitometria de Raios X Imageamento por Ressonância MagnéticaTomografia.Body CompositionUltrasonographyAbsorptiometry PhotonMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography.Objective: To evaluate the clinical applicability, examination techniques and compare the US with other body composition methods, to elucidate its potentials and limitations. Methods: Studies were selected in which echography was used in parallel with computed tomography, magnetic resonance, DEXA, bioimpedance, or anthropometry and that included young adults in their sample. The search for articles was performed in Pubmed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, and BVS databases. Results: 2120 articles were found in the databases and after the evaluation steps, 30 articles were part of the review. In general, the US showed a good correlation with other body composition methods. In muscle assessment, the quantitative assessment with the measurement of muscle thickness or area showed better results. The authors obtained a strong correlation with MRI using measurements of 9 muscle groups (r=0.96 and r=0.91) for men and women, respectively. Qualitative assessment, due to muscle echogenicity, had weaker correlations. A sample studying the reliability and validity of US against MRI reports moderate reliability, with an interclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.42 to 0.44. Assessing subcutaneous adipose tissue, the studies also showed good results, even measuring adipose tissue in only two body regions, the results were consistent with DEXA (r=0.947) for men and (r=0.909) for women. Conclusion: ultrasound is a useful method for estimating adipose tissue and muscle tissue, showing a good correlation with the most widely used methods of body composition.Objetivo: evaluar la aplicabilidad clínica, las técnicas de exploración y comparar la ecografía con otros métodos de composición corporal, con el fin de dilucidar sus potencialidades y limitaciones. Métodos: se seleccionaron estudios en los que se utilizó ecografía en paralelo con tomografía computarizada, resonancia magnética, DEXA, bioimpedancia o antropometría y que incluyeron a adultos jóvenes en su muestra. La búsqueda de artículos se realizó en las bases de datos Pubmed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus y BVS. Resultados: Se encontraron 2120 artículos en las bases de datos y luego de los pasos de evaluación, 30 artículos fueron parte de la revisión. En general, la ecografia mostró una buena correlación con otros métodos de composición corporal. En la evaluación muscular, la evaluación cuantitativa con medición de grosor o área muscular presentó mejores resultados. Los autores obtuvieron una fuerte correlación con la resonancia magnética utilizando mediciones de 9 grupos de músculos (r = 0,96 r = 0,91) para hombres y mujeres, respectivamente. La evaluación cualitativa, debido a la ecogenicidad muscular, tuvo correlaciones más débiles. Una muestra que estudia la confiabilidad y validez de la ecografía en comparación con la resonancia magnética reporta una confiabilidad moderada, con un coeficiente de correlación entre clases que varía de 0.42 a 0.44. Al evaluar el tejido adiposo subcutáneo, los estudios también mostraron buenos resultados, incluso midiendo el tejido adiposo en solo dos regiones del cuerpo, los resultados fueron consistentes con DEXA (r = 0.947) para hombres y (r = 0.909) para mujeres. Conclusión: la ecografía es un método útil para estimar tejido adiposo y tejido muscular, presentando una buena correlación con los métodos de composición corporal más utilizados.Objetivo: avaliar as aplicabilidades clínicas, as técnicas de exame e comparar o US com demais métodos de composição corporal, de forma a elucidar seus potenciais e limitações. Métodos: selecionados estudos que a ecografia tenha sido empregada paralelamente a tomografia computadorizada, ressonância magnética, DEXA, bioimpedância ou antropometria e que incluíssem em sua amostra adultos jovens. A busca dos artigos foi realizada nas bases de dados Pubmed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus e BVS. Resultados: 2120 artigos foram encontrados nas bases de dados e após as etapas de avaliação, 30 artigos fizeram parte da revisão. De maneira geral, a US mostrou boa correlação com os demais métodos de composição corporal. Na avaliação muscular, a avaliação quantitativa com a medida da espessura ou da área muscular apresentou melhores resultados. Autores obtiveram forte correlação com ressonância magnética utilizando medida de 9 grupos musculares (r= 0,96 e r=0,91) para homens e mulheres respectivamente. A avaliação qualitativa, pela ecogenicidade muscular, obteve correlações mais fracas. Casuística estudando a confiabilidade e a validade da US frente a RNM reporta a confiabilidade moderada, com coeficiente de correlação interclasse variando de 0.42 a 0.44. Avaliando tecido adiposo subcutâneo, os trabalhos também demonstraram bons resultados, mesmo medindo o tecido adiposo em apenas duas regiões corporais, os resultados foram consistentes com o DEXA (r=0,947) para homens e (r=0,909) para mulheres. Conclusão: a ultrassonografia é um método útil para a estimativa do tecido adiposo e do tecido muscular, apresentando boa correlação com métodos de composição corporal mais amplamente utilizados.Research, Society and Development2022-02-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2622110.33448/rsd-v11i2.26221Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e56111226221Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e56111226221Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e561112262212525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26221/22866Copyright (c) 2022 Rommel Larcher Rachid Novais; André Luís de Oliveira Silveira; Ieda Aparecida Diniz; Nivea Aparecida de Almeida; Ana Carolina Corrêa Café; Juscelino de Souza Borges Neto; Cezenário Gonçalves Campos; Márcia Christina Caetano Romano; Joel Alves Lamounierhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNovais, Rommel Larcher RachidSilveira, André Luís de OliveiraDiniz, Ieda AparecidaAlmeida, Nivea Aparecida deCafé, Ana Carolina CorrêaBorges Neto, Juscelino de SouzaCampos, Cezenário GonçalvesRomano, Márcia Christina CaetanoLamounier, Joel Alves2022-02-07T01:42:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26221Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:44:19.055683Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ultrasound as a method for evaluation of body composition: a systematic review
Ultrasonido como método de evaluación de la composición corporal: una revisión sistemática
Ultrassonografia como método para avaliação da composição corporal: uma revisão sistemática
title Ultrasound as a method for evaluation of body composition: a systematic review
spellingShingle Ultrasound as a method for evaluation of body composition: a systematic review
Novais, Rommel Larcher Rachid
Composición Corporal
Ultrasonografía
Absorciometría de Fotón
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
Tomografía.
Composição Corporal
Ultrassonografia
Fotodensitometria de Raios X
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética
Tomografia.
Body Composition
Ultrasonography
Absorptiometry Photon
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Tomography.
title_short Ultrasound as a method for evaluation of body composition: a systematic review
title_full Ultrasound as a method for evaluation of body composition: a systematic review
title_fullStr Ultrasound as a method for evaluation of body composition: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound as a method for evaluation of body composition: a systematic review
title_sort Ultrasound as a method for evaluation of body composition: a systematic review
author Novais, Rommel Larcher Rachid
author_facet Novais, Rommel Larcher Rachid
Silveira, André Luís de Oliveira
Diniz, Ieda Aparecida
Almeida, Nivea Aparecida de
Café, Ana Carolina Corrêa
Borges Neto, Juscelino de Souza
Campos, Cezenário Gonçalves
Romano, Márcia Christina Caetano
Lamounier, Joel Alves
author_role author
author2 Silveira, André Luís de Oliveira
Diniz, Ieda Aparecida
Almeida, Nivea Aparecida de
Café, Ana Carolina Corrêa
Borges Neto, Juscelino de Souza
Campos, Cezenário Gonçalves
Romano, Márcia Christina Caetano
Lamounier, Joel Alves
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Novais, Rommel Larcher Rachid
Silveira, André Luís de Oliveira
Diniz, Ieda Aparecida
Almeida, Nivea Aparecida de
Café, Ana Carolina Corrêa
Borges Neto, Juscelino de Souza
Campos, Cezenário Gonçalves
Romano, Márcia Christina Caetano
Lamounier, Joel Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Composición Corporal
Ultrasonografía
Absorciometría de Fotón
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
Tomografía.
Composição Corporal
Ultrassonografia
Fotodensitometria de Raios X
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética
Tomografia.
Body Composition
Ultrasonography
Absorptiometry Photon
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Tomography.
topic Composición Corporal
Ultrasonografía
Absorciometría de Fotón
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
Tomografía.
Composição Corporal
Ultrassonografia
Fotodensitometria de Raios X
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética
Tomografia.
Body Composition
Ultrasonography
Absorptiometry Photon
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Tomography.
description Objective: To evaluate the clinical applicability, examination techniques and compare the US with other body composition methods, to elucidate its potentials and limitations. Methods: Studies were selected in which echography was used in parallel with computed tomography, magnetic resonance, DEXA, bioimpedance, or anthropometry and that included young adults in their sample. The search for articles was performed in Pubmed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, and BVS databases. Results: 2120 articles were found in the databases and after the evaluation steps, 30 articles were part of the review. In general, the US showed a good correlation with other body composition methods. In muscle assessment, the quantitative assessment with the measurement of muscle thickness or area showed better results. The authors obtained a strong correlation with MRI using measurements of 9 muscle groups (r=0.96 and r=0.91) for men and women, respectively. Qualitative assessment, due to muscle echogenicity, had weaker correlations. A sample studying the reliability and validity of US against MRI reports moderate reliability, with an interclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.42 to 0.44. Assessing subcutaneous adipose tissue, the studies also showed good results, even measuring adipose tissue in only two body regions, the results were consistent with DEXA (r=0.947) for men and (r=0.909) for women. Conclusion: ultrasound is a useful method for estimating adipose tissue and muscle tissue, showing a good correlation with the most widely used methods of body composition.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26221
10.33448/rsd-v11i2.26221
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26221
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i2.26221
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26221/22866
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e56111226221
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e56111226221
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e56111226221
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052704647806976