Affinity of Staphylococcus aureus for prostheses colonization compared to other bacteria. An in vitro study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nai, Gisele Alborghetti
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Medina, Denis Aloísio Lopes, Martelli, Cesar Alberto Talavera, Oliveira, Mayla Silva Cayres de, Caldeira, Isadora Delfino, Henriques, Bruno Carvalho, Portelinha, Maria Júlia Schadeck, Almeida, Mércia de Carvalho, Eller, Lizziane Kretli Winkelstroter, Oliveira Neto, Fausto Viterbo de, Marques, Mariângela Esther Alencar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14701
Resumo: Staphylococcus aureus biofilms have been recognized as a leading cause of multiple infections, including implant-associated infections and chronic wounds. We evaluated the colonization capacity of two distinct textured prostheses by different bacterial strains. Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis and Enterococcus faecalis were evaluated. Initially, the hydrophobicity and biofilm formation capacity were determined. Subsequently, 20 fragments of vascular prosthesis and 20 silicone prostheses were embedded in suspensions with the microorganisms and incubated. The prostheses were then sown in culture medium and incubated for 48 hours. Petri dishes were photographed and analyzed by fractal dimension. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Dunn test were applied for the analysis of biofilm formation. To compare the mean intensity for the type of bacteria and the type of prosthesis, a general linear model was applied. Staphylococcus aureus was the bacterium with the highest colonization density in both prostheses (p = 0.0001). E. coli showed strong adherence in the biofilm formation capacity test (p = 0.0001), however, it did not colonize either prosthesis. We demonstrated that Staphylococcus aureus has a greater affinity for vascular and silicone prostheses than other bacteria.
id UNIFEI_a2139616946649ab40073a4398b9395c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14701
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Affinity of Staphylococcus aureus for prostheses colonization compared to other bacteria. An in vitro studyAfinidad de Staphylococcus aureus por la colonización de prótesis en comparación con otras bacterias. Un estudio in vitroAfinidade de Staphylococcus aureus para colonização de próteses em comparação com outras bactérias. Um estudo in vitroBiofilmesPróteses e implantesPolitetrafluoroetilenoProcedimentos cirúrgicos vascularesImplantes mamários.BiopelículasPrótesis e implantesPolitetrafluoroetilenoProcedimientos quirúrgicos vascularesImplante mamario.BiofilmsProstheses and implantsPolytetrafluoroethyleneVascular surgical proceduresBreast implant. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms have been recognized as a leading cause of multiple infections, including implant-associated infections and chronic wounds. We evaluated the colonization capacity of two distinct textured prostheses by different bacterial strains. Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis and Enterococcus faecalis were evaluated. Initially, the hydrophobicity and biofilm formation capacity were determined. Subsequently, 20 fragments of vascular prosthesis and 20 silicone prostheses were embedded in suspensions with the microorganisms and incubated. The prostheses were then sown in culture medium and incubated for 48 hours. Petri dishes were photographed and analyzed by fractal dimension. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Dunn test were applied for the analysis of biofilm formation. To compare the mean intensity for the type of bacteria and the type of prosthesis, a general linear model was applied. Staphylococcus aureus was the bacterium with the highest colonization density in both prostheses (p = 0.0001). E. coli showed strong adherence in the biofilm formation capacity test (p = 0.0001), however, it did not colonize either prosthesis. We demonstrated that Staphylococcus aureus has a greater affinity for vascular and silicone prostheses than other bacteria.Se ha reconocido que las biopelículas de Staphylococcus aureus son una de las principales causas de infecciones múltiples, incluidas las infecciones asociadas a implantes y las heridas crónicas. Evaluamos la capacidad de colonización de dos prótesis texturizadas distintas por diferentes cepas bacterianas. Se evaluaron Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis y Enterococcus faecalis. Inicialmente se determinó la hidrofobicidad y la capacidad de formación de biopelículas. Posteriormente, se embebieron 20 fragmentos de prótesis vasculares y 20 prótesis de silicona en suspensiones con los microorganismos y se incubaron. A continuación, las prótesis se sembraron en medio de cultivo y se incubaron durante 48 horas. Las placas de Petri se fotografiaron y analizaron por dimensión fractal. Se aplicaron la prueba de Kruskal-Wallis y la prueba de Dunn para el análisis de la formación de biopelículas. Para comparar la intensidad media para el tipo de bacteria y el tipo de prótesis, se aplicó un modelo lineal general. Staphylococcus aureus fue la bacteria con mayor densidad de colonización en ambas prótesis (p = 0,0001). Escherichia coli mostró una fuerte adherencia en la prueba de capacidad de formación de biopelículas (p = 0,0001), sin embargo, no colonizó ninguna de las prótesis. Demostramos que Staphylococcus aureus tiene una mayor afinidad por las prótesis vasculares y de silicona que otras bacterias.Biofilmes de Staphylococcus aureus foram reconhecidos como uma das principais causas de infecções múltiplas, incluindo infecções associadas a implantes e feridas crônicas. Avaliamos a capacidade de colonização de duas próteses texturizadas distintas por diferentes cepas bacterianas. Foram avaliados Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis e Enterococcus faecalis. Inicialmente, foram determinadas a hidrofobicidade e a capacidade de formação de biofilme. Posteriormente, 20 fragmentos de próteses vasculares e 20 próteses de silicone foram incluídos em suspensões com os microrganismos e incubados. As próteses foram então semeadas em meio de cultura e incubadas por 48 horas. As placas de Petri foram fotografadas e analisadas pela dimensão fractal. O teste de Kruskal-Wallis e o teste de Dunn foram aplicados para a análise da formação de biofilme. Para comparar a intensidade média para o tipo de bactéria e o tipo de prótese, foi aplicado um modelo linear geral. Staphylococcus aureus foi a bactéria com maior densidade de colonização em ambas as próteses (p = 0,0001). Escherichia coli apresentou forte aderência no teste de capacidade de formação de biofilme (p = 0,0001), porém não colonizou nenhuma das próteses. Demonstramos que o Staphylococcus aureus tem maior afinidade por próteses vasculares e de silicone do que outras bactérias.Research, Society and Development2021-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1470110.33448/rsd-v10i5.14701Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e15310514701Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e15310514701Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e153105147012525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14701/13267Copyright (c) 2021 Gisele Alborghetti Nai; Denis Aloísio Lopes Medina; Cesar Alberto Talavera Martelli; Mayla Silva Cayres de Oliveira; Isadora Delfino Caldeira; Bruno Carvalho Henriques; Maria Júlia Schadeck Portelinha; Mércia de Carvalho Almeida; Lizziane Kretli Winkelstroter Eller; Fausto Viterbo de Oliveira Neto; Mariângela Esther Alencar Marqueshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNai, Gisele AlborghettiMedina, Denis Aloísio Lopes Martelli, Cesar Alberto TalaveraOliveira, Mayla Silva Cayres de Caldeira, Isadora Delfino Henriques, Bruno CarvalhoPortelinha, Maria Júlia SchadeckAlmeida, Mércia de Carvalho Eller, Lizziane Kretli Winkelstroter Oliveira Neto, Fausto Viterbo de Marques, Mariângela Esther Alencar 2021-05-17T18:20:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14701Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:45.082546Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Affinity of Staphylococcus aureus for prostheses colonization compared to other bacteria. An in vitro study
Afinidad de Staphylococcus aureus por la colonización de prótesis en comparación con otras bacterias. Un estudio in vitro
Afinidade de Staphylococcus aureus para colonização de próteses em comparação com outras bactérias. Um estudo in vitro
title Affinity of Staphylococcus aureus for prostheses colonization compared to other bacteria. An in vitro study
spellingShingle Affinity of Staphylococcus aureus for prostheses colonization compared to other bacteria. An in vitro study
Nai, Gisele Alborghetti
Biofilmes
Próteses e implantes
Politetrafluoroetileno
Procedimentos cirúrgicos vasculares
Implantes mamários.
Biopelículas
Prótesis e implantes
Politetrafluoroetileno
Procedimientos quirúrgicos vasculares
Implante mamario.
Biofilms
Prostheses and implants
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Vascular surgical procedures
Breast implant.
title_short Affinity of Staphylococcus aureus for prostheses colonization compared to other bacteria. An in vitro study
title_full Affinity of Staphylococcus aureus for prostheses colonization compared to other bacteria. An in vitro study
title_fullStr Affinity of Staphylococcus aureus for prostheses colonization compared to other bacteria. An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Affinity of Staphylococcus aureus for prostheses colonization compared to other bacteria. An in vitro study
title_sort Affinity of Staphylococcus aureus for prostheses colonization compared to other bacteria. An in vitro study
author Nai, Gisele Alborghetti
author_facet Nai, Gisele Alborghetti
Medina, Denis Aloísio Lopes
Martelli, Cesar Alberto Talavera
Oliveira, Mayla Silva Cayres de
Caldeira, Isadora Delfino
Henriques, Bruno Carvalho
Portelinha, Maria Júlia Schadeck
Almeida, Mércia de Carvalho
Eller, Lizziane Kretli Winkelstroter
Oliveira Neto, Fausto Viterbo de
Marques, Mariângela Esther Alencar
author_role author
author2 Medina, Denis Aloísio Lopes
Martelli, Cesar Alberto Talavera
Oliveira, Mayla Silva Cayres de
Caldeira, Isadora Delfino
Henriques, Bruno Carvalho
Portelinha, Maria Júlia Schadeck
Almeida, Mércia de Carvalho
Eller, Lizziane Kretli Winkelstroter
Oliveira Neto, Fausto Viterbo de
Marques, Mariângela Esther Alencar
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nai, Gisele Alborghetti
Medina, Denis Aloísio Lopes
Martelli, Cesar Alberto Talavera
Oliveira, Mayla Silva Cayres de
Caldeira, Isadora Delfino
Henriques, Bruno Carvalho
Portelinha, Maria Júlia Schadeck
Almeida, Mércia de Carvalho
Eller, Lizziane Kretli Winkelstroter
Oliveira Neto, Fausto Viterbo de
Marques, Mariângela Esther Alencar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biofilmes
Próteses e implantes
Politetrafluoroetileno
Procedimentos cirúrgicos vasculares
Implantes mamários.
Biopelículas
Prótesis e implantes
Politetrafluoroetileno
Procedimientos quirúrgicos vasculares
Implante mamario.
Biofilms
Prostheses and implants
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Vascular surgical procedures
Breast implant.
topic Biofilmes
Próteses e implantes
Politetrafluoroetileno
Procedimentos cirúrgicos vasculares
Implantes mamários.
Biopelículas
Prótesis e implantes
Politetrafluoroetileno
Procedimientos quirúrgicos vasculares
Implante mamario.
Biofilms
Prostheses and implants
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Vascular surgical procedures
Breast implant.
description Staphylococcus aureus biofilms have been recognized as a leading cause of multiple infections, including implant-associated infections and chronic wounds. We evaluated the colonization capacity of two distinct textured prostheses by different bacterial strains. Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis and Enterococcus faecalis were evaluated. Initially, the hydrophobicity and biofilm formation capacity were determined. Subsequently, 20 fragments of vascular prosthesis and 20 silicone prostheses were embedded in suspensions with the microorganisms and incubated. The prostheses were then sown in culture medium and incubated for 48 hours. Petri dishes were photographed and analyzed by fractal dimension. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Dunn test were applied for the analysis of biofilm formation. To compare the mean intensity for the type of bacteria and the type of prosthesis, a general linear model was applied. Staphylococcus aureus was the bacterium with the highest colonization density in both prostheses (p = 0.0001). E. coli showed strong adherence in the biofilm formation capacity test (p = 0.0001), however, it did not colonize either prosthesis. We demonstrated that Staphylococcus aureus has a greater affinity for vascular and silicone prostheses than other bacteria.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14701
10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14701
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14701
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14701
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14701/13267
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e15310514701
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e15310514701
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e15310514701
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052748564267008