Accuracy in the inference of nursing diagnoses: a scoping review protocol
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
| Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19822 |
Resumo: | Objective: to describe the methodological steps of a review protocol, to map the scientific knowledge of accuracy of nursing diagnoses. Methodology: This scoping review will be developed as proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and adopted by The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual. For the writing of the study, the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews will be used. An open search will be carried out in the databases, in addition to a search in gray literature, without limitation regarding the year of publication, language and type of design. Additionally, a search for articles will be carried out by reading the references of the studies included in the review. They will include primary and secondary studies that address diagnostic accuracy. Documents such as letters, comments, editors and opinion articles will be excluded. The selection of studies by reading the titles, abstracts and full text will be conducted by two independent reviewers. Data extraction takes place through a form built by the authors. Data will be organized, summarized and propagated in terms of extent, nature, distribution and recurring patterns, and the results will be communicated narratively and through figures and network maps. Conclusion: It is expected that the construction of this protocol will enable the development of a research with the least amount of biases possible, as it will make clear the methodological steps for the progress of a scope review about the accuracy in inferring nursing diagnoses. |
| id |
UNIFEI_a230d9ce569f9487cec372586a2bb1ea |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19822 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
| network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Accuracy in the inference of nursing diagnoses: a scoping review protocolPrecisión en la inferencia de diagnósticos de enfermería: protocolo de scoping reviewAcurácia de diagnósticos de enfermagem: protocolo de scoping reviewNursingNursing DiagnosisNursing ProcessReview.EnfermeríaDiagnóstico de EnfermeríaProcesos de EnfermeríaRevision.EnfermagemDiagnóstico de enfermagemProcessos de EnfermagemRevisão.Objective: to describe the methodological steps of a review protocol, to map the scientific knowledge of accuracy of nursing diagnoses. Methodology: This scoping review will be developed as proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and adopted by The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual. For the writing of the study, the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews will be used. An open search will be carried out in the databases, in addition to a search in gray literature, without limitation regarding the year of publication, language and type of design. Additionally, a search for articles will be carried out by reading the references of the studies included in the review. They will include primary and secondary studies that address diagnostic accuracy. Documents such as letters, comments, editors and opinion articles will be excluded. The selection of studies by reading the titles, abstracts and full text will be conducted by two independent reviewers. Data extraction takes place through a form built by the authors. Data will be organized, summarized and propagated in terms of extent, nature, distribution and recurring patterns, and the results will be communicated narratively and through figures and network maps. Conclusion: It is expected that the construction of this protocol will enable the development of a research with the least amount of biases possible, as it will make clear the methodological steps for the progress of a scope review about the accuracy in inferring nursing diagnoses.Objetivo: describir los pasos metodológicos de un protocolo de revisión, mapear el conocimiento científico de precisión de diagnósticos de enfermería. Metodología: Esta revisión de alcance se desarrollará según lo propuesto por Arksey y O'Malley y adoptado por el Manual de revisores del Instituto Joanna Briggs. Para la redacción del estudio, se utilizará la Extensión PRISMA para revisiones de alcance. Se realizará una búsqueda abierta en las bases de datos, además de la búsqueda en literatura gris, sin limitación en cuanto al año de publicación, idioma y tipo de diseño. Adicionalmente, se realizará una búsqueda de artículos mediante la lectura de las referencias de los estudios incluidos en la revisión. Incluirán estudios primarios y secundarios que aborden la precisión del diagnóstico. Se excluirán documentos como cartas, comentarios, editores y artículos de opinión. La selección de estudios mediante la lectura de títulos, resúmenes y texto completo será realizada por dos revisores independientes. La extracción de datos se realiza a través de un formulario creado por los autores. Los datos se organizarán, resumirán y propagarán en términos de extensión, naturaleza, distribución y patrones recurrentes, y los resultados se comunicarán de forma narrativa y mediante figuras y mapas de redes. Conclusión: Se espera que la construcción de este protocolo permita el desarrollo de una investigación con la menor cantidad de sesgos posible, ya que dejará claros los pasos metodológicos para el avance de una revisión de alcance sobre la precisión en la inferencia de diagnósticos de enfermería.Objetivo: descrever os passos metodógicos de um protocolo de revisão, visando mapear o conhecimento científico acerca da acurácia de diagnósticos de enfermagem. Metodologia: Esta revisão de escopo será desenvolvida conforme proposto por Arksey e O'Malley e adotado pelo The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual. Para a redação do estudo, utilizar-se-á o PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Uma pesquisa abrangente será realizada nas bases de dados, além da busca na literatura cinzenta, sem limitação quanto ao ano de publicação, idioma e tipo de delineamento. Adicionalmente, será efetivada uma busca de artigos através da leitura das referências dos estudos incluídos na revisão. Incluirão estudos primários e secundários que abordem acerca da acurácia diagnóstica. Estarão excluídos documentos do tipo cartas, comentários, editoriais e artigos de opinião. A seleção dos estudos por meio da leitura dos títulos, resumos e texto completo será conduzida por dois revisores independentes. A extração de dados ocorrerá através de formulário construído pelos autores. Os dados serão organizados, resumidos e analisados quanto à extensão, natureza, distribuição e padrões recorrentes e os resultados serão comunicados narrativamente e por meio de figuras e mapas de rede. Conclusão: Espera-se que a construção deste protocolo possibilite o desenvolvimento de uma pesquisa com a menor quantidade de vieses possíveis, uma vez que tornará claro os passos metodológicos para o progresso de uma revisão de escopo acerca da acurácia na inferência de diagnósticos de enfermagem.Research, Society and Development2021-09-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1982210.33448/rsd-v10i11.19822Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 11; e466101119822Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 11; e466101119822Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 11; e4661011198222525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19822/17732Copyright (c) 2021 Lílian Miranda Belineli; Rafael Santos Lima; Adenir da Silva Júnior; Melissa Santos Nassif; Andréia Cristina Barbosa Costa; Isabelle Cristinne Pinto Costahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBelineli, Lílian Miranda Lima, Rafael Santos Silva Júnior, Adenir da Nassif, Melissa Santos Costa, Andréia Cristina Barbosa Costa, Isabelle Cristinne Pinto 2021-10-23T19:01:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19822Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:38.411846Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Accuracy in the inference of nursing diagnoses: a scoping review protocol Precisión en la inferencia de diagnósticos de enfermería: protocolo de scoping review Acurácia de diagnósticos de enfermagem: protocolo de scoping review |
| title |
Accuracy in the inference of nursing diagnoses: a scoping review protocol |
| spellingShingle |
Accuracy in the inference of nursing diagnoses: a scoping review protocol Belineli, Lílian Miranda Nursing Nursing Diagnosis Nursing Process Review. Enfermería Diagnóstico de Enfermería Procesos de Enfermería Revision. Enfermagem Diagnóstico de enfermagem Processos de Enfermagem Revisão. |
| title_short |
Accuracy in the inference of nursing diagnoses: a scoping review protocol |
| title_full |
Accuracy in the inference of nursing diagnoses: a scoping review protocol |
| title_fullStr |
Accuracy in the inference of nursing diagnoses: a scoping review protocol |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Accuracy in the inference of nursing diagnoses: a scoping review protocol |
| title_sort |
Accuracy in the inference of nursing diagnoses: a scoping review protocol |
| author |
Belineli, Lílian Miranda |
| author_facet |
Belineli, Lílian Miranda Lima, Rafael Santos Silva Júnior, Adenir da Nassif, Melissa Santos Costa, Andréia Cristina Barbosa Costa, Isabelle Cristinne Pinto |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Lima, Rafael Santos Silva Júnior, Adenir da Nassif, Melissa Santos Costa, Andréia Cristina Barbosa Costa, Isabelle Cristinne Pinto |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Belineli, Lílian Miranda Lima, Rafael Santos Silva Júnior, Adenir da Nassif, Melissa Santos Costa, Andréia Cristina Barbosa Costa, Isabelle Cristinne Pinto |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nursing Nursing Diagnosis Nursing Process Review. Enfermería Diagnóstico de Enfermería Procesos de Enfermería Revision. Enfermagem Diagnóstico de enfermagem Processos de Enfermagem Revisão. |
| topic |
Nursing Nursing Diagnosis Nursing Process Review. Enfermería Diagnóstico de Enfermería Procesos de Enfermería Revision. Enfermagem Diagnóstico de enfermagem Processos de Enfermagem Revisão. |
| description |
Objective: to describe the methodological steps of a review protocol, to map the scientific knowledge of accuracy of nursing diagnoses. Methodology: This scoping review will be developed as proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and adopted by The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual. For the writing of the study, the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews will be used. An open search will be carried out in the databases, in addition to a search in gray literature, without limitation regarding the year of publication, language and type of design. Additionally, a search for articles will be carried out by reading the references of the studies included in the review. They will include primary and secondary studies that address diagnostic accuracy. Documents such as letters, comments, editors and opinion articles will be excluded. The selection of studies by reading the titles, abstracts and full text will be conducted by two independent reviewers. Data extraction takes place through a form built by the authors. Data will be organized, summarized and propagated in terms of extent, nature, distribution and recurring patterns, and the results will be communicated narratively and through figures and network maps. Conclusion: It is expected that the construction of this protocol will enable the development of a research with the least amount of biases possible, as it will make clear the methodological steps for the progress of a scope review about the accuracy in inferring nursing diagnoses. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-06 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19822 10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19822 |
| url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19822 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19822 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19822/17732 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 11; e466101119822 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 11; e466101119822 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 11; e466101119822 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
| instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
| institution |
UNIFEI |
| reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
| collection |
Research, Society and Development |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
| _version_ |
1797052755075923968 |