Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Eduardo Bryan Souza
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Franco Junior, Kleso Silva, Brigante, Giselle Prado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38529
Resumo: Weeds have become resistant to the herbicide Glyphosate resulting in a constant problem for coffee growers in Brazil. The use of herbicide mixtures with different mechanisms of action has been used aiming a better control of these plants. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of applying Glyphosate in a mixture with different herbicides on the control of weeds in coffee plantations. Therefore, an experiment was conducted in the field, with six treatments and four repetitions, in a randomized block design. The plots were installed between the rows of coffee trees, each plot measuring 1m², and at least 1m apart. The following treatments were adopted: Glyphosate, Clethodim, Metsulfuron-methyl, Glyphosate + Clethodim, Glyphosate + Metsulfuron, Control (witness). Control and percentage of toxicity were evaluated at 7, 14 and 21 days after application. It can be seen that the mixture of Glyphosate + Metsulfurom-methyl showed better efficiency for the control of Bitter, Caruru and tiririca grass. The mixture of Glyphosate + Cletodim was efficient in the control of Cipó de veado. In relation to isolated applications, Metsulfuron-methyl stood out with better results in general
id UNIFEI_aa77aeacae564850a1fdadad6c8d02c1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38529
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee treesEvaluación de herbicidas para el control de malas hierbas en el caféAvaliação de herbicidas no controle de plantas daninhas no cafeeiroGlifosatoMistura de tanqueResistência.GlifosatoMezcla de tanquesResistencia.GlyphosateTank mixResistance.Weeds have become resistant to the herbicide Glyphosate resulting in a constant problem for coffee growers in Brazil. The use of herbicide mixtures with different mechanisms of action has been used aiming a better control of these plants. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of applying Glyphosate in a mixture with different herbicides on the control of weeds in coffee plantations. Therefore, an experiment was conducted in the field, with six treatments and four repetitions, in a randomized block design. The plots were installed between the rows of coffee trees, each plot measuring 1m², and at least 1m apart. The following treatments were adopted: Glyphosate, Clethodim, Metsulfuron-methyl, Glyphosate + Clethodim, Glyphosate + Metsulfuron, Control (witness). Control and percentage of toxicity were evaluated at 7, 14 and 21 days after application. It can be seen that the mixture of Glyphosate + Metsulfurom-methyl showed better efficiency for the control of Bitter, Caruru and tiririca grass. The mixture of Glyphosate + Cletodim was efficient in the control of Cipó de veado. In relation to isolated applications, Metsulfuron-methyl stood out with better results in generalLas malas hierbas se han vuelto resistentes al herbicida glifosato, lo que supone un problema constante para los cultivadores de café de Brasil. Se ha recurrido al uso de mezclas de herbicidas con diferentes mecanismos de acción con el objetivo de lograr un mejor control de estas plantas. Por lo tanto, el objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar el efecto de la aplicación de Glifosato en mezcla con diferentes herbicidas en el control de malezas en el cultivo de café. Por lo tanto, se realizó un experimento en el campo, con seis tratamientos y cuatro repeticiones, instalados en un diseño de bloques aleatorizados. Las parcelas se instalaron entre las hileras de cafetos, midiendo cada parcela 1m² y con una separación mínima de 1m. Se adoptaron los siguientes tratamientos: Glifosato, Cletodim, Metsulfurón-metilo, Glifosato + Cletodim, Glifosato + Metsulfurón, Control (testigo). El control y el porcentaje de toxicidad se evaluaron a los 7, 14 y 21 días de la aplicación. La mezcla de Glifosato + Metsulfurom-metil mostró mejor eficacia en el control de Amargoso, Caruru y hierba tiririca. La mezcla de Glifosato + Cletodim fue eficaz para el control de Cipó de veado. En relación con las aplicaciones aisladas, el Metsulfurón-metilo destacó con mejores resultados en generalAs plantas daninhas tem se tornado resistentes ao herbicida Glyphosate resultando em uma problemática constante para os cafeicultores do Brasil. O uso de misturas de herbicidas com diferentes mecanismos de ação tem sido utilizado visando um melhor controle destas plantas. Assim sendo, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito da aplicação de Glyphosate em mistura com diferentes herbicidas no controle de plantas daninhas na cultura do cafeeiro. Portanto, foi realizado um  experimento em campo, com seis tratamentos e quatro repetições, instalado em delineamento de blocos casualizados. As parcelas foram instaladas nas entrelinhas do cafeeiro, com dimenssão de 1m² para cada parcela, e distantes uma das outras a pelo menos 1 m. Foram adotados os seguintes tratamentos: Glyphosate, Cletodim, Metsulfuron-metílco,  Glyphosate + Cletodim, Glyphosate + Metsulfuron, Controle (testemunha). Avaliou-se o controle e  percentual de toxidez aos 7, 14 e 21 dias após aplicação. Pode-se constatar então que, A mistura de Glyphosate + Metsulfurom-metílico apresentou melhor eficiência para o controle de Amargoso, Caruru e Capim tiririca. Já a mistura de Glyphosate + Cletodim apresentou eficiência para o controle de Cipó de veado. Em relação as aplicações isoladas, o Metsulfuron-metílico se destacou com melhores resultados de maneira geral.Research, Society and Development2022-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3852910.33448/rsd-v11i16.38529Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 16; e519111638529Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 16; e519111638529Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 16; e5191116385292525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38529/31905Copyright (c) 2022 Eduardo Bryan Souza Santos; Kleso Silva Franco Junior; Giselle Prado Brigantehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Eduardo Bryan Souza Franco Junior, Kleso SilvaBrigante, Giselle Prado2022-12-18T18:26:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38529Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:52:13.987368Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees
Evaluación de herbicidas para el control de malas hierbas en el café
Avaliação de herbicidas no controle de plantas daninhas no cafeeiro
title Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees
spellingShingle Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees
Santos, Eduardo Bryan Souza
Glifosato
Mistura de tanque
Resistência.
Glifosato
Mezcla de tanques
Resistencia.
Glyphosate
Tank mix
Resistance.
title_short Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees
title_full Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees
title_fullStr Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees
title_sort Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees
author Santos, Eduardo Bryan Souza
author_facet Santos, Eduardo Bryan Souza
Franco Junior, Kleso Silva
Brigante, Giselle Prado
author_role author
author2 Franco Junior, Kleso Silva
Brigante, Giselle Prado
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Eduardo Bryan Souza
Franco Junior, Kleso Silva
Brigante, Giselle Prado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glifosato
Mistura de tanque
Resistência.
Glifosato
Mezcla de tanques
Resistencia.
Glyphosate
Tank mix
Resistance.
topic Glifosato
Mistura de tanque
Resistência.
Glifosato
Mezcla de tanques
Resistencia.
Glyphosate
Tank mix
Resistance.
description Weeds have become resistant to the herbicide Glyphosate resulting in a constant problem for coffee growers in Brazil. The use of herbicide mixtures with different mechanisms of action has been used aiming a better control of these plants. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of applying Glyphosate in a mixture with different herbicides on the control of weeds in coffee plantations. Therefore, an experiment was conducted in the field, with six treatments and four repetitions, in a randomized block design. The plots were installed between the rows of coffee trees, each plot measuring 1m², and at least 1m apart. The following treatments were adopted: Glyphosate, Clethodim, Metsulfuron-methyl, Glyphosate + Clethodim, Glyphosate + Metsulfuron, Control (witness). Control and percentage of toxicity were evaluated at 7, 14 and 21 days after application. It can be seen that the mixture of Glyphosate + Metsulfurom-methyl showed better efficiency for the control of Bitter, Caruru and tiririca grass. The mixture of Glyphosate + Cletodim was efficient in the control of Cipó de veado. In relation to isolated applications, Metsulfuron-methyl stood out with better results in general
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38529
10.33448/rsd-v11i16.38529
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38529
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i16.38529
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38529/31905
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Eduardo Bryan Souza Santos; Kleso Silva Franco Junior; Giselle Prado Brigante
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Eduardo Bryan Souza Santos; Kleso Silva Franco Junior; Giselle Prado Brigante
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 16; e519111638529
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 16; e519111638529
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 16; e519111638529
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052838028771328