Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38529 |
Resumo: | Weeds have become resistant to the herbicide Glyphosate resulting in a constant problem for coffee growers in Brazil. The use of herbicide mixtures with different mechanisms of action has been used aiming a better control of these plants. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of applying Glyphosate in a mixture with different herbicides on the control of weeds in coffee plantations. Therefore, an experiment was conducted in the field, with six treatments and four repetitions, in a randomized block design. The plots were installed between the rows of coffee trees, each plot measuring 1m², and at least 1m apart. The following treatments were adopted: Glyphosate, Clethodim, Metsulfuron-methyl, Glyphosate + Clethodim, Glyphosate + Metsulfuron, Control (witness). Control and percentage of toxicity were evaluated at 7, 14 and 21 days after application. It can be seen that the mixture of Glyphosate + Metsulfurom-methyl showed better efficiency for the control of Bitter, Caruru and tiririca grass. The mixture of Glyphosate + Cletodim was efficient in the control of Cipó de veado. In relation to isolated applications, Metsulfuron-methyl stood out with better results in general |
id |
UNIFEI_aa77aeacae564850a1fdadad6c8d02c1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38529 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee treesEvaluación de herbicidas para el control de malas hierbas en el caféAvaliação de herbicidas no controle de plantas daninhas no cafeeiroGlifosatoMistura de tanqueResistência.GlifosatoMezcla de tanquesResistencia.GlyphosateTank mixResistance.Weeds have become resistant to the herbicide Glyphosate resulting in a constant problem for coffee growers in Brazil. The use of herbicide mixtures with different mechanisms of action has been used aiming a better control of these plants. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of applying Glyphosate in a mixture with different herbicides on the control of weeds in coffee plantations. Therefore, an experiment was conducted in the field, with six treatments and four repetitions, in a randomized block design. The plots were installed between the rows of coffee trees, each plot measuring 1m², and at least 1m apart. The following treatments were adopted: Glyphosate, Clethodim, Metsulfuron-methyl, Glyphosate + Clethodim, Glyphosate + Metsulfuron, Control (witness). Control and percentage of toxicity were evaluated at 7, 14 and 21 days after application. It can be seen that the mixture of Glyphosate + Metsulfurom-methyl showed better efficiency for the control of Bitter, Caruru and tiririca grass. The mixture of Glyphosate + Cletodim was efficient in the control of Cipó de veado. In relation to isolated applications, Metsulfuron-methyl stood out with better results in generalLas malas hierbas se han vuelto resistentes al herbicida glifosato, lo que supone un problema constante para los cultivadores de café de Brasil. Se ha recurrido al uso de mezclas de herbicidas con diferentes mecanismos de acción con el objetivo de lograr un mejor control de estas plantas. Por lo tanto, el objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar el efecto de la aplicación de Glifosato en mezcla con diferentes herbicidas en el control de malezas en el cultivo de café. Por lo tanto, se realizó un experimento en el campo, con seis tratamientos y cuatro repeticiones, instalados en un diseño de bloques aleatorizados. Las parcelas se instalaron entre las hileras de cafetos, midiendo cada parcela 1m² y con una separación mínima de 1m. Se adoptaron los siguientes tratamientos: Glifosato, Cletodim, Metsulfurón-metilo, Glifosato + Cletodim, Glifosato + Metsulfurón, Control (testigo). El control y el porcentaje de toxicidad se evaluaron a los 7, 14 y 21 días de la aplicación. La mezcla de Glifosato + Metsulfurom-metil mostró mejor eficacia en el control de Amargoso, Caruru y hierba tiririca. La mezcla de Glifosato + Cletodim fue eficaz para el control de Cipó de veado. En relación con las aplicaciones aisladas, el Metsulfurón-metilo destacó con mejores resultados en generalAs plantas daninhas tem se tornado resistentes ao herbicida Glyphosate resultando em uma problemática constante para os cafeicultores do Brasil. O uso de misturas de herbicidas com diferentes mecanismos de ação tem sido utilizado visando um melhor controle destas plantas. Assim sendo, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito da aplicação de Glyphosate em mistura com diferentes herbicidas no controle de plantas daninhas na cultura do cafeeiro. Portanto, foi realizado um experimento em campo, com seis tratamentos e quatro repetições, instalado em delineamento de blocos casualizados. As parcelas foram instaladas nas entrelinhas do cafeeiro, com dimenssão de 1m² para cada parcela, e distantes uma das outras a pelo menos 1 m. Foram adotados os seguintes tratamentos: Glyphosate, Cletodim, Metsulfuron-metílco, Glyphosate + Cletodim, Glyphosate + Metsulfuron, Controle (testemunha). Avaliou-se o controle e percentual de toxidez aos 7, 14 e 21 dias após aplicação. Pode-se constatar então que, A mistura de Glyphosate + Metsulfurom-metílico apresentou melhor eficiência para o controle de Amargoso, Caruru e Capim tiririca. Já a mistura de Glyphosate + Cletodim apresentou eficiência para o controle de Cipó de veado. Em relação as aplicações isoladas, o Metsulfuron-metílico se destacou com melhores resultados de maneira geral.Research, Society and Development2022-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3852910.33448/rsd-v11i16.38529Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 16; e519111638529Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 16; e519111638529Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 16; e5191116385292525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38529/31905Copyright (c) 2022 Eduardo Bryan Souza Santos; Kleso Silva Franco Junior; Giselle Prado Brigantehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Eduardo Bryan Souza Franco Junior, Kleso SilvaBrigante, Giselle Prado2022-12-18T18:26:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38529Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:52:13.987368Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees Evaluación de herbicidas para el control de malas hierbas en el café Avaliação de herbicidas no controle de plantas daninhas no cafeeiro |
title |
Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees Santos, Eduardo Bryan Souza Glifosato Mistura de tanque Resistência. Glifosato Mezcla de tanques Resistencia. Glyphosate Tank mix Resistance. |
title_short |
Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees |
title_full |
Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees |
title_sort |
Evaluation of herbicides to control weeds in coffee trees |
author |
Santos, Eduardo Bryan Souza |
author_facet |
Santos, Eduardo Bryan Souza Franco Junior, Kleso Silva Brigante, Giselle Prado |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Franco Junior, Kleso Silva Brigante, Giselle Prado |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Eduardo Bryan Souza Franco Junior, Kleso Silva Brigante, Giselle Prado |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Glifosato Mistura de tanque Resistência. Glifosato Mezcla de tanques Resistencia. Glyphosate Tank mix Resistance. |
topic |
Glifosato Mistura de tanque Resistência. Glifosato Mezcla de tanques Resistencia. Glyphosate Tank mix Resistance. |
description |
Weeds have become resistant to the herbicide Glyphosate resulting in a constant problem for coffee growers in Brazil. The use of herbicide mixtures with different mechanisms of action has been used aiming a better control of these plants. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of applying Glyphosate in a mixture with different herbicides on the control of weeds in coffee plantations. Therefore, an experiment was conducted in the field, with six treatments and four repetitions, in a randomized block design. The plots were installed between the rows of coffee trees, each plot measuring 1m², and at least 1m apart. The following treatments were adopted: Glyphosate, Clethodim, Metsulfuron-methyl, Glyphosate + Clethodim, Glyphosate + Metsulfuron, Control (witness). Control and percentage of toxicity were evaluated at 7, 14 and 21 days after application. It can be seen that the mixture of Glyphosate + Metsulfurom-methyl showed better efficiency for the control of Bitter, Caruru and tiririca grass. The mixture of Glyphosate + Cletodim was efficient in the control of Cipó de veado. In relation to isolated applications, Metsulfuron-methyl stood out with better results in general |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38529 10.33448/rsd-v11i16.38529 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38529 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i16.38529 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38529/31905 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Eduardo Bryan Souza Santos; Kleso Silva Franco Junior; Giselle Prado Brigante https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Eduardo Bryan Souza Santos; Kleso Silva Franco Junior; Giselle Prado Brigante https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 16; e519111638529 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 16; e519111638529 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 16; e519111638529 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052838028771328 |