Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32855 |
Resumo: | The Brazilian National System of Conservation Units (SNUC) has a wide spectrum of conservationist strategies, so that often the choice of a protected area typology is not adequate to the proposed conservation objectives. The recategorization of a Conservation Unit (CU) is a legal and widely used procedure to resolve conflicts of interest that exist even before the SNUC implementation. This research carried out a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with the objective of identifying the methods applied in recategorizations and factors that led to the occurrence of this phenomenon in Brazilian CUs. Three bibliographic databases (Research gate, PubMed and Repositório UFSC) were searched, in addition to Google Scholar, obtaining total number of 1,068 articles. The results indicate increase in the number of publications on the theme in the last three years, and that there are twenty methods used in CU recategorization processes in Brazil. A variation of instruments used for recategorization was also identified, and it was found that in most cases, more than one instrument is used, with the implementation of a decree or law being the most used. Several factors are also responsible for recategorization, being territorial conflicts and their overlapping on traditional communities the most relevant. |
id |
UNIFEI_b15fc29952c58853828d5b0007bc03a2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32855 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature reviewRecategorización de Áreas Protegidas en Brasil: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura Recategorização de Unidades de Conservação no Brasil: Uma revisão sistemática de literaturaÁreas ProtegidasReenquadramentoInstrumentosFatores.Áreas ProtegidasReencuadreInstrumentosFactores.Protected AreasReclassificationInstrumentsFactors.The Brazilian National System of Conservation Units (SNUC) has a wide spectrum of conservationist strategies, so that often the choice of a protected area typology is not adequate to the proposed conservation objectives. The recategorization of a Conservation Unit (CU) is a legal and widely used procedure to resolve conflicts of interest that exist even before the SNUC implementation. This research carried out a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with the objective of identifying the methods applied in recategorizations and factors that led to the occurrence of this phenomenon in Brazilian CUs. Three bibliographic databases (Research gate, PubMed and Repositório UFSC) were searched, in addition to Google Scholar, obtaining total number of 1,068 articles. The results indicate increase in the number of publications on the theme in the last three years, and that there are twenty methods used in CU recategorization processes in Brazil. A variation of instruments used for recategorization was also identified, and it was found that in most cases, more than one instrument is used, with the implementation of a decree or law being the most used. Several factors are also responsible for recategorization, being territorial conflicts and their overlapping on traditional communities the most relevant. El Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservación de Brasil (SNUC) tiene un amplio espectro de estrategias de conservación, por lo que la elección de una tipología de área protegida a menudo no se adapta a los objetivos de conservación propuestos. La recategorización de una Unidad de Conservación (UC) es un procedimiento legal y ampliamente utilizado para resolver los conflictos de interés existentes incluso antes de la implementación del SNUC. Esta investigación realizó una Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura (RSL) con el objetivo de identificar los métodos aplicados en las recategorizaciones y los factores que llevaron a la ocurrencia de este fenómeno en las UC brasileñas. Se consultaron tres bases de datos de búsqueda bibliográfica (Researchgate, Pubmed y UFSC Repository) además de Google Scholar, obteniendo un total de 1.068 trabajos. Los resultados indican un aumento en el número de publicaciones sobre el tema en los años 2017 y 2019 y una disminución en 2020. Y que hay veinte métodos utilizados en los procesos de recategorización de la UC en Brasil. También se identificó una variación de los instrumentos utilizados para la recategorización, y se verificó que en la mayoría de los casos se utiliza más de un instrumento, siendo la implementación de un decreto o ley el más utilizado. También hay varios factores responsables de las recategorizaciones, siendo el principal los conflictos territoriales y sus superposiciones con las comunidades tradicionales.O Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação brasileiro (SNUC) possui amplo espectro de estratégias conservacionistas, de forma que muitas vezes a escolha de uma tipologia de área protegida não se adequa aos objetivos de conservação propostos. A recategorização de uma Unidade de Conservação (UC) é um procedimento legal e amplamente utilizado para solucionar conflitos de interesses existentes até mesmo antes da implementação do SNUC. Esta pesquisa realizou uma Revisão Sistemática de Literatura (RSL) com o objetivo de identificar os métodos aplicados nas recategorizações e os fatores que levaram a ocorrência desse fenômeno nas UC brasileiras. Foram consultadas três bases bibliográficas de busca (Researchgate, Pubmed e Repositório UFSC) além do Google Scholar, obtendo um número total de 1.068 trabalhos. Os resultados indicam um aumento no número de publicações referentes a temática nos anos de 2017 e 2019 e uma diminuição em 2020. E que existem vinte métodos utilizados nos processos de recategorização de UC no Brasil. Foi identificado também uma variação dos instrumentos utilizados para recategorização, e verificado que na maioria dos casos são utilizados mais de um instrumento, sendo a implementação de decreto ou lei os mais utilizados. Diversos também são os fatores responsáveis pelas recategorizações, sendo o principal os conflitos territoriais e suas sobreposições com comunidades tradicionais.Research, Society and Development2022-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3285510.33448/rsd-v11i10.32855Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e418111032855Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e418111032855Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e4181110328552525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32855/27928Copyright (c) 2022 Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de Paula; Renato de Mei Romero; Joabe Gomes de Melo; Alexandre Schiavettihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaula, Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de Romero, Renato de Mei Melo, Joabe Gomes de Schiavetti, Alexandre2022-08-12T22:23:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32855Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:48:42.308701Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review Recategorización de Áreas Protegidas en Brasil: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura Recategorização de Unidades de Conservação no Brasil: Uma revisão sistemática de literatura |
title |
Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review |
spellingShingle |
Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review Paula, Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de Áreas Protegidas Reenquadramento Instrumentos Fatores. Áreas Protegidas Reencuadre Instrumentos Factores. Protected Areas Reclassification Instruments Factors. |
title_short |
Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review |
title_full |
Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review |
title_fullStr |
Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review |
title_sort |
Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review |
author |
Paula, Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de |
author_facet |
Paula, Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de Romero, Renato de Mei Melo, Joabe Gomes de Schiavetti, Alexandre |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Romero, Renato de Mei Melo, Joabe Gomes de Schiavetti, Alexandre |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paula, Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de Romero, Renato de Mei Melo, Joabe Gomes de Schiavetti, Alexandre |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Áreas Protegidas Reenquadramento Instrumentos Fatores. Áreas Protegidas Reencuadre Instrumentos Factores. Protected Areas Reclassification Instruments Factors. |
topic |
Áreas Protegidas Reenquadramento Instrumentos Fatores. Áreas Protegidas Reencuadre Instrumentos Factores. Protected Areas Reclassification Instruments Factors. |
description |
The Brazilian National System of Conservation Units (SNUC) has a wide spectrum of conservationist strategies, so that often the choice of a protected area typology is not adequate to the proposed conservation objectives. The recategorization of a Conservation Unit (CU) is a legal and widely used procedure to resolve conflicts of interest that exist even before the SNUC implementation. This research carried out a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with the objective of identifying the methods applied in recategorizations and factors that led to the occurrence of this phenomenon in Brazilian CUs. Three bibliographic databases (Research gate, PubMed and Repositório UFSC) were searched, in addition to Google Scholar, obtaining total number of 1,068 articles. The results indicate increase in the number of publications on the theme in the last three years, and that there are twenty methods used in CU recategorization processes in Brazil. A variation of instruments used for recategorization was also identified, and it was found that in most cases, more than one instrument is used, with the implementation of a decree or law being the most used. Several factors are also responsible for recategorization, being territorial conflicts and their overlapping on traditional communities the most relevant. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32855 10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32855 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32855 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32855 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32855/27928 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e418111032855 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e418111032855 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e418111032855 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052796959195136 |