Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paula, Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Romero, Renato de Mei, Melo, Joabe Gomes de, Schiavetti, Alexandre
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32855
Resumo: The Brazilian National System of Conservation Units (SNUC) has a wide spectrum of conservationist strategies, so that often the choice of a protected area typology is not adequate to the proposed conservation objectives. The recategorization of a Conservation Unit (CU) is a legal and widely used procedure to resolve conflicts of interest that exist even before the SNUC implementation. This research carried out a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with the objective of identifying the methods applied in recategorizations and factors that led to the occurrence of this phenomenon in Brazilian CUs. Three bibliographic databases (Research gate, PubMed and Repositório UFSC) were searched, in addition to Google Scholar, obtaining total number of 1,068 articles. The results indicate increase in the number of publications on the theme in the last three years, and that there are twenty methods used in CU recategorization processes in Brazil. A variation of instruments used for recategorization was also identified, and it was found that in most cases, more than one instrument is used, with the implementation of a decree or law being the most used. Several factors are also responsible for recategorization, being territorial conflicts and their overlapping on traditional communities the most relevant.  
id UNIFEI_b15fc29952c58853828d5b0007bc03a2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32855
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature reviewRecategorización de Áreas Protegidas en Brasil: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura Recategorização de Unidades de Conservação no Brasil: Uma revisão sistemática de literaturaÁreas ProtegidasReenquadramentoInstrumentosFatores.Áreas ProtegidasReencuadreInstrumentosFactores.Protected AreasReclassificationInstrumentsFactors.The Brazilian National System of Conservation Units (SNUC) has a wide spectrum of conservationist strategies, so that often the choice of a protected area typology is not adequate to the proposed conservation objectives. The recategorization of a Conservation Unit (CU) is a legal and widely used procedure to resolve conflicts of interest that exist even before the SNUC implementation. This research carried out a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with the objective of identifying the methods applied in recategorizations and factors that led to the occurrence of this phenomenon in Brazilian CUs. Three bibliographic databases (Research gate, PubMed and Repositório UFSC) were searched, in addition to Google Scholar, obtaining total number of 1,068 articles. The results indicate increase in the number of publications on the theme in the last three years, and that there are twenty methods used in CU recategorization processes in Brazil. A variation of instruments used for recategorization was also identified, and it was found that in most cases, more than one instrument is used, with the implementation of a decree or law being the most used. Several factors are also responsible for recategorization, being territorial conflicts and their overlapping on traditional communities the most relevant.  El Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservación de Brasil (SNUC) tiene un amplio espectro de estrategias de conservación, por lo que la elección de una tipología de área protegida a menudo no se adapta a los objetivos de conservación propuestos. La recategorización de una Unidad de Conservación (UC) es un procedimiento legal y ampliamente utilizado para resolver los conflictos de interés existentes incluso antes de la implementación del SNUC. Esta investigación realizó una Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura (RSL) con el objetivo de identificar los métodos aplicados en las recategorizaciones y los factores que llevaron a la ocurrencia de este fenómeno en las UC brasileñas. Se consultaron tres bases de datos de búsqueda bibliográfica (Researchgate, Pubmed y UFSC Repository) además de Google Scholar, obteniendo un total de 1.068 trabajos. Los resultados indican un aumento en el número de publicaciones sobre el tema en los años 2017 y 2019 y una disminución en 2020. Y que hay veinte métodos utilizados en los procesos de recategorización de la UC en Brasil. También se identificó una variación de los instrumentos utilizados para la recategorización, y se verificó que en la mayoría de los casos se utiliza más de un instrumento, siendo la implementación de un decreto o ley el más utilizado. También hay varios factores responsables de las recategorizaciones, siendo el principal los conflictos territoriales y sus superposiciones con las comunidades tradicionales.O Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação brasileiro (SNUC) possui amplo espectro de estratégias conservacionistas, de forma que muitas vezes a escolha de uma tipologia de área protegida não se adequa aos objetivos de conservação propostos. A recategorização de uma Unidade de Conservação (UC) é um procedimento legal e amplamente utilizado para solucionar conflitos de interesses existentes até mesmo antes da implementação do SNUC. Esta pesquisa realizou uma Revisão Sistemática de Literatura (RSL) com o objetivo de identificar os métodos aplicados nas recategorizações e os fatores que levaram a ocorrência desse fenômeno nas UC brasileiras. Foram consultadas três bases bibliográficas de busca (Researchgate, Pubmed e Repositório UFSC) além do Google Scholar, obtendo um número total de 1.068 trabalhos. Os resultados indicam um aumento no número de publicações referentes a temática nos anos de 2017 e 2019 e uma diminuição em 2020. E que existem vinte métodos utilizados nos processos de recategorização de UC no Brasil. Foi identificado também uma variação dos instrumentos utilizados para recategorização, e verificado que na maioria dos casos são utilizados mais de um instrumento, sendo a implementação de decreto ou lei os mais utilizados.  Diversos também são os fatores responsáveis pelas recategorizações, sendo o principal os conflitos territoriais e suas sobreposições com comunidades tradicionais.Research, Society and Development2022-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3285510.33448/rsd-v11i10.32855Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e418111032855Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e418111032855Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e4181110328552525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32855/27928Copyright (c) 2022 Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de Paula; Renato de Mei Romero; Joabe Gomes de Melo; Alexandre Schiavettihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaula, Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de Romero, Renato de Mei Melo, Joabe Gomes de Schiavetti, Alexandre2022-08-12T22:23:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32855Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:48:42.308701Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review
Recategorización de Áreas Protegidas en Brasil: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura
Recategorização de Unidades de Conservação no Brasil: Uma revisão sistemática de literatura
title Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review
spellingShingle Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review
Paula, Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de
Áreas Protegidas
Reenquadramento
Instrumentos
Fatores.
Áreas Protegidas
Reencuadre
Instrumentos
Factores.
Protected Areas
Reclassification
Instruments
Factors.
title_short Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review
title_full Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review
title_fullStr Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review
title_sort Recategorization of Conservation Units in Brazil: A systematic literature review
author Paula, Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de
author_facet Paula, Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de
Romero, Renato de Mei
Melo, Joabe Gomes de
Schiavetti, Alexandre
author_role author
author2 Romero, Renato de Mei
Melo, Joabe Gomes de
Schiavetti, Alexandre
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paula, Kadja Monaysa Mendonça de
Romero, Renato de Mei
Melo, Joabe Gomes de
Schiavetti, Alexandre
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Áreas Protegidas
Reenquadramento
Instrumentos
Fatores.
Áreas Protegidas
Reencuadre
Instrumentos
Factores.
Protected Areas
Reclassification
Instruments
Factors.
topic Áreas Protegidas
Reenquadramento
Instrumentos
Fatores.
Áreas Protegidas
Reencuadre
Instrumentos
Factores.
Protected Areas
Reclassification
Instruments
Factors.
description The Brazilian National System of Conservation Units (SNUC) has a wide spectrum of conservationist strategies, so that often the choice of a protected area typology is not adequate to the proposed conservation objectives. The recategorization of a Conservation Unit (CU) is a legal and widely used procedure to resolve conflicts of interest that exist even before the SNUC implementation. This research carried out a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with the objective of identifying the methods applied in recategorizations and factors that led to the occurrence of this phenomenon in Brazilian CUs. Three bibliographic databases (Research gate, PubMed and Repositório UFSC) were searched, in addition to Google Scholar, obtaining total number of 1,068 articles. The results indicate increase in the number of publications on the theme in the last three years, and that there are twenty methods used in CU recategorization processes in Brazil. A variation of instruments used for recategorization was also identified, and it was found that in most cases, more than one instrument is used, with the implementation of a decree or law being the most used. Several factors are also responsible for recategorization, being territorial conflicts and their overlapping on traditional communities the most relevant.  
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32855
10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32855
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32855
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32855
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32855/27928
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e418111032855
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e418111032855
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e418111032855
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052796959195136