Functional Mobility and postural balance in older adults with Alzheimer's disease: comparative study between mild and moderate stages
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/37968 |
Resumo: | Objective: This study aimed to compare the functional mobility and postural balance of older adults among smild and moderate stages of Alzheimer's disease using the Timed Up and Go test (TUGT) and the Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (CTSIB). Methodology: Forty elderly people were divided into two groups according to the mild (CDR1; n = 26) and moderate (CDR2; n = 14) stages of the disease. The Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) was used for staging the disease, which allows classifying the different degrees of dementia, assessing cognition and behavior. The scale allows classification into CDR 0 (normal or no alteration); 0.5 (questionable or mild cognitive impairment); 1 (mild dementia); 2 (moderate dementia) and 3 (severe dementia). In this study, only subjects classified as CDR 1 or CDR 2 were included. For the assessment of functional mobility, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) was used in the conditions of single task, dual cognitive task and dual motor task, and the Clinical Test of Sensory (CTSIB) to assess postural balance. Data were compared between groups. Results: Performance on the TUGT single task, cognitive dual task, and motor dual task was significantly worse in the CDR2 group compared to the CDR1 group (p < 0.05). The CTSIB was not significantly different between the groups in the four conditions. Conclusion: Functional mobility during tasks involving cognition differs between older adults with mild and moderate dementia, and this commitment is more accentuated in dual-task situations. Postural balance did not differ between the stages of the disease. |
id |
UNIFEI_b33de0c785981d44dd8fcffc6317ad87 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37968 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Functional Mobility and postural balance in older adults with Alzheimer's disease: comparative study between mild and moderate stagesMovilidad Funcional y equilibrio postural de ancianos con enfermedad de Alzheimer: análisis comparativo entre fases leves y moderadasMobilidade Funcional e equilíbrio postural de idosos com Doença de Alzheimer: análise comparativa entre as fases leve e moderadaControle posturalDesordens neurodegenerativasDesempenho Físico FuncionalComprometimento cognitivo.Control de la posturaTrastornos NeurodegenerativosDesempeño Funcional FísicoDeterioro cognitivo.Posture controlNeurodegenerative disordersPhysical Functional PerformanceCognitive impairment.Objective: This study aimed to compare the functional mobility and postural balance of older adults among smild and moderate stages of Alzheimer's disease using the Timed Up and Go test (TUGT) and the Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (CTSIB). Methodology: Forty elderly people were divided into two groups according to the mild (CDR1; n = 26) and moderate (CDR2; n = 14) stages of the disease. The Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) was used for staging the disease, which allows classifying the different degrees of dementia, assessing cognition and behavior. The scale allows classification into CDR 0 (normal or no alteration); 0.5 (questionable or mild cognitive impairment); 1 (mild dementia); 2 (moderate dementia) and 3 (severe dementia). In this study, only subjects classified as CDR 1 or CDR 2 were included. For the assessment of functional mobility, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) was used in the conditions of single task, dual cognitive task and dual motor task, and the Clinical Test of Sensory (CTSIB) to assess postural balance. Data were compared between groups. Results: Performance on the TUGT single task, cognitive dual task, and motor dual task was significantly worse in the CDR2 group compared to the CDR1 group (p < 0.05). The CTSIB was not significantly different between the groups in the four conditions. Conclusion: Functional mobility during tasks involving cognition differs between older adults with mild and moderate dementia, and this commitment is more accentuated in dual-task situations. Postural balance did not differ between the stages of the disease.Objetivo: Este estudio tiene como objetivo comparar la movilidad funcional y el equilibrio postural de personas mayores entre estadios leves y moderados de la enfermedad de Alzheimer utilizando la prueba Timed Up and Go (TUGT) y la Prueba Clínica de Interacción Sensorial y Equilibrio (CTSIB). Metodología: Cuarenta ancianos fueron divididos en dos grupos según el estadio leve (CDR1; n = 26) y moderado (CDR2; n = 14) de la enfermedad. Para la estadificación de la enfermedad se utilizó la Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR), que permite clasificar los diferentes grados de demencia, valorando la cognición y la conducta. La escala permite clasificar en CDR 0 (normal o sin alteración); 0,5 (deterioro cognitivo dudoso o leve); 1 (demencia leve); 2 (demencia moderada) y 3 (demencia grave). En este estudio solo se incluyeron sujetos clasificados como CDR 1 o CDR 2. Para la evaluación de la movilidad funcional se utilizó el Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) en las condiciones de tarea simple, tarea cognitiva dual y tarea dual motora, y la Prueba Clínica de Interacción Sensorial y Equilibrio (CTSIB) para evaluar el equilibrio postural. Los datos se compararon entre los grupos. Resultados: El rendimiento en la tarea simple TUGT, la tarea dual cognitiva y la tarea motora dual fue significativamente peor en el grupo CDR2 en comparación con el grupo CDR1 (p < 0,05). El CTSIB no fue significativamente diferente entre los grupos en las cuatro condiciones. Conclusión: La movilidad funcional durante las tareas que implican la cognición difiere entre las etapas leve y moderada de la demencia en las personas mayores, siendo este deterioro más pronunciado en situaciones de doble tarea. El equilibrio postural no difirió entre las etapas de la enfermedad.Objetivo: Este estudo objetiva comparar o equilíbrio postural de pessoas idosas entre as fases leve e moderada da Doença de Alzheimer utilizando o Timed Up and Go test (TUGT) e o Teste Clínico de Interação Sensorial e Equilíbrio (CTSIB). Metodologia: Foram avaliados 40 idosos divididos em dois grupos de acordo com os estágios leve (CDR1; n = 26) e moderado (CDR2; n = 14) da doença. Utilizou-se para estadiamento da doença o Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR), o qual permite classificar os diversos graus de demência, avaliando cognição e comportamento. A escala possibilita a classificação em CDR 0 (normal ou nenhuma alteração); 0,5 (questionável ou comprometimento cognitivo leve); 1 (demência leve); 2 (demência moderada) e 3 (demência grave). Nesse estudo, foram incluídos apenas os sujeitos classificados em CDR 1 ou CDR 2. Para a avaliação da mobilidade funcional usou-se o Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) nas condições de tarefa simples, dupla tarefa cognitiva e dupla tarefa motora, e o Teste Clínico de Interação Sensorial e Equilíbrio (CTSIB) para avaliação do equilíbrio postural. Os dados foram comparados entre os grupos. Resultados: O desempenho nas tarefas do TUGT simples, dupla tarefa cognitiva e dupla tarefa motora foi significativamente pior no CDR2 em comparação ao grupo CDR1 (p < 0,05). O CTSIB não se apresentou significativamente diferente entre os grupos nas quatro condições. Conclusão: A mobilidade funcional durante tarefas que envolvem a cognição difere entre as fases leve e moderada da demência em pessoas idosas, sendo esse comprometimento mais acentuado em situações de dupla tarefa. O equilíbrio postural não apresentou diferença entre as fases da doença.Research, Society and Development2022-12-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3796810.33448/rsd-v11i16.37968Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 16; e346111637968Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 16; e346111637968Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 16; e3461116379682525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/37968/31717Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Clara Silva de Melo; Susann Kelly Damião do Rego e Silva Andrade; Vanessa Giffoni Nunes de Medeiros Pinheiro Peixoto; Fabrícia Azevedo da Costa Cavalcanti; Juliana Maria Gazzolahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Maria Clara Silva deAndrade, Susann Kelly Damião do Rego e Silva Peixoto, Vanessa Giffoni Nunes de Medeiros Pinheiro Cavalcanti, Fabrícia Azevedo da CostaGazzola, Juliana Maria 2022-12-18T18:26:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37968Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:51:55.087585Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Functional Mobility and postural balance in older adults with Alzheimer's disease: comparative study between mild and moderate stages Movilidad Funcional y equilibrio postural de ancianos con enfermedad de Alzheimer: análisis comparativo entre fases leves y moderadas Mobilidade Funcional e equilíbrio postural de idosos com Doença de Alzheimer: análise comparativa entre as fases leve e moderada |
title |
Functional Mobility and postural balance in older adults with Alzheimer's disease: comparative study between mild and moderate stages |
spellingShingle |
Functional Mobility and postural balance in older adults with Alzheimer's disease: comparative study between mild and moderate stages Melo, Maria Clara Silva de Controle postural Desordens neurodegenerativas Desempenho Físico Funcional Comprometimento cognitivo. Control de la postura Trastornos Neurodegenerativos Desempeño Funcional Físico Deterioro cognitivo. Posture control Neurodegenerative disorders Physical Functional Performance Cognitive impairment. |
title_short |
Functional Mobility and postural balance in older adults with Alzheimer's disease: comparative study between mild and moderate stages |
title_full |
Functional Mobility and postural balance in older adults with Alzheimer's disease: comparative study between mild and moderate stages |
title_fullStr |
Functional Mobility and postural balance in older adults with Alzheimer's disease: comparative study between mild and moderate stages |
title_full_unstemmed |
Functional Mobility and postural balance in older adults with Alzheimer's disease: comparative study between mild and moderate stages |
title_sort |
Functional Mobility and postural balance in older adults with Alzheimer's disease: comparative study between mild and moderate stages |
author |
Melo, Maria Clara Silva de |
author_facet |
Melo, Maria Clara Silva de Andrade, Susann Kelly Damião do Rego e Silva Peixoto, Vanessa Giffoni Nunes de Medeiros Pinheiro Cavalcanti, Fabrícia Azevedo da Costa Gazzola, Juliana Maria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Andrade, Susann Kelly Damião do Rego e Silva Peixoto, Vanessa Giffoni Nunes de Medeiros Pinheiro Cavalcanti, Fabrícia Azevedo da Costa Gazzola, Juliana Maria |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo, Maria Clara Silva de Andrade, Susann Kelly Damião do Rego e Silva Peixoto, Vanessa Giffoni Nunes de Medeiros Pinheiro Cavalcanti, Fabrícia Azevedo da Costa Gazzola, Juliana Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Controle postural Desordens neurodegenerativas Desempenho Físico Funcional Comprometimento cognitivo. Control de la postura Trastornos Neurodegenerativos Desempeño Funcional Físico Deterioro cognitivo. Posture control Neurodegenerative disorders Physical Functional Performance Cognitive impairment. |
topic |
Controle postural Desordens neurodegenerativas Desempenho Físico Funcional Comprometimento cognitivo. Control de la postura Trastornos Neurodegenerativos Desempeño Funcional Físico Deterioro cognitivo. Posture control Neurodegenerative disorders Physical Functional Performance Cognitive impairment. |
description |
Objective: This study aimed to compare the functional mobility and postural balance of older adults among smild and moderate stages of Alzheimer's disease using the Timed Up and Go test (TUGT) and the Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (CTSIB). Methodology: Forty elderly people were divided into two groups according to the mild (CDR1; n = 26) and moderate (CDR2; n = 14) stages of the disease. The Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) was used for staging the disease, which allows classifying the different degrees of dementia, assessing cognition and behavior. The scale allows classification into CDR 0 (normal or no alteration); 0.5 (questionable or mild cognitive impairment); 1 (mild dementia); 2 (moderate dementia) and 3 (severe dementia). In this study, only subjects classified as CDR 1 or CDR 2 were included. For the assessment of functional mobility, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) was used in the conditions of single task, dual cognitive task and dual motor task, and the Clinical Test of Sensory (CTSIB) to assess postural balance. Data were compared between groups. Results: Performance on the TUGT single task, cognitive dual task, and motor dual task was significantly worse in the CDR2 group compared to the CDR1 group (p < 0.05). The CTSIB was not significantly different between the groups in the four conditions. Conclusion: Functional mobility during tasks involving cognition differs between older adults with mild and moderate dementia, and this commitment is more accentuated in dual-task situations. Postural balance did not differ between the stages of the disease. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/37968 10.33448/rsd-v11i16.37968 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/37968 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i16.37968 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/37968/31717 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 16; e346111637968 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 16; e346111637968 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 16; e346111637968 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052822430154752 |