Oral Health in universal health systems: comparative analysis of Brazil and the United Kingdom
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18444 |
Resumo: | This study analyzed the main characteristics of two universal systems, the National Health Service (NHS), in the United Kingdom, and the Unified Health System (SUS), in Brazil, in relation to oral health care actions and services. A literature review, document and secondary data analysis were performed from official databases in Brazil and the United Kingdom. There were differences in financing, covered population, infrastructure, organization, provision and management of actions and services. The sociodemographic and oral health indicators are more unfavorable in the Brazilian situation, however, inequalities persist also in the United Kingdom. In both countries, health is seen as a constitutional right, but NHS oral health actions are restricted to a specific public and offered by professionals from the private sector, with a large part of the cost of procedures by families. Successive reforms of the NHS have contributed to restricting access. The SUS, on the other hand, presents oral health services, primary and specialized care, universal and public offer, even if the coverage is insufficient and with problems in implementation. Austerity measures have been identified as a threat to the principles of universality and integrality in both countries. Comparative analysis helps in the identification of elements that contribute to the advancement of public provision of dental care. |
id |
UNIFEI_b3bad7010d2bd3d9754acca6c6511602 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18444 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Oral Health in universal health systems: comparative analysis of Brazil and the United KingdomSalud Bucal en sistemas universales de salud: análisis comparativo de Brasil y Reino UnidoSaúde Bucal em sistemas universais de saúde: análise comparativa do Brasil e Reino UnidoSistemas de saludPolítica de saludSistema Único de SaludSalud oralSistemas nacionales de salud.Sistema Único de SaúdeSistemas de saúdePolítica de saúdeSaúde bucalSistemas nacionais de Saúde.Health systemsHealth policyUnified Health SystemOral healthNational health systems.This study analyzed the main characteristics of two universal systems, the National Health Service (NHS), in the United Kingdom, and the Unified Health System (SUS), in Brazil, in relation to oral health care actions and services. A literature review, document and secondary data analysis were performed from official databases in Brazil and the United Kingdom. There were differences in financing, covered population, infrastructure, organization, provision and management of actions and services. The sociodemographic and oral health indicators are more unfavorable in the Brazilian situation, however, inequalities persist also in the United Kingdom. In both countries, health is seen as a constitutional right, but NHS oral health actions are restricted to a specific public and offered by professionals from the private sector, with a large part of the cost of procedures by families. Successive reforms of the NHS have contributed to restricting access. The SUS, on the other hand, presents oral health services, primary and specialized care, universal and public offer, even if the coverage is insufficient and with problems in implementation. Austerity measures have been identified as a threat to the principles of universality and integrality in both countries. Comparative analysis helps in the identification of elements that contribute to the advancement of public provision of dental care.Este estudio analizó las principales características de dos sistemas universales, el National Health Service (NHS), en el Reino Unido, y el Sistema Único de Salud (SUS), en Brasil, en relación a las acciones y servicios de atención a la salud bucal. Se realizó revisión de la literatura, análisis documental y de datos secundarios a partir de bases oficiales de Brasil y del Reino Unido. Se observaron diferencias en el financiamiento, población cubierta, infraestructura, organización, prestación y gestión de las acciones y servicios. Los indicadores sociodemográficos y de condiciones de salud bucal son más desfavorables en la situación brasileña, sin embargo, las desigualdades persisten también en el Reino Unido. En los dos países, la salud es vista como derecho constitucional, sin embargo las acciones de salud bucal del NHS son restringidas a un público específico y ofertada por profesionales del sector privado, con gran parte del costeo de procedimientos por las familias. Las sucesivas reformas del NHS contribuyeron a restringir el acceso. Ya el SUS presenta servicios de salud bucal, de atención primaria y especializada, de oferta universal y pública, aunque la cobertura sea insuficiente y con problemas en la implantación. Las medidas de austeridad han sido identificadas como una amenaza a los principios de universalidad e integridad en ambos países. El análisis comparativo auxilia en la identificación de elementos que contribuyen para el avance de la oferta pública de la atención odontológica.Este estudo analisou as principais características de dois sistemas universais, o National Health Service (NHS), no Reino Unido, e o Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), no Brasil, em relação às ações e serviços de atenção à saúde bucal. Foi realizada revisão da literatura, análise documental e de dados secundários a partir de bases oficiais do Brasil e do Reino Unido. Observaram-se diferenças no financiamento, população coberta, infraestrutura, organização, prestação e gestão das ações e serviços. Os indicadores sociodemográficos e de condições de saúde bucal são mais desfavoráveis na situação brasileira, contudo, as desigualdades persistem também no Reino Unido. Nos dois países, a saúde é vista como direito constitucional, entretanto as ações de saúde bucal do NHS são restritas a um público específico e ofertada por profissionais do setor privado, com grande parte do custeio de procedimentos pelas famílias. As sucessivas reformas do NHS contribuíram para restrição do acesso. Já o SUS apresenta serviços de saúde bucal, de atenção primária e especializada, de oferta universal e pública, ainda que a cobertura seja insuficiente e com problemas na implantação. Medidas de austeridade foram identificadas como ameaça aos princípios da universalidade e integralidade nos dois países. A análise comparativa auxilia na identificação de elementos que contribuem para o avanço da oferta pública da atenção odontológica.Research, Society and Development2021-08-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1844410.33448/rsd-v10i10.18444Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e185101018444Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e185101018444Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e1851010184442525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18444/16723Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Maria Freire de Souza Lima; Larissa de Sousa Lyra; Larissa Lima Viana Guimarães; Michele Pontes Teixeira; Thaís Regis Aranha Rossi; Sônia Cristina Lima Chaveshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Ana Maria Freire de SouzaLyra, Larissa de Sousa Guimarães, Larissa Lima VianaTeixeira, Michele PontesRossi, Thaís Regis AranhaChaves, Sônia Cristina Lima2021-10-02T21:49:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18444Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:38:35.074466Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Oral Health in universal health systems: comparative analysis of Brazil and the United Kingdom Salud Bucal en sistemas universales de salud: análisis comparativo de Brasil y Reino Unido Saúde Bucal em sistemas universais de saúde: análise comparativa do Brasil e Reino Unido |
title |
Oral Health in universal health systems: comparative analysis of Brazil and the United Kingdom |
spellingShingle |
Oral Health in universal health systems: comparative analysis of Brazil and the United Kingdom Lima, Ana Maria Freire de Souza Sistemas de salud Política de salud Sistema Único de Salud Salud oral Sistemas nacionales de salud. Sistema Único de Saúde Sistemas de saúde Política de saúde Saúde bucal Sistemas nacionais de Saúde. Health systems Health policy Unified Health System Oral health National health systems. |
title_short |
Oral Health in universal health systems: comparative analysis of Brazil and the United Kingdom |
title_full |
Oral Health in universal health systems: comparative analysis of Brazil and the United Kingdom |
title_fullStr |
Oral Health in universal health systems: comparative analysis of Brazil and the United Kingdom |
title_full_unstemmed |
Oral Health in universal health systems: comparative analysis of Brazil and the United Kingdom |
title_sort |
Oral Health in universal health systems: comparative analysis of Brazil and the United Kingdom |
author |
Lima, Ana Maria Freire de Souza |
author_facet |
Lima, Ana Maria Freire de Souza Lyra, Larissa de Sousa Guimarães, Larissa Lima Viana Teixeira, Michele Pontes Rossi, Thaís Regis Aranha Chaves, Sônia Cristina Lima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lyra, Larissa de Sousa Guimarães, Larissa Lima Viana Teixeira, Michele Pontes Rossi, Thaís Regis Aranha Chaves, Sônia Cristina Lima |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Ana Maria Freire de Souza Lyra, Larissa de Sousa Guimarães, Larissa Lima Viana Teixeira, Michele Pontes Rossi, Thaís Regis Aranha Chaves, Sônia Cristina Lima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sistemas de salud Política de salud Sistema Único de Salud Salud oral Sistemas nacionales de salud. Sistema Único de Saúde Sistemas de saúde Política de saúde Saúde bucal Sistemas nacionais de Saúde. Health systems Health policy Unified Health System Oral health National health systems. |
topic |
Sistemas de salud Política de salud Sistema Único de Salud Salud oral Sistemas nacionales de salud. Sistema Único de Saúde Sistemas de saúde Política de saúde Saúde bucal Sistemas nacionais de Saúde. Health systems Health policy Unified Health System Oral health National health systems. |
description |
This study analyzed the main characteristics of two universal systems, the National Health Service (NHS), in the United Kingdom, and the Unified Health System (SUS), in Brazil, in relation to oral health care actions and services. A literature review, document and secondary data analysis were performed from official databases in Brazil and the United Kingdom. There were differences in financing, covered population, infrastructure, organization, provision and management of actions and services. The sociodemographic and oral health indicators are more unfavorable in the Brazilian situation, however, inequalities persist also in the United Kingdom. In both countries, health is seen as a constitutional right, but NHS oral health actions are restricted to a specific public and offered by professionals from the private sector, with a large part of the cost of procedures by families. Successive reforms of the NHS have contributed to restricting access. The SUS, on the other hand, presents oral health services, primary and specialized care, universal and public offer, even if the coverage is insufficient and with problems in implementation. Austerity measures have been identified as a threat to the principles of universality and integrality in both countries. Comparative analysis helps in the identification of elements that contribute to the advancement of public provision of dental care. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18444 10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18444 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18444 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18444 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18444/16723 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e185101018444 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e185101018444 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e185101018444 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052787661471744 |