Infectious risk of using biomaterials for cranioplasty: polymethylmethacrylate vs. autologous bone

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Lucas Santos
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Santos, Ainatna Adgena de Carvalho, Carvalho, João Victor de Andrade, Bezerra, Amanda Gomes Lima, Sales, Alexia Morgana Santos, Robles, Marco Antonio Silva, Almeida, Luciana Montalvão Gois Figueiredo de, Castro, Maria Clara da Silva, Freire, Nathan Correia, Santos, Bruno Fernandes de Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30483
Resumo: This study aimed to describe the infectious risks of using autologous bone and PMMA in cranioplasty. This is an integrative literature review of a qualitative and descriptive nature. The bibliographic survey was carried out in March and April 2022 by searching the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Virtual Health Library (BVS), Public Medline (PubMed) and Science Direct databases and libraries. The inclusion criteria for the selection of studies were: articles published in full between the years 2013 to 2022, in English. The exclusion criteria were: monographs, dissertations, theses, Course Conclusion Papers (TCC), publications in annals of events, literature reviews and duplicate articles in one or more databases. By analyzing the articles included in this review, some authors consider that there are no significant differences regarding the infectious risk in the use of PMMA prosthesis and autologous bone, as raw material for cranioplasty. One study evaluated the impact of using antibiotics in PMMA prostheses in cranioplasty with moderate to large defects. Another study analyzed the use of prefabricated and pre-sterilized PMMA as cranioplasty material in the Indian population. One study says that prior craniotomy and PMMA cranioplasty were associated with a higher rate of postoperative infection. In another article, cranial reconstruction with autologous bone presented greater complications. The use of PMMA in cranioplasty compared to autologous bone has different outcomes in the literature.
id UNIFEI_ba7234d8cfc28188649220b14e2f0855
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30483
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Infectious risk of using biomaterials for cranioplasty: polymethylmethacrylate vs. autologous boneRiesgo infeccioso del uso de biomateriales para craneoplastia: polimetilmetacrilato vs. hueso autólogoRisco infeccioso do uso de biomateriais para cranioplastia: polimetilmetacrilato vs. osso autólogoPMMAPolimetilmetacrilatoInfecçãoNeurocirurgiaEnsino em saúde.PMMAPolymethylmethacrylateInfectionNeurosurgeryHealth teaching.PMMAPolimetacrilato de metiloInfecciónNeurocirugíaEnseñanza en salud.This study aimed to describe the infectious risks of using autologous bone and PMMA in cranioplasty. This is an integrative literature review of a qualitative and descriptive nature. The bibliographic survey was carried out in March and April 2022 by searching the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Virtual Health Library (BVS), Public Medline (PubMed) and Science Direct databases and libraries. The inclusion criteria for the selection of studies were: articles published in full between the years 2013 to 2022, in English. The exclusion criteria were: monographs, dissertations, theses, Course Conclusion Papers (TCC), publications in annals of events, literature reviews and duplicate articles in one or more databases. By analyzing the articles included in this review, some authors consider that there are no significant differences regarding the infectious risk in the use of PMMA prosthesis and autologous bone, as raw material for cranioplasty. One study evaluated the impact of using antibiotics in PMMA prostheses in cranioplasty with moderate to large defects. Another study analyzed the use of prefabricated and pre-sterilized PMMA as cranioplasty material in the Indian population. One study says that prior craniotomy and PMMA cranioplasty were associated with a higher rate of postoperative infection. In another article, cranial reconstruction with autologous bone presented greater complications. The use of PMMA in cranioplasty compared to autologous bone has different outcomes in the literature.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo describir los riesgos infecciosos del uso de hueso autólogo y PMMA en craneoplastia. Se trata de una revisión integrativa de la literatura de carácter cualitativo y descriptivo. El levantamiento bibliográfico se realizó en marzo y abril de 2022 mediante la búsqueda en las bases de datos y bibliotecas Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Virtual Health Library (BVS), Public Medline (PubMed) y Science Direct. Los criterios de inclusión para la selección de estudios fueron: artículos publicados íntegramente entre los años 2013 a 2022, en idioma inglés. Los criterios de exclusión fueron: monografías, disertaciones, tesis, Course Conclusion Papers (TCC), publicaciones en anales de eventos, revisiones de literatura y artículos duplicados en una o más bases de datos. Al analizar los artículos incluidos en esta revisión, algunos autores consideran que no existen diferencias significativas en relación al riesgo infeccioso en el uso de prótesis de PMMA y hueso autólogo, como materia prima para la craneoplastia. Un estudio evaluó el impacto del uso de antibióticos en prótesis de PMMA en craneoplastia con defectos moderados a grandes. Otro estudio analizó el uso de PMMA prefabricado y preesterilizado como material de craneoplastia en población india. Un estudio dice que la craneotomía previa y la craneoplastia con PMMA se asociaron con una mayor tasa de infección posoperatoria. En otro artículo, la reconstrucción craneal con hueso autólogo presentó mayores complicaciones. El uso de PMMA en craneoplastia en comparación con hueso autólogo tiene diferentes resultados en la literatura.Este estudo objetivou descrever os riscos infecciosos do uso de osso autólogo e PMMA na cranioplastia. Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura de natureza qualitativa e caráter descritivo. O levantamento bibliográfico foi executado no mês de março e abril de 2022 mediante busca nas bases e bibliotecas de dados da Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), Public Medline (PubMed) e Science Direct. Os critérios de inclusão para seleção dos estudos foram: artigos publicados na íntegra entre os anos de 2013 a 2022, no idioma inglês. Como critérios de exclusão foram: monografias, dissertações, teses, Trabalhos de Conclusão de Curso (TCC), publicações em anais de eventos, revisões de literatura e artigos duplicados em uma ou mais bases de dados. Mediante análise dos artigos inclusos nesta revisão, alguns autores ponderam que não há diferenças significativas em relação ao risco infeccioso no uso da prótese de PMMA e do osso autólogo, como matéria-prima da cranioplastia. Um estudo avaliou o impacto do uso de antibióticos em próteses de PMMA na cranioplastia com defeitos moderados a grandes. Já outro estudo, analisou o uso de PMMA pré-fabricado e pré-esterilizado como material de cranioplastia na população indiana. Um estudo diz que a craniotomia prévia e a cranioplastia com PMMA foram associadas à maior taxa de infecção pós-operatória. Em outro artigo, a reconstrução craniana com osso autólogo apresentou maiores complicações. O uso de PMMA na cranioplastia comparado ao osso autólogo apresenta desfechos diferentes na literatura.Research, Society and Development2022-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3048310.33448/rsd-v11i8.30483Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 8; e0511830483Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 8; e0511830483Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 8; e05118304832525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30483/26214Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas Santos Souza; Ainatna Adgena de Carvalho Santos; João Victor de Andrade Carvalho; Amanda Gomes Lima Bezerra; Alexia Morgana Santos Sales; Marco Antonio Silva Robles; Luciana Montalvão Gois Figueiredo de Almeida; Maria Clara da Silva Castro; Nathan Correia Freire; Bruno Fernandes de Oliveira Santoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Lucas SantosSantos, Ainatna Adgena de CarvalhoCarvalho, João Victor de Andrade Bezerra, Amanda Gomes Lima Sales, Alexia Morgana Santos Robles, Marco Antonio SilvaAlmeida, Luciana Montalvão Gois Figueiredo de Castro, Maria Clara da Silva Freire, Nathan Correia Santos, Bruno Fernandes de Oliveira 2022-07-01T13:34:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30483Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:47:13.093730Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Infectious risk of using biomaterials for cranioplasty: polymethylmethacrylate vs. autologous bone
Riesgo infeccioso del uso de biomateriales para craneoplastia: polimetilmetacrilato vs. hueso autólogo
Risco infeccioso do uso de biomateriais para cranioplastia: polimetilmetacrilato vs. osso autólogo
title Infectious risk of using biomaterials for cranioplasty: polymethylmethacrylate vs. autologous bone
spellingShingle Infectious risk of using biomaterials for cranioplasty: polymethylmethacrylate vs. autologous bone
Souza, Lucas Santos
PMMA
Polimetilmetacrilato
Infecção
Neurocirurgia
Ensino em saúde.
PMMA
Polymethylmethacrylate
Infection
Neurosurgery
Health teaching.
PMMA
Polimetacrilato de metilo
Infección
Neurocirugía
Enseñanza en salud.
title_short Infectious risk of using biomaterials for cranioplasty: polymethylmethacrylate vs. autologous bone
title_full Infectious risk of using biomaterials for cranioplasty: polymethylmethacrylate vs. autologous bone
title_fullStr Infectious risk of using biomaterials for cranioplasty: polymethylmethacrylate vs. autologous bone
title_full_unstemmed Infectious risk of using biomaterials for cranioplasty: polymethylmethacrylate vs. autologous bone
title_sort Infectious risk of using biomaterials for cranioplasty: polymethylmethacrylate vs. autologous bone
author Souza, Lucas Santos
author_facet Souza, Lucas Santos
Santos, Ainatna Adgena de Carvalho
Carvalho, João Victor de Andrade
Bezerra, Amanda Gomes Lima
Sales, Alexia Morgana Santos
Robles, Marco Antonio Silva
Almeida, Luciana Montalvão Gois Figueiredo de
Castro, Maria Clara da Silva
Freire, Nathan Correia
Santos, Bruno Fernandes de Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Santos, Ainatna Adgena de Carvalho
Carvalho, João Victor de Andrade
Bezerra, Amanda Gomes Lima
Sales, Alexia Morgana Santos
Robles, Marco Antonio Silva
Almeida, Luciana Montalvão Gois Figueiredo de
Castro, Maria Clara da Silva
Freire, Nathan Correia
Santos, Bruno Fernandes de Oliveira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Lucas Santos
Santos, Ainatna Adgena de Carvalho
Carvalho, João Victor de Andrade
Bezerra, Amanda Gomes Lima
Sales, Alexia Morgana Santos
Robles, Marco Antonio Silva
Almeida, Luciana Montalvão Gois Figueiredo de
Castro, Maria Clara da Silva
Freire, Nathan Correia
Santos, Bruno Fernandes de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv PMMA
Polimetilmetacrilato
Infecção
Neurocirurgia
Ensino em saúde.
PMMA
Polymethylmethacrylate
Infection
Neurosurgery
Health teaching.
PMMA
Polimetacrilato de metilo
Infección
Neurocirugía
Enseñanza en salud.
topic PMMA
Polimetilmetacrilato
Infecção
Neurocirurgia
Ensino em saúde.
PMMA
Polymethylmethacrylate
Infection
Neurosurgery
Health teaching.
PMMA
Polimetacrilato de metilo
Infección
Neurocirugía
Enseñanza en salud.
description This study aimed to describe the infectious risks of using autologous bone and PMMA in cranioplasty. This is an integrative literature review of a qualitative and descriptive nature. The bibliographic survey was carried out in March and April 2022 by searching the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Virtual Health Library (BVS), Public Medline (PubMed) and Science Direct databases and libraries. The inclusion criteria for the selection of studies were: articles published in full between the years 2013 to 2022, in English. The exclusion criteria were: monographs, dissertations, theses, Course Conclusion Papers (TCC), publications in annals of events, literature reviews and duplicate articles in one or more databases. By analyzing the articles included in this review, some authors consider that there are no significant differences regarding the infectious risk in the use of PMMA prosthesis and autologous bone, as raw material for cranioplasty. One study evaluated the impact of using antibiotics in PMMA prostheses in cranioplasty with moderate to large defects. Another study analyzed the use of prefabricated and pre-sterilized PMMA as cranioplasty material in the Indian population. One study says that prior craniotomy and PMMA cranioplasty were associated with a higher rate of postoperative infection. In another article, cranial reconstruction with autologous bone presented greater complications. The use of PMMA in cranioplasty compared to autologous bone has different outcomes in the literature.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30483
10.33448/rsd-v11i8.30483
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30483
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i8.30483
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30483/26214
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 8; e0511830483
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 8; e0511830483
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 8; e0511830483
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052714263248896