Experiences of women: an analysis of the assistance to vaginal birth
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/33174 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Despite the publication of evidence-based good practices recommended by the Ministry of Health and the World Health Organization, the process of childbirth has still been assisted based on hospital habits focused on the rational labor process. General Objective: To identify the practices of labor, delivery and immediate postpartum care, practiced in institutions in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Methodology: This is a quantitative field research, with women who gave birth in the state of Rio de Janeiro, from January 2018 to March 2022, in health institutions. Data collection was via Microsoft Forms, distributed by the WhatsApp application. Results: 47 women participated in the research. 72.3% gave birth in the SUS. 51.06% are brown and black. 59.6% did not receive information in prenatal care about non-pharmacological labor pain relief techniques, but 55.3% had access to non-traditional pain relief methods. 70.2% were not fed during labor, and 61.7% delivered in the lithotomy position. 48.1% felt welcomed by the nursing staff. 59.6% were informed about the advantages of skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding in the delivery room during prenatal care, 51.1% had skin-to-skin contact for up to 30 minutes, and 21.3% for up to 1 hour. Conclusion: Obstetric care in the sample represented by the study partially meets evidence-based recommendations. And nursing plays an important role in building women's autonomy throughout the perinatal period. |
id |
UNIFEI_bb05404a4370011eb719835695d936ba |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33174 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Experiences of women: an analysis of the assistance to vaginal birthExperiencias de las mujeres: un análisis de la asistencia al parto vaginalVivências de mulheres: uma análise da assistência ao parto vaginalParto HumanizadoDor do PartoCuidado Pré-NatalPeríodo pós-parto.PrenatalParto humanizadoDolor de partoPeriodo posparto.Humanized childbirthChildbirth painPrenatal CarePostpartum period.Introduction: Despite the publication of evidence-based good practices recommended by the Ministry of Health and the World Health Organization, the process of childbirth has still been assisted based on hospital habits focused on the rational labor process. General Objective: To identify the practices of labor, delivery and immediate postpartum care, practiced in institutions in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Methodology: This is a quantitative field research, with women who gave birth in the state of Rio de Janeiro, from January 2018 to March 2022, in health institutions. Data collection was via Microsoft Forms, distributed by the WhatsApp application. Results: 47 women participated in the research. 72.3% gave birth in the SUS. 51.06% are brown and black. 59.6% did not receive information in prenatal care about non-pharmacological labor pain relief techniques, but 55.3% had access to non-traditional pain relief methods. 70.2% were not fed during labor, and 61.7% delivered in the lithotomy position. 48.1% felt welcomed by the nursing staff. 59.6% were informed about the advantages of skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding in the delivery room during prenatal care, 51.1% had skin-to-skin contact for up to 30 minutes, and 21.3% for up to 1 hour. Conclusion: Obstetric care in the sample represented by the study partially meets evidence-based recommendations. And nursing plays an important role in building women's autonomy throughout the perinatal period.Introducción: A pesar de la publicación de buenas prácticas basadas en la evidencia recomendadas por el Ministerio de Sanidad y la Organización Mundial de la Salud, el proceso de parto sigue siendo asistido en base a hábitos hospitalarios centrados en el proceso racional del parto. Objetivo general: Identificar las prácticas de atención al trabajo de parto, parto y pósparto inmediato, practicadas en instituciones del estado de Río de Janeiro. Metodología: Se trata de una investigación cuantitativa de campo, con mujeres que dieron a luz en el estado de Río de Janeiro, de enero de 2018 a marzo de 2022, en instituciones de salud. La recogida de datos se realizó a través de Microsoft Forms, distribuidos por la aplicación WhatsApp. Resultados: 47 mujeres participaron en la investigación. El 72,3% dio a luz en el SUS. El 51,06% son marrones y negros. El 59,6% no recibió información en la atención prenatal sobre técnicas no farmacológicas para el alivio del dolor del parto, sin embargo el 55,3% tuvo acceso a métodos no tradicionales de alivio del dolor. El 70,2% no recibió alimentos durante el parto y el 61,7% dio a luz en posición de litotomía. El 48,1% se sintió acogido por el personal de enfermería. El 59,6% recibió información sobre las ventajas del contacto piel con piel y la lactancia materna en la sala de partos durante el periodo prenatal, el 51,1% tuvo contacto piel con piel hasta 30 minutos y el 21,3% hasta 1 hora. Conclusión: La atención obstétrica en la muestra representada por el estudio cumple parcialmente las recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia. Y la enfermería tiene un papel importante en la construcción de la autonomía de la mujer en todo el período perinatal.Introdução: Apesar da publicação das boas práticas baseadas em evidências recomendadas pelo Ministério da Saúde e pela Organização Mundial da Saúde, o processo do parto ainda tem sido assistido com base em hábitos hospitalares focados no processo racional de trabalho. Objetivo geral: Identificar as práticas de atenção ao trabalho de parto, parto e pós-parto imediato, praticadas em instituições no estado do Rio de Janeiro. Metodologia: Trata-se de uma pesquisa de campo quantitativa, com mulheres que pariram no estado do Rio de Janeiro, de janeiro de 2018 a março de 2022, em instituições de saúde. A coleta de dados foi via Microsoft Forms, distribuído pelo aplicativo WhatsApp. Resultados: 47 mulheres participaram da pesquisa. 72,3% pariram no SUS. 51,06% são pardas e pretas. 59,6% não receberam informações no pré-natal sobre técnicas não farmacológicas de alívio da dor de parto, porém 55,3% tiveram acesso a métodos não-tradicionais de alívio da dor. 70,2% não receberam alimento no trabalho de parto e 61,7% pariram em posição de litotomia. 48,1% se sentiram acolhidas pela enfermagem. 59,6% foram informadas quanto às vantagens do contato pele-a-pele e aleitamento na sala de parto no pré-natal, 51,1% tiveram contato pele-a-pele por até 30 minutos e 21,3% por até 1 hora. Conclusão: A assistência obstétrica na amostra representada pelo estudo atende parcialmente às recomendações baseadas em evidências. E a enfermagem tem importante papel na construção da autonomia da mulher em todo o período perinatal.Research, Society and Development2022-08-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3317410.33448/rsd-v11i11.33174Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 11; e116111133174Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 11; e116111133174Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 11; e1161111331742525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/33174/28258Copyright (c) 2022 Renata Reis Loureiro e Sá; Abilene do Nascimento Gouvêahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSá, Renata Reis Loureiro e Gouvêa, Abilene do Nascimento 2022-09-05T13:24:46Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33174Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:48:54.440729Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Experiences of women: an analysis of the assistance to vaginal birth Experiencias de las mujeres: un análisis de la asistencia al parto vaginal Vivências de mulheres: uma análise da assistência ao parto vaginal |
title |
Experiences of women: an analysis of the assistance to vaginal birth |
spellingShingle |
Experiences of women: an analysis of the assistance to vaginal birth Sá, Renata Reis Loureiro e Parto Humanizado Dor do Parto Cuidado Pré-Natal Período pós-parto. Prenatal Parto humanizado Dolor de parto Periodo posparto. Humanized childbirth Childbirth pain Prenatal Care Postpartum period. |
title_short |
Experiences of women: an analysis of the assistance to vaginal birth |
title_full |
Experiences of women: an analysis of the assistance to vaginal birth |
title_fullStr |
Experiences of women: an analysis of the assistance to vaginal birth |
title_full_unstemmed |
Experiences of women: an analysis of the assistance to vaginal birth |
title_sort |
Experiences of women: an analysis of the assistance to vaginal birth |
author |
Sá, Renata Reis Loureiro e |
author_facet |
Sá, Renata Reis Loureiro e Gouvêa, Abilene do Nascimento |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gouvêa, Abilene do Nascimento |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sá, Renata Reis Loureiro e Gouvêa, Abilene do Nascimento |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Parto Humanizado Dor do Parto Cuidado Pré-Natal Período pós-parto. Prenatal Parto humanizado Dolor de parto Periodo posparto. Humanized childbirth Childbirth pain Prenatal Care Postpartum period. |
topic |
Parto Humanizado Dor do Parto Cuidado Pré-Natal Período pós-parto. Prenatal Parto humanizado Dolor de parto Periodo posparto. Humanized childbirth Childbirth pain Prenatal Care Postpartum period. |
description |
Introduction: Despite the publication of evidence-based good practices recommended by the Ministry of Health and the World Health Organization, the process of childbirth has still been assisted based on hospital habits focused on the rational labor process. General Objective: To identify the practices of labor, delivery and immediate postpartum care, practiced in institutions in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Methodology: This is a quantitative field research, with women who gave birth in the state of Rio de Janeiro, from January 2018 to March 2022, in health institutions. Data collection was via Microsoft Forms, distributed by the WhatsApp application. Results: 47 women participated in the research. 72.3% gave birth in the SUS. 51.06% are brown and black. 59.6% did not receive information in prenatal care about non-pharmacological labor pain relief techniques, but 55.3% had access to non-traditional pain relief methods. 70.2% were not fed during labor, and 61.7% delivered in the lithotomy position. 48.1% felt welcomed by the nursing staff. 59.6% were informed about the advantages of skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding in the delivery room during prenatal care, 51.1% had skin-to-skin contact for up to 30 minutes, and 21.3% for up to 1 hour. Conclusion: Obstetric care in the sample represented by the study partially meets evidence-based recommendations. And nursing plays an important role in building women's autonomy throughout the perinatal period. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/33174 10.33448/rsd-v11i11.33174 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/33174 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i11.33174 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/33174/28258 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Renata Reis Loureiro e Sá; Abilene do Nascimento Gouvêa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Renata Reis Loureiro e Sá; Abilene do Nascimento Gouvêa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 11; e116111133174 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 11; e116111133174 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 11; e116111133174 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052770030714880 |