The influence of translucent barriers on the effectiveness of dental light curing
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
| Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16713 |
Resumo: | The aim of the present study was to evaluate the irradiance of different light-curing devices when subjected to the use of different types of biological protection barriers. The tested devices were: Bluephase N. Radii-Cal and VALO wireless. The biosafety barriers were: Polyethylene and Polyvinyl Chloride with one and two turns. The tips of the devices had their diameters measured on a digital pachymeter and the area of each tip was calculated. The power (mW) of the devices was measured with a potentiometer for 20 seconds and three times for each device. Then. the irradiance (mW / cm²) was calculated by the quotient of the power of the device by the cross-sectional area of the tip of the photoactivator. The irradiance data for each group were collected and subjected to two-way ANOVA analysis of variance (SPSS). with Tukey's post-hoc. As a result. a statistically significant interaction between the different types of light-curing device and translucent protection barriers (p < 0.05) were observed. It can be concluded that the protective barrier made with 1-turn polyvinyl chloride demonstrated the best irradiance results and among the light-curing devices. regardless of the type of barrier used. Bluephase obtained the best irradiance results. followed by Valo and Radii. |
| id |
UNIFEI_bbd39b3bae11b5154b80f10ae1400856 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16713 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
| network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
The influence of translucent barriers on the effectiveness of dental light curing La influencia de las barreras translúcidas en la eficacia de la fotopolimerización dentalA influência das barreiras translúcidas na eficácia da fotopolimerização odontológicaPolimerizaciónLuces de Curación DentalResinas compuestas.PolymerizationComposite resins.Dental curing lightsPolimerizaçãoLuzes de cura dentáriaResinas compostas.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the irradiance of different light-curing devices when subjected to the use of different types of biological protection barriers. The tested devices were: Bluephase N. Radii-Cal and VALO wireless. The biosafety barriers were: Polyethylene and Polyvinyl Chloride with one and two turns. The tips of the devices had their diameters measured on a digital pachymeter and the area of each tip was calculated. The power (mW) of the devices was measured with a potentiometer for 20 seconds and three times for each device. Then. the irradiance (mW / cm²) was calculated by the quotient of the power of the device by the cross-sectional area of the tip of the photoactivator. The irradiance data for each group were collected and subjected to two-way ANOVA analysis of variance (SPSS). with Tukey's post-hoc. As a result. a statistically significant interaction between the different types of light-curing device and translucent protection barriers (p < 0.05) were observed. It can be concluded that the protective barrier made with 1-turn polyvinyl chloride demonstrated the best irradiance results and among the light-curing devices. regardless of the type of barrier used. Bluephase obtained the best irradiance results. followed by Valo and Radii. El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar la irradiancia de diferentes fotoactivadores al ser sometidos al uso de diferentes tipos de barreras de protección biológica. Los dispositivos probados fueron Bluephase N. Radii-Cal y VALO inalámbricos. Las barreras de bioseguridad fueron: Polietileno. Cloruro de polivinilo con 1 capa y Cloruro de polivinilo con 2 capas. Se midió el diámetro de las puntas de los dispositivos con un calibre digital y se calculó el área de cada punta. La potencia (mW) de los dispositivos se midió con un potenciómetro durante 20 segundos y tres veces para cada dispositivo. Luego. se calculó la irradiancia (mW / cm²) por el cociente de la potencia del dispositivo por el área de la sección transversal de la punta de la lámpara de polimerización. La prueba muestra dos factores y demostró una interacción estadísticamente significativa entre los diferentes tipos de dispositivos fotopolimerizables y barreras de protección biológica (p < 0.05). Entre los fotopolimerizadores. Bluephase N obtuvo los valores de irradiancia más altos independientemente del tipo de barrera. seguido de VALO inalámbrico y Radii-Cal. Todos los dispositivos obtuvieron mayor irradiancia en el grupo control. cuando no utilizaron barreras desechables. Entre las barreras. el cloruro de polivinilo de 1 vuelta logró el mejor desempeño en todos los grupos de fotopolimerizadores. Aunque el uso de barreras de bioseguridad redujo la irradiancia de los dispositivos. estos valores no fueron inferiores al mínimo adecuado para la polimerización de resinas compuestas convencionales (400 mW / cm²).O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar a irradiância de diferentes fotoativadores quando submetidos a utilização de diferentes tipos de barreiras de proteção biológica. Os aparelhos testados foram Bluephase N. Radii-Cal e VALO cordless. As barreiras de biossegurança foram: Polietileno. Policloreto de vinila com 1 volta e Policloreto de vinila com 2 voltas. As pontas dos aparelhos tiveram seu diâmetro aferido a partir de um paquímetro digital e a área de cada ponteira foi calculada. A potência (mW) dos aparelhos foi medida com um potenciômetro por 20 segundos. e três vezes para cada aparelho. E então. a irradiância (mW / cm²) foi calculada pelo quociente da potência do aparelho pela área da seção transversal da ponta do fotopolimerizador. O teste anova dois fatores demonstrou interação estatisticamente significante entre os diferentes tipos de aparelhos fotopolimerizadores e barreiras de proteção biológica (p < 0.05). Dentre os fotopolimerizadores. Bluephase N obteve os maiores valores de irradiância independente do tipo de barreira. seguido do VALO cordless e Radii-Cal. Todos os aparelhos obtiveram maior irradiância no grupo controle. quando não faziam uso de barreiras descartáveis. Dentre as barreiras. o policloreto de vinila com 1 volta obteve o melhor desempenho em todos os grupos de fotopolimerizadores. Apesar do uso de barreiras de biossegurança terem reduzido a irradiância dos aparelhos. esses valores não foram inferiores ao mínimo adequado para a polimerização de resinas compostas convencionais (400 mW/cm²).Research, Society and Development2021-07-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1671310.33448/rsd-v10i7.16713Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e53910716713Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e53910716713Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e539107167132525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16713/15143Copyright (c) 2021 Gabriel Ramos Rúbio; Antônio Lopes Júnior; Caio Felipe de Almeida Nobre; Mariana Itaborai Moreira Freitas; May Anny Alves Fraga; Nathalia Silveira Finckhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRúbio, Gabriel RamosLopes Júnior, Antônio Nobre, Caio Felipe de AlmeidaFreitas, Mariana Itaborai Moreira Fraga, May Anny AlvesFinck, Nathalia Silveira 2021-07-18T21:07:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16713Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:37:11.632548Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The influence of translucent barriers on the effectiveness of dental light curing La influencia de las barreras translúcidas en la eficacia de la fotopolimerización dental A influência das barreiras translúcidas na eficácia da fotopolimerização odontológica |
| title |
The influence of translucent barriers on the effectiveness of dental light curing |
| spellingShingle |
The influence of translucent barriers on the effectiveness of dental light curing Rúbio, Gabriel Ramos Polimerización Luces de Curación Dental Resinas compuestas. Polymerization Composite resins. Dental curing lights Polimerização Luzes de cura dentária Resinas compostas. |
| title_short |
The influence of translucent barriers on the effectiveness of dental light curing |
| title_full |
The influence of translucent barriers on the effectiveness of dental light curing |
| title_fullStr |
The influence of translucent barriers on the effectiveness of dental light curing |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The influence of translucent barriers on the effectiveness of dental light curing |
| title_sort |
The influence of translucent barriers on the effectiveness of dental light curing |
| author |
Rúbio, Gabriel Ramos |
| author_facet |
Rúbio, Gabriel Ramos Lopes Júnior, Antônio Nobre, Caio Felipe de Almeida Freitas, Mariana Itaborai Moreira Fraga, May Anny Alves Finck, Nathalia Silveira |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Lopes Júnior, Antônio Nobre, Caio Felipe de Almeida Freitas, Mariana Itaborai Moreira Fraga, May Anny Alves Finck, Nathalia Silveira |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rúbio, Gabriel Ramos Lopes Júnior, Antônio Nobre, Caio Felipe de Almeida Freitas, Mariana Itaborai Moreira Fraga, May Anny Alves Finck, Nathalia Silveira |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Polimerización Luces de Curación Dental Resinas compuestas. Polymerization Composite resins. Dental curing lights Polimerização Luzes de cura dentária Resinas compostas. |
| topic |
Polimerización Luces de Curación Dental Resinas compuestas. Polymerization Composite resins. Dental curing lights Polimerização Luzes de cura dentária Resinas compostas. |
| description |
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the irradiance of different light-curing devices when subjected to the use of different types of biological protection barriers. The tested devices were: Bluephase N. Radii-Cal and VALO wireless. The biosafety barriers were: Polyethylene and Polyvinyl Chloride with one and two turns. The tips of the devices had their diameters measured on a digital pachymeter and the area of each tip was calculated. The power (mW) of the devices was measured with a potentiometer for 20 seconds and three times for each device. Then. the irradiance (mW / cm²) was calculated by the quotient of the power of the device by the cross-sectional area of the tip of the photoactivator. The irradiance data for each group were collected and subjected to two-way ANOVA analysis of variance (SPSS). with Tukey's post-hoc. As a result. a statistically significant interaction between the different types of light-curing device and translucent protection barriers (p < 0.05) were observed. It can be concluded that the protective barrier made with 1-turn polyvinyl chloride demonstrated the best irradiance results and among the light-curing devices. regardless of the type of barrier used. Bluephase obtained the best irradiance results. followed by Valo and Radii. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-02 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16713 10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16713 |
| url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16713 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16713 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16713/15143 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e53910716713 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e53910716713 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e53910716713 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
| instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
| institution |
UNIFEI |
| reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
| collection |
Research, Society and Development |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
| _version_ |
1797052786336071680 |