Reproducibility and validity of Londrina ADL Protocol in people with multiple sclerosis with light and moderate disability
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25494 |
Resumo: | People with multiple sclerosis (MS) commonly present negative impacts on activities of daily living (ADLs) with the disease progression. However, there is no instrument with measured metric properties specifically for use in people with MS. Objective: To verify the reproducibility and validity of the Londrina ADL Protocol (LAP) to assess ADLs in people with MS. Methods: Individuals diagnosed with ME presenting mild or moderate disability according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) performed the LAP in three moments (intra-rater and inter-rater) following standardized recommendations. Physical activity level was used as validation criterion and was assessed by the pedometer which counts steps/day during seven consecutive days. Results: Twenty-three individuals (48% women, 39 ± 9.2 years, diagnosis time: 9.9 ± 5.5 years) with EDSS 2.5±1.0 points were included. The LAP was reproducible intra-rater and inter-rater (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] = 0.86 and 0.72, respectively); however, participants demonstrated a learning effect of -6.6 ± 8.4%. There was a significant correlation between the LAP and the number of steps/day (r = -0.556, p = 0.014). Conclusion: The Londrina ADL Protocol is a promised reproducible and valid instrument that can be used for the objective assessment of ADLs in people with MS. |
id |
UNIFEI_c15918c64120894c5e2db95965fe4523 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25494 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reproducibility and validity of Londrina ADL Protocol in people with multiple sclerosis with light and moderate disabilityReproducibilidad y validez del Londrina ADL Protocol en personas con esclerosis múltiple con leve y moderada discapacidadReprodutibilidade e validade do Londrina ADL Protocol em pessoas com esclerose múltipla com incapacidade leve e moderada Multiple sclerosisDaily activitiesMotor activity. Esclerosis múltipleActividades diariasActividad motora.Esclerose múltiplaAtividades diáriasAtividade motora.People with multiple sclerosis (MS) commonly present negative impacts on activities of daily living (ADLs) with the disease progression. However, there is no instrument with measured metric properties specifically for use in people with MS. Objective: To verify the reproducibility and validity of the Londrina ADL Protocol (LAP) to assess ADLs in people with MS. Methods: Individuals diagnosed with ME presenting mild or moderate disability according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) performed the LAP in three moments (intra-rater and inter-rater) following standardized recommendations. Physical activity level was used as validation criterion and was assessed by the pedometer which counts steps/day during seven consecutive days. Results: Twenty-three individuals (48% women, 39 ± 9.2 years, diagnosis time: 9.9 ± 5.5 years) with EDSS 2.5±1.0 points were included. The LAP was reproducible intra-rater and inter-rater (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] = 0.86 and 0.72, respectively); however, participants demonstrated a learning effect of -6.6 ± 8.4%. There was a significant correlation between the LAP and the number of steps/day (r = -0.556, p = 0.014). Conclusion: The Londrina ADL Protocol is a promised reproducible and valid instrument that can be used for the objective assessment of ADLs in people with MS.Introducción: Las personas con esclerosis múltiple (EM) comúnmente tienen impactos negativos en las actividades de la vida diaria (AVD) a medida que avanza la enfermedad. Sin embargo, no existe ningún instrumento con propiedades métricas específicamente medidas para su uso en personas con EM. Objetivo: Verificar la reproducibilidad y validez del Londrina ADL Protocol (LAP) para la evaluación de AVD en personas con EM. Métodos: Los individuos con EM con discapacidad leve o moderada de acuerdo con la Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) realizaron el LAP en tres momentos (intra e inter-examinador) siguiendo las recomendaciones estandarizadas. El nivel de actividad física se utilizó como criterio de validación y se evaluó mediante un podómetro que cuenta pasos/día durante siete días consecutivos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 23 sujetos (48% mujeres, 39 ± 9,2 años, tiempo al diagnóstico: 9,9 ± 5,5 años) con EDSS 2,5 ± 1,0 puntos. El LAP fue reproducible intra e interevaluador (coeficiente de correlación intraclase [CCI] = 0,86 y 0,72, respectivamente); sin embargo, los participantes demostraron un efecto de aprendizaje de -6,6 ± 8,4%. Hubo una correlación significativa entre LAP y el número de pasos/día (r = -0,556, p = 0,014). Conclusión: El Londrina ADL Protocol es un instrumento prometedor, reproducible y válido para la evaluación de las AVD en personas con EM.Introdução: Pessoas com esclerose múltipla (EM) comumente apresentam impactos negativos nas atividades de vida diária (AVDs) com a progressão da doença. No entanto, não há nenhum instrumento com propriedades métricas medidas especificamente para uso em pessoas com EM. Objetivo: Verificar a reprodutibilidade e validade do Londrina ADL Protocol (LAP) para avaliação de AVD em pessoas com EM. Métodos: Indivíduos com EM com incapacidade leve ou moderado segundo a Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) realizaram o LAP em três momentos (intraexaminador e interexaminador) seguindo recomendações padronizadas. O nível de atividade física foi utilizado como critério de validação e foi avaliado pelo pedômetro que conta passos/dia durante sete dias consecutivos. Resultados: Vinte e três indivíduos (48% mulheres, 39 ± 9,2 anos, tempo de diagnóstico: 9,9 ± 5,5 anos) com EDSS 2,5 ± 1,0 pontos foram incluídos. O LAP foi reprodutível intra-avaliador e inter-avaliador (coeficiente de correlação intraclasse [ICC] = 0,86 e 0,72, respectivamente); no entanto, os participantes demonstraram um efeito de aprendizagem de -6,6 ± 8,4%. Houve correlação significativa entre o LAP e o número de passos/dia (r = -0,556, p = 0,014). Conclusão: O Londrina ADL Protocol é um instrumento promissor reprodutível e válido para a avaliação de AVDs em pessoas com EM.Research, Society and Development2022-01-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2549410.33448/rsd-v11i2.25494Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e19611225494Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e19611225494Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e196112254942525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25494/22457Copyright (c) 2022 Heloisa Galdino Gumieiro Ribeiro; Viviane de Souza Pinho Costa; Michelle Moreira Abujamra Fillis; Thainá Bessa Alves; Vitória Cavalheiro Puzzi ; Gabriela Alves dos Santos; Karina Perez Porto; Bruno Mastellini Trevisan ; Joice Mara de Oliveira; Karina Couto Furlanettohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Heloisa Galdino Gumieiro Costa, Viviane de Souza Pinho Fillis, Michelle Moreira AbujamraAlves, Thainá BessaPuzzi , Vitória Cavalheiro Santos, Gabriela Alves dos Porto, Karina Perez Trevisan , Bruno Mastellini Oliveira, Joice Mara de Furlanetto, Karina Couto2022-02-07T01:42:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25494Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:45.669924Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reproducibility and validity of Londrina ADL Protocol in people with multiple sclerosis with light and moderate disability Reproducibilidad y validez del Londrina ADL Protocol en personas con esclerosis múltiple con leve y moderada discapacidad Reprodutibilidade e validade do Londrina ADL Protocol em pessoas com esclerose múltipla com incapacidade leve e moderada |
title |
Reproducibility and validity of Londrina ADL Protocol in people with multiple sclerosis with light and moderate disability |
spellingShingle |
Reproducibility and validity of Londrina ADL Protocol in people with multiple sclerosis with light and moderate disability Ribeiro, Heloisa Galdino Gumieiro Multiple sclerosis Daily activities Motor activity. Esclerosis múltiple Actividades diarias Actividad motora. Esclerose múltipla Atividades diárias Atividade motora. |
title_short |
Reproducibility and validity of Londrina ADL Protocol in people with multiple sclerosis with light and moderate disability |
title_full |
Reproducibility and validity of Londrina ADL Protocol in people with multiple sclerosis with light and moderate disability |
title_fullStr |
Reproducibility and validity of Londrina ADL Protocol in people with multiple sclerosis with light and moderate disability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reproducibility and validity of Londrina ADL Protocol in people with multiple sclerosis with light and moderate disability |
title_sort |
Reproducibility and validity of Londrina ADL Protocol in people with multiple sclerosis with light and moderate disability |
author |
Ribeiro, Heloisa Galdino Gumieiro |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Heloisa Galdino Gumieiro Costa, Viviane de Souza Pinho Fillis, Michelle Moreira Abujamra Alves, Thainá Bessa Puzzi , Vitória Cavalheiro Santos, Gabriela Alves dos Porto, Karina Perez Trevisan , Bruno Mastellini Oliveira, Joice Mara de Furlanetto, Karina Couto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Viviane de Souza Pinho Fillis, Michelle Moreira Abujamra Alves, Thainá Bessa Puzzi , Vitória Cavalheiro Santos, Gabriela Alves dos Porto, Karina Perez Trevisan , Bruno Mastellini Oliveira, Joice Mara de Furlanetto, Karina Couto |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Heloisa Galdino Gumieiro Costa, Viviane de Souza Pinho Fillis, Michelle Moreira Abujamra Alves, Thainá Bessa Puzzi , Vitória Cavalheiro Santos, Gabriela Alves dos Porto, Karina Perez Trevisan , Bruno Mastellini Oliveira, Joice Mara de Furlanetto, Karina Couto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Multiple sclerosis Daily activities Motor activity. Esclerosis múltiple Actividades diarias Actividad motora. Esclerose múltipla Atividades diárias Atividade motora. |
topic |
Multiple sclerosis Daily activities Motor activity. Esclerosis múltiple Actividades diarias Actividad motora. Esclerose múltipla Atividades diárias Atividade motora. |
description |
People with multiple sclerosis (MS) commonly present negative impacts on activities of daily living (ADLs) with the disease progression. However, there is no instrument with measured metric properties specifically for use in people with MS. Objective: To verify the reproducibility and validity of the Londrina ADL Protocol (LAP) to assess ADLs in people with MS. Methods: Individuals diagnosed with ME presenting mild or moderate disability according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) performed the LAP in three moments (intra-rater and inter-rater) following standardized recommendations. Physical activity level was used as validation criterion and was assessed by the pedometer which counts steps/day during seven consecutive days. Results: Twenty-three individuals (48% women, 39 ± 9.2 years, diagnosis time: 9.9 ± 5.5 years) with EDSS 2.5±1.0 points were included. The LAP was reproducible intra-rater and inter-rater (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] = 0.86 and 0.72, respectively); however, participants demonstrated a learning effect of -6.6 ± 8.4%. There was a significant correlation between the LAP and the number of steps/day (r = -0.556, p = 0.014). Conclusion: The Londrina ADL Protocol is a promised reproducible and valid instrument that can be used for the objective assessment of ADLs in people with MS. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25494 10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25494 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25494 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25494 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25494/22457 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e19611225494 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e19611225494 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e19611225494 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052702582112256 |