Acute effects of different heating strategies on benchmark Fran performance in Crossfit practitioners

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Freitas, Ana Keroly Rocha
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pinto, Nilson Vieira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18019
Resumo: Warming up is an important preparatory strategy for good physical performance during training, however its methodological application in CrossFit is still little discussed. This study aims to verify the acute effect of different warm-up strategies on benchmark Fran performance in CrossFit practitioners. This is a cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach, composed of an intentional non-probabilistic sampling of CrossFit practitioners. Initially, weight, height, body mass index and fat percentage will be evaluated for sample characterization purposes. Following will be performed the 1-RM test to determine the load and intensity of individual training. After obtaining diagnostic data, active static stretching (SS) and specific warm-up (SW) will be applied on different days, followed by the benchmarking performance “Fran”, through the assessment of heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) and Borg scale. The results characterized a sampling with anthropometric and body composition parameters homogeneous. Specific warming showed a lower response of heart rate (168.65 ± 16.9 bpm) and subjective perception of exertion (6.65 ± 1.26) compared to static stretching (178.8 ± 13.50 and 7 75 ± 1.11, respectively), however the pressure responses were not statistically different (SBP: 151.5 ± 27.39 mmHg vs. 154.5 ± 10.99 mmHg; DBP: 116 ± 5.98 mmHg vs. 117.5 ± 10.69 mmHg. In conclusion, specific warm-up promoted less cardiovascular work after benchmarking compared to static stretching.
id UNIFEI_c8259263b1e4165be43a0e43b7fdaf94
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18019
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Acute effects of different heating strategies on benchmark Fran performance in Crossfit practitionersEfecto agudo de diferentes estrategias de calentamiento sobre el rendimiento de benchmark Fran en practicantes de CrossfitEfeito agudo de diferentes estratégias de aquecimento sobre o desempenho do benchmark Fran em praticantes de CrossfitTreinamento intervalado de alta intensidadeExercício de aquecimentoExercícios de alongamento muscular.Entrenamiento por intervalos de alta intensidadEjercicio de calentamientoEjercicios de estiramiento muscular.High intensity interval trainingWarm up exerciseMuscle stretching exercises.Warming up is an important preparatory strategy for good physical performance during training, however its methodological application in CrossFit is still little discussed. This study aims to verify the acute effect of different warm-up strategies on benchmark Fran performance in CrossFit practitioners. This is a cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach, composed of an intentional non-probabilistic sampling of CrossFit practitioners. Initially, weight, height, body mass index and fat percentage will be evaluated for sample characterization purposes. Following will be performed the 1-RM test to determine the load and intensity of individual training. After obtaining diagnostic data, active static stretching (SS) and specific warm-up (SW) will be applied on different days, followed by the benchmarking performance “Fran”, through the assessment of heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) and Borg scale. The results characterized a sampling with anthropometric and body composition parameters homogeneous. Specific warming showed a lower response of heart rate (168.65 ± 16.9 bpm) and subjective perception of exertion (6.65 ± 1.26) compared to static stretching (178.8 ± 13.50 and 7 75 ± 1.11, respectively), however the pressure responses were not statistically different (SBP: 151.5 ± 27.39 mmHg vs. 154.5 ± 10.99 mmHg; DBP: 116 ± 5.98 mmHg vs. 117.5 ± 10.69 mmHg. In conclusion, specific warm-up promoted less cardiovascular work after benchmarking compared to static stretching.El calentamiento es una estrategia preparatoria importante para un buen rendimiento físico durante el entrenamiento, sin embargo, su aplicación metodológica en CrossFit aún es poco discutida. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo verificar el efecto agudo de diferentes estrategias de calentamiento sobre el rendimiento del punto de referencia de Fran en practicantes de CrossFit. Se trata de un estudio transversal con un enfoque cuantitativo, que consiste en un muestreo intencional no probabilístico de practicantes de CrossFit. Inicialmente, se evaluó el peso, la altura, el índice de masa corporal y el porcentaje de grasa para la caracterización de la muestra. En secuencia, se realizó la prueba de 1-RM para determinar la carga y la intensidad del entrenamiento individual. Tras la obtención de los datos diagnósticos, se aplicaron estiramientos estáticos activos (AL) y calentamiento específico (AQ), en diferentes días, seguido de la evaluación del rendimiento del benchmark "Fran", mediante la evaluación de la frecuencia cardíaca (FC), presión arterial sistólica (PAS) y diastólica (PAD) y escala de Borg. Los resultados caracterizaron un muestreo con parámetros antropométricos y composición corporal homogénea. El calentamiento específico mostró una respuesta de frecuencia cardíaca más baja (168,65 ± 16,9 lpm) y una percepción subjetiva de esfuerzo (6,65 ± 1,26) en comparación con el estiramiento estático (178,8 ± 13,50 y 7,75 ± 1,11, respectivamente), sin embargo, las respuestas de presión fueron no estadísticamente diferentes entre sí (PAS: 151,5 ± 27,39 mmHg frente a 154,5 ± 10,99 mmHg; PAD: 116 ± 5,98 mmHg frente a 117,5 ± 10,69 mmHg En conclusión, el calentamiento específico promovió menos trabajo cardiovascular después de la ejecución de referencia en comparación con el estiramiento estático.O aquecimento é uma importante estratégia preparatória para o bom desempenho físico durante o treinamento, todavia a sua aplicação metodológica no CrossFit ainda é pouco discutida. Este estudo objetivou verificar o efeito agudo de diferentes estratégias de aquecimento sobre o desempenho do benchmark Fran em praticantes de CrossFit. Trata-se de um estudo com delineamento transversal e com abordagem quantitativa, composto por uma amostragem não-probabilística intencional de praticantes de CrossFit. Inicialmente foram avaliados o peso, altura, o índice de massa corporal e o percentual de gordura para fins de caracterização amostral. Em sequência foi realizado o teste de 1-RM para determinação da carga e intensidade de treinamento individual. Após obtenção de dados diagnósticos, foram aplicados, em dias distintos, o alongamento estático ativo (AL) e o aquecimento específico (AQ) seguido da avaliação de desempenho do benchmark “Fran”, através da avaliação da frequência cardíaca (FC), pressão arterial sistólica (PAS) e diastólica (PAD) e escala de Borg. Os resultados caracterizaram uma amostragem com parâmetros antropométricos e de composição corporal homogênea. O aquecimento específico apresentou uma menor resposta da frequência cardíaca (168,65±16,9 bpm) e da percepção subjetiva de esforço (6,65±1,26) em relação ao alongamento estático (178,8±13,50 e 7,75±1,11, respectivamente), entretanto as respostas pressóricas não foram estatisticamente diferentes entre si (PAS: 151,5±27,39 mmHg vs. 154,5±10,99 mmHg; PAD:  116±5,98 mmHg vs. 117,5±10,69 mmHg. Em conclusão, o aquecimento específico promoveu um menor trabalho cardiovascular após a execução do benchmark em comparação ao alongamento estático.Research, Society and Development2021-07-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1801910.33448/rsd-v10i9.18019Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 9; e30910918019Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 9; e30910918019Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 9; e309109180192525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18019/16177Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Keroly Rocha Freitas; Nilson Vieira Pintohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas, Ana Keroly Rocha Pinto, Nilson Vieira2021-09-12T14:28:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18019Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:38:14.198268Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Acute effects of different heating strategies on benchmark Fran performance in Crossfit practitioners
Efecto agudo de diferentes estrategias de calentamiento sobre el rendimiento de benchmark Fran en practicantes de Crossfit
Efeito agudo de diferentes estratégias de aquecimento sobre o desempenho do benchmark Fran em praticantes de Crossfit
title Acute effects of different heating strategies on benchmark Fran performance in Crossfit practitioners
spellingShingle Acute effects of different heating strategies on benchmark Fran performance in Crossfit practitioners
Freitas, Ana Keroly Rocha
Treinamento intervalado de alta intensidade
Exercício de aquecimento
Exercícios de alongamento muscular.
Entrenamiento por intervalos de alta intensidad
Ejercicio de calentamiento
Ejercicios de estiramiento muscular.
High intensity interval training
Warm up exercise
Muscle stretching exercises.
title_short Acute effects of different heating strategies on benchmark Fran performance in Crossfit practitioners
title_full Acute effects of different heating strategies on benchmark Fran performance in Crossfit practitioners
title_fullStr Acute effects of different heating strategies on benchmark Fran performance in Crossfit practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Acute effects of different heating strategies on benchmark Fran performance in Crossfit practitioners
title_sort Acute effects of different heating strategies on benchmark Fran performance in Crossfit practitioners
author Freitas, Ana Keroly Rocha
author_facet Freitas, Ana Keroly Rocha
Pinto, Nilson Vieira
author_role author
author2 Pinto, Nilson Vieira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freitas, Ana Keroly Rocha
Pinto, Nilson Vieira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Treinamento intervalado de alta intensidade
Exercício de aquecimento
Exercícios de alongamento muscular.
Entrenamiento por intervalos de alta intensidad
Ejercicio de calentamiento
Ejercicios de estiramiento muscular.
High intensity interval training
Warm up exercise
Muscle stretching exercises.
topic Treinamento intervalado de alta intensidade
Exercício de aquecimento
Exercícios de alongamento muscular.
Entrenamiento por intervalos de alta intensidad
Ejercicio de calentamiento
Ejercicios de estiramiento muscular.
High intensity interval training
Warm up exercise
Muscle stretching exercises.
description Warming up is an important preparatory strategy for good physical performance during training, however its methodological application in CrossFit is still little discussed. This study aims to verify the acute effect of different warm-up strategies on benchmark Fran performance in CrossFit practitioners. This is a cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach, composed of an intentional non-probabilistic sampling of CrossFit practitioners. Initially, weight, height, body mass index and fat percentage will be evaluated for sample characterization purposes. Following will be performed the 1-RM test to determine the load and intensity of individual training. After obtaining diagnostic data, active static stretching (SS) and specific warm-up (SW) will be applied on different days, followed by the benchmarking performance “Fran”, through the assessment of heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) and Borg scale. The results characterized a sampling with anthropometric and body composition parameters homogeneous. Specific warming showed a lower response of heart rate (168.65 ± 16.9 bpm) and subjective perception of exertion (6.65 ± 1.26) compared to static stretching (178.8 ± 13.50 and 7 75 ± 1.11, respectively), however the pressure responses were not statistically different (SBP: 151.5 ± 27.39 mmHg vs. 154.5 ± 10.99 mmHg; DBP: 116 ± 5.98 mmHg vs. 117.5 ± 10.69 mmHg. In conclusion, specific warm-up promoted less cardiovascular work after benchmarking compared to static stretching.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18019
10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18019
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18019
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18019
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18019/16177
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Keroly Rocha Freitas; Nilson Vieira Pinto
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Keroly Rocha Freitas; Nilson Vieira Pinto
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 9; e30910918019
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 9; e30910918019
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 9; e30910918019
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052683893342208

Registros relacionados