Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Ana Catharinny da Silva de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Batalha Junior, Nilson de Jesus Pereira, Serejo, Ana Paula Muniz, Costa, Izolda Souza, Oliveira Neto, Antonio Cardoso de, Godinho, Jéssyca Wan Lume da Silva, Kzam, Pollyanna Melo, Amaral, Flavia Maria Mendonça do
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25608
Resumo: Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage; multifactorial in nature and recognized as a public health problem. Although with synthetic drugs used in therapy, increasing popular use of plants in the treatment and/or relief of pain has been observed; a situation that deserves to be highlighted as it allows selection of plant species for validation studies, but there are risks, as the use of plant-based inputs for therapeutic purposes requires certification of efficacy, safety and quality. Thus, this work aims to carry out a review of ethno-directed studies of plant species used in popular practices for pain treatment. The search was performed in the Scielo, LILACS and Pubmed databases, including articles published from 2011 to 2021, using the descriptors “pain”, “ethnobotany” and “phytotherapy”. 66 articles were selected, with a predominance of publications in Brazil and India, in English; with 70 plant species mentioned, belonging to 40 families, predominantly the Asteraceae family (12.35%). The most mentioned plant species were Curcuma longa L. (7.14%), Zingiber officinale Roscoe (5,71%) and Mentha x piperita L. (4,28%); predominating the use of leaves (54.54%), prepared by decoction (15.15%) and aqueous extraction (13.63%). Although several plant species are popularly used to treat pain, there are still few studies on safety and efficacy certification for therapeutic use. This review indicates species to be selected for continuation with a validation study, aiming to contribute to the offer of new treatment options for pain, but raises the need for Pharmacovigilance actions in Phytotherapy.
id UNIFEI_c8ba41f74f349a61494ec938737a8a33
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25608
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic reviewEspecies de plantas de uso popular en el tratamiento del dolor: una revisión sistemáticaEspécies vegetais de uso popular no tratamento da dor: uma revisão sistemáticaethno-directed studyvalidation studiesPharmacovigilanceCurcuma longaMentha x piperitaZingiber officinale.estudo etnodirigidoestudos de validaçãoFarmacovigilânciaCurcuma longaMentha x piperitaZingiber officinale.estudio etnodirigidoestudios de validaciónFarmacovigilanciaCurcuma longaMentha x piperitaZingiber officinale.Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage; multifactorial in nature and recognized as a public health problem. Although with synthetic drugs used in therapy, increasing popular use of plants in the treatment and/or relief of pain has been observed; a situation that deserves to be highlighted as it allows selection of plant species for validation studies, but there are risks, as the use of plant-based inputs for therapeutic purposes requires certification of efficacy, safety and quality. Thus, this work aims to carry out a review of ethno-directed studies of plant species used in popular practices for pain treatment. The search was performed in the Scielo, LILACS and Pubmed databases, including articles published from 2011 to 2021, using the descriptors “pain”, “ethnobotany” and “phytotherapy”. 66 articles were selected, with a predominance of publications in Brazil and India, in English; with 70 plant species mentioned, belonging to 40 families, predominantly the Asteraceae family (12.35%). The most mentioned plant species were Curcuma longa L. (7.14%), Zingiber officinale Roscoe (5,71%) and Mentha x piperita L. (4,28%); predominating the use of leaves (54.54%), prepared by decoction (15.15%) and aqueous extraction (13.63%). Although several plant species are popularly used to treat pain, there are still few studies on safety and efficacy certification for therapeutic use. This review indicates species to be selected for continuation with a validation study, aiming to contribute to the offer of new treatment options for pain, but raises the need for Pharmacovigilance actions in Phytotherapy.El dolor es una experiencia sensorial y emocional desagradable asociada con daño tisular real o potencial; de naturaleza multifactorial y reconocido como un problema de salud pública. Aunque con las drogas sintéticas utilizadas en terapia, ha habido un uso popular cada vez mayor de plantas en el tratamiento y / o alivio del dolor; situación que merece ser destacada ya que permite la selección de especies vegetales para estudios de validación, pero existen riesgos, ya que el uso de insumos vegetales con fines terapéuticos requiere certificaciones de eficacia, inocuidad y calidad. Así, este trabajo tiene como objetivo realizar una revisión de estudios etnodirigidos de especies vegetales utilizadas en prácticas populares para el tratamiento del dolor. La búsqueda se realizó en las bases de datos Scielo, LILACS y Pubmed, incluyendo artículos publicados entre 2011 y 2021, utilizando los descriptores “dolor”, “etnobotánica” y “fitoterapia”. Se seleccionaron 66 artículos, con predominio de publicaciones en Brasil e India, en inglés; con 70 especies vegetales mencionadas, pertenecientes a 40 familias, predominantemente la familia Asteraceae (12,35%). Las especies vegetales más mencionadas fueron Curcuma longa L. (7,14%), Zingiber officinale Roscoe (5,71%) y Mentha  x piperita L. (4,28%); el uso predominante de hojas (54,54%), preparadas por decocción (15,15%) y extracción acuosa (13,63%). Aunque varias especies de plantas se utilizan popularmente para tratar el dolor, todavía hay pocos estudios sobre la certificación de seguridad y eficacia para uso terapéutico. Esta revisión indica especies a ser seleccionadas para continuar con un estudio de validación, con el objetivo de contribuir a la oferta de nuevas opciones de tratamiento para el dolor, pero plantea la necesidad de acciones de Farmacovigilancia en Fitoterapia.A dor é uma experiência sensitiva e emocional desagradável associada a lesão tecidual real ou potencial; de natureza multifatorial e reconhecida como sério problema de saúde pública. Embora com diversos fármacos sintéticos empregados na terapêutica, é constatado crescente expansão no uso popular de plantas e produtos derivados no tratamento e/ou alívio da dor; situação que merece destaque pela perspectiva do uso popular possibilitar seleção de espécies vegetais para os estudos de validação, mas alertar também para riscos pois a utilização dos insumos vegetais para fins terapêuticos exige certificação de eficácia, segurança e qualidade. Assim, este trabalho objetiva realizar revisão dos estudos etnodirigidos de espécies vegetais utilizadas nas popuçarmente para tratamento da dor. A busca foi realizada nas bases Scielo, LILACS e Pubmed, incluindo artigos publicados de 2011 a 2021, usando como descritores: “dor”, “etnobotânica” e “fitoterapia”. Foram selecionados 66 artigos, com predomínio de publicações no Brasil e Índia, na língua inglesa; com 70 espécies vegetais referidas, pertencentes a 40 famílias, predominando Asteraceae (12,35%). As espécies mais referidas foram Curcuma longa L. (7,14%), Zingiber officinale Roscoe (5,71%) e Mentha x piperita (4,28%); predominando uso das folhas (54,54%), preparadas por decocção (15,15%) e extração aquosa (13,63%). Embora diversas espécies sejam usadas popularmente para tratamento de dor, ainda são escassos os estudos de segurança e eficácia para uso terapêutico. Essa revisão sinaliza espécies a serem selecionadas para prosseguimento com estudo de validação, visando contribuição na oferta de novas opções de tratamento para dor, mas desperta para necessidade de ações de Farmacovigilância em Fitoterapia.  Research, Society and Development2022-01-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2560810.33448/rsd-v11i2.25608Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e22511225608Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e22511225608Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e225112256082525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25608/22497Copyright (c) 2022 Ana Catharinny da Silva de Oliveira; Nilson de Jesus Pereira Batalha Junior; Ana Paula Muniz Serejo; Izolda Souza Costa; Antonio Cardoso de Oliveira Neto; Jéssyca Wan Lume da Silva Godinho; Pollyanna Melo Kzam; Flavia Maria Mendonça do Amaralhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Ana Catharinny da Silva de Batalha Junior, Nilson de Jesus Pereira Serejo, Ana Paula MunizCosta, Izolda SouzaOliveira Neto, Antonio Cardoso deGodinho, Jéssyca Wan Lume da Silva Kzam, Pollyanna MeloAmaral, Flavia Maria Mendonça do2022-02-07T01:42:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25608Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:51.271078Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review
Especies de plantas de uso popular en el tratamiento del dolor: una revisión sistemática
Espécies vegetais de uso popular no tratamento da dor: uma revisão sistemática
title Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review
spellingShingle Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review
Oliveira, Ana Catharinny da Silva de
ethno-directed study
validation studies
Pharmacovigilance
Curcuma longa
Mentha x piperita
Zingiber officinale.
estudo etnodirigido
estudos de validação
Farmacovigilância
Curcuma longa
Mentha x piperita
Zingiber officinale.
estudio etnodirigido
estudios de validación
Farmacovigilancia
Curcuma longa
Mentha x piperita
Zingiber officinale.
title_short Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review
title_full Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review
title_fullStr Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review
title_sort Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review
author Oliveira, Ana Catharinny da Silva de
author_facet Oliveira, Ana Catharinny da Silva de
Batalha Junior, Nilson de Jesus Pereira
Serejo, Ana Paula Muniz
Costa, Izolda Souza
Oliveira Neto, Antonio Cardoso de
Godinho, Jéssyca Wan Lume da Silva
Kzam, Pollyanna Melo
Amaral, Flavia Maria Mendonça do
author_role author
author2 Batalha Junior, Nilson de Jesus Pereira
Serejo, Ana Paula Muniz
Costa, Izolda Souza
Oliveira Neto, Antonio Cardoso de
Godinho, Jéssyca Wan Lume da Silva
Kzam, Pollyanna Melo
Amaral, Flavia Maria Mendonça do
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Ana Catharinny da Silva de
Batalha Junior, Nilson de Jesus Pereira
Serejo, Ana Paula Muniz
Costa, Izolda Souza
Oliveira Neto, Antonio Cardoso de
Godinho, Jéssyca Wan Lume da Silva
Kzam, Pollyanna Melo
Amaral, Flavia Maria Mendonça do
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ethno-directed study
validation studies
Pharmacovigilance
Curcuma longa
Mentha x piperita
Zingiber officinale.
estudo etnodirigido
estudos de validação
Farmacovigilância
Curcuma longa
Mentha x piperita
Zingiber officinale.
estudio etnodirigido
estudios de validación
Farmacovigilancia
Curcuma longa
Mentha x piperita
Zingiber officinale.
topic ethno-directed study
validation studies
Pharmacovigilance
Curcuma longa
Mentha x piperita
Zingiber officinale.
estudo etnodirigido
estudos de validação
Farmacovigilância
Curcuma longa
Mentha x piperita
Zingiber officinale.
estudio etnodirigido
estudios de validación
Farmacovigilancia
Curcuma longa
Mentha x piperita
Zingiber officinale.
description Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage; multifactorial in nature and recognized as a public health problem. Although with synthetic drugs used in therapy, increasing popular use of plants in the treatment and/or relief of pain has been observed; a situation that deserves to be highlighted as it allows selection of plant species for validation studies, but there are risks, as the use of plant-based inputs for therapeutic purposes requires certification of efficacy, safety and quality. Thus, this work aims to carry out a review of ethno-directed studies of plant species used in popular practices for pain treatment. The search was performed in the Scielo, LILACS and Pubmed databases, including articles published from 2011 to 2021, using the descriptors “pain”, “ethnobotany” and “phytotherapy”. 66 articles were selected, with a predominance of publications in Brazil and India, in English; with 70 plant species mentioned, belonging to 40 families, predominantly the Asteraceae family (12.35%). The most mentioned plant species were Curcuma longa L. (7.14%), Zingiber officinale Roscoe (5,71%) and Mentha x piperita L. (4,28%); predominating the use of leaves (54.54%), prepared by decoction (15.15%) and aqueous extraction (13.63%). Although several plant species are popularly used to treat pain, there are still few studies on safety and efficacy certification for therapeutic use. This review indicates species to be selected for continuation with a validation study, aiming to contribute to the offer of new treatment options for pain, but raises the need for Pharmacovigilance actions in Phytotherapy.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25608
10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25608
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25608
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25608
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25608/22497
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e22511225608
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e22511225608
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e22511225608
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052761997574144