Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25608 |
Resumo: | Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage; multifactorial in nature and recognized as a public health problem. Although with synthetic drugs used in therapy, increasing popular use of plants in the treatment and/or relief of pain has been observed; a situation that deserves to be highlighted as it allows selection of plant species for validation studies, but there are risks, as the use of plant-based inputs for therapeutic purposes requires certification of efficacy, safety and quality. Thus, this work aims to carry out a review of ethno-directed studies of plant species used in popular practices for pain treatment. The search was performed in the Scielo, LILACS and Pubmed databases, including articles published from 2011 to 2021, using the descriptors “pain”, “ethnobotany” and “phytotherapy”. 66 articles were selected, with a predominance of publications in Brazil and India, in English; with 70 plant species mentioned, belonging to 40 families, predominantly the Asteraceae family (12.35%). The most mentioned plant species were Curcuma longa L. (7.14%), Zingiber officinale Roscoe (5,71%) and Mentha x piperita L. (4,28%); predominating the use of leaves (54.54%), prepared by decoction (15.15%) and aqueous extraction (13.63%). Although several plant species are popularly used to treat pain, there are still few studies on safety and efficacy certification for therapeutic use. This review indicates species to be selected for continuation with a validation study, aiming to contribute to the offer of new treatment options for pain, but raises the need for Pharmacovigilance actions in Phytotherapy. |
id |
UNIFEI_c8ba41f74f349a61494ec938737a8a33 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25608 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic reviewEspecies de plantas de uso popular en el tratamiento del dolor: una revisión sistemáticaEspécies vegetais de uso popular no tratamento da dor: uma revisão sistemáticaethno-directed studyvalidation studiesPharmacovigilanceCurcuma longaMentha x piperitaZingiber officinale.estudo etnodirigidoestudos de validaçãoFarmacovigilânciaCurcuma longaMentha x piperitaZingiber officinale.estudio etnodirigidoestudios de validaciónFarmacovigilanciaCurcuma longaMentha x piperitaZingiber officinale.Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage; multifactorial in nature and recognized as a public health problem. Although with synthetic drugs used in therapy, increasing popular use of plants in the treatment and/or relief of pain has been observed; a situation that deserves to be highlighted as it allows selection of plant species for validation studies, but there are risks, as the use of plant-based inputs for therapeutic purposes requires certification of efficacy, safety and quality. Thus, this work aims to carry out a review of ethno-directed studies of plant species used in popular practices for pain treatment. The search was performed in the Scielo, LILACS and Pubmed databases, including articles published from 2011 to 2021, using the descriptors “pain”, “ethnobotany” and “phytotherapy”. 66 articles were selected, with a predominance of publications in Brazil and India, in English; with 70 plant species mentioned, belonging to 40 families, predominantly the Asteraceae family (12.35%). The most mentioned plant species were Curcuma longa L. (7.14%), Zingiber officinale Roscoe (5,71%) and Mentha x piperita L. (4,28%); predominating the use of leaves (54.54%), prepared by decoction (15.15%) and aqueous extraction (13.63%). Although several plant species are popularly used to treat pain, there are still few studies on safety and efficacy certification for therapeutic use. This review indicates species to be selected for continuation with a validation study, aiming to contribute to the offer of new treatment options for pain, but raises the need for Pharmacovigilance actions in Phytotherapy.El dolor es una experiencia sensorial y emocional desagradable asociada con daño tisular real o potencial; de naturaleza multifactorial y reconocido como un problema de salud pública. Aunque con las drogas sintéticas utilizadas en terapia, ha habido un uso popular cada vez mayor de plantas en el tratamiento y / o alivio del dolor; situación que merece ser destacada ya que permite la selección de especies vegetales para estudios de validación, pero existen riesgos, ya que el uso de insumos vegetales con fines terapéuticos requiere certificaciones de eficacia, inocuidad y calidad. Así, este trabajo tiene como objetivo realizar una revisión de estudios etnodirigidos de especies vegetales utilizadas en prácticas populares para el tratamiento del dolor. La búsqueda se realizó en las bases de datos Scielo, LILACS y Pubmed, incluyendo artículos publicados entre 2011 y 2021, utilizando los descriptores “dolor”, “etnobotánica” y “fitoterapia”. Se seleccionaron 66 artículos, con predominio de publicaciones en Brasil e India, en inglés; con 70 especies vegetales mencionadas, pertenecientes a 40 familias, predominantemente la familia Asteraceae (12,35%). Las especies vegetales más mencionadas fueron Curcuma longa L. (7,14%), Zingiber officinale Roscoe (5,71%) y Mentha x piperita L. (4,28%); el uso predominante de hojas (54,54%), preparadas por decocción (15,15%) y extracción acuosa (13,63%). Aunque varias especies de plantas se utilizan popularmente para tratar el dolor, todavía hay pocos estudios sobre la certificación de seguridad y eficacia para uso terapéutico. Esta revisión indica especies a ser seleccionadas para continuar con un estudio de validación, con el objetivo de contribuir a la oferta de nuevas opciones de tratamiento para el dolor, pero plantea la necesidad de acciones de Farmacovigilancia en Fitoterapia.A dor é uma experiência sensitiva e emocional desagradável associada a lesão tecidual real ou potencial; de natureza multifatorial e reconhecida como sério problema de saúde pública. Embora com diversos fármacos sintéticos empregados na terapêutica, é constatado crescente expansão no uso popular de plantas e produtos derivados no tratamento e/ou alívio da dor; situação que merece destaque pela perspectiva do uso popular possibilitar seleção de espécies vegetais para os estudos de validação, mas alertar também para riscos pois a utilização dos insumos vegetais para fins terapêuticos exige certificação de eficácia, segurança e qualidade. Assim, este trabalho objetiva realizar revisão dos estudos etnodirigidos de espécies vegetais utilizadas nas popuçarmente para tratamento da dor. A busca foi realizada nas bases Scielo, LILACS e Pubmed, incluindo artigos publicados de 2011 a 2021, usando como descritores: “dor”, “etnobotânica” e “fitoterapia”. Foram selecionados 66 artigos, com predomínio de publicações no Brasil e Índia, na língua inglesa; com 70 espécies vegetais referidas, pertencentes a 40 famílias, predominando Asteraceae (12,35%). As espécies mais referidas foram Curcuma longa L. (7,14%), Zingiber officinale Roscoe (5,71%) e Mentha x piperita (4,28%); predominando uso das folhas (54,54%), preparadas por decocção (15,15%) e extração aquosa (13,63%). Embora diversas espécies sejam usadas popularmente para tratamento de dor, ainda são escassos os estudos de segurança e eficácia para uso terapêutico. Essa revisão sinaliza espécies a serem selecionadas para prosseguimento com estudo de validação, visando contribuição na oferta de novas opções de tratamento para dor, mas desperta para necessidade de ações de Farmacovigilância em Fitoterapia. Research, Society and Development2022-01-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2560810.33448/rsd-v11i2.25608Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e22511225608Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e22511225608Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e225112256082525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25608/22497Copyright (c) 2022 Ana Catharinny da Silva de Oliveira; Nilson de Jesus Pereira Batalha Junior; Ana Paula Muniz Serejo; Izolda Souza Costa; Antonio Cardoso de Oliveira Neto; Jéssyca Wan Lume da Silva Godinho; Pollyanna Melo Kzam; Flavia Maria Mendonça do Amaralhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Ana Catharinny da Silva de Batalha Junior, Nilson de Jesus Pereira Serejo, Ana Paula MunizCosta, Izolda SouzaOliveira Neto, Antonio Cardoso deGodinho, Jéssyca Wan Lume da Silva Kzam, Pollyanna MeloAmaral, Flavia Maria Mendonça do2022-02-07T01:42:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25608Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:51.271078Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review Especies de plantas de uso popular en el tratamiento del dolor: una revisión sistemática Espécies vegetais de uso popular no tratamento da dor: uma revisão sistemática |
title |
Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review Oliveira, Ana Catharinny da Silva de ethno-directed study validation studies Pharmacovigilance Curcuma longa Mentha x piperita Zingiber officinale. estudo etnodirigido estudos de validação Farmacovigilância Curcuma longa Mentha x piperita Zingiber officinale. estudio etnodirigido estudios de validación Farmacovigilancia Curcuma longa Mentha x piperita Zingiber officinale. |
title_short |
Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review |
title_full |
Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Plant species of popular use in pain management: a systematic review |
author |
Oliveira, Ana Catharinny da Silva de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Ana Catharinny da Silva de Batalha Junior, Nilson de Jesus Pereira Serejo, Ana Paula Muniz Costa, Izolda Souza Oliveira Neto, Antonio Cardoso de Godinho, Jéssyca Wan Lume da Silva Kzam, Pollyanna Melo Amaral, Flavia Maria Mendonça do |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Batalha Junior, Nilson de Jesus Pereira Serejo, Ana Paula Muniz Costa, Izolda Souza Oliveira Neto, Antonio Cardoso de Godinho, Jéssyca Wan Lume da Silva Kzam, Pollyanna Melo Amaral, Flavia Maria Mendonça do |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Ana Catharinny da Silva de Batalha Junior, Nilson de Jesus Pereira Serejo, Ana Paula Muniz Costa, Izolda Souza Oliveira Neto, Antonio Cardoso de Godinho, Jéssyca Wan Lume da Silva Kzam, Pollyanna Melo Amaral, Flavia Maria Mendonça do |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ethno-directed study validation studies Pharmacovigilance Curcuma longa Mentha x piperita Zingiber officinale. estudo etnodirigido estudos de validação Farmacovigilância Curcuma longa Mentha x piperita Zingiber officinale. estudio etnodirigido estudios de validación Farmacovigilancia Curcuma longa Mentha x piperita Zingiber officinale. |
topic |
ethno-directed study validation studies Pharmacovigilance Curcuma longa Mentha x piperita Zingiber officinale. estudo etnodirigido estudos de validação Farmacovigilância Curcuma longa Mentha x piperita Zingiber officinale. estudio etnodirigido estudios de validación Farmacovigilancia Curcuma longa Mentha x piperita Zingiber officinale. |
description |
Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage; multifactorial in nature and recognized as a public health problem. Although with synthetic drugs used in therapy, increasing popular use of plants in the treatment and/or relief of pain has been observed; a situation that deserves to be highlighted as it allows selection of plant species for validation studies, but there are risks, as the use of plant-based inputs for therapeutic purposes requires certification of efficacy, safety and quality. Thus, this work aims to carry out a review of ethno-directed studies of plant species used in popular practices for pain treatment. The search was performed in the Scielo, LILACS and Pubmed databases, including articles published from 2011 to 2021, using the descriptors “pain”, “ethnobotany” and “phytotherapy”. 66 articles were selected, with a predominance of publications in Brazil and India, in English; with 70 plant species mentioned, belonging to 40 families, predominantly the Asteraceae family (12.35%). The most mentioned plant species were Curcuma longa L. (7.14%), Zingiber officinale Roscoe (5,71%) and Mentha x piperita L. (4,28%); predominating the use of leaves (54.54%), prepared by decoction (15.15%) and aqueous extraction (13.63%). Although several plant species are popularly used to treat pain, there are still few studies on safety and efficacy certification for therapeutic use. This review indicates species to be selected for continuation with a validation study, aiming to contribute to the offer of new treatment options for pain, but raises the need for Pharmacovigilance actions in Phytotherapy. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25608 10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25608 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25608 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25608 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25608/22497 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e22511225608 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e22511225608 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e22511225608 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052761997574144 |