Solidarity Economy and Mental Health: Issues and strategies for the social inclusion of people in mental suffering
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16924 |
Resumo: | The Psychiatric Reform movement in Brazil proposed the dismantling of the asylum model and the establishment of a new paradigm of mental health care, based on community treatment done in freedom and on proposals for social inclusion. The current national policy on Mental Health, known as the Psychosocial Care Network (RAPS), aims to promote and support its service’s users in their (re)insertion into work. In parallel, the Solidarity Economy presents itself as a means of material organization of life and work relationships based on the primacy of respect for human beings in their relationship with each other and with the environment, as well as on the ideals of cooperation, self-management and solidarity. At the same time, different initiatives to generate work and income based on the Solidarity Economy have been structured by different RAPS attention points, enabling new forms of social inclusion. In this scenario, the research in question consists of a systematic review with a qualitative approach, whose objective is to present the potentialities, challenges and strategies adopted in the literature to strengthen the interface between the fields of Mental Health and Solidarity Economy. The results suggest: the importance of the initiatives’ commitment to guarantee the right to work; the assisted workshops as the main strategy for the formation of enterprises; the lack of legal and public policy support for the constitution of the initiatives; as well as the lack of adequate spaces for commercialization and the low financial return to the enterprises. |
id |
UNIFEI_cc6ff0babe37e75490e14339819c6772 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16924 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Solidarity Economy and Mental Health: Issues and strategies for the social inclusion of people in mental sufferingEconomía Solidaria y Salud Mental: Temas y estrategias para la inclusión social de personas en sufrimiento mentalEconomia Solidária e Saúde Mental: Problemáticas e estratégias para a inclusão social de pessoas em sofrimento mentalEconomía SolidariaSalud mentalInclusión social.Solidarity EconomyMental healthSocial inclusion.Economia SolidáriaSaúde MentalInclusão social.The Psychiatric Reform movement in Brazil proposed the dismantling of the asylum model and the establishment of a new paradigm of mental health care, based on community treatment done in freedom and on proposals for social inclusion. The current national policy on Mental Health, known as the Psychosocial Care Network (RAPS), aims to promote and support its service’s users in their (re)insertion into work. In parallel, the Solidarity Economy presents itself as a means of material organization of life and work relationships based on the primacy of respect for human beings in their relationship with each other and with the environment, as well as on the ideals of cooperation, self-management and solidarity. At the same time, different initiatives to generate work and income based on the Solidarity Economy have been structured by different RAPS attention points, enabling new forms of social inclusion. In this scenario, the research in question consists of a systematic review with a qualitative approach, whose objective is to present the potentialities, challenges and strategies adopted in the literature to strengthen the interface between the fields of Mental Health and Solidarity Economy. The results suggest: the importance of the initiatives’ commitment to guarantee the right to work; the assisted workshops as the main strategy for the formation of enterprises; the lack of legal and public policy support for the constitution of the initiatives; as well as the lack of adequate spaces for commercialization and the low financial return to the enterprises.En Brasil, el movimiento de la Reforma Psiquiátrica propuso la extinción del modelo de asilo u hospicio de tipo manicomio, estableciendo un nuevo paradigma de atención en salud mental, basado en el tratamiento comunitario en libertad y en propuestas de inclusión social. La actual política nacional de Salud Mental, conocida como Red de Atención Psicosocial (RAPS), asume entre sus objetivos la promoción y apoyo a los ciudadanos para su (re) inserción laboral. Asimismo, la Economía Solidaria representa una forma de organización material de las relaciones de vida y trabajo basada en la primacía del respeto al ser humano en su relación entre sí y con el medio ambiente y en ideales de cooperación, autogestión y solidaridad. Al mismo tiempo, distintas iniciativas de creación de empleos e ingresos basadas en la Economía Solidaria se han estructurado mediante diferentes puntos de atención del RAPS, permitiendo nuevas formas de inclusión social. En ese contexto, esta investigación se trata de una revisión sistemática con enfoque cualitativo, cuyo objetivo es presentar las potencialidades, desafíos y estrategias presentadas en la literatura para fortalecer la interface entre los campos de la Salud Mental y la Economía Solidaria. Los resultados sugieren: la importancia de que las iniciativas asuman su compromiso de garantizar el derecho al trabajo; los talleres asistidos como principal estrategia para la formación de empresas; poco soporte legal y de políticas públicas para la constitución de las iniciativas; además de la falta de espacios adecuados para la comercialización y la baja rentabilidad de las empresas.Em contexto brasileiro, o movimento da Reforma Psiquiátrica propôs o desmonte do modelo manicomial e a instauração de um novo paradigma de atenção à saúde mental, baseado no tratamento comunitário em liberdade e em propostas de inclusão social. A atual política nacional de Saúde Mental, conhecida como Rede de Atenção Psicossocial (RAPS), assume como um de seus objetivos a promoção e apoio aos usuários de seus serviços em sua (re)inserção laboral. Paralelamente, a Economia Solidária se apresenta como um modo de organização material da vida e das relações de trabalho pautado na primazia pelo respeito ao ser humano em sua relação entre si e com o meio ambiente e nos ideais de cooperação, autogestão e solidariedade. Em confluência, diferentes iniciativas de geração de trabalho e renda baseadas na Economia Solidária vêm sendo estruturadas por diferentes pontos de atenção da RAPS, possibilitando novas formas de inclusão social. Nesse cenário, a pesquisa em tela se trata de uma revisão sistemática de abordagem qualitativa, cujo objetivo é apresentar as potencialidades, desafios e estratégias adotadas abordadas pela literatura para fortalecer a interface entre os campos da Saúde Mental e Economia Solidária. Os resultados sugerem: a importância da assunção, pelas iniciativas, de seu compromisso na garantia do direito ao trabalho; as oficinas assistidas como principal estratégia de formação de empreendimentos; a falta de respaldo jurídico e de políticas públicas para constituição das iniciativas; além da falta de espaços adequados à comercialização e o baixo retorno financeiro aos empreendimentos.Research, Society and Development2021-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1692410.33448/rsd-v10i7.16924Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e57710716924Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e57710716924Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e577107169242525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16924/14912Copyright (c) 2021 Caique Lima Sette Franzoloso; Luis Felipe Ferrohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFranzoloso, Caique Lima Sette Ferro, Luis Felipe 2021-07-18T21:07:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16924Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:37:20.944571Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Solidarity Economy and Mental Health: Issues and strategies for the social inclusion of people in mental suffering Economía Solidaria y Salud Mental: Temas y estrategias para la inclusión social de personas en sufrimiento mental Economia Solidária e Saúde Mental: Problemáticas e estratégias para a inclusão social de pessoas em sofrimento mental |
title |
Solidarity Economy and Mental Health: Issues and strategies for the social inclusion of people in mental suffering |
spellingShingle |
Solidarity Economy and Mental Health: Issues and strategies for the social inclusion of people in mental suffering Franzoloso, Caique Lima Sette Economía Solidaria Salud mental Inclusión social. Solidarity Economy Mental health Social inclusion. Economia Solidária Saúde Mental Inclusão social. |
title_short |
Solidarity Economy and Mental Health: Issues and strategies for the social inclusion of people in mental suffering |
title_full |
Solidarity Economy and Mental Health: Issues and strategies for the social inclusion of people in mental suffering |
title_fullStr |
Solidarity Economy and Mental Health: Issues and strategies for the social inclusion of people in mental suffering |
title_full_unstemmed |
Solidarity Economy and Mental Health: Issues and strategies for the social inclusion of people in mental suffering |
title_sort |
Solidarity Economy and Mental Health: Issues and strategies for the social inclusion of people in mental suffering |
author |
Franzoloso, Caique Lima Sette |
author_facet |
Franzoloso, Caique Lima Sette Ferro, Luis Felipe |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferro, Luis Felipe |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Franzoloso, Caique Lima Sette Ferro, Luis Felipe |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Economía Solidaria Salud mental Inclusión social. Solidarity Economy Mental health Social inclusion. Economia Solidária Saúde Mental Inclusão social. |
topic |
Economía Solidaria Salud mental Inclusión social. Solidarity Economy Mental health Social inclusion. Economia Solidária Saúde Mental Inclusão social. |
description |
The Psychiatric Reform movement in Brazil proposed the dismantling of the asylum model and the establishment of a new paradigm of mental health care, based on community treatment done in freedom and on proposals for social inclusion. The current national policy on Mental Health, known as the Psychosocial Care Network (RAPS), aims to promote and support its service’s users in their (re)insertion into work. In parallel, the Solidarity Economy presents itself as a means of material organization of life and work relationships based on the primacy of respect for human beings in their relationship with each other and with the environment, as well as on the ideals of cooperation, self-management and solidarity. At the same time, different initiatives to generate work and income based on the Solidarity Economy have been structured by different RAPS attention points, enabling new forms of social inclusion. In this scenario, the research in question consists of a systematic review with a qualitative approach, whose objective is to present the potentialities, challenges and strategies adopted in the literature to strengthen the interface between the fields of Mental Health and Solidarity Economy. The results suggest: the importance of the initiatives’ commitment to guarantee the right to work; the assisted workshops as the main strategy for the formation of enterprises; the lack of legal and public policy support for the constitution of the initiatives; as well as the lack of adequate spaces for commercialization and the low financial return to the enterprises. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16924 10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16924 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16924 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16924 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16924/14912 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Caique Lima Sette Franzoloso; Luis Felipe Ferro https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Caique Lima Sette Franzoloso; Luis Felipe Ferro https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e57710716924 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e57710716924 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e57710716924 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052681090498560 |