Efficiency of commercial antiseptic soaps against pathogenic bacteria and labels analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12241 |
Resumo: | Bar soaps with antiseptic action are intended for cleaning residues present in the body, their use has grown significantly due to the population's concern about certain diseases caused by microbiological contamination. With this, different brands of soaps have appeared on the market, guaranteeing the elimination of 99.9% of bacteria. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of pH, antibacterial activity and labels of 5 different brands of antibacterial bar soaps, identified as A, B, C, D and E. The pH was determined with the aid of a digital pH meter, and in the microbiological analysis, the disk diffusion methodology was used in order to observe the presence or absence of the multiplication of the bacteria Streptococcus pyogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli against the different soaps tested. During the analysis of the labeling of the soaps, the presence of the “composition” requirement required by the current resolution was evaluated. In the tests carried out it was found that the pH of all tested brands were outside the established parameters. In the microbiological analysis, it was observed that only the E mark showed an antiseptic effect against the tested bacteria. The other soaps showed less and even no potential to inhibit the growth of these microorganisms. The products analyzed in this study present in their formulations two active substances, triclosan and triclocarban, however they can be harmful to human health and the environment, and induce bacterial resistance, therefore, some countries have already banned the use of these assets. According to the results obtained, it is possible to conclude that the labels present on the packaging of these different brands analyzed are at variance with that established by the manufacturers. |
id |
UNIFEI_cd62d864b2b491c896da2f6bb0f97354 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12241 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Efficiency of commercial antiseptic soaps against pathogenic bacteria and labels analysis Eficiencia de jabones comerciales antisépticos contra bactérias patógenas y análisis de etiquetasEficiência de sabonetes comerciais antissépticos contra bactérias patogênicas e análise dos rótulosHygieneSoapAntibacterialsTriclosan.HigieneJaboneAntibacterianosTriclosan.HigieneSaboneteAntibacterianosTriclosan.Bar soaps with antiseptic action are intended for cleaning residues present in the body, their use has grown significantly due to the population's concern about certain diseases caused by microbiological contamination. With this, different brands of soaps have appeared on the market, guaranteeing the elimination of 99.9% of bacteria. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of pH, antibacterial activity and labels of 5 different brands of antibacterial bar soaps, identified as A, B, C, D and E. The pH was determined with the aid of a digital pH meter, and in the microbiological analysis, the disk diffusion methodology was used in order to observe the presence or absence of the multiplication of the bacteria Streptococcus pyogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli against the different soaps tested. During the analysis of the labeling of the soaps, the presence of the “composition” requirement required by the current resolution was evaluated. In the tests carried out it was found that the pH of all tested brands were outside the established parameters. In the microbiological analysis, it was observed that only the E mark showed an antiseptic effect against the tested bacteria. The other soaps showed less and even no potential to inhibit the growth of these microorganisms. The products analyzed in this study present in their formulations two active substances, triclosan and triclocarban, however they can be harmful to human health and the environment, and induce bacterial resistance, therefore, some countries have already banned the use of these assets. According to the results obtained, it is possible to conclude that the labels present on the packaging of these different brands analyzed are at variance with that established by the manufacturers.Los jabones en barra con acción antiséptica están destinados a la limpieza de residuos presentes en el organismo, su uso ha crecido significativamente debido a la preocupación de la población por determinadas enfermedades provocadas por la contaminación microbiológica. Con ello han aparecido en el mercado diferentes marcas de jabones, garantizando la eliminación del 99,9% de las bacterias. El objetivo de este estudio fue realizar un análisis comparativo de pH, actividad antibacteriana y etiquetas de 5 marcas diferentes de jabones en barra antibacterianos, identificado como A, B, C, D y E. El pH se determinó con la ayuda de un pHmetro digital, y en el análisis microbiológico se utilizó la metodología de difusión en disco para observar la presencia o ausencia de la multiplicación de las bacterias Streptococcus pyogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus y Escherichia coli frente a los diferentes jabones ensayados. Durante el análisis del etiquetado de los jabones se evaluó la presencia del requisito de “composición” exigido por la resolución actual. En las pruebas realizadas se encontró que el pH de todas las marcas probadas estaba fuera de los parámetros establecidos. En el análisis microbiológico, se observó que solo la marca E mostró un efecto antiséptico contra las bacterias probadas. Los otros jabones mostraron menos e incluso ningún potencial para inhibir el crecimiento de estos microorganismos. Los productos analizados en este estudio presentan en sus formulaciones dos principios activos, triclosán y triclocarbán, sin embargo pueden ser nocivos para la salud humana y el medio ambiente, e inducir resistencias bacterianas, por ello, algunos países ya han prohibido el uso de estos activos. De acuerdo con los resultados obtenidos, es posible concluir que las etiquetas presentes en los envases de estas diferentes marcas analizadas están en desacuerdo con lo establecido por los fabricantes.Os sabonetes em barra com ação antisséptica são destinados à limpeza de resíduos presentes no corpo, sua utilização tem crescido significativamente em decorrência da preocupação da população com determinadas doenças causadas por contaminação microbiológica. Com isso, têm surgido no mercado diferentes marcas de sabonetes garantindo a eliminação de 99,9% das bactérias. O objetivo deste estudo foi realizar a análise comparativa do pH, atividade antibacteriana e rótulos de 5 diferentes marcas de sabonetes antibacterianos em barra, identificados como A, B, C D e E. Realizou-se a determinação do pH com auxílio de pHmetro digital, e na análise microbiológica utilizou-se a metodologia de disco difusão, com o intuito de observar a presença ou ausência da multiplicação das bactérias Streptococcus pyogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus e Escherichia coli frente aos diferentes sabonetes testados. Durante a análise da rotulagem dos sabonetes foi avaliada a presença do requisito “composição”, exigido pela resolução vigente. Nos testes realizados constatou-se que o pH de todas as marcas testadas encontraram-se fora dos parâmetros estabelecidos. Na análise microbiológica observou-se que apenas a marca E, demonstrou efeito antisséptico frente às bactérias testadas. Os demais sabonetes apresentaram menor e até mesmo nenhum potencial de inibição do crescimento desses microrganismos. Os produtos analisados neste estudo apresentam em suas formulações duas substâncias ativas, o triclosan e o triclocarban, porém os mesmos podem ser nocivos para a saúde humana e meio ambiente, e induzirem a resistência bacteriana, por isso, alguns países já proibiram o uso destes ativos. Segundo os resultados obtidos é possível concluir que os rótulos presentes das embalagens destas diferentes marcas analisadas estão em desacordo com o estabelecido pelos fabricantes.Research, Society and Development2021-02-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1224110.33448/rsd-v10i2.12241Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 2; e20310212241Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 2; e20310212241Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 2; e203102122412525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12241/11146Copyright (c) 2021 Jeisa Patricia Leitzke; Tatiany Alves Nierri; Jaqueline Hoscheid; Nathielle Mirandahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeitzke, Jeisa Patricia Nierri, Tatiany Alves Hoscheid, Jaqueline Miranda, Nathielle2021-03-02T09:32:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12241Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:33:52.323119Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficiency of commercial antiseptic soaps against pathogenic bacteria and labels analysis Eficiencia de jabones comerciales antisépticos contra bactérias patógenas y análisis de etiquetas Eficiência de sabonetes comerciais antissépticos contra bactérias patogênicas e análise dos rótulos |
title |
Efficiency of commercial antiseptic soaps against pathogenic bacteria and labels analysis |
spellingShingle |
Efficiency of commercial antiseptic soaps against pathogenic bacteria and labels analysis Leitzke, Jeisa Patricia Hygiene Soap Antibacterials Triclosan. Higiene Jabone Antibacterianos Triclosan. Higiene Sabonete Antibacterianos Triclosan. |
title_short |
Efficiency of commercial antiseptic soaps against pathogenic bacteria and labels analysis |
title_full |
Efficiency of commercial antiseptic soaps against pathogenic bacteria and labels analysis |
title_fullStr |
Efficiency of commercial antiseptic soaps against pathogenic bacteria and labels analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficiency of commercial antiseptic soaps against pathogenic bacteria and labels analysis |
title_sort |
Efficiency of commercial antiseptic soaps against pathogenic bacteria and labels analysis |
author |
Leitzke, Jeisa Patricia |
author_facet |
Leitzke, Jeisa Patricia Nierri, Tatiany Alves Hoscheid, Jaqueline Miranda, Nathielle |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nierri, Tatiany Alves Hoscheid, Jaqueline Miranda, Nathielle |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leitzke, Jeisa Patricia Nierri, Tatiany Alves Hoscheid, Jaqueline Miranda, Nathielle |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hygiene Soap Antibacterials Triclosan. Higiene Jabone Antibacterianos Triclosan. Higiene Sabonete Antibacterianos Triclosan. |
topic |
Hygiene Soap Antibacterials Triclosan. Higiene Jabone Antibacterianos Triclosan. Higiene Sabonete Antibacterianos Triclosan. |
description |
Bar soaps with antiseptic action are intended for cleaning residues present in the body, their use has grown significantly due to the population's concern about certain diseases caused by microbiological contamination. With this, different brands of soaps have appeared on the market, guaranteeing the elimination of 99.9% of bacteria. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of pH, antibacterial activity and labels of 5 different brands of antibacterial bar soaps, identified as A, B, C, D and E. The pH was determined with the aid of a digital pH meter, and in the microbiological analysis, the disk diffusion methodology was used in order to observe the presence or absence of the multiplication of the bacteria Streptococcus pyogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli against the different soaps tested. During the analysis of the labeling of the soaps, the presence of the “composition” requirement required by the current resolution was evaluated. In the tests carried out it was found that the pH of all tested brands were outside the established parameters. In the microbiological analysis, it was observed that only the E mark showed an antiseptic effect against the tested bacteria. The other soaps showed less and even no potential to inhibit the growth of these microorganisms. The products analyzed in this study present in their formulations two active substances, triclosan and triclocarban, however they can be harmful to human health and the environment, and induce bacterial resistance, therefore, some countries have already banned the use of these assets. According to the results obtained, it is possible to conclude that the labels present on the packaging of these different brands analyzed are at variance with that established by the manufacturers. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12241 10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12241 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12241 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12241 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12241/11146 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 2; e20310212241 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 2; e20310212241 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 2; e20310212241 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052745090334720 |