Experimental models for induction of muscle injury in rodents: literature review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30133 |
Resumo: | Objective: the present study aims to evidence the most recurrent muscle injury techniques in the literature. Methodology: This is a bibliographical research of the integrative review type of literature. The articles were searched in 2021, from November 22 to 24, in the PubMed database, using the eligibility criteria. Results and Discussion: According to the search strategy used in this study, of all articles only 28 studies met the eligibility criteria. When analyzing the publication journals, it was observed that the most recurrent were PLoS One (7.14%), Int J Med Sci (7.14%), and J Trauma Acute Care with (7.14%). It was also evidenced that the number of publications on the subject has been growing over the years, when it compared the year 2016 (10.71%) with later years, except in 2019 with the same percentage of 10.71% and 2021 with zero publication. The breeds most used in the experiments were Sprague-Dawley (32.14%) and Wistar with 25%. There was a predominance of models due to contusion (35.71%), followed by excessive use injury (10.71%), and traumatic injury (10.71%), for induction of muscle injury in rodents. Conclusion: According to the results of this review, the most recurrent muscle injury induction models were injury by contusion, followed by excessive use injury, and traumatic injury. However, all the techniques addressed in the present study were able to reproduce with excellence the mechanism of muscle injury. |
id |
UNIFEI_ce439099d7d675f655d5d09860bbbcac |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30133 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Experimental models for induction of muscle injury in rodents: literature reviewModelos experimentales para la inducción de lesiones musculares en roedores: una revisión de la literaturaModelos experimentais para indução de lesão muscular em roedores: uma revisão de literaturaExperimental modelsAnimal modelLesions and woundsMusculoskeletalMice.Modelos experimentalesModelo animalLesiones y heridasMusculoesqueléticoRatones.Modelos experimentaisModelo animalLesões e feridasMusculoesqueléticoCamundongos.Objective: the present study aims to evidence the most recurrent muscle injury techniques in the literature. Methodology: This is a bibliographical research of the integrative review type of literature. The articles were searched in 2021, from November 22 to 24, in the PubMed database, using the eligibility criteria. Results and Discussion: According to the search strategy used in this study, of all articles only 28 studies met the eligibility criteria. When analyzing the publication journals, it was observed that the most recurrent were PLoS One (7.14%), Int J Med Sci (7.14%), and J Trauma Acute Care with (7.14%). It was also evidenced that the number of publications on the subject has been growing over the years, when it compared the year 2016 (10.71%) with later years, except in 2019 with the same percentage of 10.71% and 2021 with zero publication. The breeds most used in the experiments were Sprague-Dawley (32.14%) and Wistar with 25%. There was a predominance of models due to contusion (35.71%), followed by excessive use injury (10.71%), and traumatic injury (10.71%), for induction of muscle injury in rodents. Conclusion: According to the results of this review, the most recurrent muscle injury induction models were injury by contusion, followed by excessive use injury, and traumatic injury. However, all the techniques addressed in the present study were able to reproduce with excellence the mechanism of muscle injury.Objetivo: el presente estudio tiene como objetivo destacar las técnicas de lesión muscular más recurrentes en la literatura. Metodología: Se trata de una investigación bibliográfica del tipo revisión integradora de literatura. Los artículos fueron buscados en el año 2021, del 22 al 24 de noviembre, en la base de datos PubMed, utilizando los criterios de elegibilidad. Resultados y Discusión: De acuerdo con la estrategia de búsqueda utilizada en este estudio, de todos los artículos, solo 28 estudios cumplieron con los criterios de elegibilidad. Al analizar las revistas de publicación, se observa que las más recurrentes fueron PLoS One (7,14%), Int J Med Sci (7,14%) y J Trauma Acute Care with (7,14%). También se evidenció que el número de publicaciones sobre el tema ha ido creciendo a lo largo de los años, al comparar el año 2016 (10,71%) con años posteriores, excepto en el 2019 con el mismo porcentaje de 10,71% y el 2021 con cero publicaciones. Las razas más utilizadas en los experimentos fueron Sprague-Dawley (32,14%) y Wistar con un 25%. Predominaron los modelos de contusión (35,71%), seguido de lesión por sobreuso (10,71%) y lesión traumática (10,71%), por inducir lesión muscular en roedores. Conclusión: Según los resultados de esta revisión, los modelos de inducción de lesiones musculares más recurrentes fueron las lesiones por contusión, seguidas de las lesiones por uso excesivo y las lesiones traumáticas. Sin embargo, todas las técnicas discutidas en el presente estudio pudieron reproducir con excelencia el mecanismo de lesión muscular.Objetivo: O presente estudo tem como objetivo evidenciar as técnicas de lesão muscular mais recorrentes na literatura. Metodologia: Trata-se de uma pesquisa bibliográfica do tipo revisão integrativa da literatura. Os artigos foram pesquisados no ano de 2021, no período de 22 a 24 de novembro, na base de dados PubMed, usando os critérios de elegibilidade. Resultados e Discussão: De acordo com a estratégia de busca utilizada neste estudo, da totalidade dos artigos apenas 28 estudos atenderam os critérios de elegibilidade. Ao analisar as revistas de publicação, observa-se que as mais recorrentes foram PLoS One (7.14%), Int J Med Sci (7.14%), e J Trauma Acute Care com (7.14%). Evidenciou-se também, que o número de publicações sobre a temática vem crescendo ao longo dos anos, quando compara o ano de 2016 (10.71%) com anos posteriores, exceto em 2019 com o mesmo percentual de 10.71% e 2021 com zero publicação. As raças mais utilizadas nos experimentos foram Sprague-Dawley (32.14%) e Wistar com 25%. Houve uma predominância dos modelos por contusão (35.71%), seguido da lesão por uso excessivo (10.71%), e por lesão traumática (10.71%), para indução de lesão muscular em roedores. Conclusão: Conforme os resultados desta revisão, os modelos de indução de lesão muscular mais recorrente foi a lesão por contusão, seguido da lesão por uso excessivo, e por lesão traumática. Porém, todas as técnicas abordadas no presente estudo conseguiram reproduzir com excelência o mecanismo de injúria muscular.Research, Society and Development2022-05-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3013310.33448/rsd-v11i7.30133Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 7; e35011730133Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 7; e35011730133Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 7; e350117301332525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30133/25940Copyright (c) 2022 Pammela Weryka da Silva Santos; Thalyta Cibele Passos dos Santos; Fuad Ahmad Hazime; Marcelo de Carvalho Filgueirashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Pammela Weryka da Silva Santos, Thalyta Cibele Passos dos Hazime, Fuad Ahmad Filgueiras, Marcelo de Carvalho 2022-06-06T15:12:05Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30133Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:47:00.064621Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Experimental models for induction of muscle injury in rodents: literature review Modelos experimentales para la inducción de lesiones musculares en roedores: una revisión de la literatura Modelos experimentais para indução de lesão muscular em roedores: uma revisão de literatura |
title |
Experimental models for induction of muscle injury in rodents: literature review |
spellingShingle |
Experimental models for induction of muscle injury in rodents: literature review Santos, Pammela Weryka da Silva Experimental models Animal model Lesions and wounds Musculoskeletal Mice. Modelos experimentales Modelo animal Lesiones y heridas Musculoesquelético Ratones. Modelos experimentais Modelo animal Lesões e feridas Musculoesquelético Camundongos. |
title_short |
Experimental models for induction of muscle injury in rodents: literature review |
title_full |
Experimental models for induction of muscle injury in rodents: literature review |
title_fullStr |
Experimental models for induction of muscle injury in rodents: literature review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Experimental models for induction of muscle injury in rodents: literature review |
title_sort |
Experimental models for induction of muscle injury in rodents: literature review |
author |
Santos, Pammela Weryka da Silva |
author_facet |
Santos, Pammela Weryka da Silva Santos, Thalyta Cibele Passos dos Hazime, Fuad Ahmad Filgueiras, Marcelo de Carvalho |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Thalyta Cibele Passos dos Hazime, Fuad Ahmad Filgueiras, Marcelo de Carvalho |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Pammela Weryka da Silva Santos, Thalyta Cibele Passos dos Hazime, Fuad Ahmad Filgueiras, Marcelo de Carvalho |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Experimental models Animal model Lesions and wounds Musculoskeletal Mice. Modelos experimentales Modelo animal Lesiones y heridas Musculoesquelético Ratones. Modelos experimentais Modelo animal Lesões e feridas Musculoesquelético Camundongos. |
topic |
Experimental models Animal model Lesions and wounds Musculoskeletal Mice. Modelos experimentales Modelo animal Lesiones y heridas Musculoesquelético Ratones. Modelos experimentais Modelo animal Lesões e feridas Musculoesquelético Camundongos. |
description |
Objective: the present study aims to evidence the most recurrent muscle injury techniques in the literature. Methodology: This is a bibliographical research of the integrative review type of literature. The articles were searched in 2021, from November 22 to 24, in the PubMed database, using the eligibility criteria. Results and Discussion: According to the search strategy used in this study, of all articles only 28 studies met the eligibility criteria. When analyzing the publication journals, it was observed that the most recurrent were PLoS One (7.14%), Int J Med Sci (7.14%), and J Trauma Acute Care with (7.14%). It was also evidenced that the number of publications on the subject has been growing over the years, when it compared the year 2016 (10.71%) with later years, except in 2019 with the same percentage of 10.71% and 2021 with zero publication. The breeds most used in the experiments were Sprague-Dawley (32.14%) and Wistar with 25%. There was a predominance of models due to contusion (35.71%), followed by excessive use injury (10.71%), and traumatic injury (10.71%), for induction of muscle injury in rodents. Conclusion: According to the results of this review, the most recurrent muscle injury induction models were injury by contusion, followed by excessive use injury, and traumatic injury. However, all the techniques addressed in the present study were able to reproduce with excellence the mechanism of muscle injury. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30133 10.33448/rsd-v11i7.30133 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30133 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i7.30133 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/30133/25940 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 7; e35011730133 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 7; e35011730133 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 7; e35011730133 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052827241021440 |