Use of xenograft for tissue repair in the treatment of burns: integrative literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Eduardo Brito da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Silva, Kaio Germano Sousa da, Coêlho , Luana Pereira Ibiapina, da Silva, Wenderson Costa, Aguiar, Leiliane Barbosa de, Silva, Felipe Azevedo da, Silva , Amanda Kauany Pereira da, Marques, Victória Ribeiro de Sousa, Coelho, Lara Beatriz de Sousa, Melo, Rafael Fernandes de, Rocha, Danielle Carvalho, Chaves, Rondinelle dos Santos, Mesquita, Eudilene da Silva, Coêlho , Bruna Rafaelle Pereira Ibiapina, Leão, George do Carmo, Santos , Jesica Cristina Lira dos, Coelho , Isadora Sayonara Ferreira, Oliveira , Milka Esthefanni dos Santos Passos, Ferreira, Geovanna Clara Cunha Lima, Santos , Thalita Cristina Oliveira, Nascimento, Ianca Sabrina Silva, Santos, Sara Tereza Lisboa dos, Viana, Jeslaine da Silva Alves, Silva, Wanderson de Almeida, Silva, Laianny Luize Lima e
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18560
Resumo: Biological tissues of animal origin, such as pig skin, frog skin, bovine pericardium and pig intestinal submucosa have been used in bioocclusive dressings (xenotransplantation) for burns. The present study aimed to analyze the use of xenograft therapy in the treatment of burns. This is an integrative literature review, in which the following clinical question was formulated: “What is the scientific evidence on the use of xenograft therapy in tissue repair in burn victims?”. PubMed, Bireme and CINAHL databases were consulted. Studies available in their entirety, published from 2016 to 2021, in Portuguese, Spanish and English, were used. Eight studies were included in this review. The studies addressed the characteristics of the use of xenograft as a biological dressing in the therapy of burn patients, such as gender, type of burn, degree of burn, percentage of affected area, type of biological dressing, indication, intervention time and evolution of cases. The results conclude that the use of xenotransplantation has been shown to be effective in reducing pain, reducing hospital stays, faster re-epithelialization, less dressing changes, lower cost-effectiveness, and fewer infections. The study allowed an evaluation of the treatment of burns through heterologous dressing therapy, concluding that it is effective, in addition, it was concluded that the Nile tilapia skin dressing had statistically more significant results when compared to all interventions, including with porcine biological dressing.
id UNIFEI_cf6677f44e14a10cc6df54f1bdd980c5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18560
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Use of xenograft for tissue repair in the treatment of burns: integrative literature review Uso de xenograft para la reparación de tejidos en el tratamiento de quemaduras: revisión integradora de la literaturaUtilização de xenoenxerto para reparação tecidual no tratamento das queimaduras: revisão integrativa de literatura BurnsHeterograftsWound healing.QuemadurasXenoinjertosCicatrización de heridas.QueimadurasXenoenxertosCicatrização.Biological tissues of animal origin, such as pig skin, frog skin, bovine pericardium and pig intestinal submucosa have been used in bioocclusive dressings (xenotransplantation) for burns. The present study aimed to analyze the use of xenograft therapy in the treatment of burns. This is an integrative literature review, in which the following clinical question was formulated: “What is the scientific evidence on the use of xenograft therapy in tissue repair in burn victims?”. PubMed, Bireme and CINAHL databases were consulted. Studies available in their entirety, published from 2016 to 2021, in Portuguese, Spanish and English, were used. Eight studies were included in this review. The studies addressed the characteristics of the use of xenograft as a biological dressing in the therapy of burn patients, such as gender, type of burn, degree of burn, percentage of affected area, type of biological dressing, indication, intervention time and evolution of cases. The results conclude that the use of xenotransplantation has been shown to be effective in reducing pain, reducing hospital stays, faster re-epithelialization, less dressing changes, lower cost-effectiveness, and fewer infections. The study allowed an evaluation of the treatment of burns through heterologous dressing therapy, concluding that it is effective, in addition, it was concluded that the Nile tilapia skin dressing had statistically more significant results when compared to all interventions, including with porcine biological dressing.Los tejidos biológicos de origen animal, como piel de cerdo, piel de rana, pericardio bovino y submucosa intestinal de cerdo, se han utilizado en apósitos biooclusivos (xenotrasplantes) para quemaduras. El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar el uso de la terapia con xenoinjertos en el tratamiento de quemaduras. Se trata de una revisión integradora de la literatura, en la que se formuló la siguiente pregunta clínica: “¿Cuál es la evidencia científica sobre el uso de la terapia con xenoinjerto en la reparación de tejidos en víctimas de quemaduras?”. Se consultaron las bases de datos PubMed, Bireme y CINAHL. Se utilizaron los estudios disponibles en su totalidad, publicados de 2016 a 2021, en portugués, español e inglés. En esta revisión se incluyeron ocho estudios. Los estudios abordaron las características del uso de xenoinjerto como apósito biológico en la terapia de pacientes quemados, tales como sexo, tipo de quemadura, grado de quemadura, porcentaje de área afectada, tipo de apósito biológico, indicación, tiempo de intervención y evolución de casos. Los resultados concluyen que el uso de xenotrasplantes ha demostrado ser eficaz para reducir el dolor, reducir las estancias hospitalarias, una reepitelización más rápida, menos cambios de apósitos, menor rentabilidad y menos infecciones. El estudio permitió evaluar el tratamiento de las quemaduras mediante apósito heterólogo, concluyendo que es efectivo, además, se concluyó que el apósito de piel de tilapia del Nilo tuvo resultados estadísticamente más significativos en comparación con todas las intervenciones, incluso con apósito biológico porcino.Tecidos biológicos de origem animal, como pele de porco, pele de rã, pericárdio bovino e submucosa intestinal de porco têm sido utilizados em curativos biooclusivos (xenotransplantes) para queimaduras. O presente estudo objetivou analisar a utilização da terapia com xenoenxerto no tratamento de queimaduras. Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura, na qual se formulou a seguinte questão clínica: “Quais as evidências científicas acerca da utilização da terapia com xenoenxerto na reparação tecidual de pacientes vítimas de queimaduras?”. Foram consultadas bases de dados PubMed, Bireme e CINAHL. Utilizaram-se estudos disponíveis em sua totalidade, publicados nos anos de 2016 até 2021, nos idiomas Português, Espanhol e Inglês. Oito estudos foram incluídos nesta revisão. Os estudos abordaram as características da utilização de xenoenxerto como curativo biológico na terapia em pacientes queimados quanto sexo, tipo de queimadura, grau de queimadura, porcentagem da área acometida, tipo de curativo biológico, indicação, tempo de intervenção e evolução dos casos. Os resultados concluem que o uso de xenotransplantes tem se mostrado eficaz na diminuição de algias, diminuição da internação hospitalar, reepitelização mais rápida, menor trocas de curativos, menor custo benefício, diminuição de infecções. O estudo permitiu uma avaliação do tratamento de queimaduras por meio da terapia com curativo heterólogo, concluindo que ele é eficaz, além disso, concluiu-se que o curativo com pele de tilápia do Nilo teve resultados estatisticamente mais significativos, quando comparado a todas intervenções, incluindo com curativo biológico porcino.Research, Society and Development2021-08-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1856010.33448/rsd-v10i10.18560Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e175101018560Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e175101018560Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e1751010185602525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18560/16713Copyright (c) 2021 Eduardo Brito da Silva; Kaio Germano Sousa da Silva; Luana Pereira Ibiapina Coêlho ; Wenderson Costa da Silva; Leiliane Barbosa de Aguiar; Felipe Azevedo da Silva; Amanda Kauany Pereira da Silva ; Victória Ribeiro de Sousa Marques; Lara Beatriz de Sousa Coelho; Rafael Fernandes de Melo; Danielle Carvalho Rocha; Rondinelle dos Santos Chaves; Eudilene da Silva Mesquita; Bruna Rafaelle Pereira Ibiapina Coêlho ; George do Carmo Leão; Jesica Cristina Lira dos Santos ; Isadora Sayonara Ferreira Coelho ; Milka Esthefanni dos Santos Passos Oliveira ; Geovanna Clara Cunha Lima Ferreira; Thalita Cristina Oliveira Santos ; Ianca Sabrina Silva Nascimento; Sara Tereza Lisboa dos Santos; Jeslaine da Silva Alves Viana; Wanderson de Almeida Silva; Laianny Luize Lima e Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Eduardo Brito da Silva, Kaio Germano Sousa da Coêlho , Luana Pereira Ibiapina da Silva, Wenderson Costa Aguiar, Leiliane Barbosa de Silva, Felipe Azevedo da Silva , Amanda Kauany Pereira da Marques, Victória Ribeiro de Sousa Coelho, Lara Beatriz de Sousa Melo, Rafael Fernandes de Rocha, Danielle Carvalho Chaves, Rondinelle dos Santos Mesquita, Eudilene da Silva Coêlho , Bruna Rafaelle Pereira Ibiapina Leão, George do Carmo Santos , Jesica Cristina Lira dos Coelho , Isadora Sayonara Ferreira Oliveira , Milka Esthefanni dos Santos Passos Ferreira, Geovanna Clara Cunha Lima Santos , Thalita Cristina Oliveira Nascimento, Ianca Sabrina Silva Santos, Sara Tereza Lisboa dos Viana, Jeslaine da Silva Alves Silva, Wanderson de Almeida Silva, Laianny Luize Lima e 2021-10-02T21:49:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18560Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:38:40.496728Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of xenograft for tissue repair in the treatment of burns: integrative literature review
Uso de xenograft para la reparación de tejidos en el tratamiento de quemaduras: revisión integradora de la literatura
Utilização de xenoenxerto para reparação tecidual no tratamento das queimaduras: revisão integrativa de literatura
title Use of xenograft for tissue repair in the treatment of burns: integrative literature review
spellingShingle Use of xenograft for tissue repair in the treatment of burns: integrative literature review
Silva, Eduardo Brito da
Burns
Heterografts
Wound healing.
Quemaduras
Xenoinjertos
Cicatrización de heridas.
Queimaduras
Xenoenxertos
Cicatrização.
title_short Use of xenograft for tissue repair in the treatment of burns: integrative literature review
title_full Use of xenograft for tissue repair in the treatment of burns: integrative literature review
title_fullStr Use of xenograft for tissue repair in the treatment of burns: integrative literature review
title_full_unstemmed Use of xenograft for tissue repair in the treatment of burns: integrative literature review
title_sort Use of xenograft for tissue repair in the treatment of burns: integrative literature review
author Silva, Eduardo Brito da
author_facet Silva, Eduardo Brito da
Silva, Kaio Germano Sousa da
Coêlho , Luana Pereira Ibiapina
da Silva, Wenderson Costa
Aguiar, Leiliane Barbosa de
Silva, Felipe Azevedo da
Silva , Amanda Kauany Pereira da
Marques, Victória Ribeiro de Sousa
Coelho, Lara Beatriz de Sousa
Melo, Rafael Fernandes de
Rocha, Danielle Carvalho
Chaves, Rondinelle dos Santos
Mesquita, Eudilene da Silva
Coêlho , Bruna Rafaelle Pereira Ibiapina
Leão, George do Carmo
Santos , Jesica Cristina Lira dos
Coelho , Isadora Sayonara Ferreira
Oliveira , Milka Esthefanni dos Santos Passos
Ferreira, Geovanna Clara Cunha Lima
Santos , Thalita Cristina Oliveira
Nascimento, Ianca Sabrina Silva
Santos, Sara Tereza Lisboa dos
Viana, Jeslaine da Silva Alves
Silva, Wanderson de Almeida
Silva, Laianny Luize Lima e
author_role author
author2 Silva, Kaio Germano Sousa da
Coêlho , Luana Pereira Ibiapina
da Silva, Wenderson Costa
Aguiar, Leiliane Barbosa de
Silva, Felipe Azevedo da
Silva , Amanda Kauany Pereira da
Marques, Victória Ribeiro de Sousa
Coelho, Lara Beatriz de Sousa
Melo, Rafael Fernandes de
Rocha, Danielle Carvalho
Chaves, Rondinelle dos Santos
Mesquita, Eudilene da Silva
Coêlho , Bruna Rafaelle Pereira Ibiapina
Leão, George do Carmo
Santos , Jesica Cristina Lira dos
Coelho , Isadora Sayonara Ferreira
Oliveira , Milka Esthefanni dos Santos Passos
Ferreira, Geovanna Clara Cunha Lima
Santos , Thalita Cristina Oliveira
Nascimento, Ianca Sabrina Silva
Santos, Sara Tereza Lisboa dos
Viana, Jeslaine da Silva Alves
Silva, Wanderson de Almeida
Silva, Laianny Luize Lima e
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Eduardo Brito da
Silva, Kaio Germano Sousa da
Coêlho , Luana Pereira Ibiapina
da Silva, Wenderson Costa
Aguiar, Leiliane Barbosa de
Silva, Felipe Azevedo da
Silva , Amanda Kauany Pereira da
Marques, Victória Ribeiro de Sousa
Coelho, Lara Beatriz de Sousa
Melo, Rafael Fernandes de
Rocha, Danielle Carvalho
Chaves, Rondinelle dos Santos
Mesquita, Eudilene da Silva
Coêlho , Bruna Rafaelle Pereira Ibiapina
Leão, George do Carmo
Santos , Jesica Cristina Lira dos
Coelho , Isadora Sayonara Ferreira
Oliveira , Milka Esthefanni dos Santos Passos
Ferreira, Geovanna Clara Cunha Lima
Santos , Thalita Cristina Oliveira
Nascimento, Ianca Sabrina Silva
Santos, Sara Tereza Lisboa dos
Viana, Jeslaine da Silva Alves
Silva, Wanderson de Almeida
Silva, Laianny Luize Lima e
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Burns
Heterografts
Wound healing.
Quemaduras
Xenoinjertos
Cicatrización de heridas.
Queimaduras
Xenoenxertos
Cicatrização.
topic Burns
Heterografts
Wound healing.
Quemaduras
Xenoinjertos
Cicatrización de heridas.
Queimaduras
Xenoenxertos
Cicatrização.
description Biological tissues of animal origin, such as pig skin, frog skin, bovine pericardium and pig intestinal submucosa have been used in bioocclusive dressings (xenotransplantation) for burns. The present study aimed to analyze the use of xenograft therapy in the treatment of burns. This is an integrative literature review, in which the following clinical question was formulated: “What is the scientific evidence on the use of xenograft therapy in tissue repair in burn victims?”. PubMed, Bireme and CINAHL databases were consulted. Studies available in their entirety, published from 2016 to 2021, in Portuguese, Spanish and English, were used. Eight studies were included in this review. The studies addressed the characteristics of the use of xenograft as a biological dressing in the therapy of burn patients, such as gender, type of burn, degree of burn, percentage of affected area, type of biological dressing, indication, intervention time and evolution of cases. The results conclude that the use of xenotransplantation has been shown to be effective in reducing pain, reducing hospital stays, faster re-epithelialization, less dressing changes, lower cost-effectiveness, and fewer infections. The study allowed an evaluation of the treatment of burns through heterologous dressing therapy, concluding that it is effective, in addition, it was concluded that the Nile tilapia skin dressing had statistically more significant results when compared to all interventions, including with porcine biological dressing.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18560
10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18560
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18560
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18560
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18560/16713
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e175101018560
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e175101018560
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e175101018560
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052808049983488