In Vitro anti-mycotoxin activity of probiotic (Bacillus spp) and microalgae (Chaetoceros gracilis) for aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A used to feed Litopenaeus vannamei

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Calvet, Rodrigo Maciel
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Nóbrega, Maria Marlúcia Gomes Pereira, Costa, Amilton Paulo Raposo, Pereyra, Carina Maricel, Monte, Aline Marques, Muratori, Maria Christina Sanches
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9998
Resumo: Objectives: The objective of this work was to evaluate the in vitro anti-mycotoxin capacity of two commercial probiotics consisting of spores of Bacillus spp - A1 and A2 and of the microalgae Chaetoceros gracilis - A3 used to feed Litopenaeus vannamei for aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and ochratoxin A (OTA). The amount of probiotic was calculated for 10 L of water. The amount of Chaetoceros gracilis microalgae was calculated according to the amount used in the farms (12 x 104 cells / mL). A group with five microtubes of each probiotic with pH 2.0 and another group with pH 6.0 was prepared using phosphate buffered saline (PBS) in duplicate to simulate the stomach and intestinal pH of the shrimp, respectively. The concentrations of probiotics used were 0.0%; 25%; 50%; 75% and 100% (0.0025 g; 0.005 g; 0.0075 g; 0.010 g) in each tube. The same concentration of microalgae was used. The concentration of mycotoxins was 1.000 ng / mL. The anti-mycotoxin activity of A1, A2 and A3 for OTA and AFB1 were performed by high performance liquid chromatography. There was a difference in the anti-mycotoxin capacity between the probiotics tested for OTA and AFB1 with greater efficiency of A2. A3 did not show anti-mycotoxin activity. In A1 and A2 the adsorption of OTA and AFB1 started from the 25% concentration. Half of the OTA (513 ng / mL) was adsorbed using A2 (concentrations ≥ 50%) at pH 2.0 and A1 (concentrations ≥75%) at the same pH (400 ng / mL). For AFB1 the greatest adsorption occurred in A2 (concentrations ≥75%) at pH 2.0 (643 ng / mL) and pH 6.0 (672 ng / mL). The greatest anti-mycotoxin effect of A1 only occurred (concentrations ≥ 50%) at pH 2.0 (481 ng / mL) and 25% at pH 6.0 (592 ng / mL). Probiotics made up of spores of Bacillus spp have anti-mycotoxin capacity in vitro for AFB1 and OTA and the microalgae Chaetoceros gracilis did not show this capacity.
id UNIFEI_d636c11c2ee8fc8f7a7017697198f98d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9998
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling In Vitro anti-mycotoxin activity of probiotic (Bacillus spp) and microalgae (Chaetoceros gracilis) for aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A used to feed Litopenaeus vannameiActividad anti-micotoxina in vitro de probióticos (Bacillus spp) y microalgas (Chaetoceros gracilis) para aflatoxina B1 y ocratoxina A utilizadas para alimentar a Litopenaeus vannameiAtividade anti-micotoxina in vitro de probiótico (Bacillus spp) e microalgas (Chaetoceros gracilis) para aflatoxina B1 e ocratoxina A usados na alimentação do Litopenaeus vannameiAdsorciónDegradaciónMicotoxinasBiotransformaciónCultivo de camarón. AdsorçãoDegradaçãoMicotoxinasBiotransformaçãoCarcinicultura.AdsorptionDegradationMycotoxinsBiotransformationShrimp farming.Objectives: The objective of this work was to evaluate the in vitro anti-mycotoxin capacity of two commercial probiotics consisting of spores of Bacillus spp - A1 and A2 and of the microalgae Chaetoceros gracilis - A3 used to feed Litopenaeus vannamei for aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and ochratoxin A (OTA). The amount of probiotic was calculated for 10 L of water. The amount of Chaetoceros gracilis microalgae was calculated according to the amount used in the farms (12 x 104 cells / mL). A group with five microtubes of each probiotic with pH 2.0 and another group with pH 6.0 was prepared using phosphate buffered saline (PBS) in duplicate to simulate the stomach and intestinal pH of the shrimp, respectively. The concentrations of probiotics used were 0.0%; 25%; 50%; 75% and 100% (0.0025 g; 0.005 g; 0.0075 g; 0.010 g) in each tube. The same concentration of microalgae was used. The concentration of mycotoxins was 1.000 ng / mL. The anti-mycotoxin activity of A1, A2 and A3 for OTA and AFB1 were performed by high performance liquid chromatography. There was a difference in the anti-mycotoxin capacity between the probiotics tested for OTA and AFB1 with greater efficiency of A2. A3 did not show anti-mycotoxin activity. In A1 and A2 the adsorption of OTA and AFB1 started from the 25% concentration. Half of the OTA (513 ng / mL) was adsorbed using A2 (concentrations ≥ 50%) at pH 2.0 and A1 (concentrations ≥75%) at the same pH (400 ng / mL). For AFB1 the greatest adsorption occurred in A2 (concentrations ≥75%) at pH 2.0 (643 ng / mL) and pH 6.0 (672 ng / mL). The greatest anti-mycotoxin effect of A1 only occurred (concentrations ≥ 50%) at pH 2.0 (481 ng / mL) and 25% at pH 6.0 (592 ng / mL). Probiotics made up of spores of Bacillus spp have anti-mycotoxin capacity in vitro for AFB1 and OTA and the microalgae Chaetoceros gracilis did not show this capacity.Objetivos: El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar in vitro la capacidad anti-micotoxina de dos probióticos comerciales constituidos por esporas de Bacillus spp - A1 y A2 y de la microalga Chaetoceros gracilis - A3 utilizadas en la alimentación de Litopenaeus vannamei para aflatoxina B1 (AFB1) y ocratoxina. A (OTA). La cantidad de probiótico se calculó para 10 L de agua. La cantidad de microalgas Chaetoceros gracilis se calculó según la cantidad utilizada en las granjas (12 x 104 células / mL). Se preparó un grupo con cinco microtubos de cada probiótico con pH 2.0 y otro grupo con pH 6.0 usando solución salina tamponada con fosfato (PBS) por duplicado para simular el pH del estómago y intestino de los camarones, respectivamente. Las concentraciones de probióticos utilizados fueron 0.0%; 25%; 50%; 75,% y 100% (0,0025 g; 0,005 g; 0,0075 g; 0,010 g) en cada tubo. Se utilizó la misma concentración de microalgas. La concentración de micotoxinas fue de 1.000 ng / mL. La actividad anti-micotoxina de A1, A2 y A3 para OTA y AFB1 se realizó mediante cromatografía líquida de alta resolución. Hubo una diferencia en la capacidad anti-micotoxina entre los probióticos probados para OTA y AFB1 con mayor eficiencia de A2. A3 no mostró actividad anti-micotoxina. En A1 y A2, la adsorción de OTA y AFB1 comenzó a partir de la concentración del 25%. La mitad de la OTA (513 ng / mL) se adsorbió usando A2 (concentraciones ≥ 50%) a pH 2.0 y A1 (concentraciones ≥75%) al mismo pH (400 ng / mL). Para AFB1, la mayor adsorción ocurrió en A2 (concentraciones ≥75%) a pH 2.0 (643 ng / mL) y pH 6.0 (672 ng / mL). El mayor efecto anti-micotoxinas de A1 solo ocurrió (concentraciones ≥ 50%) a pH 2.0 (481 ng / mL) y al 25% a pH 6.0 (592 ng / mL). Los probióticos compuestos por esporas de Bacillus spp tienen capacidad anti-micotoxina in vitro para AFB1 y OTA y la microalga Chaetoceros gracilis no mostró esta capacidad.Objetivos: O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar in vitro a capacidade anti-micotoxina de dois probióticos comerciais constituído de esporos de Bacillus spp – A1 e A2 e da microalga Chaetoceros gracilis – A3 utilizados na alimentação de Litopenaeus vannamei para aflatoxina B1 (AFB1) e ocratoxina A (OTA). A quantidade de probiótico foi calculada para 10 L de água. A quantidade da microalga Chaetoceros gracilis foi calculada de acordo com a quantidade utilizada nas fazendas (12 x 104 células/mL). Foi preparado um grupo com cinco microtubos de cada probiótico com pH 2,0 e um outro grupo com pH 6,0 utilizando solução tampão fostato salino (PBS) em duplicata para simular o pH estomacal e intestinal dos camarões, respectivamente. As concentrações de probióticos utilizadas foram 0,0%; 25%; 50%; 75% e 100% (0,0025 g; 0,005 g; 0,0075 g; 0,010 g) em cada tubo. As concentrações da microalga foram as mesmas do probiótico. A concentração das micotoxinas foi 1.000 ng/mL. A atividade anti-micotoxina do A1, A2 e A3 para OTA e AFB1 foram realizados por cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência. Houve diferença na capacidade anti-micotoxina entre os probióticos testados para OTA e AFB1 com maior eficiência do A2. O A3 não apresentou atividade anti-micotoxina. Em A1 e A2 a adsorção de OTA e AFB1 iniciou a partir da concentração 25%. Metade da OTA (513 ng/mL) foi adsorvida utilizando o A2 (concentrações ≥ 50%) em pH 2,0 e no A1 (concentrações ≥75%) no mesmo pH (400 ng/mL). Para AFB1 a maior adsorção ocorreu no A2 (concentrações ≥75%) em pH 2,0 (643 ng/mL) e pH 6,0 (672 ng/mL). O maior efeito anti-micotoxina do A1 só ocorreu (concentrações ≥ 50%) em pH 2,0 (481 ng/mL) e 25% em pH 6,0 (592 ng/mL). Os probióticos constituídos por esporos de Bacillus spp possuem capacidade anti-micotoxina in vitro para AFB1 e OTA e a microalga Chaetoceros gracilis não apresentou esta capacidade.Research, Society and Development2020-11-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/999810.33448/rsd-v9i11.9998Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e5499119998Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e5499119998Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e54991199982525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9998/9092Copyright (c) 2020 Rodrigo Maciel Calvet; Maria Marlúcia Gomes Pereira Nóbrega; Amilton Paulo Raposo Costa; Carina Maricel Pereyra; Aline Marques Monte; Maria Christina Sanches Muratorihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCalvet, Rodrigo Maciel Nóbrega, Maria Marlúcia Gomes Pereira Costa, Amilton Paulo Raposo Pereyra, Carina Maricel Monte, Aline MarquesMuratori, Maria Christina Sanches2020-12-10T23:37:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9998Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:32:09.686171Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In Vitro anti-mycotoxin activity of probiotic (Bacillus spp) and microalgae (Chaetoceros gracilis) for aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A used to feed Litopenaeus vannamei
Actividad anti-micotoxina in vitro de probióticos (Bacillus spp) y microalgas (Chaetoceros gracilis) para aflatoxina B1 y ocratoxina A utilizadas para alimentar a Litopenaeus vannamei
Atividade anti-micotoxina in vitro de probiótico (Bacillus spp) e microalgas (Chaetoceros gracilis) para aflatoxina B1 e ocratoxina A usados na alimentação do Litopenaeus vannamei
title In Vitro anti-mycotoxin activity of probiotic (Bacillus spp) and microalgae (Chaetoceros gracilis) for aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A used to feed Litopenaeus vannamei
spellingShingle In Vitro anti-mycotoxin activity of probiotic (Bacillus spp) and microalgae (Chaetoceros gracilis) for aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A used to feed Litopenaeus vannamei
Calvet, Rodrigo Maciel
Adsorción
Degradación
Micotoxinas
Biotransformación
Cultivo de camarón.
Adsorção
Degradação
Micotoxinas
Biotransformação
Carcinicultura.
Adsorption
Degradation
Mycotoxins
Biotransformation
Shrimp farming.
title_short In Vitro anti-mycotoxin activity of probiotic (Bacillus spp) and microalgae (Chaetoceros gracilis) for aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A used to feed Litopenaeus vannamei
title_full In Vitro anti-mycotoxin activity of probiotic (Bacillus spp) and microalgae (Chaetoceros gracilis) for aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A used to feed Litopenaeus vannamei
title_fullStr In Vitro anti-mycotoxin activity of probiotic (Bacillus spp) and microalgae (Chaetoceros gracilis) for aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A used to feed Litopenaeus vannamei
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro anti-mycotoxin activity of probiotic (Bacillus spp) and microalgae (Chaetoceros gracilis) for aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A used to feed Litopenaeus vannamei
title_sort In Vitro anti-mycotoxin activity of probiotic (Bacillus spp) and microalgae (Chaetoceros gracilis) for aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A used to feed Litopenaeus vannamei
author Calvet, Rodrigo Maciel
author_facet Calvet, Rodrigo Maciel
Nóbrega, Maria Marlúcia Gomes Pereira
Costa, Amilton Paulo Raposo
Pereyra, Carina Maricel
Monte, Aline Marques
Muratori, Maria Christina Sanches
author_role author
author2 Nóbrega, Maria Marlúcia Gomes Pereira
Costa, Amilton Paulo Raposo
Pereyra, Carina Maricel
Monte, Aline Marques
Muratori, Maria Christina Sanches
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Calvet, Rodrigo Maciel
Nóbrega, Maria Marlúcia Gomes Pereira
Costa, Amilton Paulo Raposo
Pereyra, Carina Maricel
Monte, Aline Marques
Muratori, Maria Christina Sanches
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adsorción
Degradación
Micotoxinas
Biotransformación
Cultivo de camarón.
Adsorção
Degradação
Micotoxinas
Biotransformação
Carcinicultura.
Adsorption
Degradation
Mycotoxins
Biotransformation
Shrimp farming.
topic Adsorción
Degradación
Micotoxinas
Biotransformación
Cultivo de camarón.
Adsorção
Degradação
Micotoxinas
Biotransformação
Carcinicultura.
Adsorption
Degradation
Mycotoxins
Biotransformation
Shrimp farming.
description Objectives: The objective of this work was to evaluate the in vitro anti-mycotoxin capacity of two commercial probiotics consisting of spores of Bacillus spp - A1 and A2 and of the microalgae Chaetoceros gracilis - A3 used to feed Litopenaeus vannamei for aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and ochratoxin A (OTA). The amount of probiotic was calculated for 10 L of water. The amount of Chaetoceros gracilis microalgae was calculated according to the amount used in the farms (12 x 104 cells / mL). A group with five microtubes of each probiotic with pH 2.0 and another group with pH 6.0 was prepared using phosphate buffered saline (PBS) in duplicate to simulate the stomach and intestinal pH of the shrimp, respectively. The concentrations of probiotics used were 0.0%; 25%; 50%; 75% and 100% (0.0025 g; 0.005 g; 0.0075 g; 0.010 g) in each tube. The same concentration of microalgae was used. The concentration of mycotoxins was 1.000 ng / mL. The anti-mycotoxin activity of A1, A2 and A3 for OTA and AFB1 were performed by high performance liquid chromatography. There was a difference in the anti-mycotoxin capacity between the probiotics tested for OTA and AFB1 with greater efficiency of A2. A3 did not show anti-mycotoxin activity. In A1 and A2 the adsorption of OTA and AFB1 started from the 25% concentration. Half of the OTA (513 ng / mL) was adsorbed using A2 (concentrations ≥ 50%) at pH 2.0 and A1 (concentrations ≥75%) at the same pH (400 ng / mL). For AFB1 the greatest adsorption occurred in A2 (concentrations ≥75%) at pH 2.0 (643 ng / mL) and pH 6.0 (672 ng / mL). The greatest anti-mycotoxin effect of A1 only occurred (concentrations ≥ 50%) at pH 2.0 (481 ng / mL) and 25% at pH 6.0 (592 ng / mL). Probiotics made up of spores of Bacillus spp have anti-mycotoxin capacity in vitro for AFB1 and OTA and the microalgae Chaetoceros gracilis did not show this capacity.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9998
10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9998
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9998
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9998
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9998/9092
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e5499119998
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e5499119998
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e5499119998
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052663713497088