Does intercropping maize with forage sorghum effect biomass yield, silage bromatological quality and economic viability?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2818 |
Resumo: | Maize and forage sorghum crops have a relevant economic importance in Midwest Brazil and there is a need for more information for their intercropping as a strategy for the farmers to reduce inputs. The objective of this work is evaluate if forage sorghum and maize intercropping effects agronomic traits, the bromatological characteristics of silage from the consortium at different times of silo openings, and the economic viability of all crop systems. This experiment was carried on in the field with seven treatments, consisting of monoculture and intercropping of corn and sorghum hybrids. Monoculture of sorghum Agri 001 and maize Agri 320, as well as in maize Agri 320, Agri 340 and Agri 104 intercropped with sorghum Agri 001 had the highest biomass yield. Intercropped maize did not have lodging, reduction in height, nor decrease in the first ear height in relation to the intercropped plants. Maize hybrids intercropped with sorghum led to a better fermentation pattern of silages, reducing ammonia concentrations. However, due the higher contents of NDF and the lower TDN contents of sorghum, nutritional values of intercropped silages were generally smaller than when they were composed only with maize. It was observed that the monoculture of sorghum Agri 001 for silage showed a higher profit compared to the other treatments. |
id |
UNIFEI_d81323a34b9d072f3ac898c019c8668e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2818 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Does intercropping maize with forage sorghum effect biomass yield, silage bromatological quality and economic viability?El consorcio de maíz con sorgo forrajera influye en la producción de biomasa, la calidad bromatológica del ensilado y la viabilidad económica?O consórcio de milho com sorgo forrageiro influencia a produção de biomassa, a qualidade bromatológica da silagem e a viabilidade econômica?Sorghum bicolorZea maysSostenibilidad.Sorghum bicolorZea maysSustainability.Sorghum bicolorZea maysSustentabilidade.Maize and forage sorghum crops have a relevant economic importance in Midwest Brazil and there is a need for more information for their intercropping as a strategy for the farmers to reduce inputs. The objective of this work is evaluate if forage sorghum and maize intercropping effects agronomic traits, the bromatological characteristics of silage from the consortium at different times of silo openings, and the economic viability of all crop systems. This experiment was carried on in the field with seven treatments, consisting of monoculture and intercropping of corn and sorghum hybrids. Monoculture of sorghum Agri 001 and maize Agri 320, as well as in maize Agri 320, Agri 340 and Agri 104 intercropped with sorghum Agri 001 had the highest biomass yield. Intercropped maize did not have lodging, reduction in height, nor decrease in the first ear height in relation to the intercropped plants. Maize hybrids intercropped with sorghum led to a better fermentation pattern of silages, reducing ammonia concentrations. However, due the higher contents of NDF and the lower TDN contents of sorghum, nutritional values of intercropped silages were generally smaller than when they were composed only with maize. It was observed that the monoculture of sorghum Agri 001 for silage showed a higher profit compared to the other treatments.Los cultivos de maíz y sorgo tienen una importancia económica significativa en el Medio Oeste de Brasil y es necesario obtener más información para su cultivo en consorcio como estrategia para que el productor rural reduzca los insumos. El objetivo de este trabajo era evaluar si el consorcio de maíz con sorgo forrajera ejerce influencia en las características agronómicas y bromatológicas del ensilado, debido a diferentes momentos de aperturas de silo y la viabilidad económica de todos los tratamientos. El experimento se llevó a cabo en condiciones de campo y se utilizaron siete tratamientos, consistentes en monocultivos de maíz y sorgo híbridos, así como estos cultivos intercropled. El mayor rendimiento de masa fresca se observó en el monocultivo de sorgo Agri001 y maíz Agri 320, así como en el consorcio de los híbridos agri 320, agri 340 y 104 de maíz con el sorgo forraje Agri 001. Las plantas de maíz intercropping no presentaron escamas, reducción de altura, ni disminución en el momento de la inserción del primer oído. Los silages del consorcio de híbridos de maíz con sorgo forrajera presentaron un mejor patrón de fermentación, reduciendo las concentraciones de amoníaco. Sin embargo, debido al mayor contenido de NDF y al Menor TDN en sorción, los valores nutricionales de los silages originarios del consorcio eran generalmente más bajos que cuando estaban compuestos sólo de maíz. Se observó que el cultivo del Sorgo Agri 001 para ensilado proporcionaba más beneficios que los otros tratamientos.As culturas de milho e sorgo têm uma relevante importância econômica no Centro-Oeste do Brasil e há a necessidade de mais informações para seu cultivo em consórcio como uma estratégia para o produtor rural reduzir a necessidade de insumos. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar se o consórcio de milho com sorgo forrageiro exerce influência em características agronômicas e bromatológicas da silagem, em função de diferentes momentos de aberturas do silo e na viabilidade econômica de todos tratamentos. O experimento foi realizado em condições de campo e foram utilizados sete tratamentos, consistindo de monoculturas de híbridos de milho e sorgo, assim como estas culturas consorciadas. O maior rendimento da massa fresca foi observado no monocultivo de sorgo Agri001 e milho Agri 320, bem como no consórcio dos híbridos de milho Agri 320, Agri 340 e Agri 104 com o sorgo forrageiro Agri 001. As plantas de milho consorciadas não apresentaram acamamento, redução de altura, nem diminuição na altura da inserção da primeira espiga. As silagens oriunda do consórcio dos híbridos de milho com o sorgo forrageiro apresentaram um melhor padrão de fermentação, reduzindo as concentrações de amônia. No entanto, devido ao maior teor de NDF e ao menor de TDN no sorgo, os valores nutricionais das silagens oriundas do consórcio eram geralmente menores do que quando eram compostos apenas pelo milho. Observou-se que o cultivo do sorgo Agri 001 para silagem proporcionou mais lucro que os demais tratamentos.Research, Society and Development2020-03-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/281810.33448/rsd-v9i4.2818Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 4; e46942818Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 4; e46942818Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 4; e469428182525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2818/2200Copyright (c) 2020 Rafael Padilha de Rezende, Henrique de Oliveira Golin, Victor Luan da Silva de Abreu, Gustavo de Faria Theodoro, Gumercindo Loriano Franco, Ricardo Carneiro Brumatti, Patrick Bezerra Fernandesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRezende, Rafael Padilha deGolin, Henrique de OliveiraAbreu, Victor Luan da Silva deTheodoro, Gustavo de FariaFranco, Gumercindo LorianoBrumatti, Ricardo CarneiroFernandes, Patrick BezerraBento, Anderson Luiz de LuccaRocha, Raizza Fátima Abadia Tulux2020-08-20T18:07:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2818Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:27:15.329892Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Does intercropping maize with forage sorghum effect biomass yield, silage bromatological quality and economic viability? El consorcio de maíz con sorgo forrajera influye en la producción de biomasa, la calidad bromatológica del ensilado y la viabilidad económica? O consórcio de milho com sorgo forrageiro influencia a produção de biomassa, a qualidade bromatológica da silagem e a viabilidade econômica? |
title |
Does intercropping maize with forage sorghum effect biomass yield, silage bromatological quality and economic viability? |
spellingShingle |
Does intercropping maize with forage sorghum effect biomass yield, silage bromatological quality and economic viability? Rezende, Rafael Padilha de Sorghum bicolor Zea mays Sostenibilidad. Sorghum bicolor Zea mays Sustainability. Sorghum bicolor Zea mays Sustentabilidade. |
title_short |
Does intercropping maize with forage sorghum effect biomass yield, silage bromatological quality and economic viability? |
title_full |
Does intercropping maize with forage sorghum effect biomass yield, silage bromatological quality and economic viability? |
title_fullStr |
Does intercropping maize with forage sorghum effect biomass yield, silage bromatological quality and economic viability? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does intercropping maize with forage sorghum effect biomass yield, silage bromatological quality and economic viability? |
title_sort |
Does intercropping maize with forage sorghum effect biomass yield, silage bromatological quality and economic viability? |
author |
Rezende, Rafael Padilha de |
author_facet |
Rezende, Rafael Padilha de Golin, Henrique de Oliveira Abreu, Victor Luan da Silva de Theodoro, Gustavo de Faria Franco, Gumercindo Loriano Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro Fernandes, Patrick Bezerra Bento, Anderson Luiz de Lucca Rocha, Raizza Fátima Abadia Tulux |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Golin, Henrique de Oliveira Abreu, Victor Luan da Silva de Theodoro, Gustavo de Faria Franco, Gumercindo Loriano Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro Fernandes, Patrick Bezerra Bento, Anderson Luiz de Lucca Rocha, Raizza Fátima Abadia Tulux |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rezende, Rafael Padilha de Golin, Henrique de Oliveira Abreu, Victor Luan da Silva de Theodoro, Gustavo de Faria Franco, Gumercindo Loriano Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro Fernandes, Patrick Bezerra Bento, Anderson Luiz de Lucca Rocha, Raizza Fátima Abadia Tulux |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sorghum bicolor Zea mays Sostenibilidad. Sorghum bicolor Zea mays Sustainability. Sorghum bicolor Zea mays Sustentabilidade. |
topic |
Sorghum bicolor Zea mays Sostenibilidad. Sorghum bicolor Zea mays Sustainability. Sorghum bicolor Zea mays Sustentabilidade. |
description |
Maize and forage sorghum crops have a relevant economic importance in Midwest Brazil and there is a need for more information for their intercropping as a strategy for the farmers to reduce inputs. The objective of this work is evaluate if forage sorghum and maize intercropping effects agronomic traits, the bromatological characteristics of silage from the consortium at different times of silo openings, and the economic viability of all crop systems. This experiment was carried on in the field with seven treatments, consisting of monoculture and intercropping of corn and sorghum hybrids. Monoculture of sorghum Agri 001 and maize Agri 320, as well as in maize Agri 320, Agri 340 and Agri 104 intercropped with sorghum Agri 001 had the highest biomass yield. Intercropped maize did not have lodging, reduction in height, nor decrease in the first ear height in relation to the intercropped plants. Maize hybrids intercropped with sorghum led to a better fermentation pattern of silages, reducing ammonia concentrations. However, due the higher contents of NDF and the lower TDN contents of sorghum, nutritional values of intercropped silages were generally smaller than when they were composed only with maize. It was observed that the monoculture of sorghum Agri 001 for silage showed a higher profit compared to the other treatments. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2818 10.33448/rsd-v9i4.2818 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2818 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i4.2818 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2818/2200 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 4; e46942818 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 4; e46942818 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 4; e46942818 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052646371098624 |