Comparison between Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (MR) techniques in patients with chronic low back pain
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38530 |
Resumo: | Pain in the lumbar region of the spine is called low back pain and affects about 80% of the population. They can result in incapacitation and often require physical therapy treatment. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (LM) techniques in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. 60 patients of both genders, aged 30 to 60 years, attended at a physiotherapy clinic in São Pedro da Aldeia, RJ, were selected. Three groups were formed: I of RPG, II of (LM) and III of RPG + LM. Each patient underwent anamnesis and two weekly physical therapy sessions, with a total of eight 30-minute sessions. The Visual Numerical Scale and the Roland Morris Disability Scale were used to assess pain. Results did not show significant differences between groups regarding pain reduction (p = 0.3816). Statistical difference was also observed between the first and the last consultation regarding pain in all groups. The Roland Morris scale revealed significant differences between the beginning and end of treatment. It is concluded that, according to the applied scales, both techniques resulted in a reduction in the level of pain, but none of the techniques was more effective than the other. Furthermore, it was noted that the association of techniques results in a reduction in the level of pain from the first consultation, which is a relevant finding to guide the treatment of these patients. |
id |
UNIFEI_db78c94ba422471ef69fac2e35714860 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38530 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison between Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (MR) techniques in patients with chronic low back painComparación entre las técnicas de Reeducación Postural Global (RPG) y Liberación Miofascial (LM) en pacientes con dolor lumbar crónicoComparação entre as técnicas de Reeducação Postural Global (RPG) e Liberação Miofascial (LM) em pacientes com lombalgia crônicaLumbalgiaPosturaLiberación miofascial.Low back painPostureMyofascial release.LombalgiaPosturaLiberação miofascial.Pain in the lumbar region of the spine is called low back pain and affects about 80% of the population. They can result in incapacitation and often require physical therapy treatment. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (LM) techniques in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. 60 patients of both genders, aged 30 to 60 years, attended at a physiotherapy clinic in São Pedro da Aldeia, RJ, were selected. Three groups were formed: I of RPG, II of (LM) and III of RPG + LM. Each patient underwent anamnesis and two weekly physical therapy sessions, with a total of eight 30-minute sessions. The Visual Numerical Scale and the Roland Morris Disability Scale were used to assess pain. Results did not show significant differences between groups regarding pain reduction (p = 0.3816). Statistical difference was also observed between the first and the last consultation regarding pain in all groups. The Roland Morris scale revealed significant differences between the beginning and end of treatment. It is concluded that, according to the applied scales, both techniques resulted in a reduction in the level of pain, but none of the techniques was more effective than the other. Furthermore, it was noted that the association of techniques results in a reduction in the level of pain from the first consultation, which is a relevant finding to guide the treatment of these patients.El dolor en la región lumbar de la columna se denomina lumbalgia y afecta aproximadamente al 80% de la población. Pueden resultar en incapacitación y, a menudo, requieren tratamiento de fisioterapia. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar la efectividad de las técnicas de Reeducación Postural Global (GPR) y Liberación Miofascial (LM) en el tratamiento de pacientes con dolor lumbar crónico. Fueron seleccionados 60 pacientes de ambos sexos, con edades entre 30 y 60 años, atendidos en una clínica de fisioterapia en São Pedro da Aldeia, RJ. Se formaron tres grupos: I de RPG, II de LM y III de RPG + LM. A cada paciente se le realizó anamnesis y dos sesiones semanales de fisioterapia, con un total de ocho sesiones de 30 minutos. Para evaluar el dolor se utilizaron la Escala Visual Numérica y la Escala de Discapacidad de Roland Morris. Los resultados no mostraron diferencias significativas entre los grupos en cuanto a la reducción del dolor (p = 0,3816). También se observó diferencia estadística entre la primera y la última consulta en cuanto al dolor en todos los grupos. La escala de Roland Morris reveló diferencias significativas entre el inicio y el final del tratamiento. Se concluye que, según las escalas aplicadas, ambas técnicas resultaron en una reducción del nivel de dolor, pero ninguna de las técnicas fue más efectiva que la otra. Además, se observó que la asociación de técnicas da como resultado una reducción del nivel de dolor desde la primera consulta, lo que es un hallazgo relevante para orientar el tratamiento de estos pacientes.As dores apresentadas na região lombar da coluna são denominadas de lombalgia e acometem cerca de 80% da população. Podem resultar em incapacitação e muitas vezes necessitam de tratamento fisioterápico. Este trabalho teve por objetivo comparar a eficácia das técnicas de Reeducação Postural Global (RPG) e Liberação Miofascial (LM) no tratamento de pacientes com lombalgia crônica. Foram selecionados 60 pacientes de ambos os sexos, de 30 a 60 anos, atendidos em clínica de fisioterapia em São Pedro da Aldeia, RJ. Constituiu-se três grupos: I de RPG, II de LM e o III de RPG + LM. Cada paciente foi submetido à anamnese e a duas sessões fisioterápicas semanais, sendo um total de oito sessões de 30 minutos de duração. Para avaliação da dor utilizou-se a Escala Visual Numérica e Escala de incapacidade de Roland Morris. Os resultados não evidenciaram diferenças significativas entre os grupos quanto à redução da dor (p = 0,3816). Foi observada ainda diferença estatística entre o primeiro e o último atendimento com relação a dor em todos os grupos. A escala de Roland Morris revelou diferenças significativas entre o início e final do tratamento. Conclui-se que, de acordo com as escalas aplicadas, ambas as técnicas resultaram em redução no nível da dor, mas nenhuma das técnicas se mostrou mais eficaz em relação a outra. Ademais, notou-se que a associação das técnicas resulta em redução no nível da dor desde o primeiro atendimento, sendo este um achado relevante para direcionar o tratamento destes pacientes.Research, Society and Development2022-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3853010.33448/rsd-v11i16.38530Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 16; e549111638530Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 16; e549111638530Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 16; e5491116385302525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38530/31938Copyright (c) 2022 Dênis Pereira de Almeida; Antonio Carlos Ricardo de Braga Junior; João Marcos Yamasaki Catunda; Raquel de Souza Gestinarihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Dênis Pereira de Braga Junior, Antonio Carlos Ricardo de Catunda, João Marcos Yamasaki Gestinari, Raquel de Souza 2022-12-18T18:26:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38530Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:52:14.039515Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (MR) techniques in patients with chronic low back pain Comparación entre las técnicas de Reeducación Postural Global (RPG) y Liberación Miofascial (LM) en pacientes con dolor lumbar crónico Comparação entre as técnicas de Reeducação Postural Global (RPG) e Liberação Miofascial (LM) em pacientes com lombalgia crônica |
title |
Comparison between Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (MR) techniques in patients with chronic low back pain |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (MR) techniques in patients with chronic low back pain Almeida, Dênis Pereira de Lumbalgia Postura Liberación miofascial. Low back pain Posture Myofascial release. Lombalgia Postura Liberação miofascial. |
title_short |
Comparison between Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (MR) techniques in patients with chronic low back pain |
title_full |
Comparison between Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (MR) techniques in patients with chronic low back pain |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (MR) techniques in patients with chronic low back pain |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (MR) techniques in patients with chronic low back pain |
title_sort |
Comparison between Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (MR) techniques in patients with chronic low back pain |
author |
Almeida, Dênis Pereira de |
author_facet |
Almeida, Dênis Pereira de Braga Junior, Antonio Carlos Ricardo de Catunda, João Marcos Yamasaki Gestinari, Raquel de Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Braga Junior, Antonio Carlos Ricardo de Catunda, João Marcos Yamasaki Gestinari, Raquel de Souza |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, Dênis Pereira de Braga Junior, Antonio Carlos Ricardo de Catunda, João Marcos Yamasaki Gestinari, Raquel de Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lumbalgia Postura Liberación miofascial. Low back pain Posture Myofascial release. Lombalgia Postura Liberação miofascial. |
topic |
Lumbalgia Postura Liberación miofascial. Low back pain Posture Myofascial release. Lombalgia Postura Liberação miofascial. |
description |
Pain in the lumbar region of the spine is called low back pain and affects about 80% of the population. They can result in incapacitation and often require physical therapy treatment. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) and Myofascial Release (LM) techniques in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. 60 patients of both genders, aged 30 to 60 years, attended at a physiotherapy clinic in São Pedro da Aldeia, RJ, were selected. Three groups were formed: I of RPG, II of (LM) and III of RPG + LM. Each patient underwent anamnesis and two weekly physical therapy sessions, with a total of eight 30-minute sessions. The Visual Numerical Scale and the Roland Morris Disability Scale were used to assess pain. Results did not show significant differences between groups regarding pain reduction (p = 0.3816). Statistical difference was also observed between the first and the last consultation regarding pain in all groups. The Roland Morris scale revealed significant differences between the beginning and end of treatment. It is concluded that, according to the applied scales, both techniques resulted in a reduction in the level of pain, but none of the techniques was more effective than the other. Furthermore, it was noted that the association of techniques results in a reduction in the level of pain from the first consultation, which is a relevant finding to guide the treatment of these patients. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38530 10.33448/rsd-v11i16.38530 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38530 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i16.38530 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38530/31938 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 16; e549111638530 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 16; e549111638530 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 16; e549111638530 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052838031917056 |