Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cruz, Itanielly Dantas Silveira
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Tomaz, Amanda Felix Gonçalves, Moreno, Mariana Cabral, Araújo, Rafaela Monteiro de, Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros, Pereira, Hallissa Simplício Gomes, Caldas, Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13927
Resumo: Objective: The objective this review was to identify the current range of shear bond strength values (SBS) that are clinically acceptable based on a synthesis of the studies published in 20 years that evaluated the SBS of brackets bonded to dental enamel with emitter diode light photo activators and whether damage to the enamel has been reported after the test. Methodology: A search strategy was developed for the selection of articles published from 1999 to 2019 in the PubMed/MedLine electronic database. In addition to reading the titles, keywords and summaries of the studies found, the studies were also obtained for the reading of the methodologies and identification of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The search for scientific articles resulted in 580 studies, but only 14 were selected based on the pre-established criteria. Ten presented methodological quality to be included in this integrative review, and the mean SBS found was 14,05 MPa with a standard deviation of ± 6,52 MPa (range from 7,53 to 20,57 MPa). Conclusion: In conclusion, it was observed that the range of shear bond strength values (5,9 to 7,8 MPa) and taken as a parameter by most authors until now is outdated, since higher values of SBS are feasible without, however, causing dental enamel damage after the debonding of the bracket.
id UNIFEI_dda51042df0b26780d1163dc9f54b05b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13927
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative reviewValores clínicamente aceptables de resistencia al cizallamiento de los soportes ortodóncicos adheridos al esmalte: Una revisión integradoraValores clinicamente aceitáveis de resistência ao cisalhamento de bráquetes ortodônticos colados ao esmalte: Uma revisão integrativaShear StrengthDental EnamelOrthodontic brackets.Resistencia al CorteEsmalte DentalSoportes ortodóncicos.Resistência ao CisalhamentoEsmalte DentárioBraquetes ortodônticos.Objective: The objective this review was to identify the current range of shear bond strength values (SBS) that are clinically acceptable based on a synthesis of the studies published in 20 years that evaluated the SBS of brackets bonded to dental enamel with emitter diode light photo activators and whether damage to the enamel has been reported after the test. Methodology: A search strategy was developed for the selection of articles published from 1999 to 2019 in the PubMed/MedLine electronic database. In addition to reading the titles, keywords and summaries of the studies found, the studies were also obtained for the reading of the methodologies and identification of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The search for scientific articles resulted in 580 studies, but only 14 were selected based on the pre-established criteria. Ten presented methodological quality to be included in this integrative review, and the mean SBS found was 14,05 MPa with a standard deviation of ± 6,52 MPa (range from 7,53 to 20,57 MPa). Conclusion: In conclusion, it was observed that the range of shear bond strength values (5,9 to 7,8 MPa) and taken as a parameter by most authors until now is outdated, since higher values of SBS are feasible without, however, causing dental enamel damage after the debonding of the bracket.Objetivo: El objetivo de esta revisión fue identificar el rango actual de valores de resistencia al cizallamiento (RC) que son clínicamente aceptables en base a una síntesis de los estudios publicados en 20 años que evaluaron el RC de soportes adheridos al esmalte dental con diodo emisor foto activadores de luz y si se ha informado daño al esmalte después de la prueba. Metodología: Se desarrolló una estrategia de búsqueda para la selección de artículos publicados desde 1999 hasta 2019 en la base de datos electrónica PubMed/MedLine. Además de la lectura de los títulos, palabras clave y resúmenes de los estudios encontrados, los estudios también se obtuvieron para la lectura de las metodologías e identificación de los criterios de inclusión y exclusión. Resultados: La búsqueda de artículos científicos arrojó 580 estudios, pero solo 14 fueron seleccionados en base a los criterios preestablecidos. Diez presentaron calidad metodológica para ser incluidos en esta revisión integradora, y el RC medio encontrado fue de 14,05 MPa con una desviación estándar de ± 6,52 MPa (rango de 7,53 a 20,57 MPa). Conclusión: En conclusión, se observó que el rango de valores de resistencia al cizallamiento (5,9 a 7,8 MPa) y tomado como parámetro por la mayoría de los autores hasta ahora está desactualizado, ya que los valores más altos de RC son factibles sin, sin embargo, causando daño al esmalte dental después del desprendimiento del soporte.Objetivo: O objetivo desta revisão foi identificar a faixa atual dos valores de resistência ao cisalhamento (RUC) clinicamente aceitáveis ​​com base em uma síntese dos estudos publicados em 20 anos que avaliaram o RUC de bráquetes colados ao esmalte dentário com fotoativadores de diodo emissor de luz e se foi relatada a presença de danos ao esmalte após o ensaio. Metodologia: Foi desenvolvida uma estratégia de busca para a seleção dos artigos publicados de 1999 a 2019 na base de dados eletrônica PubMed/MedLine. Além da leitura dos títulos, palavras-chave e resumos dos estudos encontrados, os estudos também foram obtidos para a leitura das metodologias e identificação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão. Resultados: A busca dos artigos científicos resultou em 580 estudos, mas apenas 14 foram selecionados com base nos critérios pré-estabelecidos. Dez apresentaram qualidade metodológica para serem incluídos nesta revisão integrativa, e a média de RUC encontrada foi de 14,05 MPa com desvio padrão de ± 6,52 MPa (intervalo de 7,53 a 20,57 MPa). Conclusão: Em conclusão, observou-se que a faixa de valores de resistência ao cisalhamento (5,9 a 7,8 MPa) tida como parâmetro pela maioria dos autores até o momento está desatualizada, visto que maiores valores de RUC são factíveis sem, no entanto, causar dano ao esmalte dentário após a descolagem do bráquete.Research, Society and Development2021-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1392710.33448/rsd-v10i4.13927Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e11110413927Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e11110413927Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e111104139272525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13927/12478Copyright (c) 2021 Itanielly Dantas Silveira Cruz; Amanda Felix Gonçalves Tomaz; Mariana Cabral Moreno; Rafaela Monteiro de Araújo; Arthur César de Medeiros Alves; Hallissa Simplício Gomes Pereira; Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo Caldashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCruz, Itanielly Dantas Silveira Tomaz, Amanda Felix Gonçalves Moreno, Mariana Cabral Araújo, Rafaela Monteiro de Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros Pereira, Hallissa Simplício Gomes Caldas, Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo2021-04-25T11:21:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13927Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:10.078624Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review
Valores clínicamente aceptables de resistencia al cizallamiento de los soportes ortodóncicos adheridos al esmalte: Una revisión integradora
Valores clinicamente aceitáveis de resistência ao cisalhamento de bráquetes ortodônticos colados ao esmalte: Uma revisão integrativa
title Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review
spellingShingle Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review
Cruz, Itanielly Dantas Silveira
Shear Strength
Dental Enamel
Orthodontic brackets.
Resistencia al Corte
Esmalte Dental
Soportes ortodóncicos.
Resistência ao Cisalhamento
Esmalte Dentário
Braquetes ortodônticos.
title_short Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review
title_full Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review
title_fullStr Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review
title_full_unstemmed Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review
title_sort Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review
author Cruz, Itanielly Dantas Silveira
author_facet Cruz, Itanielly Dantas Silveira
Tomaz, Amanda Felix Gonçalves
Moreno, Mariana Cabral
Araújo, Rafaela Monteiro de
Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros
Pereira, Hallissa Simplício Gomes
Caldas, Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo
author_role author
author2 Tomaz, Amanda Felix Gonçalves
Moreno, Mariana Cabral
Araújo, Rafaela Monteiro de
Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros
Pereira, Hallissa Simplício Gomes
Caldas, Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cruz, Itanielly Dantas Silveira
Tomaz, Amanda Felix Gonçalves
Moreno, Mariana Cabral
Araújo, Rafaela Monteiro de
Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros
Pereira, Hallissa Simplício Gomes
Caldas, Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Shear Strength
Dental Enamel
Orthodontic brackets.
Resistencia al Corte
Esmalte Dental
Soportes ortodóncicos.
Resistência ao Cisalhamento
Esmalte Dentário
Braquetes ortodônticos.
topic Shear Strength
Dental Enamel
Orthodontic brackets.
Resistencia al Corte
Esmalte Dental
Soportes ortodóncicos.
Resistência ao Cisalhamento
Esmalte Dentário
Braquetes ortodônticos.
description Objective: The objective this review was to identify the current range of shear bond strength values (SBS) that are clinically acceptable based on a synthesis of the studies published in 20 years that evaluated the SBS of brackets bonded to dental enamel with emitter diode light photo activators and whether damage to the enamel has been reported after the test. Methodology: A search strategy was developed for the selection of articles published from 1999 to 2019 in the PubMed/MedLine electronic database. In addition to reading the titles, keywords and summaries of the studies found, the studies were also obtained for the reading of the methodologies and identification of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The search for scientific articles resulted in 580 studies, but only 14 were selected based on the pre-established criteria. Ten presented methodological quality to be included in this integrative review, and the mean SBS found was 14,05 MPa with a standard deviation of ± 6,52 MPa (range from 7,53 to 20,57 MPa). Conclusion: In conclusion, it was observed that the range of shear bond strength values (5,9 to 7,8 MPa) and taken as a parameter by most authors until now is outdated, since higher values of SBS are feasible without, however, causing dental enamel damage after the debonding of the bracket.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13927
10.33448/rsd-v10i4.13927
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13927
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.13927
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13927/12478
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e11110413927
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e11110413927
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e11110413927
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052673987444736