Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13927 |
Resumo: | Objective: The objective this review was to identify the current range of shear bond strength values (SBS) that are clinically acceptable based on a synthesis of the studies published in 20 years that evaluated the SBS of brackets bonded to dental enamel with emitter diode light photo activators and whether damage to the enamel has been reported after the test. Methodology: A search strategy was developed for the selection of articles published from 1999 to 2019 in the PubMed/MedLine electronic database. In addition to reading the titles, keywords and summaries of the studies found, the studies were also obtained for the reading of the methodologies and identification of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The search for scientific articles resulted in 580 studies, but only 14 were selected based on the pre-established criteria. Ten presented methodological quality to be included in this integrative review, and the mean SBS found was 14,05 MPa with a standard deviation of ± 6,52 MPa (range from 7,53 to 20,57 MPa). Conclusion: In conclusion, it was observed that the range of shear bond strength values (5,9 to 7,8 MPa) and taken as a parameter by most authors until now is outdated, since higher values of SBS are feasible without, however, causing dental enamel damage after the debonding of the bracket. |
id |
UNIFEI_dda51042df0b26780d1163dc9f54b05b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13927 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative reviewValores clínicamente aceptables de resistencia al cizallamiento de los soportes ortodóncicos adheridos al esmalte: Una revisión integradoraValores clinicamente aceitáveis de resistência ao cisalhamento de bráquetes ortodônticos colados ao esmalte: Uma revisão integrativaShear StrengthDental EnamelOrthodontic brackets.Resistencia al CorteEsmalte DentalSoportes ortodóncicos.Resistência ao CisalhamentoEsmalte DentárioBraquetes ortodônticos.Objective: The objective this review was to identify the current range of shear bond strength values (SBS) that are clinically acceptable based on a synthesis of the studies published in 20 years that evaluated the SBS of brackets bonded to dental enamel with emitter diode light photo activators and whether damage to the enamel has been reported after the test. Methodology: A search strategy was developed for the selection of articles published from 1999 to 2019 in the PubMed/MedLine electronic database. In addition to reading the titles, keywords and summaries of the studies found, the studies were also obtained for the reading of the methodologies and identification of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The search for scientific articles resulted in 580 studies, but only 14 were selected based on the pre-established criteria. Ten presented methodological quality to be included in this integrative review, and the mean SBS found was 14,05 MPa with a standard deviation of ± 6,52 MPa (range from 7,53 to 20,57 MPa). Conclusion: In conclusion, it was observed that the range of shear bond strength values (5,9 to 7,8 MPa) and taken as a parameter by most authors until now is outdated, since higher values of SBS are feasible without, however, causing dental enamel damage after the debonding of the bracket.Objetivo: El objetivo de esta revisión fue identificar el rango actual de valores de resistencia al cizallamiento (RC) que son clínicamente aceptables en base a una síntesis de los estudios publicados en 20 años que evaluaron el RC de soportes adheridos al esmalte dental con diodo emisor foto activadores de luz y si se ha informado daño al esmalte después de la prueba. Metodología: Se desarrolló una estrategia de búsqueda para la selección de artículos publicados desde 1999 hasta 2019 en la base de datos electrónica PubMed/MedLine. Además de la lectura de los títulos, palabras clave y resúmenes de los estudios encontrados, los estudios también se obtuvieron para la lectura de las metodologías e identificación de los criterios de inclusión y exclusión. Resultados: La búsqueda de artículos científicos arrojó 580 estudios, pero solo 14 fueron seleccionados en base a los criterios preestablecidos. Diez presentaron calidad metodológica para ser incluidos en esta revisión integradora, y el RC medio encontrado fue de 14,05 MPa con una desviación estándar de ± 6,52 MPa (rango de 7,53 a 20,57 MPa). Conclusión: En conclusión, se observó que el rango de valores de resistencia al cizallamiento (5,9 a 7,8 MPa) y tomado como parámetro por la mayoría de los autores hasta ahora está desactualizado, ya que los valores más altos de RC son factibles sin, sin embargo, causando daño al esmalte dental después del desprendimiento del soporte.Objetivo: O objetivo desta revisão foi identificar a faixa atual dos valores de resistência ao cisalhamento (RUC) clinicamente aceitáveis com base em uma síntese dos estudos publicados em 20 anos que avaliaram o RUC de bráquetes colados ao esmalte dentário com fotoativadores de diodo emissor de luz e se foi relatada a presença de danos ao esmalte após o ensaio. Metodologia: Foi desenvolvida uma estratégia de busca para a seleção dos artigos publicados de 1999 a 2019 na base de dados eletrônica PubMed/MedLine. Além da leitura dos títulos, palavras-chave e resumos dos estudos encontrados, os estudos também foram obtidos para a leitura das metodologias e identificação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão. Resultados: A busca dos artigos científicos resultou em 580 estudos, mas apenas 14 foram selecionados com base nos critérios pré-estabelecidos. Dez apresentaram qualidade metodológica para serem incluídos nesta revisão integrativa, e a média de RUC encontrada foi de 14,05 MPa com desvio padrão de ± 6,52 MPa (intervalo de 7,53 a 20,57 MPa). Conclusão: Em conclusão, observou-se que a faixa de valores de resistência ao cisalhamento (5,9 a 7,8 MPa) tida como parâmetro pela maioria dos autores até o momento está desatualizada, visto que maiores valores de RUC são factíveis sem, no entanto, causar dano ao esmalte dentário após a descolagem do bráquete.Research, Society and Development2021-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1392710.33448/rsd-v10i4.13927Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e11110413927Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e11110413927Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e111104139272525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13927/12478Copyright (c) 2021 Itanielly Dantas Silveira Cruz; Amanda Felix Gonçalves Tomaz; Mariana Cabral Moreno; Rafaela Monteiro de Araújo; Arthur César de Medeiros Alves; Hallissa Simplício Gomes Pereira; Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo Caldashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCruz, Itanielly Dantas Silveira Tomaz, Amanda Felix Gonçalves Moreno, Mariana Cabral Araújo, Rafaela Monteiro de Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros Pereira, Hallissa Simplício Gomes Caldas, Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo2021-04-25T11:21:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13927Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:10.078624Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review Valores clínicamente aceptables de resistencia al cizallamiento de los soportes ortodóncicos adheridos al esmalte: Una revisión integradora Valores clinicamente aceitáveis de resistência ao cisalhamento de bráquetes ortodônticos colados ao esmalte: Uma revisão integrativa |
title |
Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review |
spellingShingle |
Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review Cruz, Itanielly Dantas Silveira Shear Strength Dental Enamel Orthodontic brackets. Resistencia al Corte Esmalte Dental Soportes ortodóncicos. Resistência ao Cisalhamento Esmalte Dentário Braquetes ortodônticos. |
title_short |
Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review |
title_full |
Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review |
title_fullStr |
Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review |
title_sort |
Clinically acceptable values of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded on enamel: An integrative review |
author |
Cruz, Itanielly Dantas Silveira |
author_facet |
Cruz, Itanielly Dantas Silveira Tomaz, Amanda Felix Gonçalves Moreno, Mariana Cabral Araújo, Rafaela Monteiro de Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros Pereira, Hallissa Simplício Gomes Caldas, Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tomaz, Amanda Felix Gonçalves Moreno, Mariana Cabral Araújo, Rafaela Monteiro de Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros Pereira, Hallissa Simplício Gomes Caldas, Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cruz, Itanielly Dantas Silveira Tomaz, Amanda Felix Gonçalves Moreno, Mariana Cabral Araújo, Rafaela Monteiro de Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros Pereira, Hallissa Simplício Gomes Caldas, Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Shear Strength Dental Enamel Orthodontic brackets. Resistencia al Corte Esmalte Dental Soportes ortodóncicos. Resistência ao Cisalhamento Esmalte Dentário Braquetes ortodônticos. |
topic |
Shear Strength Dental Enamel Orthodontic brackets. Resistencia al Corte Esmalte Dental Soportes ortodóncicos. Resistência ao Cisalhamento Esmalte Dentário Braquetes ortodônticos. |
description |
Objective: The objective this review was to identify the current range of shear bond strength values (SBS) that are clinically acceptable based on a synthesis of the studies published in 20 years that evaluated the SBS of brackets bonded to dental enamel with emitter diode light photo activators and whether damage to the enamel has been reported after the test. Methodology: A search strategy was developed for the selection of articles published from 1999 to 2019 in the PubMed/MedLine electronic database. In addition to reading the titles, keywords and summaries of the studies found, the studies were also obtained for the reading of the methodologies and identification of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The search for scientific articles resulted in 580 studies, but only 14 were selected based on the pre-established criteria. Ten presented methodological quality to be included in this integrative review, and the mean SBS found was 14,05 MPa with a standard deviation of ± 6,52 MPa (range from 7,53 to 20,57 MPa). Conclusion: In conclusion, it was observed that the range of shear bond strength values (5,9 to 7,8 MPa) and taken as a parameter by most authors until now is outdated, since higher values of SBS are feasible without, however, causing dental enamel damage after the debonding of the bracket. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13927 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.13927 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13927 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i4.13927 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13927/12478 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e11110413927 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e11110413927 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e11110413927 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052673987444736 |