Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9746 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate the cost / benefit ratio and the economic viability of the green fertilizer consortium in conilon coffee (Coffea canephora). The experiment consisted of five consortiums (treatments) of coffee with legumes, namely: coffee + pigeon pea (Cajanu cajans L.); coffee + black mucuna (Stizolobium aterrimum); coffee + pork beans (Canavalia ensiformis); Mexican coffee + daisy (Tithonia diversifolia) and single coffee (weed soil). Evaluations were made on 10 coffee plants per treatment. The experiment was carried out in a lane, with the planting of legumes between the lines. Total Cost CT = CFT + CVT, Operating cost COP = CT - CO, Average fixed cost CFMe = CFT / Q, Average variable cost CVMe = CVT / Q, Average total cost CTMe = CT / Q, Average operating cost CopMe = COp / Q, Total gross income RBT = PxQ, Total net income RLT = RBT - CT, Net operating income Rlop = RBT - COP, Profitability RT = RLT / Investment x 100, Profitability LC = RLT / RBTx100, Leveling point PN = CT / market price, Safety margin MS = RBT / RBTx100. The treatment that stood out was the Mexican Margaridão, presenting higher net income in economic activity, allowing an oscillation both in the production and in the commercialization of the coffee bag, being the most recommended. In the second year of evaluation, in general, green manure, presented a better profitability and having a better production compared to the other treatments. In the three years of experiment, green fertilizers provided greater production in comparison to the Witness treatment, with emphasis on the Mexican Margaridão, in the years 2017 and 2018. |
id |
UNIFEI_e06fc8a2bbcf772c22e7dde67a84717d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9746 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffeeCosto / beneficio de la fertilización verde del consorcio en café conilonCusto / benefício da adubação verde do consórcio no café conilonProdutor ruralRentabilidadeAdministração rural.Productor ruralRentabilidadAdministración rural.Rural producerProfitabilityRural administration.The objective of this work was to evaluate the cost / benefit ratio and the economic viability of the green fertilizer consortium in conilon coffee (Coffea canephora). The experiment consisted of five consortiums (treatments) of coffee with legumes, namely: coffee + pigeon pea (Cajanu cajans L.); coffee + black mucuna (Stizolobium aterrimum); coffee + pork beans (Canavalia ensiformis); Mexican coffee + daisy (Tithonia diversifolia) and single coffee (weed soil). Evaluations were made on 10 coffee plants per treatment. The experiment was carried out in a lane, with the planting of legumes between the lines. Total Cost CT = CFT + CVT, Operating cost COP = CT - CO, Average fixed cost CFMe = CFT / Q, Average variable cost CVMe = CVT / Q, Average total cost CTMe = CT / Q, Average operating cost CopMe = COp / Q, Total gross income RBT = PxQ, Total net income RLT = RBT - CT, Net operating income Rlop = RBT - COP, Profitability RT = RLT / Investment x 100, Profitability LC = RLT / RBTx100, Leveling point PN = CT / market price, Safety margin MS = RBT / RBTx100. The treatment that stood out was the Mexican Margaridão, presenting higher net income in economic activity, allowing an oscillation both in the production and in the commercialization of the coffee bag, being the most recommended. In the second year of evaluation, in general, green manure, presented a better profitability and having a better production compared to the other treatments. In the three years of experiment, green fertilizers provided greater production in comparison to the Witness treatment, with emphasis on the Mexican Margaridão, in the years 2017 and 2018.El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la relación costo / beneficio y la viabilidad económica del consorcio de fertilizantes verdes en café conilon (Coffea canephora). El experimento consistió en cinco consorcios (tratamientos) de café con legumbres, a saber: café + gandul (Cajanu cajans L.); café + mucuna negra (Stizolobium aterrimum); café + frijoles de cerdo (Canavalia ensiformis); Café mexicano + margarita (Tithonia diversifolia) y café simple (suelo de malezas). Se realizaron evaluaciones en 10 plantas de café por tratamiento. El experimento se llevó a cabo en un carril, con la siembra de leguminosas entre líneas. Costo total CT = CFT + CVT, Costo operativo COP = CT - CO, Costo fijo promedio CFMe = CFT / Q, Costo variable promedio CVMe = CVT / Q, Costo total promedio CTMe = CT / Q, Costo operativo promedio CopMe = COp / Q, Ingreso bruto total RBT = PxQ, Ingreso neto total RLT = RBT - CT, Ingreso operativo neto Rlop = RBT - COP, Rentabilidad RT = RLT / Inversión x 100, Rentabilidad LC = RLT / RBTx100, Punto de nivelación PN = CT / precio de mercado, margen de seguridad MS = RBT / RBTx100. El tratamiento que se destacó fue el mexicano Margaridão, que presentó mayor ingreso neto en la actividad económica, permitiendo una oscilación tanto en la producción como en la comercialización de la bolsa de café, siendo el más recomendado. En el segundo año de evaluación, en general, abono verde, presentó una mejor rentabilidad y una mejor producción en comparación con los otros tratamientos. En los tres años de experimento, los fertilizantes verdes brindaron una mayor producción en comparación con el tratamiento Witness, con énfasis en el Margaridão mexicano, en los años 2017 y 2018.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a relação custo/benefício e a viabilidade econômica do consórcio adubação verde em café conilon (Coffea canephora). O experimento consistiu-se em cinco consócios (tratamentos) de café com leguminosas, a saber: café + feijão guandu (Cajanu cajans L.); café + mucuna preta (Stizolobium aterrimum); café + feijão de porco (Canavalia ensiformis); café + margaridão mexicano (Tithonia diversifolia) e café solteiro (solo capinado). As avaliações foram feitas em 10 plantas de café por tratamento. O experimento foi conduzido em faixa, com o plantio das leguminosas nas entrelinhas. Custo Total CT = CFT + CVT, Custo operacional COP = CT – CO, Custo fixo médio CFMe = CFT/Q, Custo variável médio CVMe = CVT/Q, Custo total médio CTMe = CT/Q, Custo operacional médio CopMe = COp/Q, Renda bruta total RBT = PxQ, Renda líquida total RLT = RBT – CT, Renda líquida operacional Rlop = RBT – COP, Rentabilidade RT = RLT/Investimento x 100, Lucratividade LC = RLT/RBTx100, Ponto de nivelamento PN = CT/preço de mercado, Margem de segurança MS = RBT/RBTx100. O tratamento que se destacou foi o Margaridão mexicano, apresentando maior renda líquida na atividade econômica, permitindo uma oscilação tanto na produção quanto na comercialização da saca de café, sendo o mais recomendado. No segundo ano de avaliação, de forma geral, a adubação verde, apresentaram uma melhor rentabilidade e possuindo uma melhor produção comparado aos demais tratamentos. Nos Três anos de experimento, os adubos verdes proporcionaram maior produção em comparação ao tratamento Testemunha, com destaque para o Margaridão mexicano, nos anos de 2017 e 2018.Research, Society and Development2020-11-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/974610.33448/rsd-v9i11.9746Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e2849119746Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e2849119746Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e28491197462525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9746/8781Copyright (c) 2020 Alex Justino Zacarias; Israel Martins Pereira; Elson Monteiro da Rocha ; Mario Euclides Pechara da Costa Jaeggi; Otacílio Jose Passos Rangel; Wallace Luiz de Lima; Rebyson Bissaco Guidinelle; Samyra de Araújo Capetini; Mirivania Olmo Domingos; Fábio Cunha Coelho; Jaídson Gonçalves da Rocha; Richardson Sales Rocha; Rita de Kássia Guarnier da Silva; Tâmara Rebecca Albuquerque de Oliveira; Derivaldo Pureza da Cruz; Alexandre Gomes de Souza; Geraldo de Amaral Gravina; Rogério Figueiredo Daher; Josimar Nogueira Batista; Camila Queiroz da Silva Sanfim de Sant'Annahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZacarias, Alex Justino Pereira, Israel Martins Rocha , Elson Monteiro da Jaeggi, Mario Euclides Pechara da Costa Rangel, Otacílio Jose Passos Lima, Wallace Luiz de Guidinelle, Rebyson Bissaco Capetini, Samyra de Araújo Domingos, Mirivania Olmo Coelho, Fábio Cunha Rocha, Jaídson Gonçalves da Rocha, Richardson Sales Silva, Rita de Kássia Guarnier da Oliveira, Tâmara Rebecca Albuquerque de Cruz, Derivaldo Pureza da Souza, Alexandre Gomes de Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral Daher, Rogério Figueiredo Batista, Josimar Nogueira Sant'Anna, Camila Queiroz da Silva Sanfim de 2020-12-10T23:37:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9746Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:31:57.377821Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee Costo / beneficio de la fertilización verde del consorcio en café conilon Custo / benefício da adubação verde do consórcio no café conilon |
title |
Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee |
spellingShingle |
Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee Zacarias, Alex Justino Produtor rural Rentabilidade Administração rural. Productor rural Rentabilidad Administración rural. Rural producer Profitability Rural administration. |
title_short |
Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee |
title_full |
Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee |
title_fullStr |
Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee |
title_sort |
Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee |
author |
Zacarias, Alex Justino |
author_facet |
Zacarias, Alex Justino Pereira, Israel Martins Rocha , Elson Monteiro da Jaeggi, Mario Euclides Pechara da Costa Rangel, Otacílio Jose Passos Lima, Wallace Luiz de Guidinelle, Rebyson Bissaco Capetini, Samyra de Araújo Domingos, Mirivania Olmo Coelho, Fábio Cunha Rocha, Jaídson Gonçalves da Rocha, Richardson Sales Silva, Rita de Kássia Guarnier da Oliveira, Tâmara Rebecca Albuquerque de Cruz, Derivaldo Pureza da Souza, Alexandre Gomes de Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral Daher, Rogério Figueiredo Batista, Josimar Nogueira Sant'Anna, Camila Queiroz da Silva Sanfim de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, Israel Martins Rocha , Elson Monteiro da Jaeggi, Mario Euclides Pechara da Costa Rangel, Otacílio Jose Passos Lima, Wallace Luiz de Guidinelle, Rebyson Bissaco Capetini, Samyra de Araújo Domingos, Mirivania Olmo Coelho, Fábio Cunha Rocha, Jaídson Gonçalves da Rocha, Richardson Sales Silva, Rita de Kássia Guarnier da Oliveira, Tâmara Rebecca Albuquerque de Cruz, Derivaldo Pureza da Souza, Alexandre Gomes de Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral Daher, Rogério Figueiredo Batista, Josimar Nogueira Sant'Anna, Camila Queiroz da Silva Sanfim de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zacarias, Alex Justino Pereira, Israel Martins Rocha , Elson Monteiro da Jaeggi, Mario Euclides Pechara da Costa Rangel, Otacílio Jose Passos Lima, Wallace Luiz de Guidinelle, Rebyson Bissaco Capetini, Samyra de Araújo Domingos, Mirivania Olmo Coelho, Fábio Cunha Rocha, Jaídson Gonçalves da Rocha, Richardson Sales Silva, Rita de Kássia Guarnier da Oliveira, Tâmara Rebecca Albuquerque de Cruz, Derivaldo Pureza da Souza, Alexandre Gomes de Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral Daher, Rogério Figueiredo Batista, Josimar Nogueira Sant'Anna, Camila Queiroz da Silva Sanfim de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Produtor rural Rentabilidade Administração rural. Productor rural Rentabilidad Administración rural. Rural producer Profitability Rural administration. |
topic |
Produtor rural Rentabilidade Administração rural. Productor rural Rentabilidad Administración rural. Rural producer Profitability Rural administration. |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate the cost / benefit ratio and the economic viability of the green fertilizer consortium in conilon coffee (Coffea canephora). The experiment consisted of five consortiums (treatments) of coffee with legumes, namely: coffee + pigeon pea (Cajanu cajans L.); coffee + black mucuna (Stizolobium aterrimum); coffee + pork beans (Canavalia ensiformis); Mexican coffee + daisy (Tithonia diversifolia) and single coffee (weed soil). Evaluations were made on 10 coffee plants per treatment. The experiment was carried out in a lane, with the planting of legumes between the lines. Total Cost CT = CFT + CVT, Operating cost COP = CT - CO, Average fixed cost CFMe = CFT / Q, Average variable cost CVMe = CVT / Q, Average total cost CTMe = CT / Q, Average operating cost CopMe = COp / Q, Total gross income RBT = PxQ, Total net income RLT = RBT - CT, Net operating income Rlop = RBT - COP, Profitability RT = RLT / Investment x 100, Profitability LC = RLT / RBTx100, Leveling point PN = CT / market price, Safety margin MS = RBT / RBTx100. The treatment that stood out was the Mexican Margaridão, presenting higher net income in economic activity, allowing an oscillation both in the production and in the commercialization of the coffee bag, being the most recommended. In the second year of evaluation, in general, green manure, presented a better profitability and having a better production compared to the other treatments. In the three years of experiment, green fertilizers provided greater production in comparison to the Witness treatment, with emphasis on the Mexican Margaridão, in the years 2017 and 2018. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9746 10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9746 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9746 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9746 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9746/8781 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e2849119746 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e2849119746 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e2849119746 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052742199410688 |