Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zacarias, Alex Justino
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Pereira, Israel Martins, Rocha , Elson Monteiro da, Jaeggi, Mario Euclides Pechara da Costa, Rangel, Otacílio Jose Passos, Lima, Wallace Luiz de, Guidinelle, Rebyson Bissaco, Capetini, Samyra de Araújo, Domingos, Mirivania Olmo, Coelho, Fábio Cunha, Rocha, Jaídson Gonçalves da, Rocha, Richardson Sales, Silva, Rita de Kássia Guarnier da, Oliveira, Tâmara Rebecca Albuquerque de, Cruz, Derivaldo Pureza da, Souza, Alexandre Gomes de, Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral, Daher, Rogério Figueiredo, Batista, Josimar Nogueira, Sant'Anna, Camila Queiroz da Silva Sanfim de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9746
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate the cost / benefit ratio and the economic viability of the green fertilizer consortium in conilon coffee (Coffea canephora). The experiment consisted of five consortiums (treatments) of coffee with legumes, namely: coffee + pigeon pea (Cajanu cajans L.); coffee + black mucuna (Stizolobium aterrimum); coffee + pork beans (Canavalia ensiformis); Mexican coffee + daisy (Tithonia diversifolia) and single coffee (weed soil). Evaluations were made on 10 coffee plants per treatment. The experiment was carried out in a lane, with the planting of legumes between the lines. Total Cost CT = CFT + CVT, Operating cost COP = CT - CO, Average fixed cost CFMe = CFT / Q, Average variable cost CVMe = CVT / Q, Average total cost CTMe = CT / Q, Average operating cost CopMe = COp / Q, Total gross income RBT = PxQ, Total net income RLT = RBT - CT, Net operating income Rlop = RBT - COP, Profitability RT = RLT / Investment x 100, Profitability LC = RLT / RBTx100, Leveling point PN = CT / market price, Safety margin MS = RBT / RBTx100. The treatment that stood out was the Mexican Margaridão, presenting higher net income in economic activity, allowing an oscillation both in the production and in the commercialization of the coffee bag, being the most recommended. In the second year of evaluation, in general, green manure, presented a better profitability and having a better production compared to the other treatments. In the three years of experiment, green fertilizers provided greater production in comparison to the Witness treatment, with emphasis on the Mexican Margaridão, in the years 2017 and 2018.
id UNIFEI_e06fc8a2bbcf772c22e7dde67a84717d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9746
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffeeCosto / beneficio de la fertilización verde del consorcio en café conilonCusto / benefício da adubação verde do consórcio no café conilonProdutor ruralRentabilidadeAdministração rural.Productor ruralRentabilidadAdministración rural.Rural producerProfitabilityRural administration.The objective of this work was to evaluate the cost / benefit ratio and the economic viability of the green fertilizer consortium in conilon coffee (Coffea canephora). The experiment consisted of five consortiums (treatments) of coffee with legumes, namely: coffee + pigeon pea (Cajanu cajans L.); coffee + black mucuna (Stizolobium aterrimum); coffee + pork beans (Canavalia ensiformis); Mexican coffee + daisy (Tithonia diversifolia) and single coffee (weed soil). Evaluations were made on 10 coffee plants per treatment. The experiment was carried out in a lane, with the planting of legumes between the lines. Total Cost CT = CFT + CVT, Operating cost COP = CT - CO, Average fixed cost CFMe = CFT / Q, Average variable cost CVMe = CVT / Q, Average total cost CTMe = CT / Q, Average operating cost CopMe = COp / Q, Total gross income RBT = PxQ, Total net income RLT = RBT - CT, Net operating income Rlop = RBT - COP, Profitability RT = RLT / Investment x 100, Profitability LC = RLT / RBTx100, Leveling point PN = CT / market price, Safety margin MS = RBT / RBTx100. The treatment that stood out was the Mexican Margaridão, presenting higher net income in economic activity, allowing an oscillation both in the production and in the commercialization of the coffee bag, being the most recommended. In the second year of evaluation, in general, green manure, presented a better profitability and having a better production compared to the other treatments. In the three years of experiment, green fertilizers provided greater production in comparison to the Witness treatment, with emphasis on the Mexican Margaridão, in the years 2017 and 2018.El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la relación costo / beneficio y la viabilidad económica del consorcio de fertilizantes verdes en café conilon (Coffea canephora). El experimento consistió en cinco consorcios (tratamientos) de café con legumbres, a saber: café + gandul (Cajanu cajans L.); café + mucuna negra (Stizolobium aterrimum); café + frijoles de cerdo (Canavalia ensiformis); Café mexicano + margarita (Tithonia diversifolia) y café simple (suelo de malezas). Se realizaron evaluaciones en 10 plantas de café por tratamiento. El experimento se llevó a cabo en un carril, con la siembra de leguminosas entre líneas. Costo total CT = CFT + CVT, Costo operativo COP = CT - CO, Costo fijo promedio CFMe = CFT / Q, Costo variable promedio CVMe = CVT / Q, Costo total promedio CTMe = CT / Q, Costo operativo promedio CopMe = COp / Q, Ingreso bruto total RBT = PxQ, Ingreso neto total RLT = RBT - CT, Ingreso operativo neto Rlop = RBT - COP, Rentabilidad RT = RLT / Inversión x 100, Rentabilidad LC = RLT / RBTx100, Punto de nivelación PN = CT / precio de mercado, margen de seguridad MS = RBT / RBTx100. El tratamiento que se destacó fue el mexicano Margaridão, que presentó mayor ingreso neto en la actividad económica, permitiendo una oscilación tanto en la producción como en la comercialización de la bolsa de café, siendo el más recomendado. En el segundo año de evaluación, en general, abono verde, presentó una mejor rentabilidad y una mejor producción en comparación con los otros tratamientos. En los tres años de experimento, los fertilizantes verdes brindaron una mayor producción en comparación con el tratamiento Witness, con énfasis en el Margaridão mexicano, en los años 2017 y 2018.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a relação custo/benefício e a viabilidade econômica do consórcio adubação verde em café conilon (Coffea canephora). O experimento consistiu-se em cinco consócios (tratamentos) de café com leguminosas, a saber: café + feijão guandu (Cajanu cajans L.); café + mucuna preta (Stizolobium aterrimum); café + feijão de porco (Canavalia ensiformis); café + margaridão mexicano (Tithonia diversifolia) e café solteiro (solo capinado). As avaliações foram feitas em 10 plantas de café por tratamento. O experimento foi conduzido em faixa, com o plantio das leguminosas nas entrelinhas. Custo Total CT = CFT + CVT, Custo operacional COP = CT – CO, Custo fixo médio CFMe = CFT/Q, Custo variável médio CVMe = CVT/Q, Custo total médio CTMe = CT/Q, Custo operacional médio CopMe = COp/Q, Renda bruta total RBT = PxQ, Renda líquida total RLT = RBT – CT, Renda líquida operacional Rlop = RBT – COP, Rentabilidade RT = RLT/Investimento x 100, Lucratividade LC = RLT/RBTx100, Ponto de nivelamento PN = CT/preço de mercado, Margem de segurança MS = RBT/RBTx100. O tratamento que se destacou foi o Margaridão mexicano, apresentando maior renda líquida na atividade econômica, permitindo uma oscilação tanto na produção quanto na comercialização da saca de café, sendo o mais recomendado. No segundo ano de avaliação, de forma geral, a adubação verde, apresentaram uma melhor rentabilidade e possuindo uma melhor produção comparado aos demais tratamentos. Nos Três anos de experimento, os adubos verdes proporcionaram maior produção em comparação ao tratamento Testemunha, com destaque para o Margaridão mexicano, nos anos de 2017 e 2018.Research, Society and Development2020-11-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/974610.33448/rsd-v9i11.9746Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e2849119746Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e2849119746Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e28491197462525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9746/8781Copyright (c) 2020 Alex Justino Zacarias; Israel Martins Pereira; Elson Monteiro da Rocha ; Mario Euclides Pechara da Costa Jaeggi; Otacílio Jose Passos Rangel; Wallace Luiz de Lima; Rebyson Bissaco Guidinelle; Samyra de Araújo Capetini; Mirivania Olmo Domingos; Fábio Cunha Coelho; Jaídson Gonçalves da Rocha; Richardson Sales Rocha; Rita de Kássia Guarnier da Silva; Tâmara Rebecca Albuquerque de Oliveira; Derivaldo Pureza da Cruz; Alexandre Gomes de Souza; Geraldo de Amaral Gravina; Rogério Figueiredo Daher; Josimar Nogueira Batista; Camila Queiroz da Silva Sanfim de Sant'Annahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZacarias, Alex Justino Pereira, Israel Martins Rocha , Elson Monteiro da Jaeggi, Mario Euclides Pechara da Costa Rangel, Otacílio Jose Passos Lima, Wallace Luiz de Guidinelle, Rebyson Bissaco Capetini, Samyra de Araújo Domingos, Mirivania Olmo Coelho, Fábio Cunha Rocha, Jaídson Gonçalves da Rocha, Richardson Sales Silva, Rita de Kássia Guarnier da Oliveira, Tâmara Rebecca Albuquerque de Cruz, Derivaldo Pureza da Souza, Alexandre Gomes de Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral Daher, Rogério Figueiredo Batista, Josimar Nogueira Sant'Anna, Camila Queiroz da Silva Sanfim de 2020-12-10T23:37:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9746Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:31:57.377821Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee
Costo / beneficio de la fertilización verde del consorcio en café conilon
Custo / benefício da adubação verde do consórcio no café conilon
title Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee
spellingShingle Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee
Zacarias, Alex Justino
Produtor rural
Rentabilidade
Administração rural.
Productor rural
Rentabilidad
Administración rural.
Rural producer
Profitability
Rural administration.
title_short Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee
title_full Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee
title_fullStr Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee
title_full_unstemmed Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee
title_sort Cost / benefit of the consortium green fertilization in conilon coffee
author Zacarias, Alex Justino
author_facet Zacarias, Alex Justino
Pereira, Israel Martins
Rocha , Elson Monteiro da
Jaeggi, Mario Euclides Pechara da Costa
Rangel, Otacílio Jose Passos
Lima, Wallace Luiz de
Guidinelle, Rebyson Bissaco
Capetini, Samyra de Araújo
Domingos, Mirivania Olmo
Coelho, Fábio Cunha
Rocha, Jaídson Gonçalves da
Rocha, Richardson Sales
Silva, Rita de Kássia Guarnier da
Oliveira, Tâmara Rebecca Albuquerque de
Cruz, Derivaldo Pureza da
Souza, Alexandre Gomes de
Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral
Daher, Rogério Figueiredo
Batista, Josimar Nogueira
Sant'Anna, Camila Queiroz da Silva Sanfim de
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Israel Martins
Rocha , Elson Monteiro da
Jaeggi, Mario Euclides Pechara da Costa
Rangel, Otacílio Jose Passos
Lima, Wallace Luiz de
Guidinelle, Rebyson Bissaco
Capetini, Samyra de Araújo
Domingos, Mirivania Olmo
Coelho, Fábio Cunha
Rocha, Jaídson Gonçalves da
Rocha, Richardson Sales
Silva, Rita de Kássia Guarnier da
Oliveira, Tâmara Rebecca Albuquerque de
Cruz, Derivaldo Pureza da
Souza, Alexandre Gomes de
Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral
Daher, Rogério Figueiredo
Batista, Josimar Nogueira
Sant'Anna, Camila Queiroz da Silva Sanfim de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zacarias, Alex Justino
Pereira, Israel Martins
Rocha , Elson Monteiro da
Jaeggi, Mario Euclides Pechara da Costa
Rangel, Otacílio Jose Passos
Lima, Wallace Luiz de
Guidinelle, Rebyson Bissaco
Capetini, Samyra de Araújo
Domingos, Mirivania Olmo
Coelho, Fábio Cunha
Rocha, Jaídson Gonçalves da
Rocha, Richardson Sales
Silva, Rita de Kássia Guarnier da
Oliveira, Tâmara Rebecca Albuquerque de
Cruz, Derivaldo Pureza da
Souza, Alexandre Gomes de
Gravina, Geraldo de Amaral
Daher, Rogério Figueiredo
Batista, Josimar Nogueira
Sant'Anna, Camila Queiroz da Silva Sanfim de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Produtor rural
Rentabilidade
Administração rural.
Productor rural
Rentabilidad
Administración rural.
Rural producer
Profitability
Rural administration.
topic Produtor rural
Rentabilidade
Administração rural.
Productor rural
Rentabilidad
Administración rural.
Rural producer
Profitability
Rural administration.
description The objective of this work was to evaluate the cost / benefit ratio and the economic viability of the green fertilizer consortium in conilon coffee (Coffea canephora). The experiment consisted of five consortiums (treatments) of coffee with legumes, namely: coffee + pigeon pea (Cajanu cajans L.); coffee + black mucuna (Stizolobium aterrimum); coffee + pork beans (Canavalia ensiformis); Mexican coffee + daisy (Tithonia diversifolia) and single coffee (weed soil). Evaluations were made on 10 coffee plants per treatment. The experiment was carried out in a lane, with the planting of legumes between the lines. Total Cost CT = CFT + CVT, Operating cost COP = CT - CO, Average fixed cost CFMe = CFT / Q, Average variable cost CVMe = CVT / Q, Average total cost CTMe = CT / Q, Average operating cost CopMe = COp / Q, Total gross income RBT = PxQ, Total net income RLT = RBT - CT, Net operating income Rlop = RBT - COP, Profitability RT = RLT / Investment x 100, Profitability LC = RLT / RBTx100, Leveling point PN = CT / market price, Safety margin MS = RBT / RBTx100. The treatment that stood out was the Mexican Margaridão, presenting higher net income in economic activity, allowing an oscillation both in the production and in the commercialization of the coffee bag, being the most recommended. In the second year of evaluation, in general, green manure, presented a better profitability and having a better production compared to the other treatments. In the three years of experiment, green fertilizers provided greater production in comparison to the Witness treatment, with emphasis on the Mexican Margaridão, in the years 2017 and 2018.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9746
10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9746
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9746
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9746
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9746/8781
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e2849119746
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e2849119746
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e2849119746
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052742199410688