Compliance of RCTs in endodontic instrumentation with the CONSORT Statement: A systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17350 |
Resumo: | This systematic review aimed to evaluate the adherence to the CONSORT Statement in clinical studies comparing different instrumentation techniques in Endodontics. Methodology: A systematic search was carried out through Medline databases. There was no restriction on publication year or idiom. Solely randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The articles were evaluated in compliance with CONSORT. Descriptive analyses of the number of studies by journal, country, and quality assessments were performed with RoB 2.0 Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in RCTs. A total of 6779 studies were identified, and only 33 meet the eligibility criteria. In relation to the overall risk of bias, eight out of 33 were classified as at ‘low’ risk of bias. The overall CONSORT score for the included studies in this review was 22 ± 6.2 points. Significant differences among countries were observed (p = 0.03). The range of years had a significant influence on the average CONSORT score (p = 0.01). The adherence of RCTs of endodontic instrumentation to the CONSORT Statement requires improvements. Adherence to the CONSORT statement will also reduce the high or some concerns risk of bias of studies in the field. CRD42020160552 |
id |
UNIFEI_e0c24b3fb4317db09015427e623cb972 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17350 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Compliance of RCTs in endodontic instrumentation with the CONSORT Statement: A systematic reviewCumplimiento de los ECAs en instrumentación endodóntica con la Declaración CONSORT: Una revisión sistemáticaConformidade de ECRs em instrumentação endodôntica com a declaração CONSORT: Uma revisão sistemáticaEndodontiaInstrumentos odontológicosEnsaios clínicos controlados aleatórios como assunto.EndodonciaInstrumentos dentalesEnsayos clínicos controlados aleatorios como asunto.EndodonticsDental InstrumentsRandomized controlled trials as topic.This systematic review aimed to evaluate the adherence to the CONSORT Statement in clinical studies comparing different instrumentation techniques in Endodontics. Methodology: A systematic search was carried out through Medline databases. There was no restriction on publication year or idiom. Solely randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The articles were evaluated in compliance with CONSORT. Descriptive analyses of the number of studies by journal, country, and quality assessments were performed with RoB 2.0 Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in RCTs. A total of 6779 studies were identified, and only 33 meet the eligibility criteria. In relation to the overall risk of bias, eight out of 33 were classified as at ‘low’ risk of bias. The overall CONSORT score for the included studies in this review was 22 ± 6.2 points. Significant differences among countries were observed (p = 0.03). The range of years had a significant influence on the average CONSORT score (p = 0.01). The adherence of RCTs of endodontic instrumentation to the CONSORT Statement requires improvements. Adherence to the CONSORT statement will also reduce the high or some concerns risk of bias of studies in the field. CRD42020160552Esta revisión sistemática tuvo como objetivo evaluar la adherencia a la Declaración CONSORT en estudios clínicos comparando diferentes técnicas de instrumentación en Endodoncia. Metodología: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática a través de las bases de datos de Medline. No hubo restricciones sobre el año de publicación o el idioma. Se incluyeron únicamente ensayos controlados aleatorios (ECAs). Los artículos fueron evaluados de acuerdo con CONSORT. Se realizaron análisis descriptivos del número de estudios por revista, país y evaluaciones de calidad con la herramienta de la Colaboración Cochrane RoB 2.0 para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en los ECAs. Se identificaron un total de 6779 estudios y solo 33 cumplen los criterios de elegibilidad. En relación con el riesgo general de sesgo, ocho de los 33 se clasificaron como de riesgo "bajo" de sesgo. La puntuación CONSORT general para los estudios incluidos en esta revisión fue de 22 ± 6,2 puntos. Se observaron diferencias significativas entre países (p = 0,03). El rango de años tuvo una influencia significativa en el puntaje CONSORT promedio (p = 0.01). La adherencia de los ECAs de instrumentación endodóntica a la Declaración CONSORT requiere mejoras. La adherencia a la declaración CONSORT también reducirá el riesgo alto o algunas preocupaciones de sesgo de los estudios en el campo. CRD42020160552Esta revisão sistemática teve como objetivo avaliar a adesão à Declaração CONSORT em estudos clínicos comparando diferentes técnicas de instrumentação em Endodontia. Metodologia: Foi realizada uma busca sistemática nas bases de dados Medline. Não houve restrição quanto ao ano ou idioma de publicação. Apenas ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) foram incluídos. Os artigos foram avaliados de acordo com o CONSORT. Análises descritivas do número de estudos por periódico, país e avaliações de qualidade foram realizadas com a ferramenta RoB 2.0 Cochrane Collaboration para avaliar o risco de viés em ECRs. Um total de 6.779 estudos foram identificados, e apenas 33 atendem aos critérios de elegibilidade. Em relação ao risco geral de viés, oito de 33 foram classificados como de risco "baixo" de viés. A pontuação geral CONSORT para os estudos incluídos nesta revisão foi de 22 ± 6,2 pontos. Foram observadas diferenças significativas entre os países (p = 0,03). O intervalo de anos teve influência significativa no escore CONSORT médio (p = 0,01). A adesão dos ECRs de instrumentação endodôntica à declaração CONSORT requer melhorias. A adesão à declaração CONSORT também reduzirá o risco elevado ou algumas preocupações de viés dos estudos na área. CRD42020160552Research, Society and Development2021-07-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1735010.33448/rsd-v10i8.17350Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e41910817350Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e41910817350Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e419108173502525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17350/15632Copyright (c) 2021 Karla Aguiar Cabral; Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins; Letícia Maíra Wambier; Nilton Vivacqua-Gomes ; Márcia Rezende; Alessandra Reis; Juliana Larocca de Geushttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCabral, Karla Aguiar Martins, Ana Cristina Rodrigues Wambier, Letícia Maíra Vivacqua-Gomes , Nilton Rezende, Márcia Reis, AlessandraGeus, Juliana Larocca de 2021-08-21T18:46:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17350Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:37:42.673441Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Compliance of RCTs in endodontic instrumentation with the CONSORT Statement: A systematic review Cumplimiento de los ECAs en instrumentación endodóntica con la Declaración CONSORT: Una revisión sistemática Conformidade de ECRs em instrumentação endodôntica com a declaração CONSORT: Uma revisão sistemática |
title |
Compliance of RCTs in endodontic instrumentation with the CONSORT Statement: A systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Compliance of RCTs in endodontic instrumentation with the CONSORT Statement: A systematic review Cabral, Karla Aguiar Endodontia Instrumentos odontológicos Ensaios clínicos controlados aleatórios como assunto. Endodoncia Instrumentos dentales Ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorios como asunto. Endodontics Dental Instruments Randomized controlled trials as topic. |
title_short |
Compliance of RCTs in endodontic instrumentation with the CONSORT Statement: A systematic review |
title_full |
Compliance of RCTs in endodontic instrumentation with the CONSORT Statement: A systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Compliance of RCTs in endodontic instrumentation with the CONSORT Statement: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Compliance of RCTs in endodontic instrumentation with the CONSORT Statement: A systematic review |
title_sort |
Compliance of RCTs in endodontic instrumentation with the CONSORT Statement: A systematic review |
author |
Cabral, Karla Aguiar |
author_facet |
Cabral, Karla Aguiar Martins, Ana Cristina Rodrigues Wambier, Letícia Maíra Vivacqua-Gomes , Nilton Rezende, Márcia Reis, Alessandra Geus, Juliana Larocca de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins, Ana Cristina Rodrigues Wambier, Letícia Maíra Vivacqua-Gomes , Nilton Rezende, Márcia Reis, Alessandra Geus, Juliana Larocca de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cabral, Karla Aguiar Martins, Ana Cristina Rodrigues Wambier, Letícia Maíra Vivacqua-Gomes , Nilton Rezende, Márcia Reis, Alessandra Geus, Juliana Larocca de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Endodontia Instrumentos odontológicos Ensaios clínicos controlados aleatórios como assunto. Endodoncia Instrumentos dentales Ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorios como asunto. Endodontics Dental Instruments Randomized controlled trials as topic. |
topic |
Endodontia Instrumentos odontológicos Ensaios clínicos controlados aleatórios como assunto. Endodoncia Instrumentos dentales Ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorios como asunto. Endodontics Dental Instruments Randomized controlled trials as topic. |
description |
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the adherence to the CONSORT Statement in clinical studies comparing different instrumentation techniques in Endodontics. Methodology: A systematic search was carried out through Medline databases. There was no restriction on publication year or idiom. Solely randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The articles were evaluated in compliance with CONSORT. Descriptive analyses of the number of studies by journal, country, and quality assessments were performed with RoB 2.0 Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in RCTs. A total of 6779 studies were identified, and only 33 meet the eligibility criteria. In relation to the overall risk of bias, eight out of 33 were classified as at ‘low’ risk of bias. The overall CONSORT score for the included studies in this review was 22 ± 6.2 points. Significant differences among countries were observed (p = 0.03). The range of years had a significant influence on the average CONSORT score (p = 0.01). The adherence of RCTs of endodontic instrumentation to the CONSORT Statement requires improvements. Adherence to the CONSORT statement will also reduce the high or some concerns risk of bias of studies in the field. CRD42020160552 |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17350 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17350 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17350 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17350 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17350/15632 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e41910817350 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e41910817350 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e41910817350 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052786950537216 |