Evaluation of communication between health professionals and users of a public maternity hospital

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mota, Laila da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Santos, Márcia Sousa, Silva, Wenderson Costa da, Miranda, Layse Siqueira Costa, Mendes, Rogério Cruz, Soares, Bianca Santos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1621
Resumo: Objective: To evaluate the perception of health professionals and users about communication in the hospital environment. Methodology: This is a qualitative, exploratory and descriptive field research. To understand the results and the meaning of communication between professionals and users, the data were organized from the speeches of patients and health professionals from a public maternity hospital. Results: Among the 20 users interviewed, 14 (70%) said that communication is great, 01 (5%) people reported that communication is regular, but needs to improve, 03 (15%) people said that communication is more or less and 02 (10%) people reported that communication is poor. Among the 20 professionals interviewed, 05 (25%) said they need not change that their communication with the patient is excellent, 09 (5%) people reported that it is always good to improve their communication with the patient 02 (10%) people spoke that their communication with the user is humanized and 04 (20%) people reported that because of the short time that communication has to be quickly explaining the entire procedure. Conclusion: there are still communication failures, since the professional is more focused on the procedure, forgetting the provision of humanized care. Thus it is expected that there will be more empathy and responsibility with the parties involved for the development of a humanized assistance, understanding the users' complaints and reducing the communication failures.
id UNIFEI_e446d921f6091072d99228ad20457aee
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1621
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of communication between health professionals and users of a public maternity hospitalEvaluación de la comunicación entre profesionales de la salud y usuarias de una maternidad públicaAvaliação da comunicação entre o profissional da saúde e usuários de uma maternidade públicaIntercommunicationHealth institutionsHealth PersonnelPatient.IntercomunicaçãoInstituições de saúdePessoal de SaúdePaciente.intercomunicaciónInstituciones de saludPersonal de saludPacienteObjective: To evaluate the perception of health professionals and users about communication in the hospital environment. Methodology: This is a qualitative, exploratory and descriptive field research. To understand the results and the meaning of communication between professionals and users, the data were organized from the speeches of patients and health professionals from a public maternity hospital. Results: Among the 20 users interviewed, 14 (70%) said that communication is great, 01 (5%) people reported that communication is regular, but needs to improve, 03 (15%) people said that communication is more or less and 02 (10%) people reported that communication is poor. Among the 20 professionals interviewed, 05 (25%) said they need not change that their communication with the patient is excellent, 09 (5%) people reported that it is always good to improve their communication with the patient 02 (10%) people spoke that their communication with the user is humanized and 04 (20%) people reported that because of the short time that communication has to be quickly explaining the entire procedure. Conclusion: there are still communication failures, since the professional is more focused on the procedure, forgetting the provision of humanized care. Thus it is expected that there will be more empathy and responsibility with the parties involved for the development of a humanized assistance, understanding the users' complaints and reducing the communication failures.Objetivo: evaluar la percepción de los profesionales y usuarios de la salud sobre la comunicación en el entorno hospitalario. Metodología: Esta es una investigación de campo cualitativa, exploratoria y descriptiva. Para comprender los resultados y el significado de la comunicación entre profesionales y usuarios, los datos se organizaron a partir de los discursos de pacientes y profesionales de la salud de una maternidad pública. Resultados: Entre los 20 usuarios entrevistados, 14 (70%) dijeron que la comunicación es excelente, 01 (5%) personas informaron que la comunicación es regular, pero necesita mejorar, 03 (15%) personas dijeron que la comunicación es más o menos y 02 (10%) personas informaron que la comunicación es deficiente. Entre los 20 profesionales entrevistados, 05 (25%) dijeron que no necesitan cambiar que su comunicación con el paciente es excelente, 09 (5%) personas informaron que siempre es bueno mejorar su comunicación con el paciente 02 (10%) personas hablaron que su comunicación con el usuario es humanizada y 04 (20%) personas informaron que, debido al poco tiempo, esa comunicación debe explicar rápidamente todo el procedimiento. Conclusión: aún existen fallas de comunicación, ya que el profesional está más enfocado en el procedimiento, olvidando la provisión de atención humanizada. Por lo tanto, se espera que haya más empatía y responsabilidad con las partes involucradas para el desarrollo de una asistencia humanizada, entendiendo las quejas de los usuarios y reduciendo las fallas de comunicación.Objetivo: avaliar a percepção dos profissionais de saúde e usuário sobre a comunicação no ambiente hospitalar. Metodologia: Trata-se de uma pesquisa de campo do tipo qualitativa, exploratória e descritiva. Para compreender os resultados o significado de comunicação entre profissionais e usuários, os dados foram organizados a partir de falas de pacientes e profissional da saúde de uma maternidade pública. Resultados: Entre as 20 usuárias entrevistadas, 14 (70%) delas falaram que a comunicação é ótima, 01 (5%) pessoa relatou que a comunicação ela é regular, porém precisa melhorar,03 (15%) pessoas falaram que a comunicação é mais ou menos e 02 (10%) pessoas relatou que a comunicação é ruim. Entre os 20 profissionais entrevistados, 05 (25%) delas falaram que não precisam mudar que sua comunicação com o paciente é excelente, 09 (5%) pessoas relataram que sempre é bom melhorar sua comunicação com o paciente 02 (10%) pessoas falaram que sua comunicação com o usuário é de forma humanizada e 04 (20%) pessoas relataram que por conta do tempo que é pouco a comunicação tem que ser de forma rápida explicando todo o procedimento. Conclusão: ainda existem falhas na comunicação, pôr o profissional está mais focado no procedimento, esquecendo a prestação de um cuidado humanizado. Assim espera-se que haja mais empatia e responsabilidade com as partes envolvidas para o desenvolvimento de uma assistência humanizada, compreendendo as queixas dos usuários e diminuindo as falhas na comunicação.Research, Society and Development2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/162110.33448/rsd-v9i1.1621Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 1; e65911621Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 1; e65911621Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 1; e659116212525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1621/1450Copyright (c) 2019 Laila da Silva Mota, Márcia Sousa Santos, Wenderson Costa da Silva, Layse Siqueira Costa Miranda, Bianca Santos Soares, Rogério Cruz Mendesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMota, Laila da SilvaSantos, Márcia SousaSilva, Wenderson Costa daMiranda, Layse Siqueira CostaMendes, Rogério CruzSoares, Bianca Santos2020-08-19T03:04:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1621Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:26:34.489691Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of communication between health professionals and users of a public maternity hospital
Evaluación de la comunicación entre profesionales de la salud y usuarias de una maternidad pública
Avaliação da comunicação entre o profissional da saúde e usuários de uma maternidade pública
title Evaluation of communication between health professionals and users of a public maternity hospital
spellingShingle Evaluation of communication between health professionals and users of a public maternity hospital
Mota, Laila da Silva
Intercommunication
Health institutions
Health Personnel
Patient.
Intercomunicação
Instituições de saúde
Pessoal de Saúde
Paciente.
intercomunicación
Instituciones de salud
Personal de salud
Paciente
title_short Evaluation of communication between health professionals and users of a public maternity hospital
title_full Evaluation of communication between health professionals and users of a public maternity hospital
title_fullStr Evaluation of communication between health professionals and users of a public maternity hospital
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of communication between health professionals and users of a public maternity hospital
title_sort Evaluation of communication between health professionals and users of a public maternity hospital
author Mota, Laila da Silva
author_facet Mota, Laila da Silva
Santos, Márcia Sousa
Silva, Wenderson Costa da
Miranda, Layse Siqueira Costa
Mendes, Rogério Cruz
Soares, Bianca Santos
author_role author
author2 Santos, Márcia Sousa
Silva, Wenderson Costa da
Miranda, Layse Siqueira Costa
Mendes, Rogério Cruz
Soares, Bianca Santos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mota, Laila da Silva
Santos, Márcia Sousa
Silva, Wenderson Costa da
Miranda, Layse Siqueira Costa
Mendes, Rogério Cruz
Soares, Bianca Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intercommunication
Health institutions
Health Personnel
Patient.
Intercomunicação
Instituições de saúde
Pessoal de Saúde
Paciente.
intercomunicación
Instituciones de salud
Personal de salud
Paciente
topic Intercommunication
Health institutions
Health Personnel
Patient.
Intercomunicação
Instituições de saúde
Pessoal de Saúde
Paciente.
intercomunicación
Instituciones de salud
Personal de salud
Paciente
description Objective: To evaluate the perception of health professionals and users about communication in the hospital environment. Methodology: This is a qualitative, exploratory and descriptive field research. To understand the results and the meaning of communication between professionals and users, the data were organized from the speeches of patients and health professionals from a public maternity hospital. Results: Among the 20 users interviewed, 14 (70%) said that communication is great, 01 (5%) people reported that communication is regular, but needs to improve, 03 (15%) people said that communication is more or less and 02 (10%) people reported that communication is poor. Among the 20 professionals interviewed, 05 (25%) said they need not change that their communication with the patient is excellent, 09 (5%) people reported that it is always good to improve their communication with the patient 02 (10%) people spoke that their communication with the user is humanized and 04 (20%) people reported that because of the short time that communication has to be quickly explaining the entire procedure. Conclusion: there are still communication failures, since the professional is more focused on the procedure, forgetting the provision of humanized care. Thus it is expected that there will be more empathy and responsibility with the parties involved for the development of a humanized assistance, understanding the users' complaints and reducing the communication failures.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1621
10.33448/rsd-v9i1.1621
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1621
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i1.1621
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1621/1450
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 1; e65911621
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 1; e65911621
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 1; e65911621
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052822987997184