Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
DOI: | 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.8177 |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8177 |
Resumo: | This essay aims to contribute directly or indirectly to the study of controversies present in economic science. Situated in the context of the "COVID-19" pandemic, we seek to map and analyze the main economic policy positions and proposals present in the Brazilian public debate to confront the problem, identifying the possible theoretical foundations behind them. The methodological strategy was based on the analysis of the content and systematization of the positions raised in a time interval from March 15th to July 15th, 2020. It is assumed that state intervention is necessary and that there is an ideological and theoretical-methodological component embedded in policy recommendations. The main conclusion is a clear divide among economists who advocate a systematic intervention program against those who only recommend exceptional intervention. It is clear that disagreements and controversies among experts are less related to the "hits and misses" of economic policy itself, but largely influenced by the various foundations and assumptions they bring with them in their educational background and trajectory. |
id |
UNIFEI_e4540a54a23e7e6f0c8319f848594d33 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8177 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
spelling |
Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in BrazilLas medidas económicas de combate a la pandemia de COVID-19: mapeando el debate de política económica en Brasil As medidas econômicas frente à pandemia da Covid-19: mapeando o debate de política econômica no Brasilpolítica econômicaCOVID-19controvérsiasdebate públicoBrasileconomic policyCOVID-19controversiespublic debateBrazilpolítica económicaCOVID-19controversiasdebate públicoBrasilThis essay aims to contribute directly or indirectly to the study of controversies present in economic science. Situated in the context of the "COVID-19" pandemic, we seek to map and analyze the main economic policy positions and proposals present in the Brazilian public debate to confront the problem, identifying the possible theoretical foundations behind them. The methodological strategy was based on the analysis of the content and systematization of the positions raised in a time interval from March 15th to July 15th, 2020. It is assumed that state intervention is necessary and that there is an ideological and theoretical-methodological component embedded in policy recommendations. The main conclusion is a clear divide among economists who advocate a systematic intervention program against those who only recommend exceptional intervention. It is clear that disagreements and controversies among experts are less related to the "hits and misses" of economic policy itself, but largely influenced by the various foundations and assumptions they bring with them in their educational background and trajectory.El propósito general de este ensayo es contribuir directa o indirectamente con el estudio de las controversias presentes en la ciencia económica. En el contexto de la pandemia de COVID-19, buscamos mapear y analizar las principales posiciones y propuestas de política económica presentes en la esfera del debate público brasileño para enfrentar el problema, identificando los posibles fundamentos teóricos que están por detrás de los mismos. La estrategia metodológica se basó en el análisis de contenido y sistematización de las posiciones levantadas en un intervalo de tiempo de 15 de marzo a 15 de julio de 2020. Partimos del presupuesto que es necesaria una intervención del Estado y que hay un componente ideológico y teórico-metodológico incrustado en las recomendaciones de política. La principal conclusión es que existe un clivaje claro entre los economistas que defienden un programa de intervención sistemático contra aquellos que solo recomiendan una intervención excepcional. Queda claro que, los desacuerdos y controversias entre expertos está poco relacionada con los "aciertos y errores" de la política económica en sí, sino que son más influenciados por los diversos fundamentos y presupuestos que ellos tienen consigo en su formación académica y trayectoria.O propósito geral deste ensaio é contribuir direta ou indiretamente com o estudo das controvérsias presentes na ciência econômica. Situado no contexto da pandemia da COVID-19, procuramos mapear e analisar os principais posicionamentos e propostas de política econômica presentes na esfera do debate público brasileiro para fazer frente ao problema, identificando os possíveis fundamentos teóricos que estão por trás das mesmas. A estratégia metodológica foi baseada na análise de conteúdo e sistematização dos posicionamentos levantados num intervalo de tempo de 15 de março a 15 de julho de 2020. Parte-se do pressuposto que é necessária a intervenção estatal e que há um componente ideológico e teórico-metodológico embutido nas recomendações de política. A principal conclusão é que existe uma clivagem clara entre os economistas que defendem um programa de intervenção sistemática frente àqueles que apenas recomendam a intervenção excepcional. Observou-se que, as discordâncias e controvérsias entre especialistas está menos relacionada aos “acertos e erros” da política econômica em si, mas, influenciadas em boa medida pelos diversos fundamentos e pressupostos que eles trazem consigo na sua formação e trajetória.Research, Society and Development2020-09-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/817710.33448/rsd-v9i9.8177Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e975998177Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e975998177Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e9759981772525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8177/7259Copyright (c) 2020 Raime Rolando Rodríguez Díaz; Carlos Alberto Ramos Torres; Milena Lidia Alves Martins; Guilherme Henrique Santos Gamitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Rodríguez Díaz, Raime RolandoRamos Torres, Carlos AlbertoAlves Martins, Milena LidiaSantos Gamito, Guilherme Henrique2020-09-18T01:42:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8177Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:30:42.591013Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil Las medidas económicas de combate a la pandemia de COVID-19: mapeando el debate de política económica en Brasil As medidas econômicas frente à pandemia da Covid-19: mapeando o debate de política econômica no Brasil |
title |
Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil Rodríguez Díaz, Raime Rolando política econômica COVID-19 controvérsias debate público Brasil economic policy COVID-19 controversies public debate Brazil política económica COVID-19 controversias debate público Brasil Rodríguez Díaz, Raime Rolando política econômica COVID-19 controvérsias debate público Brasil economic policy COVID-19 controversies public debate Brazil política económica COVID-19 controversias debate público Brasil |
title_short |
Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil |
title_full |
Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil |
title_sort |
Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil |
author |
Rodríguez Díaz, Raime Rolando |
author_facet |
Rodríguez Díaz, Raime Rolando Rodríguez Díaz, Raime Rolando Ramos Torres, Carlos Alberto Alves Martins, Milena Lidia Santos Gamito, Guilherme Henrique Ramos Torres, Carlos Alberto Alves Martins, Milena Lidia Santos Gamito, Guilherme Henrique |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ramos Torres, Carlos Alberto Alves Martins, Milena Lidia Santos Gamito, Guilherme Henrique |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodríguez Díaz, Raime Rolando Ramos Torres, Carlos Alberto Alves Martins, Milena Lidia Santos Gamito, Guilherme Henrique |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
política econômica COVID-19 controvérsias debate público Brasil economic policy COVID-19 controversies public debate Brazil política económica COVID-19 controversias debate público Brasil |
topic |
política econômica COVID-19 controvérsias debate público Brasil economic policy COVID-19 controversies public debate Brazil política económica COVID-19 controversias debate público Brasil |
description |
This essay aims to contribute directly or indirectly to the study of controversies present in economic science. Situated in the context of the "COVID-19" pandemic, we seek to map and analyze the main economic policy positions and proposals present in the Brazilian public debate to confront the problem, identifying the possible theoretical foundations behind them. The methodological strategy was based on the analysis of the content and systematization of the positions raised in a time interval from March 15th to July 15th, 2020. It is assumed that state intervention is necessary and that there is an ideological and theoretical-methodological component embedded in policy recommendations. The main conclusion is a clear divide among economists who advocate a systematic intervention program against those who only recommend exceptional intervention. It is clear that disagreements and controversies among experts are less related to the "hits and misses" of economic policy itself, but largely influenced by the various foundations and assumptions they bring with them in their educational background and trajectory. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8177 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.8177 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8177 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.8177 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8177/7259 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e975998177 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e975998177 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e975998177 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822178686569283584 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.8177 |