Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodríguez Díaz, Raime Rolando
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ramos Torres, Carlos Alberto, Alves Martins, Milena Lidia, Santos Gamito, Guilherme Henrique
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8177
Resumo: This essay aims to contribute directly or indirectly to the study of controversies present in economic science. Situated in the context of the "COVID-19" pandemic, we seek to map and analyze the main economic policy positions and proposals present in the Brazilian public debate to confront the problem, identifying the possible theoretical foundations behind them. The methodological strategy was based on the analysis of the content and systematization of the positions raised in a time interval from March 15th to July 15th, 2020. It is assumed that state intervention is necessary and that there is an ideological and theoretical-methodological component embedded in policy recommendations. The main conclusion is a clear divide among economists who advocate a systematic intervention program against those who only recommend exceptional intervention. It is clear that disagreements and controversies among experts are less related to the "hits and misses" of economic policy itself, but largely influenced by the various foundations and assumptions they bring with them in their educational background and trajectory.
id UNIFEI_e4540a54a23e7e6f0c8319f848594d33
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8177
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in BrazilLas medidas económicas de combate a la pandemia de COVID-19: mapeando el debate de política económica en Brasil As medidas econômicas frente à pandemia da Covid-19: mapeando o debate de política econômica no Brasilpolítica econômicaCOVID-19controvérsiasdebate públicoBrasileconomic policyCOVID-19controversiespublic debateBrazilpolítica económicaCOVID-19controversiasdebate públicoBrasilThis essay aims to contribute directly or indirectly to the study of controversies present in economic science. Situated in the context of the "COVID-19" pandemic, we seek to map and analyze the main economic policy positions and proposals present in the Brazilian public debate to confront the problem, identifying the possible theoretical foundations behind them. The methodological strategy was based on the analysis of the content and systematization of the positions raised in a time interval from March 15th to July 15th, 2020. It is assumed that state intervention is necessary and that there is an ideological and theoretical-methodological component embedded in policy recommendations. The main conclusion is a clear divide among economists who advocate a systematic intervention program against those who only recommend exceptional intervention. It is clear that disagreements and controversies among experts are less related to the "hits and misses" of economic policy itself, but largely influenced by the various foundations and assumptions they bring with them in their educational background and trajectory.El propósito general de este ensayo es contribuir directa o indirectamente con el estudio de las controversias presentes en la ciencia económica. En el contexto de la pandemia de COVID-19, buscamos mapear y analizar las principales posiciones y propuestas de política económica presentes en la esfera del debate público brasileño para enfrentar el problema, identificando los posibles fundamentos teóricos que están por detrás de los mismos. La estrategia metodológica se basó en el análisis de contenido y sistematización de las posiciones levantadas en un intervalo de tiempo de 15 de marzo a 15 de julio de 2020. Partimos del presupuesto que es necesaria una intervención del Estado y que hay un componente ideológico y teórico-metodológico incrustado en las recomendaciones de política. La principal conclusión es que existe un clivaje claro entre los economistas que defienden un programa de intervención sistemático contra aquellos que solo recomiendan una intervención excepcional. Queda claro que, los desacuerdos y controversias entre expertos está poco relacionada con los "aciertos y errores" de la política económica en sí, sino que son más influenciados por los diversos fundamentos y presupuestos que ellos tienen consigo en su formación académica y trayectoria.O propósito geral deste ensaio é contribuir direta ou indiretamente com o estudo das controvérsias presentes na ciência econômica. Situado no contexto da pandemia da COVID-19, procuramos mapear e analisar os principais posicionamentos e propostas de política econômica presentes na esfera do debate público brasileiro para fazer frente ao problema, identificando os possíveis fundamentos teóricos que estão por trás das mesmas. A estratégia metodológica foi baseada na análise de conteúdo e sistematização dos posicionamentos levantados num intervalo de tempo de 15 de março a 15 de julho de 2020. Parte-se do pressuposto que é necessária a intervenção estatal e que há um componente ideológico e teórico-metodológico embutido nas recomendações de política. A principal conclusão é que existe uma clivagem clara entre os economistas que defendem um programa de intervenção sistemática frente àqueles que apenas recomendam a intervenção excepcional. Observou-se que, as discordâncias e controvérsias entre especialistas está menos relacionada aos “acertos e erros” da política econômica em si, mas, influenciadas em boa medida pelos diversos fundamentos e pressupostos que eles trazem consigo na sua formação e trajetória.Research, Society and Development2020-09-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/817710.33448/rsd-v9i9.8177Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e975998177Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e975998177Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e9759981772525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8177/7259Copyright (c) 2020 Raime Rolando Rodríguez Díaz; Carlos Alberto Ramos Torres; Milena Lidia Alves Martins; Guilherme Henrique Santos Gamitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Rodríguez Díaz, Raime RolandoRamos Torres, Carlos AlbertoAlves Martins, Milena LidiaSantos Gamito, Guilherme Henrique2020-09-18T01:42:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8177Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:30:42.591013Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil
Las medidas económicas de combate a la pandemia de COVID-19: mapeando el debate de política económica en Brasil
As medidas econômicas frente à pandemia da Covid-19: mapeando o debate de política econômica no Brasil
title Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil
spellingShingle Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil
Rodríguez Díaz, Raime Rolando
política econômica
COVID-19
controvérsias
debate público
Brasil
economic policy
COVID-19
controversies
public debate
Brazil
política económica
COVID-19
controversias
debate público
Brasil
title_short Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil
title_full Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil
title_fullStr Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil
title_sort Economic measures against covid-19 pandemic: mapping the economic policy debate in Brazil
author Rodríguez Díaz, Raime Rolando
author_facet Rodríguez Díaz, Raime Rolando
Ramos Torres, Carlos Alberto
Alves Martins, Milena Lidia
Santos Gamito, Guilherme Henrique
author_role author
author2 Ramos Torres, Carlos Alberto
Alves Martins, Milena Lidia
Santos Gamito, Guilherme Henrique
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodríguez Díaz, Raime Rolando
Ramos Torres, Carlos Alberto
Alves Martins, Milena Lidia
Santos Gamito, Guilherme Henrique
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv política econômica
COVID-19
controvérsias
debate público
Brasil
economic policy
COVID-19
controversies
public debate
Brazil
política económica
COVID-19
controversias
debate público
Brasil
topic política econômica
COVID-19
controvérsias
debate público
Brasil
economic policy
COVID-19
controversies
public debate
Brazil
política económica
COVID-19
controversias
debate público
Brasil
description This essay aims to contribute directly or indirectly to the study of controversies present in economic science. Situated in the context of the "COVID-19" pandemic, we seek to map and analyze the main economic policy positions and proposals present in the Brazilian public debate to confront the problem, identifying the possible theoretical foundations behind them. The methodological strategy was based on the analysis of the content and systematization of the positions raised in a time interval from March 15th to July 15th, 2020. It is assumed that state intervention is necessary and that there is an ideological and theoretical-methodological component embedded in policy recommendations. The main conclusion is a clear divide among economists who advocate a systematic intervention program against those who only recommend exceptional intervention. It is clear that disagreements and controversies among experts are less related to the "hits and misses" of economic policy itself, but largely influenced by the various foundations and assumptions they bring with them in their educational background and trajectory.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8177
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.8177
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8177
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.8177
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8177/7259
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e975998177
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e975998177
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e975998177
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052658945622016