Anthropometric and dietary indicators applied in population-based surveys: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25434 |
Resumo: | Aim: To identify population-based health and nutrition surveys, conducted with adults and the elderly, and performed in the Americas, Europe, and Oceania, to investigate the more common anthropometric and food consumption methods used, their applicability, and their limitations. Methods: Electronic databases (LILACS, PubMed, and SCOPUS) were systematically searched for studies published between 1997 and 2017 in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. 48 studies (45.8% carried out in the Americas) met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The data were analyzed in 2018. Results: The methodological quality of most of the studies (64.4%) was classified as moderate, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality checklist for cross-sectional studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies. 35.4% of the articles evaluated only food consumption, 29.2% just anthropometry, while 35.4% evaluated food consumption and anthropometric measurements. The most used food survey methods were food record (31% of studies) and the 24-hour dietary recall (22% of studies). Body mass index (BMI) was the most used indicator for anthropometric nutritional status assessment. Although most of the studies used the World Health Organization classification criteria, these studies did not adopt the different cut-off points for BMI classification for adults and the elderly. Conclusion: BMI and methods that record current consumption, such as the food record and the 24-hour dietary recall, were the main methods of assessing nutritional status, taking into consideration the easy application, low cost, and good reproducibility. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPEROCRD42017071392. |
id |
UNIFEI_e7c0cc05a2f3beab354adb510cfe3519 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25434 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Anthropometric and dietary indicators applied in population-based surveys: a systematic reviewIndicadores antropométricos y dietéticos utilizados en estudios poblacionales: una revisión sistemáticaIndicadores antropométricos e dietéticos utilizados em estudos de base populacional: uma revisão sistemáticaNutrition SurveysPopulation surveysFood ConsumptionAnthropometrySystematic review.Encuestas NutricionalesEstudios PoblacionalesConsumo alimentarioAntropometríaRevisión sistemática.Inquéritos NutricionaisInquéritos populacionaisConsumo AlimentarAntropometriaRevisão sistemática.Aim: To identify population-based health and nutrition surveys, conducted with adults and the elderly, and performed in the Americas, Europe, and Oceania, to investigate the more common anthropometric and food consumption methods used, their applicability, and their limitations. Methods: Electronic databases (LILACS, PubMed, and SCOPUS) were systematically searched for studies published between 1997 and 2017 in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. 48 studies (45.8% carried out in the Americas) met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The data were analyzed in 2018. Results: The methodological quality of most of the studies (64.4%) was classified as moderate, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality checklist for cross-sectional studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies. 35.4% of the articles evaluated only food consumption, 29.2% just anthropometry, while 35.4% evaluated food consumption and anthropometric measurements. The most used food survey methods were food record (31% of studies) and the 24-hour dietary recall (22% of studies). Body mass index (BMI) was the most used indicator for anthropometric nutritional status assessment. Although most of the studies used the World Health Organization classification criteria, these studies did not adopt the different cut-off points for BMI classification for adults and the elderly. Conclusion: BMI and methods that record current consumption, such as the food record and the 24-hour dietary recall, were the main methods of assessing nutritional status, taking into consideration the easy application, low cost, and good reproducibility. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPEROCRD42017071392.Objetivo: Identificar encuestas poblacionales de salud y nutrición, realizadas con adultos y ancianos, y realizadas en las Américas, Europa y Oceanía, para investigar los métodos antropométricos y de consumo de alimentos más utilizados, su aplicabilidad y limitaciones. Metodología: Se realizaron búsquedas sistemáticas en bases de datos electrónicas (LILACS, PubMed y SCOPUS) de estudios publicados entre 1997 y 2017 en portugués, inglés o español. 48 estudios (45.8% realizados en las Américas) cumplieron con los criterios de elegibilidad y se incluyeron en la revisión. Los datos se analizaron en 2018. Resultados: La calidad metodológica de la mayoría de los estudios (64,4%) se clasificó como moderada, según la lista de verificación de la Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality para los estudios transversales y la escala de Newcastle-Ottawa para los estudios de cohortes. 35.4% de los artículos solo evaluó el consumo de alimentos, el 29.2% solo la antropometría, mientras que el 35.4% evaluó el consumo de alimentos y las medidas antropométricas. Los métodos de consumo de alimentos más utilizados fueron el registro de alimentos (31% de los estudios) y el recuerdo de 24 horas (22% de los estudios). El índice de masa corporal (IMC) fue el indicador más utilizado para la evaluación antropométrica del estado nutricional. Aunque la mayoría de los estudios utilizaron los criterios de clasificación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud, estos estudios no adoptaron diferentes puntos de corte para clasificar el IMC de adultos y ancianos. Conclusión: El IMC y los métodos que registran el consumo actual, como los registros de alimentos y el retiro de alimentos de 24 horas, fueron los principales métodos para evaluar el estado nutricional, teniendo en cuenta su fácil aplicación, bajo costo y buena reproducibilidad. Registro de revisión sistemática: PROSPEROCRD42017071392.Objetivo: Identificar pesquisas de saúde e nutrição de base populacional, com adultos e idosos, e realizadas nas Américas, Europa e Oceania, para investigar os métodos antropométricos e de consumo alimentar mais utilizados, sua aplicabilidade e limitações. Metodologia: Bases de dados eletrônicas (LILACS, PubMed e SCOPUS) foram sistematicamente pesquisadas em busca de estudos publicados entre 1997 e 2017 em português, inglês ou espanhol. 48 estudos (45.8% realizados nas Américas) atenderam os critérios de elegibilidade e foram incluídos na revisão. Os dados foram analisados em 2018. Resultados: A qualidade metodológica da maioria dos estudos (64,4%) foi classificada como moderada, conforme o checklist da Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality para estudos transversais e a escala Newcastle-Ottawa para estudos de coorte. 35.4% dos artigos avaliaram apenas o consumo alimentar, 29.2% apenas a antropometria, enquanto 35.4% avaliaram o consumo alimentar e as medidas antropométricas. Os métodos de consumo alimentar mais utilizados foram o registro alimentar (31% dos estudos) e o recordatório de 24h (22% dos estudos). O índice de massa corporal (IMC) foi o indicador mais utilizado para avaliação antropométrica. Embora a maioria dos estudos tenha utilizado os critérios da Organização Mundial da Saúde, estes não adotaram pontos de corte diferentes para classificar o IMC de adultos e idosos. Conclusão: o IMC e os métodos que registram o consumo atual, como o registro alimentar e o recordatório de 24h, foram os principais métodos de avaliação do estado nutricional, levando-se em consideração a fácil aplicação, baixo custo e boa reprodutibilidade. Registro de revisão sistemática: PROSPEROCRD42017071392.Research, Society and Development2022-01-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2543410.33448/rsd-v11i2.25434Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e27211225434Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e27211225434Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e272112254342525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25434/22540Copyright (c) 2022 Natália Louise de Araújo Cabral; Nila Patrícia Freire Pequeno; David Franciole de Oliveira Silva; Sandra Patrícia Crispim; Dirce Maria Lobo Marchioni; Severina Carla Vieira Cunha Lima; Clélia de Oliveira Lyrahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCabral, Natália Louise de AraújoPequeno, Nila Patrícia Freire Silva, David Franciole de Oliveira Crispim, Sandra Patrícia Marchioni, Dirce Maria LoboLima, Severina Carla Vieira Cunha Lyra, Clélia de Oliveira2022-02-07T01:42:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25434Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:42.751094Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Anthropometric and dietary indicators applied in population-based surveys: a systematic review Indicadores antropométricos y dietéticos utilizados en estudios poblacionales: una revisión sistemática Indicadores antropométricos e dietéticos utilizados em estudos de base populacional: uma revisão sistemática |
title |
Anthropometric and dietary indicators applied in population-based surveys: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Anthropometric and dietary indicators applied in population-based surveys: a systematic review Cabral, Natália Louise de Araújo Nutrition Surveys Population surveys Food Consumption Anthropometry Systematic review. Encuestas Nutricionales Estudios Poblacionales Consumo alimentario Antropometría Revisión sistemática. Inquéritos Nutricionais Inquéritos populacionais Consumo Alimentar Antropometria Revisão sistemática. |
title_short |
Anthropometric and dietary indicators applied in population-based surveys: a systematic review |
title_full |
Anthropometric and dietary indicators applied in population-based surveys: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Anthropometric and dietary indicators applied in population-based surveys: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anthropometric and dietary indicators applied in population-based surveys: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Anthropometric and dietary indicators applied in population-based surveys: a systematic review |
author |
Cabral, Natália Louise de Araújo |
author_facet |
Cabral, Natália Louise de Araújo Pequeno, Nila Patrícia Freire Silva, David Franciole de Oliveira Crispim, Sandra Patrícia Marchioni, Dirce Maria Lobo Lima, Severina Carla Vieira Cunha Lyra, Clélia de Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pequeno, Nila Patrícia Freire Silva, David Franciole de Oliveira Crispim, Sandra Patrícia Marchioni, Dirce Maria Lobo Lima, Severina Carla Vieira Cunha Lyra, Clélia de Oliveira |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cabral, Natália Louise de Araújo Pequeno, Nila Patrícia Freire Silva, David Franciole de Oliveira Crispim, Sandra Patrícia Marchioni, Dirce Maria Lobo Lima, Severina Carla Vieira Cunha Lyra, Clélia de Oliveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nutrition Surveys Population surveys Food Consumption Anthropometry Systematic review. Encuestas Nutricionales Estudios Poblacionales Consumo alimentario Antropometría Revisión sistemática. Inquéritos Nutricionais Inquéritos populacionais Consumo Alimentar Antropometria Revisão sistemática. |
topic |
Nutrition Surveys Population surveys Food Consumption Anthropometry Systematic review. Encuestas Nutricionales Estudios Poblacionales Consumo alimentario Antropometría Revisión sistemática. Inquéritos Nutricionais Inquéritos populacionais Consumo Alimentar Antropometria Revisão sistemática. |
description |
Aim: To identify population-based health and nutrition surveys, conducted with adults and the elderly, and performed in the Americas, Europe, and Oceania, to investigate the more common anthropometric and food consumption methods used, their applicability, and their limitations. Methods: Electronic databases (LILACS, PubMed, and SCOPUS) were systematically searched for studies published between 1997 and 2017 in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. 48 studies (45.8% carried out in the Americas) met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The data were analyzed in 2018. Results: The methodological quality of most of the studies (64.4%) was classified as moderate, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality checklist for cross-sectional studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies. 35.4% of the articles evaluated only food consumption, 29.2% just anthropometry, while 35.4% evaluated food consumption and anthropometric measurements. The most used food survey methods were food record (31% of studies) and the 24-hour dietary recall (22% of studies). Body mass index (BMI) was the most used indicator for anthropometric nutritional status assessment. Although most of the studies used the World Health Organization classification criteria, these studies did not adopt the different cut-off points for BMI classification for adults and the elderly. Conclusion: BMI and methods that record current consumption, such as the food record and the 24-hour dietary recall, were the main methods of assessing nutritional status, taking into consideration the easy application, low cost, and good reproducibility. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPEROCRD42017071392. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25434 10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25434 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25434 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25434 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25434/22540 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e27211225434 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e27211225434 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e27211225434 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052761545637888 |