General aspects of laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of COVID-19

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto, Geise Raquel Sousa Pinto
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Sousa, Huderson Macedo de Sousa, Cunha, Maurício Almeida Cunha, Melo, Maria Madalena Corrêa Melo, Teixeira, Camila Vitória Pinto Teixeira, Moura, Ianca Ellen dos Santos Moura, Firmo, Wellyson da Cunha Araújo Firmo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7845
Resumo: SARS-CoV-2 is a new virus of unknown origin that appeared in China in December 2019. The diagnosis is complex and involves the need to understand the types of tests and their peculiarities. There are two diagnostic tests available at the moment: the molecular and the immunological (also called serological). Each has its own specific characteristics. Given this context, the present study aimed to describe the general aspects of the techniques used in the diagnosis of COVID-19. This is a descriptive bibliographic review study with a quantitative approach in the databases of Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar and through the Research Portal of the Virtual Health Library (VHL). The sensitivity of tests for the detection of antibodies by different techniques varied between 81.5% and 88.6%, and specificity varied between 90.6% and 100%. Studies evaluating the sensitivity of RT-PCR in relation to diagnostic criteria identified sensitivity of 44.2% for samples collected by oropharyngeal swab and 76.9% when the sample used was sputum. The assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of viral particle amplification tests applied in the point-of-care modality showed a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 100%, in relation to RT-PCR. Serological tests seem to have good sensitivity and specificity when applied at a later stage of the infection. In the early stages of infection, they have a high rate of false negative results. However, to date, the RT-PCR test is indicated for the definitive diagnosis of COVID-19.
id UNIFEI_ea9b5a830e5e29b74e9e76a163fb0dd3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7845
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling General aspects of laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of COVID-19Aspectos generales de las técnicas de laboratorio para el diagnóstico de COVID-19Aspectos gerais das técnicas laboratoriais para o diagnóstico da COVID-19 Covid-19; Diagnóstico da covid-19; SARS-CoV-2.Covid-19; Diagnóstico de Covid-19; SARS-CoV-2.Covid-19; Diagnosis of Covid-19; SARS-CoV-2.SARS-CoV-2 is a new virus of unknown origin that appeared in China in December 2019. The diagnosis is complex and involves the need to understand the types of tests and their peculiarities. There are two diagnostic tests available at the moment: the molecular and the immunological (also called serological). Each has its own specific characteristics. Given this context, the present study aimed to describe the general aspects of the techniques used in the diagnosis of COVID-19. This is a descriptive bibliographic review study with a quantitative approach in the databases of Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar and through the Research Portal of the Virtual Health Library (VHL). The sensitivity of tests for the detection of antibodies by different techniques varied between 81.5% and 88.6%, and specificity varied between 90.6% and 100%. Studies evaluating the sensitivity of RT-PCR in relation to diagnostic criteria identified sensitivity of 44.2% for samples collected by oropharyngeal swab and 76.9% when the sample used was sputum. The assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of viral particle amplification tests applied in the point-of-care modality showed a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 100%, in relation to RT-PCR. Serological tests seem to have good sensitivity and specificity when applied at a later stage of the infection. In the early stages of infection, they have a high rate of false negative results. However, to date, the RT-PCR test is indicated for the definitive diagnosis of COVID-19.SARS-CoV-2 es un nuevo virus de origen desconocido que apareció en China en diciembre de 2019. El diagnóstico es complejo e implica la necesidad de comprender los tipos de pruebas y sus peculiaridades. Hay dos pruebas de diagnóstico disponibles en este momento: la molecular y la inmunológica (también llamada serológica). Cada uno tiene sus propias características específicas. En este contexto, el presente estudio tuvo como objetivo describir los aspectos generales de las técnicas utilizadas en el diagnóstico de COVID-19. Se trata de un estudio de revisión bibliográfica descriptiva con enfoque cuantitativo en las bases de datos de Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar y a través del Portal de Investigación de la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud (BVS). La sensibilidad de las pruebas para la detección de anticuerpos por diferentes técnicas varió entre el 81,5% y el 88,6%, y la especificidad varió entre el 90,6% y el 100%. La evaluación de la exactitud diagnóstica de las pruebas de amplificación de partículas virales aplicadas en la modalidad point-of-care mostró una sensibilidad del 90% y una especificidad del 100%, en relación a la RT-PCR. Las pruebas serológicas parecen tener una buena sensibilidad y especificidad cuando se aplican en una etapa posterior de la infección. En las primeras etapas de la infección, tienen una alta tasa de resultados falsos negativos. Sin embargo, hasta la fecha, la prueba de RT-PCR está indicada para el diagnóstico definitivo de COVID-19.O SARS-CoV-2 é um novo vírus de origem desconhecida que surgiu na China em dezembro de 2019. A realização do diagnóstico é complexa e envolve a necessidade de compreensão quanto aos tipos de testes e suas peculiaridades. Há dois testes diagnósticos disponíveis no momento: o molecular e o imunológico (também chamado sorológico). Cada um possui as suas características específicas. Diante desse contexto, o presente trabalho teve como objetivo descrever os aspectos gerais das técnicas empregadas no diagnóstico da COVID-19. Trata-se de um estudo de revisão bibliográfica de cunho descritivo e com abordagem quantitativa nas bases de dados do Scielo, Lilacs, Google Acadêmico e através do Portal de Pesquisa da Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS).  A sensibilidade dos testes para detecção de anticorpos por diferentes técnicas variou entre 81,5% e 88,6%, e a especificidade variou entre 90,6% e 100%. Estudos avaliando a sensibilidade do RT-PCR em relação a critérios diagnósticos identificaram sensibilidade de 44,2% para amostras coletadas por swab de orofaringe e 76,9% quando a amostra utilizada foi o escarro. A avaliação da acurácia diagnóstica de testes de amplificação de partículas virais aplicados na modalidade point-of-care evidenciou sensibilidade de 90% e especificidade de 100%, em relação ao RT-PCR. Os testes sorológicos, parecem apresentar boa sensibilidade e especificidade, quando aplicados em fase mais tardia da infecção. Em fases precoces da infecção, apresentam alta taxa de resultados falsos negativos.  Entretanto, até à presente data é indicado a realização do teste de RT-PCR para o diagnóstico definitivo da COVID-19.                                                                                       Research, Society and Development2020-09-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/784510.33448/rsd-v9i9.7845Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e804997845Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e804997845Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e8049978452525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7845/7074Copyright (c) 2020 Geise Raquel Sousa Pinto Pinto; Huderson Macedo de Sousa Sousa; Maurício Almeida Cunha Cunha; Maria Madalena Corrêa Melo Melo; Camila Vitória Pinto Teixeira Teixeira; Ianca Ellen dos Santos Moura Moura; Wellyson da Cunha Araújo Firmo Firmohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinto, Geise Raquel Sousa PintoSousa, Huderson Macedo de SousaCunha, Maurício Almeida CunhaMelo, Maria Madalena Corrêa MeloTeixeira, Camila Vitória Pinto TeixeiraMoura, Ianca Ellen dos Santos MouraFirmo, Wellyson da Cunha Araújo Firmo2020-09-18T01:42:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7845Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:30:26.674839Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv General aspects of laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of COVID-19
Aspectos generales de las técnicas de laboratorio para el diagnóstico de COVID-19
Aspectos gerais das técnicas laboratoriais para o diagnóstico da COVID-19
title General aspects of laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of COVID-19
spellingShingle General aspects of laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of COVID-19
Pinto, Geise Raquel Sousa Pinto
Covid-19; Diagnóstico da covid-19; SARS-CoV-2.
Covid-19; Diagnóstico de Covid-19; SARS-CoV-2.
Covid-19; Diagnosis of Covid-19; SARS-CoV-2.
title_short General aspects of laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of COVID-19
title_full General aspects of laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of COVID-19
title_fullStr General aspects of laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed General aspects of laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of COVID-19
title_sort General aspects of laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of COVID-19
author Pinto, Geise Raquel Sousa Pinto
author_facet Pinto, Geise Raquel Sousa Pinto
Sousa, Huderson Macedo de Sousa
Cunha, Maurício Almeida Cunha
Melo, Maria Madalena Corrêa Melo
Teixeira, Camila Vitória Pinto Teixeira
Moura, Ianca Ellen dos Santos Moura
Firmo, Wellyson da Cunha Araújo Firmo
author_role author
author2 Sousa, Huderson Macedo de Sousa
Cunha, Maurício Almeida Cunha
Melo, Maria Madalena Corrêa Melo
Teixeira, Camila Vitória Pinto Teixeira
Moura, Ianca Ellen dos Santos Moura
Firmo, Wellyson da Cunha Araújo Firmo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, Geise Raquel Sousa Pinto
Sousa, Huderson Macedo de Sousa
Cunha, Maurício Almeida Cunha
Melo, Maria Madalena Corrêa Melo
Teixeira, Camila Vitória Pinto Teixeira
Moura, Ianca Ellen dos Santos Moura
Firmo, Wellyson da Cunha Araújo Firmo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Covid-19; Diagnóstico da covid-19; SARS-CoV-2.
Covid-19; Diagnóstico de Covid-19; SARS-CoV-2.
Covid-19; Diagnosis of Covid-19; SARS-CoV-2.
topic Covid-19; Diagnóstico da covid-19; SARS-CoV-2.
Covid-19; Diagnóstico de Covid-19; SARS-CoV-2.
Covid-19; Diagnosis of Covid-19; SARS-CoV-2.
description SARS-CoV-2 is a new virus of unknown origin that appeared in China in December 2019. The diagnosis is complex and involves the need to understand the types of tests and their peculiarities. There are two diagnostic tests available at the moment: the molecular and the immunological (also called serological). Each has its own specific characteristics. Given this context, the present study aimed to describe the general aspects of the techniques used in the diagnosis of COVID-19. This is a descriptive bibliographic review study with a quantitative approach in the databases of Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar and through the Research Portal of the Virtual Health Library (VHL). The sensitivity of tests for the detection of antibodies by different techniques varied between 81.5% and 88.6%, and specificity varied between 90.6% and 100%. Studies evaluating the sensitivity of RT-PCR in relation to diagnostic criteria identified sensitivity of 44.2% for samples collected by oropharyngeal swab and 76.9% when the sample used was sputum. The assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of viral particle amplification tests applied in the point-of-care modality showed a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 100%, in relation to RT-PCR. Serological tests seem to have good sensitivity and specificity when applied at a later stage of the infection. In the early stages of infection, they have a high rate of false negative results. However, to date, the RT-PCR test is indicated for the definitive diagnosis of COVID-19.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7845
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7845
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7845
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7845
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7845/7074
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e804997845
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e804997845
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e804997845
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052657714593792