Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Queiroz, Flavio Henrique Vieira
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Probst, Livia Fernandes, Mota, Aline Hohmann Gagliardi, Fonseca, Vitor Augusto de Oliveira, Cavalcante, Denise de Fátima Barros, Pereira, Antonio Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11076
Resumo: Objective: To evaluate the allocative efficiency, financial impact, and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation of a single tooth by means of a 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis and of a dental implant from the perspective of the Commercial Social Service - SESC (“Serviço Social do Comércio”). Methods: An economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness type was designed. A Markov model was developed to capture long-term clinical and economic outcomes considering the temporal horizon of 25 years. Results: Within this temporal horizon it would be possible to perform 308 more procedures with a saving of R$ 351,737.49, if rehabilitation by means of the one-unit implant were chosen. Conclusion: The implant technique with an implant and an implant-supported prosthesis was dominant; that is, it had lower cost and higher effectiveness and its allocative efficiency allowed a much higher number of persons to have access to treatment.
id UNIFEI_f7bc0e3c5b4cc25f2edebb53b096f05e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11076
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic spaceEvaluación económica en salud bucal: rehabilitación de un espacio protésico únicoAvaliação econômica em saúde bucal: reabilitação de um único espaço protéticoCostos y análisis de costosAnálisis coste-beneficioEficienciaEconomía y organizaciones sanitariasSalud bucal.Custos e análise de custosAnálise de custo-benefícioEficiênciaEconomia e Organizações de SaúdeSaúde bucal.Costs and cost analysisCost-benefit analysisEfficiencyHealth care economics and organizationsOral health.Objective: To evaluate the allocative efficiency, financial impact, and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation of a single tooth by means of a 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis and of a dental implant from the perspective of the Commercial Social Service - SESC (“Serviço Social do Comércio”). Methods: An economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness type was designed. A Markov model was developed to capture long-term clinical and economic outcomes considering the temporal horizon of 25 years. Results: Within this temporal horizon it would be possible to perform 308 more procedures with a saving of R$ 351,737.49, if rehabilitation by means of the one-unit implant were chosen. Conclusion: The implant technique with an implant and an implant-supported prosthesis was dominant; that is, it had lower cost and higher effectiveness and its allocative efficiency allowed a much higher number of persons to have access to treatment.Objetivo: Evaluar la eficiencia asignativa, el impacto económico y la rentabilidad de la rehabilitación de un solo diente mediante una prótesis dental fija de 3 unidades y de un implante dental desde la perspectiva del Servicio Social Comercial - SESC (“Serviço Social do Comércio”). Métodos: Se diseñó un análisis económico del tipo costo-efectividad. Se desarrolló un modelo de Markov para capturar resultados clínicos y económicos a largo plazo considerando el horizonte temporal de 25 años. Resultados: Dentro de este horizonte temporal sería posible realizar 308 procedimientos más con un ahorro de R$ 351.737,49, si se optara por la rehabilitación mediante el implante unitario. Conclusión: La técnica de implante con un implante y una prótesis implanto soportada fue dominante; es decir, tenía un costo más bajo y una efectividad más alta y su eficiencia de asignación permitió que un número mucho mayor de personas tuviera acceso al tratamiento.Objetivo: Avaliar a eficiência alocativa, o impacto financeiro e o custo-efetividade da reabilitação de um único dente por meio de uma prótese dentária fixa de 3 unidades e de um implante dentário na perspectiva do Serviço Social do Comércio - SESC (“Serviço Social do Comércio”). Métodos: Foi elaborada uma análise econômica do tipo custo-efetividade. Um modelo de Markov foi desenvolvido para capturar resultados clínicos e econômicos de longo prazo considerando o horizonte temporal de 25 anos. Resultados: Nesse horizonte temporal seria possível realizar mais 308 procedimentos com economia de R$ 351.737,49, caso fosse escolhida a reabilitação por meio de implante unitário. Conclusão: A técnica de implante com uma prótese implanto-suportada foi dominante; ou seja, tinha menor custo e maior eficácia e sua eficiência alocativa permitia que um número muito maior de pessoas tivesse acesso ao tratamento.Research, Society and Development2020-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1107610.33448/rsd-v9i12.11076Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e22591211076Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e22591211076Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e225912110762525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11076/9857Copyright (c) 2020 Flavio Henrique Vieira Queiroz; Livia Fernandes Probst; Aline Hohmann Gagliardi Mota; Vitor Augusto de Oliveira Fonseca; Denise de Fátima Barros Cavalcante; Antonio Carlos Pereirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQueiroz, Flavio Henrique Vieira Probst, Livia Fernandes Mota, Aline Hohmann Gagliardi Fonseca, Vitor Augusto de Oliveira Cavalcante, Denise de Fátima Barros Pereira, Antonio Carlos 2020-12-30T23:32:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11076Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:32:59.873634Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space
Evaluación económica en salud bucal: rehabilitación de un espacio protésico único
Avaliação econômica em saúde bucal: reabilitação de um único espaço protético
title Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space
spellingShingle Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space
Queiroz, Flavio Henrique Vieira
Costos y análisis de costos
Análisis coste-beneficio
Eficiencia
Economía y organizaciones sanitarias
Salud bucal.
Custos e análise de custos
Análise de custo-benefício
Eficiência
Economia e Organizações de Saúde
Saúde bucal.
Costs and cost analysis
Cost-benefit analysis
Efficiency
Health care economics and organizations
Oral health.
title_short Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space
title_full Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space
title_fullStr Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space
title_sort Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space
author Queiroz, Flavio Henrique Vieira
author_facet Queiroz, Flavio Henrique Vieira
Probst, Livia Fernandes
Mota, Aline Hohmann Gagliardi
Fonseca, Vitor Augusto de Oliveira
Cavalcante, Denise de Fátima Barros
Pereira, Antonio Carlos
author_role author
author2 Probst, Livia Fernandes
Mota, Aline Hohmann Gagliardi
Fonseca, Vitor Augusto de Oliveira
Cavalcante, Denise de Fátima Barros
Pereira, Antonio Carlos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Queiroz, Flavio Henrique Vieira
Probst, Livia Fernandes
Mota, Aline Hohmann Gagliardi
Fonseca, Vitor Augusto de Oliveira
Cavalcante, Denise de Fátima Barros
Pereira, Antonio Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Costos y análisis de costos
Análisis coste-beneficio
Eficiencia
Economía y organizaciones sanitarias
Salud bucal.
Custos e análise de custos
Análise de custo-benefício
Eficiência
Economia e Organizações de Saúde
Saúde bucal.
Costs and cost analysis
Cost-benefit analysis
Efficiency
Health care economics and organizations
Oral health.
topic Costos y análisis de costos
Análisis coste-beneficio
Eficiencia
Economía y organizaciones sanitarias
Salud bucal.
Custos e análise de custos
Análise de custo-benefício
Eficiência
Economia e Organizações de Saúde
Saúde bucal.
Costs and cost analysis
Cost-benefit analysis
Efficiency
Health care economics and organizations
Oral health.
description Objective: To evaluate the allocative efficiency, financial impact, and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation of a single tooth by means of a 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis and of a dental implant from the perspective of the Commercial Social Service - SESC (“Serviço Social do Comércio”). Methods: An economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness type was designed. A Markov model was developed to capture long-term clinical and economic outcomes considering the temporal horizon of 25 years. Results: Within this temporal horizon it would be possible to perform 308 more procedures with a saving of R$ 351,737.49, if rehabilitation by means of the one-unit implant were chosen. Conclusion: The implant technique with an implant and an implant-supported prosthesis was dominant; that is, it had lower cost and higher effectiveness and its allocative efficiency allowed a much higher number of persons to have access to treatment.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11076
10.33448/rsd-v9i12.11076
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11076
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i12.11076
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11076/9857
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e22591211076
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e22591211076
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e22591211076
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052744035467264