Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11076 |
Resumo: | Objective: To evaluate the allocative efficiency, financial impact, and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation of a single tooth by means of a 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis and of a dental implant from the perspective of the Commercial Social Service - SESC (“Serviço Social do Comércio”). Methods: An economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness type was designed. A Markov model was developed to capture long-term clinical and economic outcomes considering the temporal horizon of 25 years. Results: Within this temporal horizon it would be possible to perform 308 more procedures with a saving of R$ 351,737.49, if rehabilitation by means of the one-unit implant were chosen. Conclusion: The implant technique with an implant and an implant-supported prosthesis was dominant; that is, it had lower cost and higher effectiveness and its allocative efficiency allowed a much higher number of persons to have access to treatment. |
id |
UNIFEI_f7bc0e3c5b4cc25f2edebb53b096f05e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11076 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic spaceEvaluación económica en salud bucal: rehabilitación de un espacio protésico únicoAvaliação econômica em saúde bucal: reabilitação de um único espaço protéticoCostos y análisis de costosAnálisis coste-beneficioEficienciaEconomía y organizaciones sanitariasSalud bucal.Custos e análise de custosAnálise de custo-benefícioEficiênciaEconomia e Organizações de SaúdeSaúde bucal.Costs and cost analysisCost-benefit analysisEfficiencyHealth care economics and organizationsOral health.Objective: To evaluate the allocative efficiency, financial impact, and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation of a single tooth by means of a 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis and of a dental implant from the perspective of the Commercial Social Service - SESC (“Serviço Social do Comércio”). Methods: An economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness type was designed. A Markov model was developed to capture long-term clinical and economic outcomes considering the temporal horizon of 25 years. Results: Within this temporal horizon it would be possible to perform 308 more procedures with a saving of R$ 351,737.49, if rehabilitation by means of the one-unit implant were chosen. Conclusion: The implant technique with an implant and an implant-supported prosthesis was dominant; that is, it had lower cost and higher effectiveness and its allocative efficiency allowed a much higher number of persons to have access to treatment.Objetivo: Evaluar la eficiencia asignativa, el impacto económico y la rentabilidad de la rehabilitación de un solo diente mediante una prótesis dental fija de 3 unidades y de un implante dental desde la perspectiva del Servicio Social Comercial - SESC (“Serviço Social do Comércio”). Métodos: Se diseñó un análisis económico del tipo costo-efectividad. Se desarrolló un modelo de Markov para capturar resultados clínicos y económicos a largo plazo considerando el horizonte temporal de 25 años. Resultados: Dentro de este horizonte temporal sería posible realizar 308 procedimientos más con un ahorro de R$ 351.737,49, si se optara por la rehabilitación mediante el implante unitario. Conclusión: La técnica de implante con un implante y una prótesis implanto soportada fue dominante; es decir, tenía un costo más bajo y una efectividad más alta y su eficiencia de asignación permitió que un número mucho mayor de personas tuviera acceso al tratamiento.Objetivo: Avaliar a eficiência alocativa, o impacto financeiro e o custo-efetividade da reabilitação de um único dente por meio de uma prótese dentária fixa de 3 unidades e de um implante dentário na perspectiva do Serviço Social do Comércio - SESC (“Serviço Social do Comércio”). Métodos: Foi elaborada uma análise econômica do tipo custo-efetividade. Um modelo de Markov foi desenvolvido para capturar resultados clínicos e econômicos de longo prazo considerando o horizonte temporal de 25 anos. Resultados: Nesse horizonte temporal seria possível realizar mais 308 procedimentos com economia de R$ 351.737,49, caso fosse escolhida a reabilitação por meio de implante unitário. Conclusão: A técnica de implante com uma prótese implanto-suportada foi dominante; ou seja, tinha menor custo e maior eficácia e sua eficiência alocativa permitia que um número muito maior de pessoas tivesse acesso ao tratamento.Research, Society and Development2020-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1107610.33448/rsd-v9i12.11076Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e22591211076Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e22591211076Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e225912110762525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11076/9857Copyright (c) 2020 Flavio Henrique Vieira Queiroz; Livia Fernandes Probst; Aline Hohmann Gagliardi Mota; Vitor Augusto de Oliveira Fonseca; Denise de Fátima Barros Cavalcante; Antonio Carlos Pereirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQueiroz, Flavio Henrique Vieira Probst, Livia Fernandes Mota, Aline Hohmann Gagliardi Fonseca, Vitor Augusto de Oliveira Cavalcante, Denise de Fátima Barros Pereira, Antonio Carlos 2020-12-30T23:32:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11076Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:32:59.873634Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space Evaluación económica en salud bucal: rehabilitación de un espacio protésico único Avaliação econômica em saúde bucal: reabilitação de um único espaço protético |
title |
Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space |
spellingShingle |
Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space Queiroz, Flavio Henrique Vieira Costos y análisis de costos Análisis coste-beneficio Eficiencia Economía y organizaciones sanitarias Salud bucal. Custos e análise de custos Análise de custo-benefício Eficiência Economia e Organizações de Saúde Saúde bucal. Costs and cost analysis Cost-benefit analysis Efficiency Health care economics and organizations Oral health. |
title_short |
Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space |
title_full |
Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space |
title_fullStr |
Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space |
title_sort |
Economic evaluation in oral health: rehabilitation of a single prosthetic space |
author |
Queiroz, Flavio Henrique Vieira |
author_facet |
Queiroz, Flavio Henrique Vieira Probst, Livia Fernandes Mota, Aline Hohmann Gagliardi Fonseca, Vitor Augusto de Oliveira Cavalcante, Denise de Fátima Barros Pereira, Antonio Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Probst, Livia Fernandes Mota, Aline Hohmann Gagliardi Fonseca, Vitor Augusto de Oliveira Cavalcante, Denise de Fátima Barros Pereira, Antonio Carlos |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Queiroz, Flavio Henrique Vieira Probst, Livia Fernandes Mota, Aline Hohmann Gagliardi Fonseca, Vitor Augusto de Oliveira Cavalcante, Denise de Fátima Barros Pereira, Antonio Carlos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Costos y análisis de costos Análisis coste-beneficio Eficiencia Economía y organizaciones sanitarias Salud bucal. Custos e análise de custos Análise de custo-benefício Eficiência Economia e Organizações de Saúde Saúde bucal. Costs and cost analysis Cost-benefit analysis Efficiency Health care economics and organizations Oral health. |
topic |
Costos y análisis de costos Análisis coste-beneficio Eficiencia Economía y organizaciones sanitarias Salud bucal. Custos e análise de custos Análise de custo-benefício Eficiência Economia e Organizações de Saúde Saúde bucal. Costs and cost analysis Cost-benefit analysis Efficiency Health care economics and organizations Oral health. |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the allocative efficiency, financial impact, and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation of a single tooth by means of a 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis and of a dental implant from the perspective of the Commercial Social Service - SESC (“Serviço Social do Comércio”). Methods: An economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness type was designed. A Markov model was developed to capture long-term clinical and economic outcomes considering the temporal horizon of 25 years. Results: Within this temporal horizon it would be possible to perform 308 more procedures with a saving of R$ 351,737.49, if rehabilitation by means of the one-unit implant were chosen. Conclusion: The implant technique with an implant and an implant-supported prosthesis was dominant; that is, it had lower cost and higher effectiveness and its allocative efficiency allowed a much higher number of persons to have access to treatment. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11076 10.33448/rsd-v9i12.11076 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11076 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i12.11076 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11076/9857 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e22591211076 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e22591211076 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e22591211076 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052744035467264 |