Cumaru cultivation as an economical alternative for family farmers: a case study in the western region of Pará
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26732 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to compare the economic viability (EV) between traditional cropping systems (coivara) and agroforestry systems (AFS), with cumaru (Dipteryx spp.) as the main component in areas of family farmers (AF) of the PDS Terra Nossa (Novo Progresso-PA) and Kayapó indigenous people from the Baú Indigenous Land (TI) (Altamira-PA). To this end, participatory diagnoses and semi-structured interviews were carried out between 2015 and 2018. Data analysis was based on the time horizon of 4 years and 8 years. The EV was measured by the Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and the benefit/cost ratio (B/C). The most frequent crops in the fields of AF of the Terra Nossa PDS (Novo Progresso) and the Kayapó indigenous peoples of the Baú Indigenous Land (TI) were banana and manioc. The economic analysis observed that the banana monoculture system (SMB) was the one that obtained the best results at 4 years, with a NPV of R$ 26,810.16, IRR of 32.62%, B/C of 2.56, with the planting of banana and cumaru (SAF2) with the second best result (NPV R$ 32,809.05, IRR of 29.39% and B/C of 3.18), and the cassava monoculture system (SMM) with the worse performance. On the other hand, when considering the time horizon of eight years, the SAF3 system showed better economic performance with a NPV of R$ 36,655.88, IRR of 25.76% and B/C of 3.15, and the second most profitable alternative was the AFS cumaru and banana (SAF2) (NPV R$ 32,809.05, IRR of 29.39% and B/C of 3.18). |
id |
UNIFEI_fbaf6aacc3c82f18e5e1cdc2294debe7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26732 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cumaru cultivation as an economical alternative for family farmers: a case study in the western region of ParáEl cultivo del cumaru como alternativa económica para los agricultores familiares: un estudio de caso en la región occidental de ParáO cultivo do cumaru como alternativa econômica para agricultores familiares: estudo de caso na região oeste do ParáSistemas agroflorestaisCultivo arbóreosProdutos agrícolas.Sistemas agroforestalesCultivo de árbolesProductos agrícolas.Agroforestry systemsTree cultivationAgricultural products.The objective of this study was to compare the economic viability (EV) between traditional cropping systems (coivara) and agroforestry systems (AFS), with cumaru (Dipteryx spp.) as the main component in areas of family farmers (AF) of the PDS Terra Nossa (Novo Progresso-PA) and Kayapó indigenous people from the Baú Indigenous Land (TI) (Altamira-PA). To this end, participatory diagnoses and semi-structured interviews were carried out between 2015 and 2018. Data analysis was based on the time horizon of 4 years and 8 years. The EV was measured by the Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and the benefit/cost ratio (B/C). The most frequent crops in the fields of AF of the Terra Nossa PDS (Novo Progresso) and the Kayapó indigenous peoples of the Baú Indigenous Land (TI) were banana and manioc. The economic analysis observed that the banana monoculture system (SMB) was the one that obtained the best results at 4 years, with a NPV of R$ 26,810.16, IRR of 32.62%, B/C of 2.56, with the planting of banana and cumaru (SAF2) with the second best result (NPV R$ 32,809.05, IRR of 29.39% and B/C of 3.18), and the cassava monoculture system (SMM) with the worse performance. On the other hand, when considering the time horizon of eight years, the SAF3 system showed better economic performance with a NPV of R$ 36,655.88, IRR of 25.76% and B/C of 3.15, and the second most profitable alternative was the AFS cumaru and banana (SAF2) (NPV R$ 32,809.05, IRR of 29.39% and B/C of 3.18).El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la viabilidad económica (VE) entre sistemas de cultivo tradicional (coivara) y sistemas agroforestales (AFS), con cumarú (Dipteryx spp.) como componente principal en áreas de agricultura familiar (AF) del PDS. Terra Nossa (Novo Progresso-PA) e indígenas Kayapó de la Tierra Indígena Baú (TI) (Altamira-PA). Para ello, se realizaron diagnósticos participativos y entrevistas semiestructuradas entre 2015 y 2018. El análisis de datos se basó en el horizonte temporal de 4 años y 8 años. El EV se midió por el Valor Actual Neto (VAN), la Tasa Interna de Retorno (TIR) y la relación beneficio/costo (B/C). Los cultivos más frecuentes en los campos de AF del PDS Terra Nossa (Novo Progresso) y de los pueblos indígenas Kayapó de la Tierra Indígena Baú (TI) fueron el plátano y la mandioca. El análisis económico observó que el sistema de monocultivo de banano (SMB) fue el que obtuvo los mejores resultados a los 4 años, con un VAN de R$ 26.810,16, TIR de 32,62%, B/C de 2,56, con la siembra de banano y cumaru (SAF2) con el segundo mejor resultado (VAN R$ 32.809,05, TIR de 29,39% y B/C de 3,18), y el sistema de monocultivo de yuca (SMM) con el peor desempeño. Por otro lado, al considerar el horizonte de tiempo de ocho años, el sistema SAF3 mostró un mejor desempeño económico con un VAN de R$ 36.655,88, TIR de 25,76% y B/C de 3,15, y la segunda alternativa más rentable fue el AFS cumaru. y banano (SAF2) (VAN R$ 32.809,05, TIR de 29,39% y B/C de 3,18).O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a viabilidade econômica (VE), entre sistemas de cultivo tradicional (coivara) e sistemas agroflorestais (SAF), com o cumaru (Dipteryx spp.) como componente principal em áreas de agricultores familiares (AF) do PDS Terra Nossa (Novo Progresso-PA) e indígenas Kayapó da Terra Indígena (TI) Baú (Altamira-PA). Para tanto, foram realizados diagnósticos participativos e entrevistas semiestruturadas, realizadas entre 2015 e 2018. A análise dos dados teve como referencial o horizonte temporal de 4 anos e 8 anos. A VE foi medida pelo Valor presente líquido (VPL), Taxa interna de retorno (TIR) e da relação benefício/custo (B/C). Os cultivos mais frequentes nas roças de AF do PDS Terra Nossa (Novo Progresso) e indígenas Kayapó, da Terra Indígena (TI) Baú, foram o cultivo de banana e da mandioca. A análise econômica observou que o sistema de monocultivo de banana (SMB) foi o que obteve os melhores resultados aos 4 anos, com VLP de R$ 26.810,16, TIR de 32,62%, B/C de 2,56, com o plantio de banana e cumaru (SAF2) com o segundo melhor resultado (VPL R$ 32.809,05, TIR de 29,39% e B/C de 3,18), e o sistema de monocultivo de mandioca (SMM) com o pior desempenho. Por outro lado, ao considerar o horizonte temporal de oito anos, o sistema SAF3 apresentou melhor desempenho econômico com VLP de R$ 36.655,88, TIR de 25,76% e B/C de 3,15, e a segunda alternativa mais rentável foi o SAF cumaru e banana (SAF2) (VPL R$ 32.809,05, TIR de 29,39% e B/C de 3,18).Research, Society and Development2022-03-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2673210.33448/rsd-v11i3.26732Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 3; e46511326732Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 3; e46511326732Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 3; e465113267322525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26732/23422Copyright (c) 2022 Cléo Gomes da Mota; Daniela Pauletto; Helinara Lais Vieira Capucho; Saulo Ubiratan Pinheiro da Silva; Marcos Ximenes Pontehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Mota, Cléo Gomes daPauletto, DanielaCapucho, Helinara Lais Vieira Silva, Saulo Ubiratan Pinheiro da Ponte, Marcos Ximenes 2022-03-09T13:44:38Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26732Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:44:41.990382Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cumaru cultivation as an economical alternative for family farmers: a case study in the western region of Pará El cultivo del cumaru como alternativa económica para los agricultores familiares: un estudio de caso en la región occidental de Pará O cultivo do cumaru como alternativa econômica para agricultores familiares: estudo de caso na região oeste do Pará |
title |
Cumaru cultivation as an economical alternative for family farmers: a case study in the western region of Pará |
spellingShingle |
Cumaru cultivation as an economical alternative for family farmers: a case study in the western region of Pará Mota, Cléo Gomes da Sistemas agroflorestais Cultivo arbóreos Produtos agrícolas. Sistemas agroforestales Cultivo de árboles Productos agrícolas. Agroforestry systems Tree cultivation Agricultural products. |
title_short |
Cumaru cultivation as an economical alternative for family farmers: a case study in the western region of Pará |
title_full |
Cumaru cultivation as an economical alternative for family farmers: a case study in the western region of Pará |
title_fullStr |
Cumaru cultivation as an economical alternative for family farmers: a case study in the western region of Pará |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cumaru cultivation as an economical alternative for family farmers: a case study in the western region of Pará |
title_sort |
Cumaru cultivation as an economical alternative for family farmers: a case study in the western region of Pará |
author |
Mota, Cléo Gomes da |
author_facet |
Mota, Cléo Gomes da Pauletto, Daniela Capucho, Helinara Lais Vieira Silva, Saulo Ubiratan Pinheiro da Ponte, Marcos Ximenes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pauletto, Daniela Capucho, Helinara Lais Vieira Silva, Saulo Ubiratan Pinheiro da Ponte, Marcos Ximenes |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mota, Cléo Gomes da Pauletto, Daniela Capucho, Helinara Lais Vieira Silva, Saulo Ubiratan Pinheiro da Ponte, Marcos Ximenes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sistemas agroflorestais Cultivo arbóreos Produtos agrícolas. Sistemas agroforestales Cultivo de árboles Productos agrícolas. Agroforestry systems Tree cultivation Agricultural products. |
topic |
Sistemas agroflorestais Cultivo arbóreos Produtos agrícolas. Sistemas agroforestales Cultivo de árboles Productos agrícolas. Agroforestry systems Tree cultivation Agricultural products. |
description |
The objective of this study was to compare the economic viability (EV) between traditional cropping systems (coivara) and agroforestry systems (AFS), with cumaru (Dipteryx spp.) as the main component in areas of family farmers (AF) of the PDS Terra Nossa (Novo Progresso-PA) and Kayapó indigenous people from the Baú Indigenous Land (TI) (Altamira-PA). To this end, participatory diagnoses and semi-structured interviews were carried out between 2015 and 2018. Data analysis was based on the time horizon of 4 years and 8 years. The EV was measured by the Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and the benefit/cost ratio (B/C). The most frequent crops in the fields of AF of the Terra Nossa PDS (Novo Progresso) and the Kayapó indigenous peoples of the Baú Indigenous Land (TI) were banana and manioc. The economic analysis observed that the banana monoculture system (SMB) was the one that obtained the best results at 4 years, with a NPV of R$ 26,810.16, IRR of 32.62%, B/C of 2.56, with the planting of banana and cumaru (SAF2) with the second best result (NPV R$ 32,809.05, IRR of 29.39% and B/C of 3.18), and the cassava monoculture system (SMM) with the worse performance. On the other hand, when considering the time horizon of eight years, the SAF3 system showed better economic performance with a NPV of R$ 36,655.88, IRR of 25.76% and B/C of 3.15, and the second most profitable alternative was the AFS cumaru and banana (SAF2) (NPV R$ 32,809.05, IRR of 29.39% and B/C of 3.18). |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26732 10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26732 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26732 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26732 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26732/23422 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 3; e46511326732 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 3; e46511326732 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 3; e46511326732 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052706060238848 |