Misthanasia: the story of a pandemic in the United Kingdom
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31149 |
Resumo: | A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic, verifying evidence of Misthanasia, even in territories with no lack of human and economic resources, due to the prioritizing of economic stabilization and the naturalization of deaths within the national public policies. As an observational territory, the United Kingdom has had its data produced and communicated in an official manner, in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, analyzed according to analog and comparative criteria. It was possible to follow the pandemic phenomenon’s evolution through time, in virtue of regular collecting and executed under relatively standardized conditions, which allowed us to create an in-panel analytical exposition, having as a comparative model the data collected in Germany, during the same period. The origin of the data sources produced come from the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME); Worldometer Coronavirus. Therefore, it concludes that Misthanasia characterized the course of public policies and the attitudes of the UK’s government in sight of the Sars-CoV-2 contamination, exposing citizens to the risks of a disease that shows no class predilections and disrespects estates, and has a strong impact on those who are vulnerable. The naturalization of death configures itself on the primordial aspect of necropolitics and necropower, placing economy over health in different States, in the pandemic phenomenon of global scale. |
id |
UNIFEI_fc675af3f3c1504bf65f64c06a924f8d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31149 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Misthanasia: the story of a pandemic in the United KingdomMisthanasia: la historia de una pandemia en el Reino UnidoMisthanasia: a história de uma pandemia no Reino UnidoCOVID-19Derecho a la saludDerechos humanosResponsabilidad socialProfesionales de la salud.COVID-19Direito à saúdeDireitos humanosResponsabilidade socialProfissionais de saúde.COVID-19Right to HealthHuman RightsSocial ResponsibilityHealth professionals.A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic, verifying evidence of Misthanasia, even in territories with no lack of human and economic resources, due to the prioritizing of economic stabilization and the naturalization of deaths within the national public policies. As an observational territory, the United Kingdom has had its data produced and communicated in an official manner, in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, analyzed according to analog and comparative criteria. It was possible to follow the pandemic phenomenon’s evolution through time, in virtue of regular collecting and executed under relatively standardized conditions, which allowed us to create an in-panel analytical exposition, having as a comparative model the data collected in Germany, during the same period. The origin of the data sources produced come from the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME); Worldometer Coronavirus. Therefore, it concludes that Misthanasia characterized the course of public policies and the attitudes of the UK’s government in sight of the Sars-CoV-2 contamination, exposing citizens to the risks of a disease that shows no class predilections and disrespects estates, and has a strong impact on those who are vulnerable. The naturalization of death configures itself on the primordial aspect of necropolitics and necropower, placing economy over health in different States, in the pandemic phenomenon of global scale.Un análisis cualitativo y cuantitativo de la pandemia Sars-CoV-2, verificando evidencias de Misthanasia, incluso en territorios sin escasez de recursos humanos y económicos, debido a la priorización de la estabilización económica y la naturalización de las muertes dentro de las políticas públicas nacionales. . Como territorio de observación, el Reino Unido ha tenido sus datos producidos y comunicados de manera oficial, en relación con la pandemia COVID-19, analizados según criterios analógicos y comparativos. Fue posible seguir la evolución del fenómeno pandémico en el tiempo, en virtud de la recolección regular y ejecutada en condiciones relativamente estandarizadas, lo que permitió crear una exposición analítica en panel, teniendo como modelo comparativo los datos recolectados en Alemania, durante el mismo. período. El origen de las fuentes de datos producidas provienen del Instituto de Métrica y Evaluación de la Salud (IHME); Coronavirus Worldometer. Por tanto, concluye que Misthanasia caracterizó el rumbo de las políticas públicas y las actitudes del gobierno del Reino Unido ante la contaminación por Sars-CoV-2, exponiendo a los ciudadanos a los riesgos de una enfermedad que no muestra predilecciones de clase y falta de respeto a las fincas, y que tiene un fuerte impacto en aquellos que son vulnerables. La naturalización de la muerte se configura en el aspecto primordial de la necropolítica y el necropoder, anteponiendo la economía a la salud en diferentes Estados, en el fenómeno pandémico de escala global.Uma análise qualitativa e quantitativa da pandemia Sars-CoV-2, verificando indícios de Misthanasia, mesmo em territórios sem carência de recursos humanos e econômicos, devido à priorização da estabilização econômica e da naturalização das mortes nas políticas públicas nacionais. Como território observacional, o Reino Unido teve seus dados produzidos e comunicados de forma oficial, em relação à pandemia COVID-19, analisados segundo critérios analógicos e comparativos. Foi possível acompanhar a evolução do fenômeno pandêmico ao longo do tempo, em virtude de coletas regulares e executadas em condições relativamente padronizadas, o que nos permitiu criar uma exposição analítica in-panel, tendo como modelo comparativo os dados coletados na Alemanha, durante o mesmo período. A origem das fontes de dados produzidas provém do Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME); Worldometer Coronavirus. Conclui, portanto, que Misthanasia caracterizou a trajetória das políticas públicas e as atitudes do governo do Reino Unido frente à contaminação do Sars-CoV-2, expondo os cidadãos aos riscos de uma doença que não apresenta predileção de classe e desrespeita propriedades, e possui um forte impacto sobre aqueles que são vulneráveis. A naturalização da morte configura-se no aspecto primordial da necropolítica e do necropoder, colocando a economia sobre a saúde nos diferentes Estados, no fenômeno pandêmico de escala global.Research, Society and Development2022-06-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3114910.33448/rsd-v11i8.31149Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 8; e46911831149Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 8; e46911831149Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 8; e469118311492525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31149/26699Copyright (c) 2022 Ângelo Augusto da Silva Araújo; José Rodrigo Santos Silva; Valéria Aparecida Bari; Miguel Ricouhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo, Ângelo Augusto da Silva Silva, José Rodrigo Santos Bari, Valéria Aparecida Ricou, Miguel2022-07-01T13:34:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31149Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:47:36.398358Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Misthanasia: the story of a pandemic in the United Kingdom Misthanasia: la historia de una pandemia en el Reino Unido Misthanasia: a história de uma pandemia no Reino Unido |
title |
Misthanasia: the story of a pandemic in the United Kingdom |
spellingShingle |
Misthanasia: the story of a pandemic in the United Kingdom Araújo, Ângelo Augusto da Silva COVID-19 Derecho a la salud Derechos humanos Responsabilidad social Profesionales de la salud. COVID-19 Direito à saúde Direitos humanos Responsabilidade social Profissionais de saúde. COVID-19 Right to Health Human Rights Social Responsibility Health professionals. |
title_short |
Misthanasia: the story of a pandemic in the United Kingdom |
title_full |
Misthanasia: the story of a pandemic in the United Kingdom |
title_fullStr |
Misthanasia: the story of a pandemic in the United Kingdom |
title_full_unstemmed |
Misthanasia: the story of a pandemic in the United Kingdom |
title_sort |
Misthanasia: the story of a pandemic in the United Kingdom |
author |
Araújo, Ângelo Augusto da Silva |
author_facet |
Araújo, Ângelo Augusto da Silva Silva, José Rodrigo Santos Bari, Valéria Aparecida Ricou, Miguel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, José Rodrigo Santos Bari, Valéria Aparecida Ricou, Miguel |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araújo, Ângelo Augusto da Silva Silva, José Rodrigo Santos Bari, Valéria Aparecida Ricou, Miguel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
COVID-19 Derecho a la salud Derechos humanos Responsabilidad social Profesionales de la salud. COVID-19 Direito à saúde Direitos humanos Responsabilidade social Profissionais de saúde. COVID-19 Right to Health Human Rights Social Responsibility Health professionals. |
topic |
COVID-19 Derecho a la salud Derechos humanos Responsabilidad social Profesionales de la salud. COVID-19 Direito à saúde Direitos humanos Responsabilidade social Profissionais de saúde. COVID-19 Right to Health Human Rights Social Responsibility Health professionals. |
description |
A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic, verifying evidence of Misthanasia, even in territories with no lack of human and economic resources, due to the prioritizing of economic stabilization and the naturalization of deaths within the national public policies. As an observational territory, the United Kingdom has had its data produced and communicated in an official manner, in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, analyzed according to analog and comparative criteria. It was possible to follow the pandemic phenomenon’s evolution through time, in virtue of regular collecting and executed under relatively standardized conditions, which allowed us to create an in-panel analytical exposition, having as a comparative model the data collected in Germany, during the same period. The origin of the data sources produced come from the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME); Worldometer Coronavirus. Therefore, it concludes that Misthanasia characterized the course of public policies and the attitudes of the UK’s government in sight of the Sars-CoV-2 contamination, exposing citizens to the risks of a disease that shows no class predilections and disrespects estates, and has a strong impact on those who are vulnerable. The naturalization of death configures itself on the primordial aspect of necropolitics and necropower, placing economy over health in different States, in the pandemic phenomenon of global scale. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31149 10.33448/rsd-v11i8.31149 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31149 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i8.31149 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31149/26699 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 8; e46911831149 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 8; e46911831149 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 8; e46911831149 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052715562434560 |