The accountability of digital platforms and the spread of harmful content: regulated self-regulation and the Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet Bill
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14657 |
Resumo: | Faced with a scenario in which digital platforms are the stage for the propagation of harmful content, as well as their business model generates profit from user publications, the debate about a new accountability of application providers emerges. In that way, the work aims to study the proposal of regulated self-regulation present in the Bill of Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet, questioning: is the model of regulated self-regulation enough to restrain the problem of the propagation of harmful content on platforms? Using a hypothetical-deductive approach and the functionalist and comparative procedure methods, the article aims to understand the dynamics that occur on platforms and compares the recommendations made by the Internet Steering Committee in Brazil (CGI.br) and the Bill, in order to to understand if the problems can be addressed by the legal provision, as well as if the CGI.br guidelines were observed - all using the techniques of bibliographical and documental research. It is concluded that the regulated self-regulation model is partially sufficient to respond to the propagation of harmful content and that the Bill does not face important issues, as well as, in other respects, added little to what was already provided for by law. Furthermore, there are discrepancies regarding the understanding of the CGI.br and the final text of the Bill, and some indications established by the Committee had been met by the bill but were withdrawn after parliamentary debate. |
id |
UNIFOR-3_13487a48bb2b520ae6594240ad560536 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/14657 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFOR-3 |
network_name_str |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The accountability of digital platforms and the spread of harmful content: regulated self-regulation and the Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet BillLa responsabilización de las plataformas digitales y difusión de contenido dañoso: autorregulación regulada y el Proyecto de Ley de Libertad, Responsabilidad y Transparencia en InternetA responsabilização das plataformas digitais e propagação de conteúdo danoso: autorregulação regulada e o Projeto de Lei de Liberdade, Responsabilidade e Transparência na Internetautorregulação reguladadanos na internetplataformas digitaisprovedores de aplicaçãoProjeto de Lei de Liberdade, Responsabilidade e Transparência na Internetregulated self-regulationinternet damagedigital platformsapplication providersBill of Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internetautorregulación reguladadaños en internetplataformas digitalesproveedores de aplicaciónProyecto de Ley de Libertadresponsabilidad y transparencia en internetFaced with a scenario in which digital platforms are the stage for the propagation of harmful content, as well as their business model generates profit from user publications, the debate about a new accountability of application providers emerges. In that way, the work aims to study the proposal of regulated self-regulation present in the Bill of Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet, questioning: is the model of regulated self-regulation enough to restrain the problem of the propagation of harmful content on platforms? Using a hypothetical-deductive approach and the functionalist and comparative procedure methods, the article aims to understand the dynamics that occur on platforms and compares the recommendations made by the Internet Steering Committee in Brazil (CGI.br) and the Bill, in order to to understand if the problems can be addressed by the legal provision, as well as if the CGI.br guidelines were observed - all using the techniques of bibliographical and documental research. It is concluded that the regulated self-regulation model is partially sufficient to respond to the propagation of harmful content and that the Bill does not face important issues, as well as, in other respects, added little to what was already provided for by law. Furthermore, there are discrepancies regarding the understanding of the CGI.br and the final text of the Bill, and some indications established by the Committee had been met by the bill but were withdrawn after parliamentary debate.Ante un escenario en el que las plataformas digitales son escena de propagación de contenido dañoso, y también que su modelo de negocio promueve la generación de lucro a partir de publicaciones de usuarios, surge el debate sobre una nueva responsabilización de proveedores de aplicación. De esta forma, el trabajo objetiva estudiar la propuesta de autorregulación regulada presente en el Proyecto de Ley de Libertad, Responsabilidad y Transparencia en Internet, cuestionando: ¿El modelo de autorregulación regulada es suficiente para contener el problema de la propagación de contenido nocivo en las plataformas? Por el enfoque hipotético-deductivo y por los métodos de procedimiento funcionalista y comparativo, el artículo se propone a comprender la dinámica que ocurre en las plataformas y realiza una comparación entre las recomendaciones hechas por el Comité Gestor de Internet en Brasil (CGI) y el Proyecto de Ley, con el objetivo de comprender si los problemas pueden ser enderezados por la previsión legal, como también si las directrices del CGI fueron observadas – todo a partir de las técnicas de investigación bibliográfica y documental. Se concluye que el modelo de autorregulación regulada es parcialmente suficiente para contestar a la propagación del contenido nocivo y que el Proyecto de Ley no enfrenta cuestiones importantes, como también, en otros aspectos, poco agregó a lo que ya tenía previsión legal. Existen, aún, discrepancias cuanto al entendimiento del CGI y el texto final del Proyecto de Ley y algunas indicaciones establecidas por el Comité inicialmente atendidas por el proyecto fueron retiradas pasado el debate parlamentar.Diante de um cenário em que as plataformas digitais são palco de propagação de conteúdo danoso, bem como que seu modelo de negócio promove a geração de lucro a partir de publicações de usuários, emerge o debate sobre uma nova responsabilização de provedores de aplicação. Dessa forma, o trabalho objetiva estudar a proposta de autorregulação regulada presente no Projeto de Lei de Liberdade, Responsabilidade e Transparência na Internet, questionando: o modelo da autorregulação regulada é suficiente para conter o problema da propagação de conteúdo nocivo nas plataformas? Pela abordagem hipotético-dedutiva e pelos métodos de procedimento funcionalista e comparativo, o artigo propõe-se a compreender a dinâmica que ocorre nas plataformas e realiza uma comparação entre as recomendações feitas pelo Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil e o Projeto de Lei, a fim de compreender se os problemas podem ser endereçados pela previsão legal, bem como se as diretrizes do CGI foram observadas - tudo a partir das técnicas de pesquisa bibliográfica e documental. Conclui-se que o modelo de autorregulação regulada é parcialmente suficiente para responder à propagação do conteúdo nocivo e que o Projeto de Lei não enfrenta questões importantes, bem como, em outros aspectos, pouco acrescentou do que já havia previsão legal. Existem, ainda, discrepâncias quanto ao entendimento do CGI.br e o texto final do Projeto de Lei e, algumas indicações estabelecidas pelo Comitê inicialmente atendidas pelo projeto, foram retiradas após debate parlamentar.Universidade de Fortaleza2024-04-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/1465710.5020/2317-2150.2024.14657Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2024); 1-13Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2024); 1-13Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 29 n. 2 (2024); 1-132317-21501519-8464reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)instacron:UNIFORporhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14657/7257Copyright (c) 2024 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Rosane Leal davon Ende, Luiza Berger Rosa, Isabela Quartieri da2024-05-09T13:03:22Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/14657Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/rpenhttp://ojs.unifor.br/index.php/rpen/oai||revistapensar@unifor.br2317-21501519-8464opendoar:2024-05-09T13:03:22Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The accountability of digital platforms and the spread of harmful content: regulated self-regulation and the Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet Bill La responsabilización de las plataformas digitales y difusión de contenido dañoso: autorregulación regulada y el Proyecto de Ley de Libertad, Responsabilidad y Transparencia en Internet A responsabilização das plataformas digitais e propagação de conteúdo danoso: autorregulação regulada e o Projeto de Lei de Liberdade, Responsabilidade e Transparência na Internet |
title |
The accountability of digital platforms and the spread of harmful content: regulated self-regulation and the Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet Bill |
spellingShingle |
The accountability of digital platforms and the spread of harmful content: regulated self-regulation and the Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet Bill Silva, Rosane Leal da autorregulação regulada danos na internet plataformas digitais provedores de aplicação Projeto de Lei de Liberdade, Responsabilidade e Transparência na Internet regulated self-regulation internet damage digital platforms application providers Bill of Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet autorregulación regulada daños en internet plataformas digitales proveedores de aplicación Proyecto de Ley de Libertad responsabilidad y transparencia en internet |
title_short |
The accountability of digital platforms and the spread of harmful content: regulated self-regulation and the Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet Bill |
title_full |
The accountability of digital platforms and the spread of harmful content: regulated self-regulation and the Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet Bill |
title_fullStr |
The accountability of digital platforms and the spread of harmful content: regulated self-regulation and the Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet Bill |
title_full_unstemmed |
The accountability of digital platforms and the spread of harmful content: regulated self-regulation and the Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet Bill |
title_sort |
The accountability of digital platforms and the spread of harmful content: regulated self-regulation and the Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet Bill |
author |
Silva, Rosane Leal da |
author_facet |
Silva, Rosane Leal da von Ende, Luiza Berger Rosa, Isabela Quartieri da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
von Ende, Luiza Berger Rosa, Isabela Quartieri da |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Rosane Leal da von Ende, Luiza Berger Rosa, Isabela Quartieri da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
autorregulação regulada danos na internet plataformas digitais provedores de aplicação Projeto de Lei de Liberdade, Responsabilidade e Transparência na Internet regulated self-regulation internet damage digital platforms application providers Bill of Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet autorregulación regulada daños en internet plataformas digitales proveedores de aplicación Proyecto de Ley de Libertad responsabilidad y transparencia en internet |
topic |
autorregulação regulada danos na internet plataformas digitais provedores de aplicação Projeto de Lei de Liberdade, Responsabilidade e Transparência na Internet regulated self-regulation internet damage digital platforms application providers Bill of Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet autorregulación regulada daños en internet plataformas digitales proveedores de aplicación Proyecto de Ley de Libertad responsabilidad y transparencia en internet |
description |
Faced with a scenario in which digital platforms are the stage for the propagation of harmful content, as well as their business model generates profit from user publications, the debate about a new accountability of application providers emerges. In that way, the work aims to study the proposal of regulated self-regulation present in the Bill of Freedom, Responsibility and Transparency on the Internet, questioning: is the model of regulated self-regulation enough to restrain the problem of the propagation of harmful content on platforms? Using a hypothetical-deductive approach and the functionalist and comparative procedure methods, the article aims to understand the dynamics that occur on platforms and compares the recommendations made by the Internet Steering Committee in Brazil (CGI.br) and the Bill, in order to to understand if the problems can be addressed by the legal provision, as well as if the CGI.br guidelines were observed - all using the techniques of bibliographical and documental research. It is concluded that the regulated self-regulation model is partially sufficient to respond to the propagation of harmful content and that the Bill does not face important issues, as well as, in other respects, added little to what was already provided for by law. Furthermore, there are discrepancies regarding the understanding of the CGI.br and the final text of the Bill, and some indications established by the Committee had been met by the bill but were withdrawn after parliamentary debate. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-04-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14657 10.5020/2317-2150.2024.14657 |
url |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14657 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5020/2317-2150.2024.14657 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14657/7257 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2024); 1-13 Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2024); 1-13 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 29 n. 2 (2024); 1-13 2317-2150 1519-8464 reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) instacron:UNIFOR |
instname_str |
Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) |
instacron_str |
UNIFOR |
institution |
UNIFOR |
reponame_str |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
collection |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistapensar@unifor.br |
_version_ |
1800217257154969600 |