Shapiro’s Planning Theory of Law
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
| Texto Completo: | https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/15003 |
Resumo: | This text is a presentation of the main characteristics of the Planning Theory of Law developed by Scott J. Shapiro in the work Legality, considering convergences and divergences before the classic models of legal positivism, developed by Kelsen, Hart and Bobbio. The question concerns the broad discussion, in the field of philosophy of law, regarding the identification of the theory with greater fidelity in the description of the legal phenomenon and, notably, with greater normative potential, especially considering the function of law. In this problematic context, the hypothesis under discussion is to assess whether Shapiro's proposition presents theoretical advances on the classic developments of legal positivism, attributed to the aforementioned authors. In conclusion, theoretical aspects were pointed out to indicate the classification of Shapiro's theory as a post-positivist proposition, with a culturalist nature, notably by presenting points of connection between law and morality (both seen as social facts), rather than the pretense of framing it as a form of non-formalist exclusive legal positivism, recommending future investigations about this argument. As for the methodology, it is emphasized that in the investigation stage we used the inductive method, in the data processing phase we used the cartesian method and the final text was composed on the basis of deductive logics. In the various stages of the research we used the techniques of the referent, the category, the operational concept and literature survey. |
| id |
UNIFOR-3_421341258112283f9ab00bdb5b0ce922 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/15003 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNIFOR-3 |
| network_name_str |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Shapiro’s Planning Theory of LawLa Teoría de la Planificación Normativa de ShapiroA Teoria do Planejamento Normativo de Shapiroteoria do planejamento normativopositivismo jurídicomoralinclusivoexclusivoteoría de la planificación normativapositivismo jurídicomoralinclusivoexclusivonormative planning theorylegal positivismmoralinclusiveexclusiveThis text is a presentation of the main characteristics of the Planning Theory of Law developed by Scott J. Shapiro in the work Legality, considering convergences and divergences before the classic models of legal positivism, developed by Kelsen, Hart and Bobbio. The question concerns the broad discussion, in the field of philosophy of law, regarding the identification of the theory with greater fidelity in the description of the legal phenomenon and, notably, with greater normative potential, especially considering the function of law. In this problematic context, the hypothesis under discussion is to assess whether Shapiro's proposition presents theoretical advances on the classic developments of legal positivism, attributed to the aforementioned authors. In conclusion, theoretical aspects were pointed out to indicate the classification of Shapiro's theory as a post-positivist proposition, with a culturalist nature, notably by presenting points of connection between law and morality (both seen as social facts), rather than the pretense of framing it as a form of non-formalist exclusive legal positivism, recommending future investigations about this argument. As for the methodology, it is emphasized that in the investigation stage we used the inductive method, in the data processing phase we used the cartesian method and the final text was composed on the basis of deductive logics. In the various stages of the research we used the techniques of the referent, the category, the operational concept and literature survey. El objetivo de este texto es presentar las características principales de la Teoría dela Planificación Normativa desarrollada por Scott J. Shapiro en la obra Legality, indicando eventuales convergencias y divergencias ante los modelos clásicos de positivismo jurídico desarrollado por Kelsen, Hart e Bobbio. El problema de investigación en cuestión está relacionado a la amplia discusión, en el campo de la filosofía del derecho, cuanto a la identificación de la teoría con mayor fidelidad en la descripción del fenómeno jurídico y, notablemente, con mayor potencialidadnormativa, principalmente considerando la función del derecho. En este contexto problemático, la hipótesis en discusión es comprobar si la proposición de Shapiro presenta avances teóricos sobre los desarrollos clásicos del iuspositivismo, atribuidos a los autores antes referidos. En sede conclusiva, fueron indicadosaspectos teóricos a señalar la clasificación de la teoría de Shapiro como una proposición post-positivista, de característica culturalista, notablemente al presentar puntos de conexión entre derecho y moral, en vez de la pretensión deencuadramiento en el modelo del positivismo jurídico exclusivo no formalista, recomendando futuras investigaciones sobre este punto. De acuerdo con lo expuesto, se nota que el presente artículo está estrictamente vinculado a la línea deinvestigación Principiología Constitucional, Política del Derecho e Inteligencia Artificial (doctorado) del Programa de posgrado en Ciencias Jurídicas de la Universidad del Vale do Itajaí (Univali) Cuanto a la metodología empleada, se enfoca que en la fase de investigación fue utilizado el método inductivo, en la fase de tratamiento de datos el cartesiano y el texto final fue compuesto en la base lógica deductiva. En las diversas fases de la investigación, fueron accionadas las técnicas del referente, de la categoría, del concepto operacional y de la búsqueda bibliográfica.O objetivo desse texto é apresentar as características principais da Teoria do Planejamento Normativo desenvolvida por Scott J. Shapiro na obra Legality, apontando eventuais convergências e divergências perante os modelos clássicos de positivismo jurídico desenvolvidos por Kelsen, Hart e Bobbio. O problema de pesquisa em questão diz respeito à ampla discussão, no campo da filosofia do direito, quanto à identificação da teoria com maior fidelidade na descrição do fenômeno jurídico e, notadamente, com maior potencialidade normativa, mormente considerando a função do direito. Nesse contexto problemático, a hipótese em discussão é aferir se a proposição de Shapiro apresenta avanços teóricos sobre os desenvolvimentos clássicos do juspositivismo, atribuídos aos autores antes referidos. Em sede conclusiva, foram apontados aspectos teóricos a indicar a classificação da teoria de Shapiro como uma proposição pós-positivista, de cunho culturalista, notadamente ao apresentar pontos de conexão entre direito e moral, ao invés da pretensão de enquadramento no modelo do positivismo jurídico exclusivo não formalista, recomendando investigações futuras sobre esse ponto. De acordo com o exposto, percebe-se que o presente artigo está estritamente vinculado à linha de pesquisa Principiologia Constitucional, Política do Direito e Inteligência Artificial (Doutorado) do Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Jurídica da Universidade do Vale do Itajaí (Univali). Quanto à metodologia empregada, destaca-se que na fase de investigação foi utilizado o método indutivo, na fase de tratamento de dados o cartesiano e o texto final foi composto na base lógica dedutiva. Nas diversas fases da pesquisa, foram acionadas as técnicas do referente, da categoria, do conceito operacional e da pesquisa bibliográfica.Universidade de Fortaleza2024-08-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/1500310.5020/2317-2150.2024.15003Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2024); 1-9Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 29 Núm. 3 (2024); 1-9Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 29 n. 3 (2024); 1-92317-21501519-8464reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)instacron:UNIFORporhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/15003/7314Copyright (c) 2024 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZanon Junior, Orlando Luiz2024-10-04T18:21:16Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/15003Revistahttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpenPUBhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/oai||revistapensar@unifor.br2317-21501519-8464opendoar:2024-10-04T18:21:16Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Shapiro’s Planning Theory of Law La Teoría de la Planificación Normativa de Shapiro A Teoria do Planejamento Normativo de Shapiro |
| title |
Shapiro’s Planning Theory of Law |
| spellingShingle |
Shapiro’s Planning Theory of Law Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz teoria do planejamento normativo positivismo jurídico moral inclusivo exclusivo teoría de la planificación normativa positivismo jurídico moral inclusivo exclusivo normative planning theory legal positivism moral inclusive exclusive |
| title_short |
Shapiro’s Planning Theory of Law |
| title_full |
Shapiro’s Planning Theory of Law |
| title_fullStr |
Shapiro’s Planning Theory of Law |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Shapiro’s Planning Theory of Law |
| title_sort |
Shapiro’s Planning Theory of Law |
| author |
Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz |
| author_facet |
Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zanon Junior, Orlando Luiz |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
teoria do planejamento normativo positivismo jurídico moral inclusivo exclusivo teoría de la planificación normativa positivismo jurídico moral inclusivo exclusivo normative planning theory legal positivism moral inclusive exclusive |
| topic |
teoria do planejamento normativo positivismo jurídico moral inclusivo exclusivo teoría de la planificación normativa positivismo jurídico moral inclusivo exclusivo normative planning theory legal positivism moral inclusive exclusive |
| description |
This text is a presentation of the main characteristics of the Planning Theory of Law developed by Scott J. Shapiro in the work Legality, considering convergences and divergences before the classic models of legal positivism, developed by Kelsen, Hart and Bobbio. The question concerns the broad discussion, in the field of philosophy of law, regarding the identification of the theory with greater fidelity in the description of the legal phenomenon and, notably, with greater normative potential, especially considering the function of law. In this problematic context, the hypothesis under discussion is to assess whether Shapiro's proposition presents theoretical advances on the classic developments of legal positivism, attributed to the aforementioned authors. In conclusion, theoretical aspects were pointed out to indicate the classification of Shapiro's theory as a post-positivist proposition, with a culturalist nature, notably by presenting points of connection between law and morality (both seen as social facts), rather than the pretense of framing it as a form of non-formalist exclusive legal positivism, recommending future investigations about this argument. As for the methodology, it is emphasized that in the investigation stage we used the inductive method, in the data processing phase we used the cartesian method and the final text was composed on the basis of deductive logics. In the various stages of the research we used the techniques of the referent, the category, the operational concept and literature survey. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-08-19 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/15003 10.5020/2317-2150.2024.15003 |
| url |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/15003 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.5020/2317-2150.2024.15003 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/15003/7314 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2024); 1-9 Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 29 Núm. 3 (2024); 1-9 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 29 n. 3 (2024); 1-9 2317-2150 1519-8464 reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) instacron:UNIFOR |
| instname_str |
Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) |
| instacron_str |
UNIFOR |
| institution |
UNIFOR |
| reponame_str |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
| collection |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistapensar@unifor.br |
| _version_ |
1817061841650581504 |