The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moreira Gomes, Ana Virgínia
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Banerjee, Rupa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/6363
Resumo: The study’s main objective is to question the exclusion of domestic workers from freedom of association and collective bargaining rights and to propose possible policy solutions to allow the rights to these workers. The paper focuses in the Canadian and in the Brazilian cases. Even though the Brazilian and Canadian models illustrate two very different approaches towards collective organization, both countries present regulatory challenges to the effective recognition of domestic workers’ freedom of association and collective bargaining rights. The policy solutions to these challenges in the case of domestic work can serve other groups of vulnerable workers, such as migrants, low wage service workers, informal workers. The methodology is developed through bibliographical and documentary analysis.
id UNIFOR-3_5ebe49cc760e32610b7da0d138df05ab
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/6363
network_acronym_str UNIFOR-3
network_name_str Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and CanadaFreedom of association. Collective Bargaining. Domestic work. ILO Convention 189. Brazil. Canada.The study’s main objective is to question the exclusion of domestic workers from freedom of association and collective bargaining rights and to propose possible policy solutions to allow the rights to these workers. The paper focuses in the Canadian and in the Brazilian cases. Even though the Brazilian and Canadian models illustrate two very different approaches towards collective organization, both countries present regulatory challenges to the effective recognition of domestic workers’ freedom of association and collective bargaining rights. The policy solutions to these challenges in the case of domestic work can serve other groups of vulnerable workers, such as migrants, low wage service workers, informal workers. The methodology is developed through bibliographical and documentary analysis.Universidade de Fortaleza2017-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/636310.5020/2317-2150.2017.6363Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 22 No. 3 (2017)Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 22 Núm. 3 (2017)Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 22 n. 3 (2017)2317-21501519-8464reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)instacron:UNIFORenghttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/6363/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreira Gomes, Ana VirgíniaBanerjee, Rupa2017-12-22T20:46:35Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/6363Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/rpenhttp://ojs.unifor.br/index.php/rpen/oai||revistapensar@unifor.br2317-21501519-8464opendoar:2017-12-22T20:46:35Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada
title The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada
spellingShingle The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada
Moreira Gomes, Ana Virgínia
Freedom of association. Collective Bargaining. Domestic work. ILO Convention 189. Brazil. Canada.
title_short The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada
title_full The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada
title_fullStr The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada
title_full_unstemmed The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada
title_sort The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada
author Moreira Gomes, Ana Virgínia
author_facet Moreira Gomes, Ana Virgínia
Banerjee, Rupa
author_role author
author2 Banerjee, Rupa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moreira Gomes, Ana Virgínia
Banerjee, Rupa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Freedom of association. Collective Bargaining. Domestic work. ILO Convention 189. Brazil. Canada.
topic Freedom of association. Collective Bargaining. Domestic work. ILO Convention 189. Brazil. Canada.
description The study’s main objective is to question the exclusion of domestic workers from freedom of association and collective bargaining rights and to propose possible policy solutions to allow the rights to these workers. The paper focuses in the Canadian and in the Brazilian cases. Even though the Brazilian and Canadian models illustrate two very different approaches towards collective organization, both countries present regulatory challenges to the effective recognition of domestic workers’ freedom of association and collective bargaining rights. The policy solutions to these challenges in the case of domestic work can serve other groups of vulnerable workers, such as migrants, low wage service workers, informal workers. The methodology is developed through bibliographical and documentary analysis.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/6363
10.5020/2317-2150.2017.6363
url https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/6363
identifier_str_mv 10.5020/2317-2150.2017.6363
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/6363/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 22 No. 3 (2017)
Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 22 Núm. 3 (2017)
Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 22 n. 3 (2017)
2317-2150
1519-8464
reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)
instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)
instacron:UNIFOR
instname_str Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)
instacron_str UNIFOR
institution UNIFOR
reponame_str Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)
collection Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistapensar@unifor.br
_version_ 1788165787850113024