The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/6363 |
Resumo: | The study’s main objective is to question the exclusion of domestic workers from freedom of association and collective bargaining rights and to propose possible policy solutions to allow the rights to these workers. The paper focuses in the Canadian and in the Brazilian cases. Even though the Brazilian and Canadian models illustrate two very different approaches towards collective organization, both countries present regulatory challenges to the effective recognition of domestic workers’ freedom of association and collective bargaining rights. The policy solutions to these challenges in the case of domestic work can serve other groups of vulnerable workers, such as migrants, low wage service workers, informal workers. The methodology is developed through bibliographical and documentary analysis. |
id |
UNIFOR-3_5ebe49cc760e32610b7da0d138df05ab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/6363 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFOR-3 |
network_name_str |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and CanadaFreedom of association. Collective Bargaining. Domestic work. ILO Convention 189. Brazil. Canada.The study’s main objective is to question the exclusion of domestic workers from freedom of association and collective bargaining rights and to propose possible policy solutions to allow the rights to these workers. The paper focuses in the Canadian and in the Brazilian cases. Even though the Brazilian and Canadian models illustrate two very different approaches towards collective organization, both countries present regulatory challenges to the effective recognition of domestic workers’ freedom of association and collective bargaining rights. The policy solutions to these challenges in the case of domestic work can serve other groups of vulnerable workers, such as migrants, low wage service workers, informal workers. The methodology is developed through bibliographical and documentary analysis.Universidade de Fortaleza2017-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/636310.5020/2317-2150.2017.6363Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 22 No. 3 (2017)Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 22 Núm. 3 (2017)Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 22 n. 3 (2017)2317-21501519-8464reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)instacron:UNIFORenghttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/6363/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreira Gomes, Ana VirgíniaBanerjee, Rupa2017-12-22T20:46:35Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/6363Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/rpenhttp://ojs.unifor.br/index.php/rpen/oai||revistapensar@unifor.br2317-21501519-8464opendoar:2017-12-22T20:46:35Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada |
title |
The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada |
spellingShingle |
The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada Moreira Gomes, Ana Virgínia Freedom of association. Collective Bargaining. Domestic work. ILO Convention 189. Brazil. Canada. |
title_short |
The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada |
title_full |
The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada |
title_fullStr |
The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada |
title_full_unstemmed |
The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada |
title_sort |
The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada |
author |
Moreira Gomes, Ana Virgínia |
author_facet |
Moreira Gomes, Ana Virgínia Banerjee, Rupa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Banerjee, Rupa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moreira Gomes, Ana Virgínia Banerjee, Rupa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Freedom of association. Collective Bargaining. Domestic work. ILO Convention 189. Brazil. Canada. |
topic |
Freedom of association. Collective Bargaining. Domestic work. ILO Convention 189. Brazil. Canada. |
description |
The study’s main objective is to question the exclusion of domestic workers from freedom of association and collective bargaining rights and to propose possible policy solutions to allow the rights to these workers. The paper focuses in the Canadian and in the Brazilian cases. Even though the Brazilian and Canadian models illustrate two very different approaches towards collective organization, both countries present regulatory challenges to the effective recognition of domestic workers’ freedom of association and collective bargaining rights. The policy solutions to these challenges in the case of domestic work can serve other groups of vulnerable workers, such as migrants, low wage service workers, informal workers. The methodology is developed through bibliographical and documentary analysis. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/6363 10.5020/2317-2150.2017.6363 |
url |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/6363 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5020/2317-2150.2017.6363 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/6363/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 22 No. 3 (2017) Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 22 Núm. 3 (2017) Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 22 n. 3 (2017) 2317-2150 1519-8464 reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) instacron:UNIFOR |
instname_str |
Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) |
instacron_str |
UNIFOR |
institution |
UNIFOR |
reponame_str |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
collection |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistapensar@unifor.br |
_version_ |
1788165787850113024 |