Vaccination compulsory in light of the theory of fundamental rights
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/12500 |
Resumo: | Compulsory vaccination has been a reality in Brazil since 1975, with the advent of Law 6.259/1975. With the recent authorization by ANVISA of the vaccines against Covid-19, the debate about the compulsory nature of the prophylactic measure has been rekindled, motivated especially by the growing movement of hesitancy to the vaccine. This study aims to try to build, amid the current context, minimum guidelines that can provide a democratic, plural and nonpartisan debate about the compulsory nature of vaccination against Covid-19 and the corresponding repercussion on fundamental rights. The research will use the deductive method, based on the examination of legal norms, books, scientific articles and judicial precedents. We conclude for the constitutionality of art. 3, inc. III, line "d", of Law 13.979/2020, when establishing the compulsory nature of vaccination against Covid-19, provided, however, that they are tested, certified, and approved by the competent organs and that the safety and efficacy requirements are met. |
id |
UNIJ-1_107c41989d33ff13a2a3b57d43408d8c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/12500 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIJ-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Vaccination compulsory in light of the theory of fundamental rightsObrigatoriedade da vacinação à luz da teoria dos direitos fundamentaisCovid-19, direitos fundamentais, vacinação obrigatória, autonomia individual, saúde coletivaCovid-19, fundamental rights, mandatory vaccination, individual autonomy, collective healthCompulsory vaccination has been a reality in Brazil since 1975, with the advent of Law 6.259/1975. With the recent authorization by ANVISA of the vaccines against Covid-19, the debate about the compulsory nature of the prophylactic measure has been rekindled, motivated especially by the growing movement of hesitancy to the vaccine. This study aims to try to build, amid the current context, minimum guidelines that can provide a democratic, plural and nonpartisan debate about the compulsory nature of vaccination against Covid-19 and the corresponding repercussion on fundamental rights. The research will use the deductive method, based on the examination of legal norms, books, scientific articles and judicial precedents. We conclude for the constitutionality of art. 3, inc. III, line "d", of Law 13.979/2020, when establishing the compulsory nature of vaccination against Covid-19, provided, however, that they are tested, certified, and approved by the competent organs and that the safety and efficacy requirements are met.A vacinação obrigatória é uma realidade no Brasil desde 1975, por ocasião do advento da Lei nº 6.259/1975. Com a recente autorização pela ANVISA das vacinas contra a Covid-19, reacendeu-se o debate acerca da obrigatoriedade da medida profilática, motivado, especialmente, pelo crescente movimento de hesitação à vacina. O presente estudo propõe-se a tentar construir, em meio ao atual contexto, diretrizes mínimas que possam proporcionar um debate democrático, plural e apartidário acerca da obrigatoriedade da vacinação contra a Covid-19 e a correspondente repercussão em relação aos direitos fundamentais. A pesquisa utilizará o método dedutivo, a partir do exame de normas jurídicas, periódicos científicos e precedentes judiciais. Conclui-se pela constitucionalidade do art. 3º, inc. III, alínea “d”, da Lei º 13.979/2020, ao estabelecer a compulsoriedade da vacinação contra Covid-19, contanto, porém, que testadas, certificadas e aprovadas pelos órgãos competentes e atendidos os requisitos de segurança e eficácia.EDITORA UNIJUI2022-11-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/1250010.21527/2317-5389.2022.20.12500Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 10 n. 20 (2022): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; e125002317-5389reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainstname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)instacron:UNIJUIporhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/12500/7179Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Diogo de Araujo Vieira, Tereza Rodrigues2022-11-23T17:53:03Zoai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/12500Revistahttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/oai2317-53892317-5389opendoar:2022-11-23T17:53:03Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Vaccination compulsory in light of the theory of fundamental rights Obrigatoriedade da vacinação à luz da teoria dos direitos fundamentais |
title |
Vaccination compulsory in light of the theory of fundamental rights |
spellingShingle |
Vaccination compulsory in light of the theory of fundamental rights Lima, Diogo de Araujo Covid-19, direitos fundamentais, vacinação obrigatória, autonomia individual, saúde coletiva Covid-19, fundamental rights, mandatory vaccination, individual autonomy, collective health |
title_short |
Vaccination compulsory in light of the theory of fundamental rights |
title_full |
Vaccination compulsory in light of the theory of fundamental rights |
title_fullStr |
Vaccination compulsory in light of the theory of fundamental rights |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vaccination compulsory in light of the theory of fundamental rights |
title_sort |
Vaccination compulsory in light of the theory of fundamental rights |
author |
Lima, Diogo de Araujo |
author_facet |
Lima, Diogo de Araujo Vieira, Tereza Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, Tereza Rodrigues |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Diogo de Araujo Vieira, Tereza Rodrigues |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Covid-19, direitos fundamentais, vacinação obrigatória, autonomia individual, saúde coletiva Covid-19, fundamental rights, mandatory vaccination, individual autonomy, collective health |
topic |
Covid-19, direitos fundamentais, vacinação obrigatória, autonomia individual, saúde coletiva Covid-19, fundamental rights, mandatory vaccination, individual autonomy, collective health |
description |
Compulsory vaccination has been a reality in Brazil since 1975, with the advent of Law 6.259/1975. With the recent authorization by ANVISA of the vaccines against Covid-19, the debate about the compulsory nature of the prophylactic measure has been rekindled, motivated especially by the growing movement of hesitancy to the vaccine. This study aims to try to build, amid the current context, minimum guidelines that can provide a democratic, plural and nonpartisan debate about the compulsory nature of vaccination against Covid-19 and the corresponding repercussion on fundamental rights. The research will use the deductive method, based on the examination of legal norms, books, scientific articles and judicial precedents. We conclude for the constitutionality of art. 3, inc. III, line "d", of Law 13.979/2020, when establishing the compulsory nature of vaccination against Covid-19, provided, however, that they are tested, certified, and approved by the competent organs and that the safety and efficacy requirements are met. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/12500 10.21527/2317-5389.2022.20.12500 |
url |
https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/12500 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21527/2317-5389.2022.20.12500 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/12500/7179 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDITORA UNIJUI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDITORA UNIJUI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 10 n. 20 (2022): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; e12500 2317-5389 reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia instname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI) instacron:UNIJUI |
instname_str |
Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI) |
instacron_str |
UNIJUI |
institution |
UNIJUI |
reponame_str |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
collection |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808845057551237120 |