Statutory Reversal as a Possible Dialectic Interpretation of Constitutions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/3679 |
Resumo: | From the recognition of the universality of Human Rights, the insertion of norms of a material nature in the world constitutions and the creation of constitutional courts to control the performance of the Executive and Legislative powers, the Western countries have been experiencing a growing activism of these cuts and an active participation of the Judiciary in the attribution of meaning to contemporary constitutions. This phenomenon, made possible by the authorization of the judicial review, is defended by the constitutionalists who understand the irreversibility of the judicialization and the relevance of the jurisdictional role for the realization of fundamental rights, but criticized by those who fear that the excess of power in the hands of the judges violates precepts Of Western democracy and lead to judicial supremacy. The jurisdictional action for the interpretation of the Constitution makes possible the dialogue between powers so that the meaning of the constitutional norm is more in keeping with popular opinion and with the guarantee of positive fundamental rights - which is also the will of the people. As a feasibility of this dialogue, the statutory reversal is one of the most expressive forms of dialogue between the powers, once representing the legislative overcoming of judicial decisions. In this sense, it should be a modality of constitutional dialogue in which the representative power finds ways of telling the Judiciary that its decision of invalidity is outdated or in disagreement with popular opinion, which could lead the judges to a review of their own Understanding of constitutional interpretation. |
id |
UNILASALLE-4_7578755f8392bb5e4c0f4f7dda97d462 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/3679 |
network_acronym_str |
UNILASALLE-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Statutory Reversal as a Possible Dialectic Interpretation of ConstitutionsO Statutory Reversal como possibilidade de interpretação dialética das Constituições FederaisJudicial Activism; Constitutional Dialogues; Statutory Reversal; Judicial Review.direito constitucional; direitos fundamentais; hermenêuticaAtivismo Judicial; Diálogos Constitucionais; Statutory Reversal; Controle de Constitucionalidade.From the recognition of the universality of Human Rights, the insertion of norms of a material nature in the world constitutions and the creation of constitutional courts to control the performance of the Executive and Legislative powers, the Western countries have been experiencing a growing activism of these cuts and an active participation of the Judiciary in the attribution of meaning to contemporary constitutions. This phenomenon, made possible by the authorization of the judicial review, is defended by the constitutionalists who understand the irreversibility of the judicialization and the relevance of the jurisdictional role for the realization of fundamental rights, but criticized by those who fear that the excess of power in the hands of the judges violates precepts Of Western democracy and lead to judicial supremacy. The jurisdictional action for the interpretation of the Constitution makes possible the dialogue between powers so that the meaning of the constitutional norm is more in keeping with popular opinion and with the guarantee of positive fundamental rights - which is also the will of the people. As a feasibility of this dialogue, the statutory reversal is one of the most expressive forms of dialogue between the powers, once representing the legislative overcoming of judicial decisions. In this sense, it should be a modality of constitutional dialogue in which the representative power finds ways of telling the Judiciary that its decision of invalidity is outdated or in disagreement with popular opinion, which could lead the judges to a review of their own Understanding of constitutional interpretation.Desde o reconhecimento da universalidade dos Direitos Humanos, da inserção de normas de natureza material nas constituições mundiais e da criação de cortes constitucionais para controlar a atuação dos poderes Executivo e Legislativo, os países ocidentais vêm vivenciando um crescente ativismo dessas cortes e uma participação ativa do Judiciário na atribuição de sentido às constituições contemporâneas. Esse fenômeno, possibilitado pela autorização do judicial review, é defendido pelos constitucionalistas que entendem a irreversibilidade da judicialização e a relevância do papel jurisdicional para a efetivação de direitos fundamentais, mas criticado por aqueles que temem que o excesso de poder nas mãos dos juízes viole preceitos básicos da democracia ocidental e leve a uma supremacia judicial. A atuação jurisdicional para a interpretação da Constituição possibilita o diálogo entre poderes para que o significado da norma constitucional seja o mais condizente com a opinião popular e com a garantia dos direitos fundamentais positivados – o que também é a vontade do povo. Como viabilização desse diálogo, o statutory reversal se mostra uma das mais expressivas formas de diálogo entre os poderes, uma vez representar a superação legislativa das decisões judiciais. Nesse sentido, deve ser encarado como uma modalidade de diálogo constitucional em que o poder representativo encontre formas de dizer ao Judiciário que sua decisão de invalidade está superada ou em desconforme com a opinião popular, o que poderia levar os juízes a uma revisão de seu próprio entendimento sobre a interpretação constitucional.LaSalle University - Unilasalle CanoasSilva, Tatiana MaretoCoura, Alexandre de Castro2018-05-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/367910.18316/redes.v6i1.3679Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade; v. 6, n. 1 (2018); p. 303-318Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES; v. 6, n. 1 (2018); p. 303-3182318-8081reponame:Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDESinstname:Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)instacron:UNILASALLEporhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/3679/pdfDireitos autorais 2018 Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDESinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-06-06T12:49:39Zoai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/3679Revistahttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/indexhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/oairevistas@unilasalle.edu.br||revista.redes@unilasalle.edu.br2318-80812318-8081opendoar:2018-06-06T12:49:39Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES - Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Statutory Reversal as a Possible Dialectic Interpretation of Constitutions O Statutory Reversal como possibilidade de interpretação dialética das Constituições Federais |
title |
Statutory Reversal as a Possible Dialectic Interpretation of Constitutions |
spellingShingle |
Statutory Reversal as a Possible Dialectic Interpretation of Constitutions Silva, Tatiana Mareto Judicial Activism; Constitutional Dialogues; Statutory Reversal; Judicial Review. direito constitucional; direitos fundamentais; hermenêutica Ativismo Judicial; Diálogos Constitucionais; Statutory Reversal; Controle de Constitucionalidade. |
title_short |
Statutory Reversal as a Possible Dialectic Interpretation of Constitutions |
title_full |
Statutory Reversal as a Possible Dialectic Interpretation of Constitutions |
title_fullStr |
Statutory Reversal as a Possible Dialectic Interpretation of Constitutions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Statutory Reversal as a Possible Dialectic Interpretation of Constitutions |
title_sort |
Statutory Reversal as a Possible Dialectic Interpretation of Constitutions |
author |
Silva, Tatiana Mareto |
author_facet |
Silva, Tatiana Mareto Coura, Alexandre de Castro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Coura, Alexandre de Castro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Tatiana Mareto Coura, Alexandre de Castro |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Judicial Activism; Constitutional Dialogues; Statutory Reversal; Judicial Review. direito constitucional; direitos fundamentais; hermenêutica Ativismo Judicial; Diálogos Constitucionais; Statutory Reversal; Controle de Constitucionalidade. |
topic |
Judicial Activism; Constitutional Dialogues; Statutory Reversal; Judicial Review. direito constitucional; direitos fundamentais; hermenêutica Ativismo Judicial; Diálogos Constitucionais; Statutory Reversal; Controle de Constitucionalidade. |
description |
From the recognition of the universality of Human Rights, the insertion of norms of a material nature in the world constitutions and the creation of constitutional courts to control the performance of the Executive and Legislative powers, the Western countries have been experiencing a growing activism of these cuts and an active participation of the Judiciary in the attribution of meaning to contemporary constitutions. This phenomenon, made possible by the authorization of the judicial review, is defended by the constitutionalists who understand the irreversibility of the judicialization and the relevance of the jurisdictional role for the realization of fundamental rights, but criticized by those who fear that the excess of power in the hands of the judges violates precepts Of Western democracy and lead to judicial supremacy. The jurisdictional action for the interpretation of the Constitution makes possible the dialogue between powers so that the meaning of the constitutional norm is more in keeping with popular opinion and with the guarantee of positive fundamental rights - which is also the will of the people. As a feasibility of this dialogue, the statutory reversal is one of the most expressive forms of dialogue between the powers, once representing the legislative overcoming of judicial decisions. In this sense, it should be a modality of constitutional dialogue in which the representative power finds ways of telling the Judiciary that its decision of invalidity is outdated or in disagreement with popular opinion, which could lead the judges to a review of their own Understanding of constitutional interpretation. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-05-29 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/3679 10.18316/redes.v6i1.3679 |
url |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/3679 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18316/redes.v6i1.3679 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/article/view/3679/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2018 Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2018 Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
LaSalle University - Unilasalle Canoas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
LaSalle University - Unilasalle Canoas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade; v. 6, n. 1 (2018); p. 303-318 Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES; v. 6, n. 1 (2018); p. 303-318 2318-8081 reponame:Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES instname:Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE) instacron:UNILASALLE |
instname_str |
Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE) |
instacron_str |
UNILASALLE |
institution |
UNILASALLE |
reponame_str |
Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES |
collection |
Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES - Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistas@unilasalle.edu.br||revista.redes@unilasalle.edu.br |
_version_ |
1788165954049409024 |